Qualys TruRisk Eliminate vs TeamViewer ONE comparison

Qualys and TeamViewer are both solutions in the Patch Management category. Qualys is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.9, while TeamViewer is ranked #19 with an average rating of 9.0. Qualys holds a 2.8% mindshare in PM, compared to TeamViewer’s 1.0% mindshare. Additionally, 98% of Qualys users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 87% of TeamViewer users who would recommend it.

Qualys TruRisk Eliminate

Read 57 Qualys TruRisk Eliminate reviews

4,457 Views
4,457 Comparison Views

98% willing to recommend

TeamViewer ONE

Read 34 TeamViewer ONE reviews

2,676 Views
883 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

Qualys TruRisk Eliminate

TeamViewer ONE

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 5, 2026

TeamViewer ONE and Qualys Patch Management compete in the remote management and security space. TeamViewer ONE is favored for competitive pricing and strong support, while Qualys Patch Management stands out with advanced features that justify its higher price.

Features:TeamViewer ONE offers robust remote access, cross-platform support, and ease of use, making it suitable for IT support tasks. Qualys Patch Management provides comprehensive vulnerability management, automated patch deployment, and excellent visibility into asset vulnerabilities, catering to broader security needs.

Room for Improvement:TeamViewer ONE could enhance its advanced security features, improve reporting capabilities, and refine its user interface for better navigation. Qualys Patch Management would benefit from simplifying its setup process, improving real-time tracking of patch deployments, and optimizing performance for lower-end systems to broaden its user base.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service:TeamViewer ONE is known for straightforward deployment and reliable support services, appealing to diverse IT environments. Qualys Patch Management, while requiring intricate setup, offers exceptional support that ensures smooth ongoing management for complex deployments.

Pricing and ROI:TeamViewer ONE presents a cost-effective solution with prompt ROI, attracting budget-conscious enterprises. In contrast, Qualys Patch Management, despite higher initial costs, delivers long-term value through robust security features, potentially leading to substantial ROI over time.

To learn more, read our detailed Qualys TruRisk Eliminate vs. TeamViewer ONE Report (Updated: August 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Qualys TruRisk Eliminate vs. TeamViewer ONE

August 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 909,725 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Qualys TruRisk Eliminate

Ranking in Patch Management

1st

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

TeamViewer ONE

Ranking in Patch Management

19th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

5.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Remote Access (22nd), Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) (9th), Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM) (12th), Unified Endpoint Management (UEM) (14th)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Patch Management category, the mindshare of Qualys TruRisk Eliminate is 2.8%, down from 4.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of TeamViewer ONE is 1.0%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Patch Management Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Qualys Patch Management	2.8%
TeamViewer ONE	1.0%
Other	96.2%

Patch Management

Featured Reviews

SangramGupta

Security Consultant at Deloitte

Automated patching has transformed risk-based remediation and now optimizes security workflows

I can highlight two areas for improvement. The first is better reporting flexibility and dashboard customization. Qualys VMDR has a great dashboard that I can customize, but Qualys Patch Management does not have a specific dashboard associated only with patch management and patch compliance. The customization could be improved significantly. The second area is third-party application coverage. Qualys Patch Management works very effectively when patching servers, internal servers, Windows, iOS, or Linux servers. However, when doing application security with third-party applications that require patches, it sometimes fails to complete the patch. The deployment issue with third-party applications needs enhancement, as even with integration, Qualys Patch Management is not able to deploy patches for some third-party applications. These are the two main points I can highlight for improvement.

Read full review

Nitesh Ranjan

Senior Software Engineer at a tech vendor with 1,001-5,000 employees

Remote sessions have become smoother and now resolve end user issues more comfortably

One feedback I have is regarding the voice feature. Whenever we take a remote session, the voice gets enabled automatically, and we have to mute it from our side. A pop-up asking whether we want to continue with the voice or not would be helpful when accessing a remote session. The audio system could be improved because sometimes we are not aware that we need to unmute the team while taking a remote session. The end user can hear us talking with colleagues, and we sometimes forget that we have unmuted while taking a remote session. If a pop-up appears when we take a remote session with the end user asking us to unmute ourselves, that would be better for us to proceed. When the pop-up appears, we can directly mute ourselves, and the end user will not be able to hear the background noise from the office. Since many colleagues are taking remote sessions and talking to end users simultaneously, there is often significant background noise. Having this pop-up appear when accessing a remote session with the end user would be a helpful update.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I would give it a ten out of ten."

"For a few applications, you do not need to go and download the patches from the network or somewhere else. They have the patches or the latest updates in the directory. You can just select a patch and deploy it to a server. You can create a patch job and select the patch. Everything is within the interface. You do not need to go out of it."

"Speaking about the advantages of Qualys Patch Management, it is clear that when I speak about a risk-based approach, I am in a position to assess it compared to a patch-based approach."

"The features I find most valuable in Qualys Patch Management include the ability to manage registry changes and run scripts both pre and post-patching. We have been able to apply workarounds for zero-day vulnerabilities efficiently."

"The integration of Qualys Gateway Scanner is my favorite feature."

"It was complicated because there were so many different moving parts, that's where Qualys Patch Management comes in and is able to work across all platforms, it's easy because you don't have to manage all kinds of different things for every cloud."

"We can update the registry with special features such as Registry Update. We can also run scripts via the Patch Management module. These features are very helpful in our operations."

"We have seen about 60% to 70% improvement in the patch rate so far."

More Qualys TruRisk Eliminate pros

"The most valuable feature of this solution is Remote Access; you can take control of the computer, walk through the process, resolve any issues, and let the other person know how you have fixed the problem."

"TeamViewer Remote Management is easy to use and user-friendly."

"The most recent enhancements are quite remarkable."

"The product is secure."

"It is user-friendly for opening my server or PC."

"It is a scalable solution...The initial setup of TeamViewer Remote Management was very simple."

"The solution is easy to set up."

"All the features of TeamViewer Remote Management are very good from my perspective."

More TeamViewer ONE pros

Cons

"I deploy patches to endpoints and servers every month. However, despite a job showing as successful, I need to examine the job in detail."

"In our environment, the application sometimes crashes, requiring improvement."

"False positives were the biggest concern. We also had some concerns with respect to the Cloud Agent."

"Qualys should improve by offering a dedicated testing environment for patches, allowing clients to test patches before deploying them to production."

"Its implementation is too recent to make any judgments about areas needing improvement. In terms of pricing, of course, it is not free. Cheaper is always better."

"While I've recently seen many problems with stability and reliability in Qualys, it was initially stable; however, current issues include modules being offline for extended periods."

"Qualys Patch Management's pricing could be more competitive, as it presents a significant obstacle for many companies who find it unaffordable."

"It is pretty good. However, it would be good to have more widgets and AI-generated reports. I have not seen anything related to AI with Qualys. It would be beneficial for Qualys to incorporate AI-generated tools for Patch Management and VMDR. This could assist in managing risks, providing AI-generated reports, and creating risk letters for clients, which can streamline communication."

More Qualys TruRisk Eliminate cons

"There have been some delays in the past due to unstable internet connection."

"They are doing many updates all the time. I don't like having so many updates."

"When a user is engaged in a chat on a system with a remote user present, copying the chat content isn't easy."

"I'm not sure if the security is ideal. They could work to improve it."

"The audio system could be improved because sometimes we are not aware that we need to unmute the team while taking a remote session."

"The solution is a little expensive."

"AnyDesk is easier compared to TeamViewer Remote Management since there is no password. We use AnyDesk more."

"The licensing model is restrictive. Even if you have a license, it's hard to use it."

More TeamViewer ONE cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Qualys Patch Management's pricing could be more competitive, as it presents a significant obstacle for many companies who find it unaffordable."

"The pricing is reasonable and less expensive than the previous tool."

"The pricing is fair and within our budget."

"It is affordable, but they should provide features as per the rate they are charging. We have a big infrastructure with about 80,000 licenses. We expect better support from the Qualys team. So, it is affordable, but more features should be there, and the support should be better."

"The licensing cost is more than 2,000 for the whole Americas region"

"From what I have heard, Qualys Patch Management is pricey, which is a main barrier to entry. Another aspect that I do not like about Qualys is that they do not add new patch management functionalities to the existing package. It is a separate SKU, so you have to pay more money."

"Qualys Patch Management comes as part of a bundled package with several modules, making it a cost-effective deal for us."

"The pricing is reasonable and competitive. We get many more features at the same price compared to other solutions such as Microsoft SCCM. It is worth the money considering the services and features it has. Their support team is also awesome."

More Qualys TruRisk Eliminate pricing and cost advice

"My company uses the free version of TeamViewer Remote Management."

"Our licenses for TeamViewer Remote Management are being managed directly by our procurement team. If we need more licenses they handle it."

"My company needs to pay towards the solution's annual licensing subscription costs. There are no extra costs in addition to the standard license fees of the product."

"We pay for a yearly license."

"Addition services could be lower priced."

"The solution's license is expensive."

"Its price is a little high as compared to other solutions."

"Users need to pay a yearly license for TeamViewer Remote Management."

More TeamViewer ONE pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Patch Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Government

10%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

Outsourcing Company

Financial Services Firm

13%

Outsourcing Company

13%

Healthcare Company

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	17
Midsize Enterprise	9
Large Enterprise	33

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	19
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	11

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Qualys Patch Management?

Regarding the pricing aspects, I do not know the exact costs because we are not responsible for the procurement, but I can indicate around a 60% increase in revenue.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Qualys Patch Management?

Qualys Patch Management could make a few enhancements to the reporting for various patch jobs. An ability to see specific reports on endpoints failing specific patches multiple times would be valua...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Qualys Patch Management?

I advise other folks on how to use Qualys Patch Management. The use cases I have seen are to patch regular end-user systems, servers, and to patch all available vulnerabilities or some vulnerabilit...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering TeamViewer Remote Management?

Regarding pricing, since the licenses are purchased by the organization, I am not aware of the pricing details. However, the setup is easy and friendly to use. My overall rating for this product is...

See all answers

What needs improvement with TeamViewer Remote Management?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for TeamViewer Remote Management?

I use TeamViewer Remote Management primarily for remote session purposes in my previous and current organization.

See all answers

Comparisons

BigFix vs Qualys TruRisk Eliminate

Compared 13% of the time

Microsoft Configuration Manager vs Qualys TruRisk Eliminate

Compared 11% of the time

Patch My PC vs Qualys TruRisk Eliminate

Compared 11% of the time

ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus vs Qualys TruRisk Eliminate

Compared 10% of the time

Microsoft Windows Server Update Services vs Qualys TruRisk Eliminate

Compared 9% of the time

More Qualys TruRisk Eliminate Competitors

NinjaOne vs TeamViewer ONE

Compared 15% of the time

Azure Bastion vs TeamViewer ONE

Compared 11% of the time

Datto Remote Monitoring and Management vs TeamViewer ONE

Compared 11% of the time

GoTo Resolve vs TeamViewer ONE

Compared 8% of the time

ConnectWise RMM vs TeamViewer ONE

Compared 8% of the time

More TeamViewer ONE Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Qualys TruRisk Eliminate

August 2026

Download Qualys TruRisk Eliminate product report

Buyer's Guide

TeamViewer ONE

July 2026

Download TeamViewer ONE product report

Also Known As

No data available

TeamViewer IoT

Overview

Qualys Patch Management offers asset visibility, risk-based prioritization, and automation to enhance security. It integrates with VMDR for vulnerability prioritization, ensuring efficient patch deployment and reduced manual effort.

Qualys Patch Management focuses on automating patch deployment and bridging the gap between vulnerability identification and resolution. It supports Windows and Linux servers, providing real-time assessments and comprehensive reporting. The integration with VMDR prioritizes risks efficiently, promoting collaboration between IT and security teams. Organizations benefit from streamlined workflows, improved vulnerability response times, and enhanced remote management.

What are the key features of Qualys Patch Management?

Asset Visibility: Provides precise tracking of all assets across environments.
Risk-Based Prioritization: Enables prioritization based on vulnerability risk level.
Automation: Streamlines patch deployment to reduce manual workload.
VMDR Integration: Integrates with VMDR for efficient vulnerability management.
Real-Time Assessments: Offers immediate analysis and feedback on patches.

What benefits can organizations expect from Qualys Patch Management?

Enhanced Security Posture: Reduces vulnerabilities across systems.
Improved Operational Efficiency: Streamlines workflows for faster resolutions.
Cost Reduction: Minimizes manual efforts, reducing associated costs.
Cross-Department Collaboration: Enhances communication between IT and security.

In industries like finance and healthcare, Qualys Patch Management is pivotal for maintaining stringent security standards. It helps organizations quickly address vulnerabilities, crucial in sectors that handle sensitive data. The ability to integrate with existing systems ensures minimal disruption and maximizes resource efficiency.

Qualys

TeamViewer ONE offers remote access and cross-platform functionality, enhancing IT operations across various systems and clouds like AWS and Azure while streamlining setup and secure connections.

Providing a robust platform for IT professionals, TeamViewer ONE enables efficient remote management with features like interactive chat, file transfers, and seamless session management. Despite its strengths, users highlight the need for improved pricing models, security measures, and enhanced stability. Regular updates are requested to tackle connectivity and lag challenges, and improvements in reporting, integration, and mobile remote functionalities are desired.

What are the standout features of TeamViewer ONE?

Remote Access: Facilitates secure control across multiple devices.
Cross-Platform Functionality: Operates on different OS and cloud environments.
File Transfers: Enables smooth and efficient data exchange.
Interactive Chat: Supports real-time communication during sessions.
Remote Management: Provides a comprehensive view of system resources.

What benefits or ROI should users look for in reviews?

Enhanced Collaboration: Simplifies teamwork with easy connectivity.
IT Support Efficiency: Streamlines troubleshooting and support tasks.
Resource Management: Offers tools for managing system performance.
Security Assurance: Delivers trusted connections for data protection.

TeamViewer ONE is implemented in industries requiring remote support and server management, offering solutions for IT support, remote client connections, and seamless meeting management. It assists in monitoring, troubleshooting, and resolving software and hardware issues for service providers and companies.

TeamViewer

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Carey Paul Honda

Buyer's Guide

Qualys TruRisk Eliminate vs. TeamViewer ONE

August 2026

Free Report: Qualys TruRisk Eliminate vs. TeamViewer ONE

Find out what your peers are saying about Qualys TruRisk Eliminate vs. TeamViewer ONE and other solutions. Updated: August 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Qualys TruRisk Eliminate vs. TeamViewer ONE report.

See our list of best Patch Management vendors.

We monitor all Patch Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.