PRTG Network Monitor vs Tenable SecurityCenter Continuous View [EOL] comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Paessler GmbH and Tenable are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. Additionally, 92% of Paessler GmbH users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Tenable users who would recommend it.

PRTG Network Monitor

Read 113 PRTG Network Monitor reviews

19,836 Views
14,084 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

Tenable SecurityCenter Cont...

Read 4 Tenable SecurityCenter Continuous View [EOL] reviews

100% willing to recommend

PRTG Network Monitor

Tenable SecurityCenter Cont...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 21, 2025

PRTG Network Monitor and Tenable Security Center Continuous View [EOL] are both prominent in network and security monitoring. PRTG is noted for its cost-effectiveness, while Tenable distinguishes itself with advanced security features.

Features: PRTG Network Monitor offers a flexible alert system, integrated network maps, and scalable sensor architecture vital for effective monitoring. In contrast, Tenable Security Center Continuous View [EOL] provides advanced vulnerability assessment, comprehensive security auditing, and Predictive Prioritization, which assists in identifying critical security threats through advanced analysis.

Room for Improvement: PRTG Network Monitor could benefit from enhanced visualization capabilities, improved reporting tools, and more comprehensive security features. Tenable Security Center Continuous View [EOL] could enhance its user interface for better ease of use, streamline its setup process, and offer more competitive pricing options to make it accessible to a wider range of enterprises.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: PRTG Network Monitor is known for its quick installation and user-friendly setup, supported by responsive customer service. Tenable Security Center Continuous View [EOL] involves a more detailed configuration but is supplemented with thorough documentation and reliable technical support to assist during the deployment phase.

Pricing and ROI: PRTG Network Monitor offers a competitive pricing model that includes low initial costs, delivering rapid ROI through its easy maintenance and operational simplicity. On the other hand, Tenable Security Center Continuous View [EOL] requires a higher upfront investment, but it's justified through its sophisticated security insights, which provide significant long-term value for enterprises focused on security.

To learn more, read our detailed Network Monitoring Software Report (Updated: October 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Network Monitoring Software

October 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 920,769 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

PRTG Network Monitor

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

113

Ranking in other categories

Network Monitoring Software (4th), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (5th), Cloud Monitoring Software (7th)

Tenable SecurityCenter Cont...

Average Rating

8.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Featured Reviews

Madhan Cs

Senior consultant at Cambridge Institute of Technology

Has reduced troubleshooting time and improved issue detection through sensor alerts and team collaboration

PRTG Network Monitor can be improved because the dashboard themes feel outdated. It should be updated to a newer version for the new Gen Z customers. The notification sound options are limited unless customized. Restarting probes after Windows updates is necessary, and there should be some kind of automatic restart. The initial auto-discovery added too many unnecessary sensors, so auto-discovery should only take the necessary sensors into consideration.

Read full review

SATYAVRAT MISHRA

AVP - Corporate IT at Godrej

A stable security solution with a useful visibility feature

We use it to scan all of our servers and network devices on a monthly basis. Then based on the outcome, we do the patching depending on high availability, and so on Through porting, we can see how the improvement is happening over a period of time. We can see the overall scenario from the last…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"PRTG Network Monitor offers valuable features that save a lot of time as the reports are automatically available, and I rely on them because they provide proof during escalation, with exact downtime logs and related information."

"PRTG Network Monitor offers a single-pane dashboard where we can monitor all the servers on one single screen, helping our team detect a failed server quickly and saving time that was previously spent checking each server manually, which in turn also reduces downtime."

"We're more proactive. Usually, we already know when something has gone down by the time we get the phone calls."

"Our users perceive it as our being able to provide a very high level of service because we're avoiding situations where they suffer downtime."

"The reliability of the solution means we are doing less work trying to figure out issues and optimize systems, as it is already supplying us with the information that we need."

"The solution is very easy to use and the web provides information with ease."

"If you're looking from a holistic infrastructure deployment and monitoring perspective, it's a good tool to use and to start with."

"Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."

More PRTG Network Monitor pros

"The first of the valuable features is how easy it is to access all of the information that's gathered from the assessments... With a lot of other technologies, like Rapid7, if you're using Nexpose you effectively have to be a DBA to get some of the lower-level results from the scans. And Qualys wasn't very intuitive."

"Tenable is already in the top three risk management solutions and Tenable is already a leader of vulnerability risk management."

"We can manage everything with only a single console on the Tenable SecurityCenter. We can pull and define the policy. We can perform every task on the Tenable SecurityCenter."

"SecurityCenter enables us to find all the vulnerabilities, export that data, prioritize it, and address the highest-risk vulnerabilities."

"The level of visibility Tenable provides us, compared to our previous solutions is night and day."

"The next big one is supportability. In a large enterprise, we have many types of technologies. The technology we previously had didn't even support authentication to a lot of those technologies."

"The scanning itself is really the core of the tool, and it's what we're most interested in."

"Through porting, we can see how the improvement is happening over a period of time. We can see the overall scenario from the last year, where were we were and where we currently stand."

Cons

"I would like the ability to monitor Cisco IRS devices."

"When using PRTG Network Monitor it is beneficial if you have prior experience with it, the user interface could improve."

"The free version only gives us 100 free sensors to use. It would be nice if there was double that."

"I would like to see them take their graphing tools and convert them into a collector so that we can point telemetry to them"

"The only sort of limitation is the actual probes. So, if you don't have enough probes on there, you can over flip them and cause the WMI sensors and SNMP sensors to sort of overload. Sometimes, they might timeout for a minute, but they do come back."

"We're using more cloud services now. It would be useful to be able to get information back from these cloud services in detail, and display any issues within PRTG for the rest of our systems."

"I would like to see Office 365 monitoring. Essentially, it doesn't do it."

"Limiting the bandwidth per host would be very good; however, that's beyond the capability of the PRTG."

More PRTG Network Monitor cons

"For dynamic application scanning, it's a two out of ten."

"One area which is missing is cloud security because there are a lot of configurations. Rapid7 has a product called a DV cloud. I would like to have a similar kind of solution and feature."

"There are certain circumstances where they may have found a vulnerable service and they just removed the service completely from the device because nobody was using it. There's no way to go into SecurityCenter and mark it, to say, "This is no longer an issue. It doesn't exist anymore." Or, "The risk was accepted for one year, so let's not report it as 'high' until that one year period is done." The handling of operational flow around vulnerability management could be improved."

"When it comes to... dynamic application scanning, I think they are lagging behind the curve. They have a lackluster solution, to the point where I think they need to determine, as a company, whether or not that's a space they even want to play in."

"In terms of what could be improved, some customers have a problem with SecurityCenter's ticket system. If I want them to assign one of the issues, they may want to assign someone to it or to assign it somewhere else and I may want to break up the ticket."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Because we are only on the free version, we have a limited number of sensors. Therefore, we are not monitoring as much as we want to be to obtain historical information."

"The price is actually on the cheaper side. If you're going with the unlimited license code, it's very cheap compared to competitors unless you're going for something free, like Zabbix. But you get what you pay for, and it doesn't have the full suite of products or tools like SolarWinds or a ScienceLogic."

"When you have a lot of devices, PRTG Network Monitor can be costly."

"It's an annual license that is based on the number of endpoints that we're tracking and using."

"Licenses are very expensive, so I would like to see cheaper licensing."

"The price was pretty good, very competitive."

"If you are not too sure about it, try the free version. Then, if you like it, you can go to the paid version and roll it out."

"PRTG Network Monitor is cheap."

More PRTG Network Monitor pricing and cost advice

"We did a three-year deal where the cost is amortized over the three years. The Elite Support was an additional cost to the standard licensing fees... If you use Security Center, most of the time it is on-premise, so you're going to have some sort of infrastructure to build out and there's going to be a cost associated with that."

"Pricing-wise, it's fine. It's not an expensive product. That's not an issue."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

it_user174738

IT Developer at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

May 31, 2015

Nagios vs. Zabbix vs. PRTG vs. Spiceworks vs. Solarwinds Network Performance Monitor

I have researched a quite a few network monitoring tools which can be used for various monitoring purposes of not only the servers, but the intermediate routers as well. There are majorly three types of these softwares. Ones which are completely open-source, you can do almost anything you want…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Comms Service Provider

11%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Outsourcing Company

Healthcare Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	60
Midsize Enterprise	19
Large Enterprise	50

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is the best network monitoring software for large enterprises?

PRTG network monitor is one of the best tool i have ever used for the monitoring. It have auto discovery option. it avoid the configuring the device in PRTG. It automatically discover the device an...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for PRTG Network Monitor?

The pricing was higher at the beginning, but the recurring licensing cost is affordable and reasonable. Overall, the pricing, setup cost, and licensing is fair for our industry. They have quoted us...

See all answers

What needs improvement with PRTG Network Monitor?

The reporting features look very technical and that can be improved. If they can change the report so everyone can understand it, that would be helpful.

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Zabbix vs PRTG Network Monitor

Compared 4% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs PRTG Network Monitor

Compared 3% of the time

WhatsUp Gold vs PRTG Network Monitor

Compared 3% of the time

Splunk Observability Cloud vs PRTG Network Monitor

Compared 3% of the time

Centreon vs PRTG Network Monitor

Compared 2% of the time

More PRTG Network Monitor Competitors

ThousandEyes vs Tenable SecurityCenter Continuous View [EOL]

Compared 16% of the time

Meraki Dashboard vs Tenable SecurityCenter Continuous View [EOL]

Compared 16% of the time

NETSCOUT Network & Application Observability vs Tenable SecurityCenter Continuous View [EOL]

Compared 15% of the time

Alluvio AppResponse vs Tenable SecurityCenter Continuous View [EOL]

Compared 11% of the time

More Tenable SecurityCenter Continuous View [EOL] Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

PRTG Network Monitor

October 2026

Download PRTG Network Monitor product report

Buyer's Guide

Tenable SecurityCenter Continuous View [EOL]

October 2026

Tenable SecurityCenter Continuous View [EOL] report

Download Tenable SecurityCenter Continuous View [EOL] product report

Also Known As

No data available

SecurityCenter Continuous View, SecurityCenter CV

Overview

PRTG Network Monitor offers seamless network health tracking with flexible alerting and robust scalability. Its real-time monitoring and compatibility across diverse technologies enhance operational efficiency.

PRTG Network Monitor stands out by providing intuitive dashboards and detailed reporting to efficiently monitor network health, significantly reducing manual checks. Its quick setup and comprehensive compatibility cater to diverse environments. The alert system and real-time monitoring enable proactive maintenance, while custom scripting and a broad range of sensors allow for personalized monitoring options. Enhancements are suggested in database management, integration capabilities, Unix support, pricing, application performance, and dashboard customization. Users benefit from enhanced error messaging, flexible licensing, and better training resources.

What are the key features of PRTG Network Monitor?

Ease of Use: Intuitive dashboard makes network monitoring straightforward.
Flexible Alerting: Provides prompt notifications for proactive maintenance.
Scalability: Adapts to various network sizes and complexities.
Compatibility: Works across diverse technologies and environments.
Custom Scripting: Allows tailored monitoring options for specific needs.

What benefits should users seek in PRTG Network Monitor reviews?

Operational Efficiency: Reduces the need for manual network checks.
Real-Time Monitoring: Enables instant response to potential issues.
Enhanced Infrastructure Oversight: Facilitates comprehensive management of network devices.
Proactive Maintenance: Alerts help prevent potential disruptions.
Central Dashboard: Manages infrastructure across multiple locations effectively.

In industries like IT, telecommunications, and healthcare, PRTG Network Monitor is employed for comprehensive monitoring of systems, servers, and networks. It assists in tracking uptime, connectivity, and alerts for potential issues, offering tailored options like monitoring traffic flows and hardware health through custom sensors and scripts.

Paessler GmbH

SecurityCenter Continuous View is the market-leading continuous network monitoring platform. It integrates SecurityCenter along with multiple Nessus Network Monitor sensors and Log Correlation Engine (LCE) to provide comprehensive continuous network monitoring.

Tenable

Sample Customers

Jameson Bank, Sidnix, RungeICT, MedicalAnimal, Truck-lite, GamingGrids, The Covell Group, Forsythn County Schools, NetMass, Musgrove Park Hospital, Lanes Health, Columbia Southern University, Vodafone, Intrust Bank

Methodist Healthcare Ministries

Buyer's Guide

Network Monitoring Software

October 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Zabbix, Auvik, SolarWinds and others in Network Monitoring Software. Updated: October 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.