Power Admin PA Server Monitor vs vRealize Network Insight comparison

Power Admin and Broadcom are both solutions in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category. Power Admin is ranked #73, while Broadcom is ranked #39 with an average rating of 8.0. Power Admin holds a 0.5% mindshare in IM, compared to Broadcom’s 0.8% mindshare. Additionally, 50% of Power Admin users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 89% of Broadcom users who would recommend it.

Power Admin PA Server Monitor

Read 2 Power Admin PA Server Monitor reviews

1,624 Views
1,267 Comparison Views

50% willing to recommend

vRealize Network Insight

Read 47 vRealize Network Insight reviews

5,224 Views
2,769 Comparison Views

89% willing to recommend

Power Admin PA Server Monitor

vRealize Network Insight

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

Power Admin PA Server Monitor and vRealize Network Insight both offer network management and monitoring solutions. vRealize Network Insight tends to have the upper hand due to its comprehensive feature set, despite its higher price tag.

Features: Power Admin PA Server Monitor offers real-time server monitoring, alerting capabilities, and performance reporting. vRealize Network Insight provides advanced network analytics, troubleshooting tools, and security compliance features.

Room for Improvement: Power Admin PA Server Monitor could enhance its advanced analytics capabilities, offer more comprehensive security features, and improve its scalability for larger enterprises. vRealize Network Insight could simplify its deployment process, offer a more budget-friendly pricing model, and improve ease of use for smaller IT teams.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Power Admin PA Server Monitor offers a simple deployment model with reliable customer service, making it accessible for IT teams with limited resources. vRealize Network Insight requires a more complex implementation process but provides extensive customer support to facilitate deployment.

Pricing and ROI: Power Admin PA Server Monitor has a lower setup cost with satisfactory ROI, appealing to small to medium businesses. vRealize Network Insight involves higher initial costs but promises substantial ROI through its sophisticated features and long-term value.

To learn more, read our detailed Power Admin PA Server Monitor vs. vRealize Network Insight Report (Updated: August 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Power Admin PA Server Monitor vs. vRealize Network Insight

August 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 909,948 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Power Admin PA Server Monitor

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

73rd

Average Rating

6.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Server Monitoring (32nd)

vRealize Network Insight

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

39th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Network Monitoring Software (36th)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category, the mindshare of Power Admin PA Server Monitor is 0.5%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of vRealize Network Insight is 0.8%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

IT Infrastructure Monitoring Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
vRealize Network Insight	0.8%
Power Admin PA Server Monitor	0.5%
Other	98.7%

IT Infrastructure Monitoring

Featured Reviews

it_user225771

IT Network Engineer at a engineering company with 51-200 employees

The setup is straightforward, but the satellite service installation file could be separated from the server one.

* The status overview page provides a state of computers monitored and provides quickly what users need to focus on * The satellite service installed on remote computers is an easy way to add clients, plus it's easy to deploy and to configure * The licence is perpetual and not linked to one computer, so it's possible to remove a licence from one computer and use it on another with no extra cost

Read full review

Shaijith KB

Senior System Specialist at General Directorate of Residence and Foreigners Affairs (GDRFA)

Comprehensive management and detailed reports benefit operations while improvements are needed in support and maintenance

We have Tanzu and OpenShift. We have OpenShift, Canonical, and the Tanzu one. The Tanzu platform from VMware is a Kubernetes platform. We haven't completely installed Tanzu yet; we installed the vROps part. vRealize Network Insight is beneficial because you can control the East-West traffic. vRealize has a component called NSX, which has East-West traffic controlling and micro-segmentation, that is one of the best options, and we have the layer extension, layer 2 extension possible through NSX. If you have anything accountable in any business, even in a candy business, having proper accountability on what you are selling and buying will save a lot. If you don't know what you're selling and buying, you will end up with a loss. My team does not use the flow analytics feature; we have a security and network monitoring team, which is a different SOC team. I am using it as an administrator internally. We perform different tasks including costing analysis, capacity management, and many other things. vRealize Network Insight has a concern about the maintenance part, as it requires a person to monitor it completely. It's not something you install and your report will be generated automatically. You have to work on this properly to get the insights. vRealize Network Automation, vRealize Operations, and vRealize Network Insight are completely related to the network. I cannot say much about these network aspects because I am on the operations side, but overall, the vRealize suite is good for reporting perspective or any ISO-related documentation; this is very helpful. The product is called vRealize Operations Manager, and now it is referred to as Aria or vAria. I am now a Senior System Specialist. We use different metrics because we have multiple departments, and we can monitor utilization and comparisons with the previous year. On a scale of one to ten, I rate this solution a seven.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The possibility to develop your own VB scripts."

"The satellite service installed on remote computers is an easy way to add clients, plus it's easy to deploy and to configure the licence is perpetual and not linked to one computer, so it's possible to remove a licence from one computer and use it on another with no extra cost"

"It allowed us to set up NSX and to do microsegmentation, without all of the pain points of having to determine each port and each IP address that needed to have access, and which ones needed to be blocked."

"It has enabled us to set up and do application discovery, as far as network traffic is concerned, and set up the appropriate rules that we need to make sure we're compliant with our security frameworks."

"The ability to use the natural language query and see the visualization is quickly intuitive, and it works very well."

"It has helped us tremendously to be able to easily deploy NSX in our environment with microsegmentation."

"It especially helps with deploying NSX, that you're not having to manually chase down and figure out what you need to do to microsegment VMs. This gives a nice option where you can say, "Hey, this VM, show me what flows are there." I can export it out and then import it as an NSX rule and job done."

"We haven't had any complaints about the stability of the solution or heard of any issues. None of our clients have mentioned running into bugs or glitches. There haven't been crashes."

"The automation collects all the relationships between servers, allowing us to visualize these relationships and organize the migration into waves."

"I find it user-friendly and intuitive. With the GUI interface that we do use on a regular basis, it's easy to navigate, it's easy to see, easy to query. We get reports. It's easy to use."

More vRealize Network Insight pros

Cons

"Basic monitoring on Unix was working really well but it didn't really help under machines in Windows Domain Controller."

"The satellite service installation file could be separated from the server one. It would reduce the size of the file, and reduce the time to deploy on weak connections."

"Support could be much better. They do not do a good job of finding issues."

"There could be some deeper analytics into packet inspection and trace flows. It could use some kind of machine learning to look at Layer 7 traffic for potential malware or corrupt packets."

"I'd like to see better support for being able to search the hardware NetFlow data. It ingests fairly well, but you can't tell, in a lot of cases, what source the data came from. I'd like to see more support for picking specific sources. That way you could really make a compelling use case. There are also some difficulties where it can't exactly trace the path between source and destination but if you hit the reverse flow on the same search it shows the entire path."

"It needs to be a little easier to use and to understand the information it's putting out. That would make it more helpful. If you're not a network person you need to understand things like network policies and concepts. If you gave it to a regular admin, it would be nice if it were easier for them to pick up what is going on, understand the flows and whether or not stuff should be talking to each other, as opposed to just port groups and IP addresses."

"While it's not exactly a feature, what normally happens when we are trying to look at the VM flow portion is - although Network Insight does have options to integrate a few physical switches into it - we can't really get an end-to-end flow of the network. We might be using a few switches that are not supported by Network Insight. That is where they can improve, in the support for more physical switches and network devices."

"If it were more application-aware, more descriptive; if it were able to determine the application that is actually doing the communication, that would be easier. More application information: which user or account it's accessing, is it accessing this application, doing these calls, if it is accessing a script, what script is it accessing. Things like that would provide deeper analytics so I can track what's going on. It would not just be, "These people shouldn't be talking," but who is actually doing these calls."

"The UI, even though once you get to know it, it's easier, still it's hard to figure out by yourself. You have to go read, watch videos. It has a lot of data on it. So that is an issue."

"Better integration into VRB."

More vRealize Network Insight cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"It's an expensive product because we have a lot of nodes."

"They should include the product in NSX because it's important to have it for deployment."

"vRealize Network Insight is expensive."

"The solution has reduced the time that we spend on other products. For example, with NSX, we were able to quickly find things that we would normally spend days trying to figure out."

"I rate vRealize Network Insight's pricing a seven point five out of ten."

"We have spent less time investigating network flows, so it is absolutely cost-effective."

"The solution has helped us to reduce time, increase performance, reduce costs, and even easily manage networks. We are probably seeing 10 to 20 percent labor savings because we are able to be very specific and focused on what we want to do. It ends up saving the customer money and makes us be more efficient on our cost deliveries."

"It's a little expensive, but for what you're getting out of the product, you often see the trade-off. It depends on the type of licensing you have. It might be a little too pricey for some."

More vRealize Network Insight pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Infrastructure Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

909,948 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

20%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Construction Company

11%

Comms Service Provider

Construction Company

13%

Outsourcing Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	11
Midsize Enterprise	9
Large Enterprise	43

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for vRealize Network Insight?

In VMware you have to buy a separate license for it. We have VVF and VCF-type of licenses, and if you want to go with this NSX and sort of higher-end professional services, you need to go with VCF....

See all answers

What needs improvement with vRealize Network Insight?

There is room for improvement as not all cases are getting resolved, and we often do not get L3 support directly, having to go through L1 and L2, resulting in delays that usually are a headache for...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for vRealize Network Insight?

We have Tanzu, and we also work with multiple Kubernetes services such as Nutanix and Google. We are working on these Kubernetes services on the operations side. For Tanzu, we have several componen...

See all answers

Comparisons

Zabbix vs Power Admin PA Server Monitor

Compared 13% of the time

Nagios XI vs Power Admin PA Server Monitor

Compared 12% of the time

Lenovo XClarity Controller vs Power Admin PA Server Monitor

Compared 6% of the time

Oracle Enterprise Manager vs Power Admin PA Server Monitor

Compared 5% of the time

Avantra vs Power Admin PA Server Monitor

Compared 5% of the time

More Power Admin PA Server Monitor Competitors

Kentik vs vRealize Network Insight

Compared 10% of the time

Nmap vs vRealize Network Insight

Compared 7% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs vRealize Network Insight

Compared 5% of the time

Datadog vs vRealize Network Insight

Compared 5% of the time

Zabbix vs vRealize Network Insight

Compared 4% of the time

More vRealize Network Insight Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

IT Infrastructure Monitoring

July 2026

Download Power Admin PA Server Monitor product report

Buyer's Guide

vRealize Network Insight

July 2026

Download vRealize Network Insight product report

Also Known As

PA Server Monitor

Arkin

Overview

Power Admin PA Server Monitor offers a comprehensive approach to server and network monitoring, aimed at enhancing IT efficiency. Its features provide robust monitoring capabilities tailored for system administrators seeking to maintain and optimize server performance.

Power Admin PA Server Monitor is designed to streamline server management by providing detailed insights into system operations. It delivers functionalities that simplify the monitoring process, allowing IT professionals to identify and resolve issues efficiently. Its real-time alerting ensures timely reactions to potential issues, while reporting tools offer valuable data analysis, aiding in decision-making processes.

What are the key features?

Real-Time Alerts: Immediate notifications help prevent potential downtime.
Comprehensive Reporting: Detailed logs for performance monitoring and planning.
Remote Access: Manage servers from any location, increasing flexibility.
Customizable Dashboards: Tailor views to track critical metrics.
Scalable Architecture: Easily adapts to growing requirements.

What benefits should users consider?

Efficiency: Streamlined operations save time and reduce manual tasks.
Cost Savings: Early detection of issues minimizes repair costs.
Reliability: Enhanced system stability increases uptime and trust.
Flexibility: Adaptable features cater to specific monitoring needs.

Power Admin PA Server Monitor is utilized across diverse industries, from healthcare to finance, where reliable server performance is crucial. Its customizable features support sector-specific requirements, ensuring seamless integration into existing IT infrastructures and delivering consistent performance monitoring tailored to industry demands.

Power Admin

vRealize Network Insight provides deep visibility into network flows, intuitive visualization, and real-time monitoring. It identifies communication patterns and offers insights into east-west traffic within data centers, simplifying complex network analysis and troubleshooting.

This platform enhances efficiency in firewall management and supports microsegmentation with an intuitive interface. Its integration with VMware products and natural language querying adds value. Users use it for optimizing network flows, planning NSX deployments, and visualizing traffic. It assists in applying security policies, tracking data center flows, and building network architecture by providing advanced insights for policy refinement, ensuring network performance and compliance.

What are the key features of vRealize Network Insight?

Deep Network Visibility: Offers detailed insights into network flows and communication patterns.
Intuitive Visualization: Simplifies monitoring with clear, real-time graphics.
User-Friendly Interface: Facilitates easy navigation for complex network analysis.
Integration with VMware: Seamless alignment with existing VMware products.
Natural Language Querying: Offers insights with easy-to-use query capabilities.

What benefits should users consider in reviews?

Efficiency in Firewall Management: Streamlines and optimizes firewall operations.
Supports Microsegmentation: Enhances security through improved policy enforcement.
Advanced Network Insights: Provides valuable data for performance optimization.
Compliance Assurance: Ensures adherence to security and performance standards.

In specific industries, vRealize Network Insight is implemented to optimize network architecture, manage application dependencies, and enhance security measures. Companies utilize its analytical capabilities to refine policies and ensure robust network performance and security compliance, particularly in complex and hybrid cloud environments.

Broadcom

Sample Customers

Sauder Woodworking, Symantec, Microsoft, Skull Candy, NASA, Xerox, Chevron

NTTi3, VCIX-NV, VMware Networking and Security Business Unit, Illumio, CompuNet

Buyer's Guide

Power Admin PA Server Monitor vs. vRealize Network Insight

August 2026

Free Report: Power Admin PA Server Monitor vs. vRealize Network Insight

Find out what your peers are saying about Power Admin PA Server Monitor vs. vRealize Network Insight and other solutions. Updated: August 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

909,948 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Power Admin PA Server Monitor vs. vRealize Network Insight report.

See our list of best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.

We monitor all IT Infrastructure Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.