We performed a comparison between PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition and Skybox Security Suite based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Vulnerability Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The tool is loaded with many features that give us ROI."
"I like normal dynamic scanning, general web applications scanning, and vulnerability assessments."
"Parallel scans can be done with PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition."
"The initial setup is straightforward."
"The most valuable features of PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition are the vast amount of options and ease of use. They frequently improve the solution every six months to a year. Additionally, if we want any more features we can upload a custom script to meet our needs."
"We are in the early stage of using the solution making it difficult to fully determine the best features. However, we have noticed the CMDB and device discovery features look valuable at this time."
"The product's initial setup phase was super easy."
"The product is easy to use."
"Robust modules can be used for different parts of network security."
"instead of asking for firewall rules which may or may not be relevant, or could already be there, or could be over-permissioned, Skybox can be used to map out the resources that that application is going to use and provide the exact rules that an application would require to function correctly. If the traffic isn't able to flow for the application, if it's erring out, Skybox can be used to troubleshoot that and say, "All right, where is the traffic being stopped and why, and how do I fix that.""
"Change Manager is most important because of the impact on each other of a network change or a firewall change. We want to understand this and to know, beforehand, what the impact of a change will be. We are a large network so that is a very important tool."
"The port division management was the solution's most valuable aspect for our organization."
"Skybox allows organizations to reprioritize the vulnerability they attempt to patch and mitigate, based on the contextual awareness of the network."
"The most valuable features are the rule compliance and the OS vulnerability checks."
"Skybox deployment is simple, and it's very useful."
"The performance could be good because we chose it at the time, but it is too complex for us to appreciate its performance because we lack the necessary skills."
"The implementation of the solution is quite complicated and could be easier."
"The solution is a bit expensive."
"The product needs to have the ability to evaluate more."
"It would be better if the solution is cloud-based."
"The stability of the scans could be improved."
"There's definitely room for improvement. There are lots of false positives. Once I do the manual assessment, it comes as a false positive. They need to improve the Enterprise Edition, especially the part that gives false positives."
"There are features or functionality missing, but PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition does try to update frequently to alleviate the shortcomings."
"The cost per license per user could be cheaper, specifically for individual licensing."
"The only place where Skybox has room for improvement, and they're working on releasing this, it's just a slow-go, is the UI. The user interface has historically been via a locally installed thick client. They are moving to a web-based console and it's slowly coming out."
"The support could be improved."
"The stability is something that is questionable. I don't know whether it is because of the kind of infrastructure we have or because of the product in itself. We're running it on a virtual machine right now. Maybe once a month, or once in every 45 days, it requires a restart because the application fails to connect. So I have to restart the whole Skybox Manager itself, the Skybox server itself, and then connect to it from our Skybox Manager."
"During implementation, we realised approximately 30 devices were not supported by the Skybox platform."
"If anything could be improved it would be staying on top of the collector scripts, but I understand that's a very tough challenge."
"Modifications and the deletion of existing policies are currently unavailable."
"There is room for improvement in pricing. It would be better, especially if a customer bought all four modules."
"The tool does not offer options for customization."
More PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition Pricing and Cost Advice →
PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition is ranked 12th in Vulnerability Management with 8 reviews while Skybox Security Suite is ranked 18th in Vulnerability Management with 34 reviews. PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition is rated 8.0, while Skybox Security Suite is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition writes " With a super easy initial setup phase, the tool also offers regular updates". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Skybox Security Suite writes "Efficient in vulnerability management, stable and easy to use ". PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition is most compared with Acunetix, Tenable Nessus, Rapid7 Metasploit, Tenable Vulnerability Management and Rapid7 InsightVM, whereas Skybox Security Suite is most compared with AlgoSec, Tufin Orchestration Suite, FireMon Security Manager, Palo Alto Networks Panorama and RedSeal. See our PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition vs. Skybox Security Suite report.
See our list of best Vulnerability Management vendors.
We monitor all Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
