IBM Rational Focal Point vs PTC Integrity Requirements Connector comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between IBM Rational Focal Point and PTC Integrity Requirements Connector based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Atlassian, Siemens and others in Application Requirements Management.
To learn more, read our detailed Application Requirements Management Report (Updated: March 2024).
767,995 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Requirements Management solutions are best for your needs.
767,995 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Top Answer:It is a stable solution...I rate the support a nine out of ten.
Top Answer:I will not be able to comment on the pricing because this is a corporate part. They have different agreements with PTC, so I cannot say.
Top Answer:I see that when we just define the configuration management part, it is a completely different case. Somehow in our organization or current profile, we are not built to make that linkage between that… more »
Ranking
Views
97
Comparisons
57
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Views
1,154
Comparisons
780
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
750
Rating
8.0
Comparisons
Also Known As
Rational Focal Point
PTC IRC
Learn More
Overview
IBM Rational Focal Point is a comprehensive portfolio planning solution for market-driven teams. With Rational Focal Point, teams can make collaborative, objective decisions to deliver market, customer, and business value. By understanding what matters most, your organization can respond to dynamic market conditions and deliver valued products and projects.

PTC Integrity Requirements Connector (IRC) enables an effective and efficient method to synchronize requirements across projects, departments and enterprise boundaries. Deploying IRC across an organization ensures that requirements are communicated, processed, easily acted upon and contribute to the success of your projects. This whitepaper explains the primary reasons why IRC is indispensable in today’s world of distributed product development.

Sample Customers
SanDisk, CareCore National, Laminar Medica, Chubb Insurance, Swedbank
Cummins, Continental
Top Industries
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Manufacturing Company26%
Computer Software Company13%
Healthcare Company8%
Educational Organization7%
Company Size
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business15%
Midsize Enterprise10%
Large Enterprise75%
Buyer's Guide
Application Requirements Management
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Atlassian, Siemens and others in Application Requirements Management. Updated: March 2024.
767,995 professionals have used our research since 2012.

IBM Rational Focal Point is ranked 14th in Application Requirements Management while PTC Integrity Requirements Connector is ranked 6th in Application Requirements Management with 1 review. IBM Rational Focal Point is rated 0.0, while PTC Integrity Requirements Connector is rated 8.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of PTC Integrity Requirements Connector writes "A requirement management tool that provides a good technical support along with stability". IBM Rational Focal Point is most compared with , whereas PTC Integrity Requirements Connector is most compared with IBM Rational DOORS, Jira and IBM Rational DOORS Next Generation.

See our list of best Application Requirements Management vendors.

We monitor all Application Requirements Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.