Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Pivotal Cloud Foundry vs Virtuozzo Application Platform comparison

VMware and Virtuozzo are both solutions in the PaaS Clouds category. VMware is ranked #8 with an average rating of 8.0, while Virtuozzo is ranked #16 with an average rating of 9.0. VMware holds a 10.2% mindshare in PSP, compared to Virtuozzo’s 0.6% mindshare. Additionally, 93% of VMware users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Virtuozzo users who would recommend it.
Pivotal Cloud Foundry
Read 15 Pivotal Cloud Foundry reviews
  • 7,551 Views
  • 6,345 Comparison Views
93% willing to recommend
Virtuozzo Application Platform
Read 7 Virtuozzo Application Platform reviews
  • 496 Views
  • 329 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 15, 2024

Virtuozzo Application Platform and Pivotal Cloud Foundry compete in the cloud application platform market, with Pivotal typically having the upper hand due to its robust feature set that outweighs its higher price point.

Features: Virtuozzo stands out for its flexibility and scalability, offering strong container management and orchestration. Additionally, its platform facilitates automatic vertical and horizontal scaling, enhancing efficiency. Pivotal Cloud Foundry offers comprehensive application lifecycle management, advanced automation, and strong DevOps integration, which provide a complete solution for enterprises. Automatic monitoring, ease of deployment, and CI/CD integration further enhance its value, highlighting superior capabilities for large-scale deployments.

Room for Improvement: Virtuozzo could benefit from enhanced feature diversity and improved integration capabilities with external tools. Its ease of use is commendable, but deeper analytics and reporting might strengthen its appeal. A richer ecosystem for plug-ins and expansions is another area to improve. For Pivotal Cloud Foundry, complexity in initial setup could be streamlined to make it more inviting for businesses with limited technical resources. The premium cost limits accessibility for smaller businesses, so flexible pricing options could be a consideration. Enhancing user training and documentation could further assist customers in leveraging its broad feature set.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Virtuozzo offers simple deployment and decent customer service, making it accessible for businesses lacking extensive IT resources. Pivotal Cloud Foundry, requiring more technical expertise, is supported by abundant resources and support, making for a smoother experience despite the complexity. Its customer service provides detailed guidance and robust support options to ensure successful implementation.

Pricing and ROI: Virtuozzo’s competitive setup cost provides substantial ROI for smaller to medium-sized businesses by virtue of its lower pricing structure. Pivotal Cloud Foundry, though initially costlier, offers high ROI through its powerful capabilities and scalability suited for larger enterprises. The comprehensive feature set justifies Pivotal’s higher cost for those needing a scalable, full-featured solution, while Virtuozzo offers a cost-effective alternative for more budget-conscious organizations.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Pivotal Cloud Foundry vs. Virtuozzo Application Platform Report (Updated: April 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Pivotal Cloud Foundry vs. Virtuozzo Application Platform
April 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 850,028 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Pivotal Cloud Foundry
Ranking in PaaS Clouds
8th
Average Rating
7.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.7
Number of Reviews
15
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Virtuozzo Application Platform
Ranking in PaaS Clouds
16th
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.6
Number of Reviews
7
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the PaaS Clouds category, the mindshare of Pivotal Cloud Foundry is 10.2%, up from 8.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Virtuozzo Application Platform is 0.6%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
PaaS Clouds
 

Featured Reviews

Vasundhara Joshi - PeerSpot reviewer
Seamlessly scalable since applications written in Java and .NET do not create issues for its users
Regarding the setup phase, every step is a hurdle. With Pivotal Cloud Foundry, I won't get any proper resources for that. Even if I Google it, there is no proper solution for Pivotal Cloud Foundry. However, if we go for Azure or some other cloud, we can get a lot of information. I believe there is not much information for Pivotal Cloud Foundry since it may be some license issue. If you go for Azure, the migration process is straightforward. Since we have been given 10 GB of space in the public cloud, we are utilizing it in our company. So, we are trying to deploy our application on the cloud, and for us, it is like a trial process for now. From our total application rate, I can say that only two to three percent is on Pivotal Cloud Foundry. Currently, half of the code is in the shell script, which is causing issues. Also, most people in my organization have worked on Java-related code. For most of the applications, they are using the same, that is, shell script and AUTOsist, and so we haven't migrated yet. So that is the reason that we are planning to opt for a hybrid model so that we don't have to migrate completely to Pivotal Cloud Foundry.
Read full review
Miguel Maloney Thompson - PeerSpot reviewer
A scalable and stable solution that has good scalability and is easy to setup
It is a scalable solution. I have yet to have a scenario regarding automatic scale and if there's an increase in resource requirement or need. We have yet to have that scenario. We have yet to test that. The scalability was more than manually adjusting and increasing whatever I had to do. I rate it eight out of ten.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"It provides a set of developer-friendly tools that simplify application deployment."
"I find the ease of deployment and management of microservices to be the most valuable features. The platform also has good auto-scaling capabilities."
"The most valuable features of Pivotal Cloud Foundry are its ease of use and the command line interface has the ability to push instances to the cloud easily."
"Stability is not a concern with this product."
"Pivotal Cloud Foundry is very easy to use compared to other cloud technologies. It has a very good performance."
"It supports CI/CD, and is integrated with the CI/CD very well."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is its ability to scale. The services that connect to the database are also very good."
"PCF is open, so the applications run really smoothly and with little downtime."
More Pivotal Cloud Foundry pros
"The dynamic vertical scaling is a unique feature."
"The advanced level of production-ready Docker hosting, one-click application deployment, and the truly flexible pricing."
"The solution is scalable, and that is what we are looking at. There is no learning curve as we have not done much research."
"Technical support from Jelastic is very good."
"The control is valuable. It's really easy to use and you have good control of your solutions."
 

Cons

"It should offer more security features."
"Regarding the setup phase, every step is a hurdle. With Pivotal Cloud Foundry, I won't get any proper resources for that. Even if I Google it, there is no proper solution for Pivotal Cloud Foundry."
"Pivotal Cloud Foundry could improve on the technology it is a bit complex."
"In the next release, they should offer additional applications for the databases, and improve the deployment experience."
"Something that can be done better is canary deployment. So, right now, we're using blue-green deployment. The support for canary deployment would be nice."
"There is a lot of uncertainty surrounding the future of Pivotal Cloud Foundry."
"There are no synthetic application monitoring and real-time monitoring features."
"Pivotal Cloud Foundry doesn't have certain advanced features."
More Pivotal Cloud Foundry cons
"The backup functionality needs to be improved."
"Lacks better integration into enterprise storage products."
"The backup features need improvement, or rather it should be added, as I could not find it."
"For now, some customers are requesting support of Docker containers for Windows."
"The security layers also need to be improved because there is no clear layer or tier of security in the solution."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price of Pivotal Cloud Foundry could improve. However, in this category of solutions, they are all expensive."
"You're paying for the number of virtual machines you want to install in the installation."
"Licensing is on a monthly basis and right now we pay $24/month. There are no other costs over and above that."
"The pricing is on the higher side and there are cheaper options available."
"We do pay for the licensing cost because we have opted for a private cloud setup. So, it is a cloud setup, and we have to make payments based on the cloud size. I do not consider it very costly when comparing it to the market."
"The price of Pivotal Cloud Foundry is based on the customer's requirements. However, the price is comparable to other similar solutions."
"Pricing for providers is revenue-shared based. Providers should invest in hardware to set up the Jelastic cluster."
"I would rate the cost 3 out of 5. There are additional costs other than licensing fees."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which PaaS Clouds solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
38%
Manufacturing Company
19%
Insurance Company
6%
Healthcare Company
4%
Financial Services Firm
23%
Computer Software Company
17%
Comms Service Provider
7%
Healthcare Company
5%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

Which would you recommend - Pivotal Cloud Foundry or OpenShift?
Pivotal Cloud Foundry is a cloud-native application platform to simplify app delivery. It is efficient and effective. The best feature is how easy it is to handle external services such as database...
See all answers
What do you like most about Pivotal Cloud Foundry?
I find the ease of deployment and management of microservices to be the most valuable features. The platform also has good auto-scaling capabilities.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Pivotal Cloud Foundry?
I would say it is around a nine out of ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive. Just short of Oracle. It's sort of Oracle cloud.
See all answers
What do you like most about Jelastic?
The solution is scalable, and that is what we are looking at. There is no learning curve as we have not done much research.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Jelastic?
The backup features need improvement, or rather it should be added, as I could not find it.
See all answers
What is your primary use case for Jelastic?
We have a static environment where we created a server and workforce, and that was basically it. And it's promising.
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Microsoft Azure vs Pivotal Cloud Foundry Logo
Microsoft Azure vs Pivotal Cloud Foundry
Compared 33% of the time
Red Hat OpenShift vs Pivotal Cloud Foundry Logo
Red Hat OpenShift vs Pivotal Cloud Foundry
Compared 31% of the time
Amazon AWS vs Pivotal Cloud Foundry Logo
Amazon AWS vs Pivotal Cloud Foundry
Compared 11% of the time
Google Cloud vs Pivotal Cloud Foundry Logo
Google Cloud vs Pivotal Cloud Foundry
Compared 10% of the time
Heroku vs Pivotal Cloud Foundry Logo
Heroku vs Pivotal Cloud Foundry
Compared 5% of the time
More Pivotal Cloud Foundry Competitors
Amazon AWS vs Virtuozzo Application Platform Logo
Amazon AWS vs Virtuozzo Application Platform
Compared 36% of the time
Red Hat OpenShift vs Virtuozzo Application Platform Logo
Red Hat OpenShift vs Virtuozzo Application Platform
Compared 33% of the time
Microsoft Azure vs Virtuozzo Application Platform Logo
Microsoft Azure vs Virtuozzo Application Platform
Compared 31% of the time
More Virtuozzo Application Platform Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Pivotal Cloud Foundry
April 2025
Pivotal Cloud Foundry reportDownload Pivotal Cloud Foundry product report
Buyer's Guide
PaaS Clouds
April 2025
Virtuozzo Application Platform reportDownload Virtuozzo Application Platform product report
 

Also Known As

PCF, Pivotal Application Service (PAS), Pivotal Container Service (PKS), Pivotal Function Service (PFS)
Jelastic
 

Overview

Pivotal Cloud Foundry (PCF) is the leading enterprise PaaS, powered by Cloud Foundry. PCF provides a cloud-native application platform that allows you to continuously deliver any app to every major private and public cloud with a single platform. PCF is proven to accelerate feature delivery with higher developer productivity and a 200:1 developer to operator ratio. PCF's built-in security and self-healing capabilities reduce risk in your app portfolio while maintaining high-availability at scale to keep customer facing systems online even in the most challenging circumstances. pivotal.io

VMware

Your Platform as a Service solution for DevOps hosting!

An elastic, high performance PaaS solution for cloud and hosting providers. The easy way to sell cloud hosting to DevOps-focused SaaS companies.


Turnkey application hosting for DevOps​.

Sell PaaS alongside your existing products. The Virtuozzo Application Platform runs on the infrastructure you have today – even virtualized in your cloud or hosting platform.

It makes DevOps hosting fast, easy and cost-effective – and with true consumption-based billing, it gives you a real competitive advantage over hyperscale clouds.

Platform as a Service opens up new markets for your business: you can sell hosting to any company that depends on DevOps for internal or customer-facing IT.

Virtuozzo
 

Sample Customers

Humana, Citibank, Mercedes Benz, Liberty Mutual, The Home Depot, GE, West Corp, Merrill Corporation, CoreLogic, Orange, Dish Network, Comcast, Bloomberg, Internal Revenue Service, Ford Motor Company, Garmin, Volkswagen, Solera, Allstate, US Air Force, Lockheed Martin, Boeing, ScotiaBank
Hosting Providers: Hidora, Elastx, eApps, SaveInCloud, Infomaniak, Layershift, Valtti, Dogado, Locaweb, Planeetta, dogado, ServInt, Hostnet, Info.nl, Innofield, Lunacloud, Reg.ru, Websolute Private Cloud and Integrators: Joe's Datacenter, Croc, Ciklum, Vergence, Centerprise, GMV Soluciones
Buyer's Guide
Pivotal Cloud Foundry vs. Virtuozzo Application Platform
April 2025
Free Report: Pivotal Cloud Foundry vs. Virtuozzo Application Platform
Find out what your peers are saying about Pivotal Cloud Foundry vs. Virtuozzo Application Platform and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Pivotal Cloud Foundry vs. Virtuozzo Application Platform report.
See our list of best PaaS Clouds vendors.

We monitor all PaaS Clouds reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.