No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Ping Identity Platform vs SAP Master Data Governance comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Apr 15, 2026

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
3.6
Ping Identity Platform simplifies identity management, lowers IT overhead, enhances security, improves efficiency, boosts satisfaction, and offers scalability.
Sentiment score
5.4
SAP Master Data Governance boosts ROI by reducing data duplications, enhancing service, and achieving $75,000 annual returns.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
6.1
Ping Identity Platform's support is praised for rapid P1 responses but critiqued for slow non-critical responses and portal confusion.
Sentiment score
6.0
SAP Master Data Governance's customer service is helpful but slow and non-specific, with satisfaction varying among users.
I have reached out to technical support for troubleshooting SAML certificate mismatches and federated errors between Ping and enterprise apps.
Senior ServiceNow Developer at Wells Fargo
The problem with the support team is that I do not like support; the day of the threat image, they never come on the call and unless it is a priority, they never come to call to defend it and to provide any kind of solutions.
Iam Consultant at itcinfotech
I would rate the technical support for Ping Identity Platform seven out of ten because of their limited support and late availability.
Senior Analyst at Toll Holdings Limited
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.3
Ping Identity Platform excels in scalability, efficiently managing large user bases and high traffic with minimal disruptions.
Sentiment score
7.1
SAP Master Data Governance scales well for various organizations, though mid-sized businesses face configuration and cost challenges.
Regarding scalability when a company is growing, you can scale SAP Master Data Governance.
Governance / Data Governance Initiative Advisory And Strategy Leadership at a consultancy with 1-10 employees
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
7.9
Ping Identity Platform is reliable with minimal downtime; users value its stability despite occasional integration and security update challenges.
Sentiment score
7.7
SAP Master Data Governance is stable, scoring 8-9/10, with manageable challenges improving since launch, aligning with SAP standards.
Ping Identity Platform demonstrates strong stability, as it is not prone to bugs.
Founder at APSSIAM
Overall, I see PingFederate as a stable product.
Iam Consultant at itcinfotech
In terms of stability for Ping Identity Platform, we haven't faced any issues till now.
Senior Analyst at Toll Holdings Limited
It has been sold to hundreds of thousands of clients worldwide since its launch in 2006 or 2007.
Governance / Data Governance Initiative Advisory And Strategy Leadership at a consultancy with 1-10 employees
 

Room For Improvement

Ping Identity Platform struggles with complexity, costs, limited legacy integration, and requires UI, troubleshooting, and integration improvements.
SAP Master Data Governance needs improved usability, data integration, AI enhancements, and support for seamless cross-platform collaboration.
The most significant area I would recommend is that things such as redirects still do not have majority of the application direct integration, such as Oracle ERP.
Iam Consultant at itcinfotech
Ping Identity Platform has multiple products for access management, identity management, a solution for API security, a solution for authorization, and a product for identity verification.
VP Engineering at Inspirit Vision
In Ping Identity Platform, it requires checking Active Directory for user issues, which can pose challenges, especially since SSO teams often do not have complete access to user data.
Founder at APSSIAM
It is not a one-time deployment; it requires ongoing investment in user and product knowledge, and you need to weigh the pros and cons of any IT solution.
Governance / Data Governance Initiative Advisory And Strategy Leadership at a consultancy with 1-10 employees
After a final approval at all levels, the vendor number is generated, and the vendor code gets passed from source to target system.
Lead at LTI - Larsen & Toubro Infotech
 

Setup Cost

Ping Identity Platform offers cost-effective pricing appealing to large enterprises, with pricing starting at $20,000 annually.
SAP Master Data Governance is often seen as costly, but justified by its value; cloud solutions offer cost-efficiency.
Regarding pricing for Ping Identity Platform, I would rate it eight out of ten.
Senior Analyst at Toll Holdings Limited
 

Valuable Features

Ping Identity Platform offers robust features like MFA, RBAC, and API security, boasting ease of use and extensive integration.
SAP Master Data Governance offers user-friendly features and robust integration for efficient data management, consolidation, and governance.
The platform enhances security measures by analyzing multi-factor authentication attempts, highlighting suspicious patterns, and generating compliance reports.
Senior ServiceNow Developer at Wells Fargo
Ping Identity Platform can be accessed both on-premises and in the cloud, allowing for high flexibility in creating user flows and policies tailored to client requirements.
Founder at APSSIAM
If I am comparing it with another competitor, such as Excel or Microsoft, it provides a similar kind of feature in terms of single sign-on.
Iam Consultant at itcinfotech
It is important that when you begin this journey of deploying the product, that you do not approach it from a technical standpoint but involve business design from the very beginning.
Governance / Data Governance Initiative Advisory And Strategy Leadership at a consultancy with 1-10 employees
 

Categories and Ranking

Ping Identity Platform
Ranking in Data Governance
17th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.6
Number of Reviews
32
Ranking in other categories
Single Sign-On (SSO) (6th), Authentication Systems (9th), Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) (9th), Access Management (6th), Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) (3rd), Directory Servers (1st)
SAP Master Data Governance
Ranking in Data Governance
19th
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.6
Number of Reviews
32
Ranking in other categories
Master Data Management (MDM) Software (2nd)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Data Governance category, the mindshare of Ping Identity Platform is 0.9%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SAP Master Data Governance is 1.7%, up from 1.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Data Governance Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Ping Identity Platform0.9%
SAP Master Data Governance1.7%
Other97.4%
Data Governance
 

Featured Reviews

AmitRathod - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Analyst at Toll Holdings Limited
Single sign-on has simplified access while adaptive authentication protects complex user journeys
Regarding areas for improvement in Ping Identity Platform, there is not much. In terms of licensing and implementation costs, it has premium pricing, and it has a very complex implementation. It provides greater feasibility, but it takes a very long time in terms of complete building. There is a very limited number of legacy support, which can pose potential difficulties in integrating with certain older or legacy systems. Additionally, issue troubleshooting can be difficult at times. Sometimes issues can be difficult to diagnose and require extensive technical expertise. There is also a very steep learning curve for administrative purposes and potential difficulties with offline authentication scenarios.
reviewer2402049 - PeerSpot reviewer
Governance / Data Governance Initiative Advisory And Strategy Leadership at a consultancy with 1-10 employees
Centralized master data has improved quality and now supports consistent global governance
Regarding what SAP can do better in SAP Master Data Governance, they have an entire roadmap of constant improvements since they deployed the product, always adding new business functionality and add-ons. Each company may have different feedback, wishing for certain features. The essence of SAP Master Data Governance is to provide structure, and from my standpoint, it offers a pretty good structure. There will always be areas for improvement; for example, when I deployed it a few years ago, their approach to internal orders for finance was still new, and they were figuring out how it would work based on organizational requirements. The financial data objects are straightforward, but financial statements are a bit more challenging. It is not a one-time deployment; it requires ongoing investment in user and product knowledge, and you need to weigh the pros and cons of any IT solution. I often advise clients to walk before they run because establishing hierarchies requires having a designed structure before implementation, though you can add that later. For additional functions in SAP Master Data Governance, it is interesting because on my project, we are already using AI technology for data cleansing before records are entered into SAP Master Data Governance. It would be beneficial to have the Dun & Bradstreet add-on within SAP Master Data Governance. However, one must remember that for AI to work effectively, it requires good data. Without that, AI does not make a difference. SAP Master Data Governance will always require a human perspective, especially to identify duplicate records. While SAP Master Data Governance provides technical capabilities for identifying potential duplicates based on searches, it requires human oversight due to the complexity of analyzing data fields. I believe integrating AI into the product could work, particularly after a solid data migration, which ensures that the records are reliable before utilizing AI for analytics.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Governance solutions are best for your needs.
909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
19%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Computer Software Company
7%
Construction Company
6%
Manufacturing Company
12%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Outsourcing Company
7%
Computer Software Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business12
Midsize Enterprise2
Large Enterprise22
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business4
Midsize Enterprise5
Large Enterprise24
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for PingFederate?
Regarding pricing for Ping Identity Platform, I would rate it eight out of ten.
What needs improvement with PingAccess?
The areas where I think PingFederate needs room for improvement include that the most significant area I would recommend is that things such as redirects still do not have majority of the applicati...
What is your primary use case for PingAccess?
The main use case for PingFederate is that we are maintaining the centralized single sign-on with DuroSengel and Carabras as the two main instances to review. If any application is hosted outside o...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SAP Master Data Governance?
The challenge with SAP MDG is not only the cost but the resources. The skills required are niche in the market, and while you can purchase the product either one time or on a subscription basis, th...
What needs improvement with SAP Master Data Governance?
Regarding what SAP can do better in SAP Master Data Governance, they have an entire roadmap of constant improvements since they deployed the product, always adding new business functionality and ad...
What is your primary use case for SAP Master Data Governance?
I am currently working with data governance and then advisory and expert for SAP Master Data Governance.
 

Also Known As

Ping Identity (ID), PingFederate, PingAccess, PingOne, PingDataGovernance, PingDirectory, OpenDJ
SAP MDG, SAP Data Governance
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Equinix, Land O'Lakes, CDPHP, Box, International SOS, Opower, VSP, Chevron, Truist, Academy of Art University, Northern Air Cargo, Repsol
Convergent IS, CHIO Aachen, Dell, Hamburg Port Authority (HPA), City of Boston, Mozzart, Mitsui Knowledge Industry (MKI), AOK Bundesverband, eBay
Find out what your peers are saying about Ping Identity Platform vs. SAP Master Data Governance and other solutions. Updated: August 2026.
909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.