The licensing cost is reasonable. However, our company is trending toward moving to the cloud and away from on-premises solutions such as this one because of the cost involved with server usage.
The pricing and licensing costs are reasonable because people often opt for this specific product since they understand its importance. Hence, the price is not a huge deciding factor when choosing the product.
In my role as a solutions architect, I don't get involved in the procurement side. Different clients have different commercial models for buying the license and I'm not privy to that information.
We have an enterprise license. The whole SAP landscape pricing model is based on the number of users, and the number of transactions. The price could be better, there is always room for improvement in the price.
SAP MDG Consultant at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
Consultant
2021-02-04T07:30:38Z
Feb 4, 2021
SAP tends to sell the customer the license, however, they make money on the amount of data. The problem is in Turkey, there are economic issues that affect SAP's sector in Turkey. For example, five years ago, one euro was three Turkish lira, now it's nine Turkish lira, so SAP, now costs triple the amount, actually. SAP is aware of this, and they do try to offer discounts, however, I don't know how much as I'm not in the sales meetings. It's not an aspect of the business I worry about.
The cloud solution is subscription-based, it is paid monthly or quarterly. If the solution is on-premises, it is a one-time fee. As far as I am aware, there are no additional costs.
Your company wants accurate, complete, and trusted supplier data to master your digital business processes and business models. The SAP® Master Data Governance application simplifies the integration of supplier data residing in both SAP and third-party sources. It supports cleansing, standardization, duplicate detection, and best-record calculation. It then lets you synchronize clean and standardized data across cloud and on-premise applications.
SAP Master Data Governance is an expensive product.
I rate the tool's pricing a seven out of ten.
The product is too expensive.
The solution is costly. Our customers buy perpetual and annual licenses for it.
We have purchased the yearly license of the solution. I rate the solution's pricing as an eight.
The licensing cost is reasonable. However, our company is trending toward moving to the cloud and away from on-premises solutions such as this one because of the cost involved with server usage.
The pricing and licensing costs are reasonable because people often opt for this specific product since they understand its importance. Hence, the price is not a huge deciding factor when choosing the product.
In terms of the license, I believe this product is at the higher end of the market but I'm unaware of licensing costs.
In my role as a solutions architect, I don't get involved in the procurement side. Different clients have different commercial models for buying the license and I'm not privy to that information.
We have an enterprise license. The whole SAP landscape pricing model is based on the number of users, and the number of transactions. The price could be better, there is always room for improvement in the price.
Licensing costs are a little on the high side.
SAP tends to sell the customer the license, however, they make money on the amount of data. The problem is in Turkey, there are economic issues that affect SAP's sector in Turkey. For example, five years ago, one euro was three Turkish lira, now it's nine Turkish lira, so SAP, now costs triple the amount, actually. SAP is aware of this, and they do try to offer discounts, however, I don't know how much as I'm not in the sales meetings. It's not an aspect of the business I worry about.
The cloud solution is subscription-based, it is paid monthly or quarterly. If the solution is on-premises, it is a one-time fee. As far as I am aware, there are no additional costs.
I don't have any details in regards to the licensing costs related to the solution. IT tends to take care of licensing and procurement.
The cost of the product is not ideal. It will be matched centrally by the global act for us. We have some help with the cost.