Microsoft MDS vs SAP Master Data Governance comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Microsoft Logo
2,016 views|990 comparisons
89% willing to recommend
SAP Logo
2,377 views|1,494 comparisons
91% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Microsoft MDS and SAP Master Data Governance based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Master Data Management (MDM) Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Microsoft MDS vs. SAP Master Data Governance Report (Updated: March 2024).
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The tool is easy to use.""One of the main features I have found useful is the integration with Azure active directory.""The backup and restore functionality are the solution's most valuable aspects.""It's very easy to use.""The best thing about it is that it comes with the Microsoft package.""The ease of use is valuable.""The solution is easy to install.""The most valuable feature of Microsoft MDS is its management."

More Microsoft MDS Pros →

"The scalability is very good.""I am satisfied with the solution's customer service.""A good solution for large enterprises.""It is a stable solution...The initial setup of SAP Master Data Governance is very easy.""The data capturing and data governance features are valuable.""Useful for building master data.""We've found the solution to be quite flexible.""SAP Master Data Governance is a customizable solution and is flexible."

More SAP Master Data Governance Pros →

Cons
"The Microsoft license cost could be lower.""From my understanding, MS, as of 2021, will not maintain the product going forward.""Most of the Microsoft partners, especially digitally, are separate. Personnel are business people, and they do not have technical expertise, so you end up as a company spending a lot of money training your staff and your engineers.""Microsoft MDS isn't getting strong support because Microsoft is focusing more on cloud solutions.""The solution could be better integrated into Microsoft's other products.""Stability can be fragile at times. If you are not attentive or make a mistake, it can cause problems.""Microsoft MDS' language should be simple so everyone can use it easily.""JMD repositories have records that come in thousands and millions, which takes a long time to process."

More Microsoft MDS Cons →

"It does not ensure data matches after system upgrades.""The product is not user-friendly.""The UI could improve by being more neat and clean. Sometimes users find it difficult to use it.""Overall, they just a little bit more flexibility in terms of assigning roles or adding new roles. We have a longer approval process, so we need to break it down into more roles than what is typically available and we need to hard-code it.""They should improve the solution's performance as sometimes the process consumes much time.""The multidomain MDM feature is based on EIP systems, which may not be a good model for all master data.""The documentation provided for the MDG extensions by Utopia could be improved.""The solution lacks some flexibility."

More SAP Master Data Governance Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The pricing of this solution is good."
  • "With Microsoft, we buy everything though an agreement, so we purchase volume licensing every year."
  • "I would like to see better pricing."
  • "MDS is a part of the SQL Server enterprise license. I am not aware of any additional costs."
  • "SAP is more expensive than Microsoft."
  • "The solution does require a license and we have enterprise licenses."
  • "Microsoft MDS is an expensive solution."
  • More Microsoft MDS Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "The cost of the product is not ideal."
  • "The cloud solution is subscription-based, it is paid monthly or quarterly. If the solution is on-premises, it is a one-time fee. As far as I am aware there are no additional costs."
  • "We have an enterprise license. The whole SAP landscape pricing model is based on the number of users, and the number of transactions. The price could be better, there is always room for improvement in the price."
  • "The licensing cost is reasonable."
  • "The solution is costly."
  • "The product is too expensive."
  • "I rate the tool's pricing a seven out of ten."
  • "SAP Master Data Governance is an expensive product."
  • More SAP Master Data Governance Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Master Data Management (MDM) Software solutions are best for your needs.
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:Unlike specialized tools, MDS is adaptable for various industries, making it a versatile choice for master data management.
    Top Answer:Microsoft MDS is cost-effective because it comes with SQL Server Enterprise Edition at no extra software cost. The main expenses are for deployment, but it saves money by reducing the need for custom… more »
    Top Answer:Microsoft MDS isn't getting strong support because Microsoft is focusing more on cloud solutions. Profisee initially made MDS, which Microsoft bought. Profisee now handles the cloud version. There are… more »
    Top Answer:The product is easy to use and is beneficial from a data governance perspective.
    Ranking
    Views
    2,016
    Comparisons
    990
    Reviews
    7
    Average Words per Review
    391
    Rating
    8.0
    Views
    2,377
    Comparisons
    1,494
    Reviews
    10
    Average Words per Review
    347
    Rating
    7.7
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Microsoft Master Data Services, Microsoft MDM, Microsoft SQL Server Master Data Services, MS MDS
    SAP MDG
    Learn More
    Overview

    Microsoft Master Data Services (MDS) is an SQL server solution for master data. MDS enables users to organize and manage a business's master set of data into models while also creating rules for updating the data and control over who can edit it. In addition, the master dataset can be shared with other people in your organization through Excel.

    In Master Data Services, you create a model, which is the highest level container in the structure of your master data. This model can then be used to group similar data. Within the model, there can be one or more entities that are similar to a table. Those entities contain members that are the data records. For example, your model can include commodities such as style, color, and product if you manage online product data. The color entity may contain members for various colors. Models may also have attributes that contain values that describe entity members and can be defined within the entities.

    There are also attributes that contain values that help describe entities within entity members. There are two different types of attributes:

    • Free-form attributes - include numbers, dates, text, or files.
    • Domain-based attributes - includes values that can be used as attribute values for other entities.

    Features of Microsoft MDS

    Microsoft MDS offers a variety of features that provide a central management of master data, while accommodating access to editors and other consumers of the information. These features include:

    • Data Validation: With a proactive monitoring process in Business Rules, users can ensure data validity before the lists are used.

    • Domain Agnostic: Any data type or data schema can be supported by the MDS system.

    • Security: Without risking unauthorized changes, IT teams are empowered to control access at the attribute, entity, and record levels.

    • Web-based UI: There is no need to install software, as the web-based user interface gives access to a vast user base.

    • Versioning: Each model in MDS can be versioned, allowing for users to tab particular versions for subscribing systems.

    • Hierarchy Management: MDS offers functional and versatile management of business hierarchies with various hierarchy types and specialized controls.

    • Transaction Logging: MDS offers a transaction log to keep track of changes, as well as the ability to explain why changes were made.

    Reviews from Real Users

    For those managing large quantities of master data, Microsoft MDS is a solution of choice for a number of reasons. Two of those are its ability to empower everyone to interact with the BI system as well as its integration with Azure active directory.

    Satyam S., a senior software developer at a manufacturing company, notes, "Enables non-technical people to directly interact with the BI system."

    An individual contributor at a pharma/biotech company writes, "One of the main features I have found useful is the integration with Azure active directory."

    Your company wants accurate, complete, and trusted supplier data to master your digital business processes and business models. The SAP® Master Data Governance application simplifies the integration of supplier data residing in both SAP and third-party sources. It supports cleansing, standardization, duplicate detection, and best-record calculation. It then lets you synchronize clean and standardized data across cloud and on-premise applications.

    Sample Customers
    ETA a.s., Apeejay Surrendra Group, Blue Star Infotech, Rotherham Doncaster and South Humber NHS Foundation, The Sydney Children's Hospitals Network, New Belgium Brewing
    Convergent IS, CHIO Aachen, Dell, Hamburg Port Authority (HPA), City of Boston, Mozzart, Mitsui Knowledge Industry (MKI), AOK Bundesverband, eBay
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Non Profit17%
    Manufacturing Company17%
    Retailer8%
    Financial Services Firm8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company15%
    Financial Services Firm10%
    Manufacturing Company9%
    Government7%
    REVIEWERS
    Wholesaler/Distributor25%
    Manufacturing Company13%
    Comms Service Provider13%
    Non Tech Company13%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Manufacturing Company15%
    Computer Software Company12%
    Financial Services Firm9%
    Energy/Utilities Company8%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business40%
    Midsize Enterprise10%
    Large Enterprise50%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business16%
    Midsize Enterprise15%
    Large Enterprise69%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business14%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise73%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business14%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise74%
    Buyer's Guide
    Microsoft MDS vs. SAP Master Data Governance
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft MDS vs. SAP Master Data Governance and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Microsoft MDS is ranked 2nd in Master Data Management (MDM) Software with 18 reviews while SAP Master Data Governance is ranked 1st in Master Data Management (MDM) Software with 22 reviews. Microsoft MDS is rated 7.6, while SAP Master Data Governance is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Microsoft MDS writes "Useful Excel plug-in, good scalability, and good integration with SQL Server and other Microsoft products". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP Master Data Governance writes "Provides efficient technical support services, but it could be more affordable ". Microsoft MDS is most compared with Informatica MDM, Profisee, TIBCO EBX, Reltio Cloud and Semarchy xDM, whereas SAP Master Data Governance is most compared with Informatica MDM, TIBCO EBX, Reltio Cloud, IBM InfoSphere MDM and Semarchy xDM. See our Microsoft MDS vs. SAP Master Data Governance report.

    See our list of best Master Data Management (MDM) Software vendors.

    We monitor all Master Data Management (MDM) Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.