Pillir vs Tray.io comparison

Pillir and Tray.io are both solutions in the Low-Code Development Platforms category. Pillir is ranked #33, while Tray.io is ranked #74. Pillir holds a 1.1% mindshare in LCDP, compared to Tray.io’s 0.3% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Pillir users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Tray.io users who would recommend it.

Pillir

Read 2 Pillir reviews

551 Views
452 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Tray.io

Read 3 Tray.io reviews

826 Views
124 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Pillir

Tray.io

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Pillir and Tray.io based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, OutSystems, Mendix and others in Low-Code Development Platforms.

To learn more, read our detailed Low-Code Development Platforms Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Low-Code Development Platforms

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 885,311 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Pillir

Ranking in Low-Code Development Platforms

33rd

Average Rating

10.0

Reviews Sentiment

8.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Rapid Application Development Software (39th)

Tray.io

Ranking in Low-Code Development Platforms

74th

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

5.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Process Automation (55th), Cloud Data Integration (30th), Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) (24th)

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Low-Code Development Platforms category, the mindshare of Pillir is 1.1%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Tray.io is 0.3%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Low-Code Development Platforms Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Pillir	1.1%
Tray.io	0.3%
Other	98.6%

Low-Code Development Platforms

Featured Reviews

principl247992

Senior SAP Systems Architect at a tech company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Intuitive and easy to use with almost no coding

The ability to analyze the business logic built over the years in ABAP and then convert it was pretty amazing. This is the first time I saw a solution that offers something like that. While obviously, it can't convert 100% of the logic (we had over 30,000 lines of code in this process alone), it did pretty well. Afterward, my team had to go in and complete the rest - using drag and drop - almost with no use of code. I love how they took the MIT Scratch concept and implemented it into the in-app backend. It makes the app creation so much more intuitive and easy to use.

Read full review

Samuele Sois

Principal AI and Data Science Engineer at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees

Marketing A/B tests have gained deeper insights from user behavior and unified global reporting

The best features Tray.io offers include excellent visualization capabilities and a dashboard, which stand out to me the most. I appreciate that it is very easy to convert the data we receive from Tray.io into dashboards from Power BI, which is extremely useful. I would also appreciate if in the future Tray.io provides a way to natively convert the data to Tableau. Tray.io has positively impacted my organization as it provides a trusted way to organize data results and share them throughout the company at once. As a multinational and very large company, it is definitely beneficial that those of us in the UK can use the same format that colleagues use in India, and the entire data architecture is framed within a trusted system from an established organization. As far as I know, Tray.io has been operating for the last 12 years, making it a very reliable system.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The ability to take ABAP code and automatically convert it to a mobile app and then adjust it to our needs is something that I haven't seen in any other low-code solution on the market, and it has been life-changing for us."

"I believe that this is the only product in the market that truly supports offline capabilities in an SAP environment."

"Since you only pay for active users, and since it gives you an immediate improvement in efficiencies, the ROI is very quick."

"I love how they took the MIT Scratch concept and implemented it into the in-app backend. It makes the app creation so much more intuitive and easy to use."

"Tray.io has positively impacted my organization by reducing the amount of redundant tasks that our team performs by approximately 80%, and the numbers are quite significant with the workflows alone, as we are working towards creating and utilizing AI within these workflows as well."

"Tray.io has positively impacted my organization as it provides a trusted way to organize data results and share them throughout the company at once."

"Tray.io has positively impacted my organization by helping us keep our internal database and this third-party service in sync, and it has really helped us automate a lot of that work because it is fairly straightforward to maintain and develop."

Cons

"While we're not in a place of letting LOB analysts build apps, at some point, we may want to give them a bit more freedom - as long as we can limit their ability to harm the ERP data."

"The modernizer element should convert a higher percentage of the ABAP code, moving it from approximately 75%, closer to 100%."

"While we're not in a place of letting LOB analysts build apps, at some point, we may want to give them a bit more freedom - as long as we can limit their ability to harm the ERP data. I would like to see more tools pertaining to this area."

"As our product got more complex, we needed to add more and more complexity to Tray.io in terms of our setup, and that is when the benefits of it being no-code or low-code started to pale in comparison to the cost of making everything slightly more complicated."

"One way Tray.io could be improved, especially for people coming in with no real coding experience, is with more comprehensive error messages."

"I have found that the error management in my main use case with Tray.io is not as effective as we would prefer."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is straightforward consumption based on the number of end-users."

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Low-Code Development Platforms solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

885,311 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Computer Software Company

13%

Construction Company

12%

Outsourcing Company

10%

Wholesaler/Distributor

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What needs improvement with Tray.io?

It was not always easy to test our changes in Tray.io. In a software engineering context, you might imagine there being different branches and different environments to make changes where you can m...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Tray.io?

We run automation workflows with Tray.io to take data from our internal databases and update a third-party software that we use. Specifically, my company offers digital trade credit, and we use tha...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Tray.io?

I think in general it has been a positive experience with Tray.io, and while there are areas where it can be improved, overall it is a good product. I rate Tray.io a seven out of ten.

See all answers

Comparisons

Mendix vs Pillir

Compared 11% of the time

Adobe ColdFusion vs Pillir

Compared 10% of the time

Microsoft Power Apps vs Pillir

Compared 10% of the time

Salesforce Platform vs Pillir

Compared 8% of the time

Bizagi vs Pillir

Compared 7% of the time

More Pillir Competitors

Zapier vs Tray.io

Compared 19% of the time

Workato vs Tray.io

Compared 12% of the time

SnapLogic vs Tray.io

Compared 11% of the time

Celigo Integration Platform vs Tray.io

Compared 11% of the time

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs Tray.io

Compared 10% of the time

More Tray.io Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Rapid Application Development Software

March 2026

Download Pillir product report

Buyer's Guide

Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)

March 2026

Download Tray.io product report

Also Known As

appsFreedom

No data available

Overview

Pillir is the developer of a low-code/no-code, cloud-native platform that enables organizations to develop mission-critical apps 20 times faster than traditional methods, leveraging the power of SAP’s digital core from any device, with or without connectivity. Pillir’s platform automatically converts legacy custom business processes to modern cloud-native applications, available on the web and via any mobile device. It enables organizations at any stage of their SAP journey to accelerate their digital transformation, enabling innovation at the edge while maintaining a clean SAP digital core.

Pillir

The Tray Platform is the leading General Automation Platform, whose modern, serverless architecture empowers users to take full control of their data by automating mission-critical processes and integrating their entire tech stack.

Tray.io

Sample Customers

Dole packaed food, Par Pacific, Brown Forman (Jack Daniels and other brands), Mobile Mini, Nabors

Copper, DigitalOcean, Udemy, AdRoll, FICO, Outreach

Buyer's Guide

Low-Code Development Platforms

March 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, OutSystems, Mendix and others in Low-Code Development Platforms. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

885,311 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Low-Code Development Platforms vendors.

We monitor all Low-Code Development Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.