pfSense vs Sophos XG
We performed a comparison between pfSense vs Sophos XG based on our users’ reviews in five categories. After reading all of the collected data, you can find our conclusion below.
"I have found the firewall portion for the blocking most valuable."
"Is good at blocking IP addresses."
"pfSense is easy to use, has user-friendly dashboards, and useful blocking features."
"The initial setup was simple and fast."
"It is a very good solution for enterprises that need a VPN for their employees. It is the best way to provide a remote work facility to employees at a very low cost. Other solutions that I have had in the past were very expensive. Enterprises don't always have that kind of money to invest."
"I'm the expert when it comes to Linux systems, however, with the pfSense, due to the web interface, the rest of the staff can actually make changes to it as required without me worrying about whether they've opened up ports incorrectly or not. The ease of use for non-expert staff is very good."
"The solution is very easy to use and has a very nice GUI."
"A valuable feature is that the solution is open source."
"The valuable features of this solution are the VPN, load balancer, and the QoS for splitting the ISP band."
"We can configure rules with the user, traffic, etc., making it a very versatile solution for our network."
"The solution is scalable."
"I like their firewall and the intrusion detection feature"
"Sophos XG protects our network from advanced threats."
"The most valuable features of Sophos XG are user-friendliness and it is highly secure."
"Reporting is the most valuable feature."
"SD-WAN features should be added."
"The stability could be improved."
"Ease of use is a problem for a user who is unfamiliar with this product because, in the interface, everything has to be set manually."
"I expect a better interface with more log analysis because I create my own interface."
"The integration of pfSense with EPS and EDS could be better. Also, it should be easier to get reports on how many users are connecting simultaneously and how sections connect in real-time."
"Also, the GUI is helpful, but it's not user-friendly. It's complicated. It should be more intuitive for the average user and have an excellent graphical view. Of course, the user will typically know about network administration, but it still should be easy to understand."
"The user interface can be improved to make it easier to add more features. And pfSense could be better integrated with other solutions, like antivirus."
"We are at the moment looking to use it as a proxy service so that we can limit what websites people go and view and that sort of thing. That's an area I've struggled with a little bit at the moment and it could be a bit easier to set up."
"More documentation would be great, especially on new features because sometimes, when new features come out, you don't get to understand them right off the bat. You have to really spend a lot of time understanding them. So, more documentation would be awesome."
"I would prefer if Sophos XG were cheaper. A lower price would benefit me as a system provider for the end customer. The cost of the license and renewal for all the software and devices is somewhat high."
"Support for this product is something that is really important, and it needs to improve."
"The manuals or guides we are given are too simple. When we are implementing the product, it is difficult for us as we don't have more detailed information."
"The response time could stand improvement."
"I'm just a sole proprietor for IT support, and from my perspective, there could be better ways to educate a proprietor, such as myself, on how to set it up, and program it, and manage it. They do tend to have support, but a lot of times, it is for larger networks. I need something that is simpler and more rudimentary as to how to go about setting up and configuring the firewall, setting up the rules, and that type of thing. So, if there is a missing component there, that would be it."
"While it is possible to configure between two of the solution's devices in the same model, the high available usually fails."
"Technical support is difficult to access."
"All of the options should be available when I renew my subscription for the year. As it is now, there are some limitations."
pfSense is ranked 3rd in Firewalls with 39 reviews while Sophos XG is ranked 7th in Firewalls with 93 reviews. pfSense is rated 8.4, while Sophos XG is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of pfSense writes "Feature-rich, well documented, and there is good support available online". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Sophos XG writes "Secure, duel switch capabilities, and good support". pfSense is most compared with OPNsense, Fortinet FortiGate, Untangle NG Firewall, Cisco Secure Firewall and Sophos UTM, whereas Sophos XG is most compared with Fortinet FortiGate, OPNsense, Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls, Cisco Secure Firewall and WatchGuard Firebox. See our Sophos XG vs. pfSense report.
See our list of best Firewalls vendors.
We monitor all Firewalls reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.