Tricentis Tosca vs pCloudy comparison

pCloudy and Tricentis are both solutions in the Mobile App Testing Tools category. pCloudy is ranked #14, while Tricentis is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.1. pCloudy holds a 2.0% mindshare in MTT, compared to Tricentis’s 22.5% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of pCloudy users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 96% of Tricentis users who would recommend it.

pCloudy

Read 2 pCloudy reviews

445 Views
445 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Tricentis Tosca

Read 114 Tricentis Tosca reviews

22,489 Views
5,172 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

pCloudy

Tricentis Tosca

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 22, 2026

Tricentis Tosca and pCloudy compete in the software testing industry. Tosca appears to have the upper hand due to its comprehensive testing suite, while pCloudy is noted for its mobile-focused capabilities.

Features: Tricentis Tosca offers extensive test automation tools, model-based testing, and comprehensive test case management. Tosca covers a wide range of applications and platforms. pCloudy specializes in mobile application testing, providing cloud-based real device testing, continuous integration, and is suitable for mobile-focused deployments.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: pCloudy features a straightforward deployment process with strong mobile testing support and excellent customer assistance. Tricentis Tosca, though more complex due to its broad capabilities, provides substantial support resources and may require more setup initially.

Pricing and ROI: Tricentis Tosca involves higher setup costs for its advanced features, potentially offering significant ROI for extensive testing needs. pCloudy, with competitive pricing, delivers good ROI, especially for mobile testing projects.

To learn more, read our detailed Tricentis Tosca vs. pCloudy Report (Updated: August 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Tricentis Tosca vs. pCloudy

August 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 909,725 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

pCloudy

Ranking in Mobile App Testing Tools

14th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

8.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Tricentis Tosca

Ranking in Mobile App Testing Tools

1st

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

114

Ranking in other categories

Service Virtualization (1st), Functional Testing Tools (1st), Regression Testing Tools (1st), API Testing Tools (2nd), Test Automation Tools (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Mobile App Testing Tools category, the mindshare of pCloudy is 2.0%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Tricentis Tosca is 22.5%, down from 33.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Mobile App Testing Tools Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Tricentis Tosca	22.5%
pCloudy	2.0%
Other	75.5%

Mobile App Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

Rabindra Maharana

Business Consultant at Tech Mahindra Limited

Helps applications to be compatible with other devices

The tool has connectivity issues. I had raised the issue with the support team who had asked me to check my internet connection and refresh the browser. I want that communication to be present at a UI level. I want a pop-up that asks users to refresh the page or check their internet connection. The product's reports also need to be optimized and refined to be presented in a better way. The tool needs to add a search option that will help users filter and extract the information that they need.

Read full review

AKSHAYRATHI

Senior engineer at Nagarro

End-to-end regression automation has accelerated delivery and now secures complex test data

I think Tosca can be improved, particularly in AI capabilities because right now Tosca does not have any strong API capabilities. It has some AI features in the newer version, but many organizations have not adopted these due to version-specific problems, as some are still using older versions. From an AI point of view, they can enhance reliability since the world is moving towards AI, and every tool must be integrated. While Tosca has made attempts, I have not used them and they are not widely adopted, so they are stuck in the testing phase in my organization. I would also mention that while I am currently using Tosca Mobile, the loading part and connectivity issues need improvement. They should better integrate AI features that are already present but not widely used across many organizations. Reliability on the AI aspect needs enhancement for practical application. From the perspective of governance and security, I believe Tosca can develop its own LLM or leverage third-party LLMs while maintaining security and risk management regarding client data. Many companies prefer using Tosca due to data security, which is crucial. An in-house LLM could significantly enhance its debugging power and provide helpful solutions upon test case failure.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The product is very good on the UI level."

"The product is also very good on the UI level where they can see the logs and discover any problem at the app level, so that the development team can fix that."

"The product is user-friendly. We can see the logs when we find the bugs."

"The low code is the best feature, and clients like it."

"I rate the overall solution a ten out of ten as I am satisfied with it."

"Every second week we release a candidate, and from two weeks of hard manual testing, we are testing now only a few days (four to five), the new fixed tickets and running in parallel the regression."

"The initial setup was straightforward."

"This solution allows you to create an entire automated framework where it allows you to easily manage everything in one place."

"The feature that I have found the most valuable is the recovery and cleanup process. Suppose there is a list of test cases and one test case has failed, it should not impact the other test cases. We can reuse the same test case. We can change the configuration of parameters and then use the test cases on the same thing. So, that's a useful thing. Otherwise, we have to use the cleanup process. Another useful feature is to have our own library files. We can create our objects in the libraries and reuse them. There is no need to create duplicate data for that. They have been giving some enhancements recently which means integration is also there. They've integrated with different software like Jenkins, Bamboo. So, we can also create pipeline points. They have recently given SAP and everything, which is very useful."

"We have to automate thousands of test cases and complete end-to-end SAP on business processes. To manually execute these tasks, it would take us at least two months. By automating these tasks using Tosca, now it takes five to 10 days maximum. Tricentis Tosca is a codeless or scriptless automation tool."

"It offers many features, such as risk-based testing and scenario creation using Kafka."

More Tricentis Tosca pros

Cons

"The tool has connectivity issues. I had raised the issue with the support team who had asked me to check my internet connection and refresh the browser. I want that communication to be present at a UI level. I want a pop-up that asks users to refresh the page or check their internet connection. The product's reports also need to be optimized and refined to be presented in a better way. The tool needs to add a search option that will help users filter and extract the information that they need."

"The connectivity is always a challenge for us."

"The connectivity is always a challenge. We have to maintain a certain bandwidth at our end to connect the tool and that can be a problem."

"Run time test execution status: They have improved on this a bit by introducing a progress bar. However, it can be further improved."

"I would like to be able to manage different projects in one repository or have better data exchange between repositories."

"I would like to see the availability of more libraries"

"Sometimes new features do not work as shown on slides, in the first release."

"Tricentis Tosca could improve on the ease of use. There is a steep learning curve. The reporting section could be better and some of the new features could be simplified. Additionally, the user management of the client and the server are confusing. There should not be two."

"There have been some setbacks because of upgrades."

"Scaling can be tedious."

"The source controls that are in Tricentis Tosca have some problems. For example, if you use Selenium or use Java-based application, it's easy to match code from two developers. However, if you're a developer and going to look at Tricentis Tosca, it's very difficult to use the source control measure."

More Tricentis Tosca cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I would rate the tool's pricing a six-point five out of ten. It is neither too low nor high. The product has different packages like gold, silver, and platinum. The number of users is determined on the basis of the package. My company has subscribed for the product's annual plan."

"Licensing fees are paid on a yearly basis."

"We have around 200 [concurrent] licenses and the cost around $1.4 million a year."

"There are two licenses: single user and multiple user. A multiple-user license means that several people can work together on one project and collaborate on code stored in a central location. A single-user license is for people working alone on a one particular application. It's much cheaper than a multi-user workspace. If you are getting a large volume of licenses for an enterprise, you can probably negotiate a discount, but I'm not sure about that."

"The pricing of the solution comes as part of our Tosca bundle."

"Although the product is slightly more expensive than tools, its automation capabilities and reduced scripting needs justify the cost."

"Tosca is expensive. I don't see small and medium customers going for it. It's always large enterprises that have a big pocket. It is very expensive as compared to the other tools that we have in the market. They should reduce the price by half, and if they do that, they would do better business. From the competition perspective, other solutions are at a pretty similar level. UiPath is also very expensive. One thing that I always wanted was a short-term consumption license. With Tricentis, the biggest challenge is that you have to go for a minimum of one year license, and they also try to sell you a three-year license. It would be good if people can get a three-month or four-month consumption license."

"They are probably more expensive than other comparable tools, but you also get the full suite of testing tools."

"Tricentis Tosca may be relatively on the higher side in terms of pricing, but their sales rep can give pretty decent deals when asked."

More Tricentis Tosca pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Mobile App Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Manufacturing Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Computer Software Company

Retailer

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	23
Midsize Enterprise	24
Large Enterprise	75

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

How does Micro Focus UFT One compare to Tricentis Tosca?

We reviewed MicroFocus UFT One but ultimately chose to use Tricentis Tosca because we needed API testing. MicroFocus UFT is a performance and functional testing tool. We tested it, and it was well...

See all answers

How does Tricentis Tosca compare with Worksoft Certify?

Tosca fulfills our business needs better because it is an end-to-end solution across technologies. We like that it is scriptless, so even non-experienced staff can use it. To put it simply, with To...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Tricentis Tosca?

The pricing for Tricentis Tosca is extremely high, and I rate it as ten in terms of expense. It is really pricey in the market, making it more suitable for large enterprises rather than small or me...

See all answers

Comparisons

Perfecto vs pCloudy

Compared 19% of the time

OpenText Functional Testing vs pCloudy

Compared 19% of the time

AWS Device Farm vs pCloudy

Compared 18% of the time

HeadSpin vs pCloudy

Compared 17% of the time

Digital.ai Continuous Testing vs pCloudy

Compared 11% of the time

More pCloudy Competitors

OpenText Functional Testing vs Tricentis Tosca

Compared 14% of the time

SmartBear TestComplete vs Tricentis Tosca

Compared 6% of the time

Worksoft Certify vs Tricentis Tosca

Compared 3% of the time

Eggplant Test vs Tricentis Tosca

Compared 3% of the time

Ranorex Studio vs Tricentis Tosca

Compared 3% of the time

More Tricentis Tosca Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Mobile App Testing Tools

August 2026

Download pCloudy product report

Buyer's Guide

Tricentis Tosca

July 2026

Download Tricentis Tosca product report

Also Known As

No data available

Orchestrated Service Virtualization

Overview

pCloudy offers a comprehensive platform for testing mobile apps. It's designed to enhance app quality through seamless integration and real-time insights, ideal for developers and testers seeking efficient solutions.

pCloudy supports a wide array of mobile devices, facilitating extensive and effective app testing. It provides real-time interaction, allowing testers to observe instant feedback on app performance. By integrating with popular DevOps tools, pCloudy ensures a streamlined workflow, making it a go-to choice for those in need of robust testing capabilities.

What are the key features of pCloudy?

Real Device Testing: Access to multiple real devices for accurate testing.
Automation Support: Integrates with popular automation tools for seamless testing processes.
Comprehensive Reports: Detailed insights and analytics on app performance.
CI/CD Integration: Compatible with popular CI/CD tools for continuous testing.
Remote Access: Test from anywhere at any time using a cloud-based approach.

What benefits and ROI should be considered?

Time Efficiency: Reduces testing time with automated processes.
Cost-Effective: Saves resources by providing cloud-based device access.
Quality Assurance: Enhances app quality with detailed error reporting.
Scalability: Accommodates growing testing demands with ease.

In sectors like e-commerce and banking, pCloudy facilitates rapid deployment and rigorous testing, ensuring apps meet industry standards. Teams benefit from the quick setup and comprehensive coverage across a range of devices, critical for maintaining competitive edge.

pCloudy

Tricentis Tosca offers model-based testing that supports both technical and non-technical users through a user-friendly interface, enabling scriptless automation and seamless integration with UI and non-UI applications.

Tosca's modular approach enhances test maintenance and reuse while delivering comprehensive automation for diverse testing environments. Backed by risk-based testing and automated data management, it supports end-to-end testing across API, SAP, and desktop applications. Tosca's integration capabilities extend to environments like Salesforce, PHP webshops, and mobile apps, effectively enhancing Agile team workflows. Despite its strengths, room remains for improved reporting, object recognition, and more efficient upgrade processes. Enhancing documentation and mobile testing support could further elevate its functionality for many.

What key features does Tricentis Tosca offer?

User-friendly interface: Simplifies interactions for non-technical users.
Model-based testing: Facilitates the easy creation of automated test cases.
Scriptless automation: Enables quick test development without coding.
Integration capabilities: Supports connections with multiple platforms like SAP and Salesforce.
Modular approach: Enhances the reuse and maintenance of test components.

What benefits to expect from Tricentis Tosca?

Efficiency: Streamlines the testing process for faster release cycles.
Versatility: Suitable for diverse application environments including web and desktop.
Productivity: Boosts Agile team integration for comprehensive testing.
Risk-based testing: Prioritizes testing efforts based on potential impact.

In retail, Tricentis Tosca automates inventory and transaction testing, ensuring efficient system updates. Financial services employ it for regulatory compliance through automated test scenarios in mainframe and PDF environments. Telecommunication companies utilize Tosca for API testing, aligning services across network platforms seamlessly.

Tricentis

Sample Customers

Philips, Capgemini, Honeywell, Jio, Northwell Health, Swiggy

HBO, AMEX, BMW Group, ING, Bosch, Austrian Airlines, Deutsche Bank, Henkel, Allianz, Bank of America, UBS, Orange, Siemens, Swiss Re, Vodafone

Buyer's Guide

Tricentis Tosca vs. pCloudy

August 2026

Free Report: Tricentis Tosca vs. pCloudy

Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis Tosca vs. pCloudy and other solutions. Updated: August 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Tricentis Tosca vs. pCloudy report.

See our list of best Mobile App Testing Tools vendors and best Regression Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Mobile App Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.