Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Parasoft SOAtest vs ZAPTEST comparison

Parasoft and ZAPTEST are both solutions in the Test Automation Tools category. Parasoft is ranked #15 with an average rating of 8.7, while ZAPTEST is ranked #28. Parasoft holds a 1.1% mindshare in TAt, compared to ZAPTEST’s 0.7% mindshare. Additionally, 93% of Parasoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 88% of ZAPTEST users who would recommend it.
Parasoft SOAtest
Read 33 Parasoft SOAtest reviews
  • 2,160 Views
  • 475 Comparison Views
93% willing to recommend
ZAPTEST
Read 7 ZAPTEST reviews
  • 586 Views
  • 346 Comparison Views
88% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 15, 2024

Parasoft SOAtest and ZAPTEST are competing products in the test automation tools category. Parasoft SOAtest seems to have the upper hand in terms of pricing and support satisfaction, whereas ZAPTEST is preferred for its feature-rich offerings.

Features: Parasoft SOAtest offers robust API testing, efficient service virtualization, and strong reporting capabilities. ZAPTEST provides enhanced cross-platform testing, scriptless automation, and live documentation features.

Room for Improvement: Parasoft SOAtest could improve in terms of flexibility in scripting and user interface design. It might benefit from broader cross-platform testing support. ZAPTEST might enhance its API testing capabilities and simplify its deployment process. Improving reporting flexibility could also be beneficial.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Parasoft SOAtest provides streamlined deployment with comprehensive customer support, making integration easy. ZAPTEST offers versatile deployment options with strong customer service, though its deployment process is less straightforward than Parasoft's.

Pricing and ROI: Parasoft SOAtest has a competitive initial setup cost and delivers favorable ROI with consistent performance improvements. ZAPTEST may have higher upfront costs but offers significant ROI through extensive capabilities and scalability.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Parasoft SOAtest vs. ZAPTEST Report (Updated: December 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Parasoft SOAtest vs. ZAPTEST
December 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 879,310 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
6.7
Parasoft SOAtest enhances API testing efficiency and ROI with minimal coding, despite lacking a comprehensive metrics system.
Sentiment score
7.7
ZAPTEST boosts ROI by enabling automation, eliminating manual testing phases and multiple tester hires, achieving 100% user-reported ROI.
Tasks that previously took four or five minutes can now be completed in 20 to 30 seconds with the help of the tool.
reviewer2772063
Quality Specialist 2A at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees
We found Parasoft SOAtest to be quick in building up test patterns, allowing us to create complex tests efficiently.
David-Whitehouse
QA Lead at a financial services firm with 51-200 employees
For more quotes and insights, download the Parasoft SOAtest report
No quotes available
For more quotes and insights, download the ZAPTEST report
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
7.7
Customer service is excellent, with fast responses and effective problem resolution, despite challenges with complex issues and regional availability.
Sentiment score
9.1
ZAPTEST excels in responsive customer service and support, with flexible pricing and effective issue resolution praised by users.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.0
Parasoft SOAtest scales well with proper licensing, though larger tests and memory management need careful planning in CI/CD contexts.
Sentiment score
8.9
Organizations experience seamless scalability with ZAPTEST, reporting smooth operations even under high demands due to effective license integration.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
7.0
Parasoft SOAtest is generally stable, but memory consumption can cause occasional issues, especially with complex scenarios on low-end systems.
Sentiment score
7.0
ZAPTEST's version 15.0.75 resolves previous stability issues, though minor crashes affect 2% of users occasionally.
In particular use cases with numerous steps, it experiences crashes.
reviewer2772063
Quality Specialist 2A at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees
For more quotes and insights, download the Parasoft SOAtest report
No quotes available
For more quotes and insights, download the ZAPTEST report
 

Room For Improvement

Parasoft SOAtest needs better reports, interface, performance, integration, automation, documentation, price, startup time, memory use, and user-friendliness.
Users find ZAPTEST documentation outdated, desire better support, improved features, and enhanced test result and save functions.
It did not support enough of the protocols or cryptography formats we needed, which led us to create our own solutions.
David-Whitehouse
QA Lead at a financial services firm with 51-200 employees
One improvement would be to integrate it with modern technologies such as AI, so we can generate test cases by providing the details so that it can generate the structure, and later the person working can modify and enhance it.
reviewer2772063
Quality Specialist 2A at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees
In terms of improvements for Parasoft SOAtest, some features could be added or perhaps existing areas could be improved, such as lowering prices.
Nghiêm Phương
CEO at SMOne
For more quotes and insights, download the Parasoft SOAtest report
No quotes available
For more quotes and insights, download the ZAPTEST report
DW
reviewer2772063 - PeerSpot reviewerNghiêm Phương - PeerSpot reviewer
 

Setup Cost

Enterprise buyers find Parasoft SOAtest expensive but worthwhile due to robust features and scalability, despite complex licensing.
ZAPTEST provides cost-effective enterprise solutions with flexible licensing, low fees, and a free evaluation, making it a budget-friendly choice.
Parasoft SOAtest is expensive, but it was acquired because the company was dissatisfied with Quick Test Pro.
David-Whitehouse
QA Lead at a financial services firm with 51-200 employees
For more quotes and insights, download the Parasoft SOAtest report
No quotes available
For more quotes and insights, download the ZAPTEST report
 

Valuable Features

Parasoft SOAtest provides rapid functional testing setup, extensive API support, seamless integration, and comprehensive validation tools for scalable end-to-end testing.
ZAPTEST offers advanced testing automation with cross-platform compatibility, multi-device support, and integrations, reducing effort and costs efficiently.
Parasoft SOAtest improves the quality of the application, increases security and security compliance, and it is a cost-effective tool.
Nghiêm Phương
CEO at SMOne
Parasoft SOAtest is very good at ensuring tests don't pass or fail until they genuinely pass or fail.
David-Whitehouse
QA Lead at a financial services firm with 51-200 employees
The best feature of Parasoft SOAtest is the extension tool where we can write our custom scripts.
reviewer2772063
Quality Specialist 2A at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees
For more quotes and insights, download the Parasoft SOAtest report
No quotes available
For more quotes and insights, download the ZAPTEST report
Nghiêm Phương - PeerSpot reviewer
DW
reviewer2772063 - PeerSpot reviewer
 

Categories and Ranking

Parasoft SOAtest
Ranking in Functional Testing Tools
16th
Ranking in Test Automation Tools
15th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
33
Ranking in other categories
Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (20th), API Testing Tools (10th)
ZAPTEST
Ranking in Functional Testing Tools
29th
Ranking in Test Automation Tools
28th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.6
Number of Reviews
7
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2025, in the Test Automation Tools category, the mindshare of Parasoft SOAtest is 1.1%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ZAPTEST is 0.7%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Test Automation Tools Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Parasoft SOAtest1.1%
ZAPTEST0.7%
Other98.2%
Test Automation Tools
 

Featured Reviews

reviewer2772063 - PeerSpot reviewer
reviewer2772063
Quality Specialist 2A at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees
Has reduced manual testing effort with customization options but occasionally crashes during complex executions
One improvement would be to integrate it with modern technologies such as AI, so we can generate test cases by providing the details so that it can generate the structure, and later the person working can modify and enhance it. We can add more customized tools, and reporting can be enhanced. Currently, the reporting part is at a step level, and it does not give details for a particular test case, so improvements in those areas would be beneficial. There are performance issues where the tool crashes sometimes. In particular use cases with numerous steps, it experiences crashes. I have encountered stability and performance issues with it.
Read full review
it_user362916 - PeerSpot reviewer
it_user362916
System engineer at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees
We can write our codes just after the functional docs are prepared, and we can straight away start testing the application in the system testing phase itself.
* Using this tool, we can automate test cases even before the deployment of an application. This can be done by scanning objects from UI mock-ups or screenshots. * One script multi-run technology reduces scripting effort and budget by which you can run one unique script to test multiple platforms. * We can write one code and run it in multiple browsers (Chrome, IE, Firefox anything) and operating systems (Android, Windows, anything). * PDF validation, average colour validation, etc. are better and stable. * We can literally automate anything (not necessarily web applications) using ZAPTEST as it works exactly as a human eye and doesn't dig into application codes. * Partial OCR and block recognization are game changers. * JIRA and ALM integration
Read full review
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Automation Tools solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
879,310 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
21%
Manufacturing Company
15%
Computer Software Company
10%
University
6%
Manufacturing Company
19%
Financial Services Firm
14%
Government
11%
Healthcare Company
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business9
Midsize Enterprise3
Large Enterprise23
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business3
Midsize Enterprise1
Large Enterprise5
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Parasoft SOAtest?
I am not involved in the pricing aspect, setup cost, or licensing cost of Parasoft SOAtest. Our dedicated tools and support teams handle those aspects.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Parasoft SOAtest?
One improvement would be to integrate it with modern technologies such as AI, so we can generate test cases by providing the details so that it can generate the structure, and later the person work...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for Parasoft SOAtest?
We use Parasoft SOAtest for API testing and service virtualization with responder setup. Service virtualization is very helpful in our testing. When any downstream system is not available or we are...
See all answers
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Comparisons

SonarQube vs Parasoft SOAtest Logo
SonarQube vs Parasoft SOAtest
Compared 15% of the time
Postman Enterprise vs Parasoft SOAtest Logo
Postman Enterprise vs Parasoft SOAtest
Compared 14% of the time
Coverity Static vs Parasoft SOAtest Logo
Coverity Static vs Parasoft SOAtest
Compared 9% of the time
Tricentis Tosca vs Parasoft SOAtest Logo
Tricentis Tosca vs Parasoft SOAtest
Compared 8% of the time
Polyspace Code Prover vs Parasoft SOAtest Logo
Polyspace Code Prover vs Parasoft SOAtest
Compared 7% of the time
More Parasoft SOAtest Competitors
SmartBear TestComplete vs ZAPTEST Logo
SmartBear TestComplete vs ZAPTEST
Compared 44% of the time
OpenText Functional Testing vs ZAPTEST Logo
OpenText Functional Testing vs ZAPTEST
Compared 38% of the time
UiPath Test Cloud vs ZAPTEST Logo
UiPath Test Cloud vs ZAPTEST
Compared 19% of the time
More ZAPTEST Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Parasoft SOAtest
December 2025
Parasoft SOAtest reportDownload Parasoft SOAtest product report
Buyer's Guide
ZAPTEST
December 2025
ZAPTEST reportDownload ZAPTEST product report
 

Also Known As

SOAtest
No data available
 

Overview

Parasoft SOAtest delivers fully integrated API and web service testing capabilities that automate end-to-end functional API testing. Streamline automated testing with advanced codeless test creation for applications with multiple interfaces (REST & SOAP APIs, microservices, databases, and more).

SOAtest reduces the risk of security breaches and performance outages by transforming functional testing artifacts into security and load equivalents. Such reuse, along with continuous monitoring of APIs for change, allows faster and more efficient testing.

Parasoft
ZAPTEST is software test automation solution for testing applications cross-platform. ZAPTEST allows testing any GUI based software on any modern OS mobile or conventional that includes iOS; Android; WinMo; Blackberry; Windows; Mac; and Linux. ZAP 1Script technology allows users to script test procedure once and execute it on any correspondent application on any platform and environment. ZAP MultiRun technology offers execution of the same test script on multiple workstations and mobile devices at once, and expedites time to test execution. zapFARM offers mobile and conventional device management, by using distributed and multi-site devices and management of devices and users. ZAPTEST is software test automation solution for testing applications cross-platform. ZAPTEST allows testing of any GUI based software on any modern OS, mobile or conventional including iOS; Android; WinMo; Blackberry; Windows; Mac; and Linux, as well as supports testing of Agile and CI development. ZAP main technologies are ZAPTEST; ZAP-fiX; MultiRun; and zapFARM With over 15 years of industry experience implementing test automation processes ZAP also offers professional help to allows enterprises with testing best practices implementing ZAPTEST. Using ZAPTEST test automation teams reducing time to test development and maintenance, expedite test execution cross-platform and manage devices under test remotely within organization
ZAPTEST
 

Sample Customers

Charter Communications, Sabre, Caesars Entertainment, Charles Schwab, ING, Intel, Northbridge Financial, Capital Services, WoodmenLife
AT&T, Ally Financial, Inc. Standard & Poors, Comcast, Boeing Employee Credit Union, Nordstroms, Bank of New Zealand, Aviva France, Delta Airlines, First National Bank of South Africa, Leukemia & Lymphoma Society, American Well, SuperValu, 24 Hour Fitness, Inc., Lexis Nexis, Cspire Wireless, GE Intelligent Systems, Accenture, Shelter Mutual Insurance, Agco
Buyer's Guide
Parasoft SOAtest vs. ZAPTEST
December 2025
Free Report: Parasoft SOAtest vs. ZAPTEST
Find out what your peers are saying about Parasoft SOAtest vs. ZAPTEST and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
879,310 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Parasoft SOAtest vs. ZAPTEST report.
See our list of best Test Automation Tools vendors and best Functional Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Test Automation Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.