Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Palo Alto Networks VM-Series vs SentinelOne Singularity Hologram comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Palo Alto Networks VM-Series
Ranking in Advanced Threat Protection (ATP)
9th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
64
Ranking in other categories
Firewalls (11th)
SentinelOne Singularity Hol...
Ranking in Advanced Threat Protection (ATP)
27th
Average Rating
7.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
Threat Deception Platforms (3rd)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) category, the mindshare of Palo Alto Networks VM-Series is 2.1%, up from 0.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SentinelOne Singularity Hologram is 0.6%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Advanced Threat Protection (ATP)
 

Featured Reviews

RonnieYazdani - PeerSpot reviewer
User-friendly CLI and efficient dashboard streamline operations with robust security features
I find Palo Alto Networks VM-Series easy to deploy, and none of my customers have had significant complaints. My customers have high certifications provided by Palo Alto Networks. The friendly dashboard and the ability to easily command and use the CLI make Palo Alto Networks VM-Series a better product. It offers robust solutions, making it valuable to my customers.
Graham Peck - PeerSpot reviewer
Lockdown devices and ports on endpoints so that you can stop propagation of any virus if it's detected but performance utilization can be better
It's scalable in the form of it now covers mobile devices as well as a number of other different types of devices, not just Windows. Also, there's no limit as to how many devices you can install it on. We plan to expand the number of devices/users as we get more people onboard or upgrade to more mobile devices; we will then increase the number of licenses for mobile devices. We've got 450 licenses, but we've got about 375 devices and users currently. I would rate the scalability a ten out of ten. There's not a product yet that I've found that I can't put it on, especially now that they've got the new release, which was the mobile agents.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The solution strengthens our IT posture."
"The product provides more visibility into our traffic."
"I recommend going with the VM series, as it integrates advanced technological standards on a single platform and supports Kubernetes and Docker, which other vendors often don't offer."
"Centralized management is valuable because it allows us to configure settings in one location and apply them across all three locations."
"The most valuable feature is the CLI."
"Palo Alto Networks VM-Series has everything centralized. You have the VPN solution, firewall, routing, UDR, flexibility, updates, and full visibility of your traffic."
"It scales linearly with load and no issues."
"Palo Alto's robust threat intelligence supports new updates, and I can open cases directly with their Threat Intelligence team."
"The automated response capability in SentinelOne enhances security operations. It means I don't have to worry about having too many security people watching it because you can automate a lot of the tasks."
 

Cons

"Perfection is unlikely as the dynamic nature of traffic and constant changes can result in occasional bugs despite regular updates."
"The product could provide protection above Layer 3, which gets into the application layer and provides better visibility into those aspects of application security."
"All areas need improvement: manufacturing, education, financial, etc."
"Integrative capabilities with other solutions should be addressed."
"There is no proper support channel to follow up on cases."
"The user-friendliness of the UI could be improved."
"I would like to have automatic daily reporting, such as how many users have connected via SSL VPN."
"AWS doesn't integrate well with third-party firewalls."
"The performance utilization on the device that it's monitoring. This aspect needs improvement."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"One of the factors for selecting Palo Alto was they had flexible pricing. They had a pay-as-you-go model. Comparable to other products, such as Check Point, the price point was definitely a plus."
"The product's most valuable feature is pricing."
"Sometimes, it's cheaper to buy a new firewall with licensing instead of renewing the licenses of an old firewall."
"Do not buy larges box if you do not need them. Rightsizing is a great task to do before​hand."
"It is an expensive product."
"Based on the customer budget, they can choose from 12-month, 36-month, or 60-month licensing models."
"It is not the cheapest on the market. The total cost for two firewall instances is $75,000. This includes licenses, deployment fees, and support for two years."
"The price of this solution is very high for some parts of Africa, which makes it a challenge."
"I would rate the pricing a three out of ten; one is very expensive, and ten is an absolutely cheap product."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) solutions are best for your needs.
853,823 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
16%
Financial Services Firm
14%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Government
7%
Computer Software Company
20%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Comms Service Provider
8%
Educational Organization
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Features comparison between Palo Alto and Fortinet firewalls
In the best tradition of these questions, Feature-wise both are quite similar, but each has things it's better at, it kind of depends what you value most. PA is good at app control, web filtering a...
How does Azure Firewall compare with Palo Alto Networks VM Series?
Both products are very stable and easily scalable. The setup of Azure Firewall is easy and very user-friendly and the overall cost is reasonable. Azure Firewall offers a solid threat awareness, can...
Does SentinelOne have a Virtual Patching functionality?
Yes -- SentinelOne has a Virtual Patching functionality called Virtual Patching and Exploit Shield. This preventive security solution uses behavioral AI to identify and block zero-day attacks and v...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SentinelOne Singularity Hologram?
It's obviously increased my cost when it comes to security management because I didn't have it before, and it isn't the cheapest one on the market. But at the same time, it has brought down my cybe...
What needs improvement with SentinelOne Singularity Hologram?
The performance utilization on the device that it's monitoring. This aspect needs improvement.
 

Also Known As

No data available
Attivo Networks
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Warren Rogers Associates
NSS Labs., Fierce IT security, FireEye
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Palo Alto Networks, Fortinet and others in Advanced Threat Protection (ATP). Updated: May 2025.
853,823 professionals have used our research since 2012.