We performed a comparison between Fortinet FortiGate and Palo Alto Networks VM-Series based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Firewalls solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
"What's most important is the ease of use."
"The most valuable feature of this solution is Quota."
"The most valuable features of Fortinet FortiGate are it is one of the most mature firewalls in the UTM bundle."
"Fortinet FortiGate appears to be scalable."
"The most valuable feature is the interface, which is very user friendly. We are utilizing most of the features, like content filtering. The firewall is powerful."
"The license management is very valuable. You can get a new license each year, or you can enroll every two to four years. You can get the logs, and you will get the information on the risk in your network and the entire organization. With this information, you can take action on your actives, computers, or devices. You can bring your own device as an SSE."
"The GUI is good."
"You can create multiple Virtual Domains (VDOMs), which are treated as separate firewall instances."
"Using Palo Alto Networks Panorama, we were able to deploy a single point of management and visualization of the firewall infrastructure in cloud, on-premise and integrated with Azure to automate scale up. Its security features, i.e. anti-malware, threat prevention, URL Filtering, VPN, and antivirus are the most valuable. The ID-User integrated with AD and 2FA features are also very useful to provide secure access to servers and some users in the company. "
"Embedding it into my application development lifecycle prevents data loss and business disruption, allowing the adoption to operate at the speed of my AWS Cloud."
"The tool's cloud version makes application migration easy."
"The technical support for the solution is very good."
"The most valuable feature is that you can launch it in a very short time. You don't have to wait for the hardware to arrive and get it staged and installed. From that perspective, it is easy to launch. It is also scalable."
"It has excellent scalability."
"The interface with Panorama makes it very easy to use."
"I have not actually called their support line, because we have a direct contact to a senior engineer in the company for any issues that we handle with them. I will say they are very responsive, and they do give you the information you need when you need it."
"The pricing could always be better."
"Fortinet FortiGate is not very easy to use. The navigation could be improved to make it easier to use."
"It would be ideal if they had some sort of GUI interface for troubleshooting and diagnostics."
"NGN, reporting and controls."
"Fortinet FortiGate could improve by having a frequent ask questions(FAQ) area for people to receive quick answers to popular questions. Additionally, it would be beneficial to have an SMS notification feature. For example, if you cannot access your email you could receive an SMS message."
"It would be a benefit if Fortinet would release a one-stop solution that is better integrated with other products and an automated emergency response system."
"The graphical user interface of Fortinet's FortiGate product does not function well with text-based interfaces."
"The process of configuring firewall rules appears excessively complex."
"Palo Alto is that it is really bad when it comes to technical support."
"The disadvantage with Palo Alto is that they don't have a cloud-based solution that includes a secure web gateway."
"The solution needs to have more easily searchable details or documentation about it online, so it's easier to Google if you have queries."
"The product's AIOps process needs improvement."
"The solution must improve Zero Trust integration and use cases."
"The solution needs to improve its visibility. It's not straightforward to use. Understanding the policies, authorizations, and initializing features requires careful review. The product needs to offer proper training."
"At the beginning of the implementation, we had some difficulties with the scripts, but Palo Alto Networks support together with a local partner finally fixed it."
"Recently, they introduced their Prisma Cloud solution. Compared to the previous technologies, like Panorama, which is used for centralized firewall management, or even the individual firewalls, it's a bit challenging to integrate the traditional firewall policies into Prisma Cloud."
Fortinet FortiGate is ranked 2nd in Firewalls with 306 reviews while Palo Alto Networks VM-Series is ranked 10th in Firewalls with 52 reviews. Fortinet FortiGate is rated 8.4, while Palo Alto Networks VM-Series is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Fortinet FortiGate writes "It's a reliable solution that's easy to install and cheaper than competitors ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Palo Alto Networks VM-Series writes "Many features are optimized for troubleshooting real-time scenarios, saving a lot of time". Fortinet FortiGate is most compared with Sophos XG, Cisco Secure Firewall, Netgate pfSense, Meraki MX and Check Point NGFW, whereas Palo Alto Networks VM-Series is most compared with Azure Firewall, Fortinet FortiGate-VM, Cisco Secure Firewall, Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls and Juniper SRX Series Firewall. See our Fortinet FortiGate vs. Palo Alto Networks VM-Series report.
See our list of best Firewalls vendors.
We monitor all Firewalls reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
Hello Tarun, we have been designing solutions with Palo Alto Networks NGFW for 6 years now and we have 95%+ customer retention.
I would suggest looking into customer requirement on the basis of the following things, and priority is given by the customer:
1. Internet Bandwidth
2. No. Of users - In-house and users connecting from home/outside organization network.
3. Security features required - Sandoxing, DNS Security, etc.
4. Port density required on the firewall.
5. SSL decryption.
6. Deployment - On-prem or virtual DC or on Cloud.
7. HA requirement
8. MFA requirement
9. Local presence of Palo Alto/Fortinet expert team.
10. Integration for other (operational) solutions like SD-WAN, Load balancer, etc
11. Integration with other security solution like EDR/XDR or XSOAR
12. Customer's current solution (firewall/UTM and engineers/IT team working on it).
13. Customer's current IT Team strategy
14. Customer future IT strategy (to move on the cloud, etc)
15. Customer's growth and scalability in 5 years.
16. Reporting and logging requirement.
17. Customer's budget for IT Security.
Well, I guess with these parameters, and customer's priority you can recommend them a suitable solution.
Palo Alto NGFW will be best recommended for the following:
1. Deployment on the cloud - It has a very stable PANOS for VM-Series
2. Security Innovations - Considering security, in terms of today and future, Palo Alto is disruptive and groundbreaking.
3. Predictive Bandwidth - Palo Alto NGFW gives us Predictive bandwidth, and hence, once sized, it will last longer than defined. The throughput numbers are test cases of real-world scenarios, and after enabling all the features. It operates on its patented SP3 architecture and defines device throughput after enabling all security features and operational functionalities.
4. Integration with EDR/XDR and SOAR/XSOAR platforms.
5. User/SSL VPN - When you are planning for SSL VPN on Palo Alto NGFW, it will not charge you additionally for users connecting their Windows or MAC systems on NGFW over SSL VPN. For users that are Android/IOS/Linux/etc, and required additional HIP checks and Clientless VPN, there is a single subscription you will need to purchase.
6. Sandboxing - Palo Alto came up with Wildfire which is a threat intel cloud, which can be termed as Palo Alto Network's Sandboxing solution, but it does much more than that. it has a response SLA of 5 mins, where it can convert any unknown to known in 5 minutes or less. Also, after it identifies the file, it auto-updates other engines like URL filtering, DNS Security, Anti-Spyware, Bad IP and Domain list, CNC tunnel signatures.
7. Reporting and alerting - Foremost reason why users started implementing Palo Alto firewalls inside their network was to get the visibility - in terms of User-level visibility, Network traffic (depth to application layer), and Content (files and threats) level visibility. Also, logging and reporting is provisioned on the appliance itself and no additional subscription or any appliance is required, unless the customer requires the storage of logs for more time frame. The NGFW also co-relates all the events and alerts to give critical visibility like Botnets and hosts and users accessing malicious websites, or resolving malicious domains.
8. EDL - again external dynamic lists(EDL) helps you reduce the attack surface by minimizing the traffic to and from Malicious and Bad - IPs and Domains. This list is automatically updated by Palo Alto Networks by default by its threat research teams (Unit 42), Threat Intel (Wildfire), DNS Security module, and other sources. It has also a provision for you and/or the customer to integrate other third-party URL lists to be blocked.
9. Security features:
-- DNS filtering - by intercepting DNS traffic, you will not need any additional solution and/or modification in your current network for protection against threats related to DNS traffic. Its DNS module is cloud-based and tightly integrated with other modules and features of NGFW.
-- Credential phishing - This feature will avoid users sharing/uploading their credentials which are the same to access internal resources and external websites. This will prevent the leak of user credentials.
-- ML Powered NGFW - Currently, PA NGFW is the only firewall powered by ML to prevent unknown threats in real-time.
10. Application layer firewall - complete identification of all and any traffic based on application rather than port and protocol. Not only the known but also if the application is not identified it will classify that traffic as unknown. Also, you can create a custom application as required.
and many more...
Benefits in Fortigate firewall will be:
1. More port density.
2. Better SD-WAN configuration
3. Easy User interface and hence lacks granular controls.
4. Provides seamless integration with FortiToken for MFA(additional cost).
5. Seamless integration with Forti Load balancer.
6. Low cost (than Palo Alto least).
Thanks
Darshil Sanghvi
Palo Alto, Fortinet, and Checkpoint are the best NGFW. You can choose one of them.
The Fortinet advantage is the Security Fabric. Many other Fortinet's products (switches, AP, EDS, XDR, DDoS, FortiClient, etc) are integrated and a Fortigate can communicate with another product to block an attack.
Because PA has FPGA based architecture, which no other firewall has, due to this firewall processes the traffic from all the engines simultaneously. it increase efficiency of the product and provides way better throughput as compare to other vendors. The performance of security engines of PA are better then other vendors. PA provides on-box reporting, you have to purchase forti-analyzer separately for reporting in fortinet. PA provides granular view of policies, providing insight to you which policies are used in and which are not. it also provides you the feature, that tells you which of the firewall's features are not being utilized, this way you can plan your renewal to only purchase the feature you need.
I have FortiGates and the last upgrade of firmware cut internet traffic if you use Inspection Mode Proxy-Based, recommended and more secure, you have to use Flow-based, less secure. I don't work with Palo Alto
I strongly recommend Sophos XG Firewall.
Take a look
Sophos Firewall: Synchronized Next-Gen Firewall
I think you can go with Palo Alto...
Palo Alto
I would recommend Palo Alto