Hi Everyone,
What do you like most about Palo Alto Networks VM-Series?
Thanks for sharing your thoughts with the community!
Palo Alto’s Panorama centralized management system simplifies our security posture based on our requirements. Instead of manually pulling logs, then generating them into readable formats, it gives us the console in a readable format to view.
With the improved visibility we now have, the traffic is being properly monitored, which means that we are better able to manage it. These are improvements that we saw very quickly.
Using Palo Alto Networks Panorama, we were able to deploy a single point of management and visualization of the firewall infrastructure in cloud, on-premise and integrated with Azure to automate scale up. Its security features, i.e. anti-malware, threat prevention, URL Filtering, VPN, and antivirus are the most valuable. The ID-User integrated with AD and 2FA features are also very useful to provide secure access to servers and some users in the company.
Palo Alto Networks VM-Series is very easy to use.
The VM series has an advantage over the physical version because we are able to change the sources that the machine has, such as the amount of available RAM.
What I like about the VM-Series is that you can launch them in a very short time.
The most valuable feature is that you can launch it in a very short time. You don't have to wait for the hardware to arrive and get it staged and installed. From that perspective, it is easy to launch. It is also scalable.
The feature that I have found the most useful is that it meets all our requirements technically.
The most valuable features are the User ID, URL filtering, and application filtering.
The Palo Alto VM-Series is nice because I can move the firewalls easily.
The most valuable feature is that you can control your traffic flowing out and coming it, allowing you to apply malware and threat protection, as well as vulnerability checks.
In Palo Alto the most important feature is the App-ID.
The most valuable features are security and support.
The most valuable aspects of this solution are that it's simple and stable. It has better security aspects compared to other similar solutions.
Embedding it into my application development lifecycle prevents data loss and business disruption, allowing the adoption to operate at the speed of my AWS Cloud.
In AWS, Palo Alto provides us a better view than flow logs for network traffic.
It allows us to see all our traffic to properly secure it and only allow what is needed through the firewall.
It provides complete security posture from end-to-end. This has given us better visibility into what our security aspects are.
It offers a single pane of glass for all the different types of installations.
You already can scale it if you put it in Auto Scaling groups. If you put it in a load balancer, it should already be able to scale.
AWS has improved our agility to apply firewall rules. It has reduced the amount of time that it takes to apply firewall rules because everything is based in the cloud.
It has the ability to create Palo Alto VM-series using software.
What are the pros and cons of each?