Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management vs Procore Project Management comparison

Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management vs. Procore Project Management

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Oracle Primavera Portfolio ...

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

4.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Project Portfolio Management (10th)

Procore Project Management

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Project Management Software (17th)

Featured Reviews

reviewer2710611

Director at a consultancy with 5,001-10,000 employees

Ensures data consistency and improves stakeholder transparency while needing pricing adjustments

It is beneficial to have the schedule updated so you can have control of the cost. When you have a change in the schedule, you can also make a change in the cost. For us, it is mostly important to control dates and to be on time, but also to know the cash flow. With both of our clients, they use Power BI extensively. Though it may not be the best solution, they have all the tools connected to Power BI, which they primarily use for reporting. The integration with Unifier, which is also an Oracle tool, ensures that the data is correct and timely. The connection between Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management and Unifier is not difficult to establish, and the information obtained is really reliable.

Read full review

DougBrown1

Project manager at CTS Electronic Components

Centralized project documents have improved remote collaboration but task workflows remain confusing

Regarding Procore Project Management's task scheduling feature for reducing project delays, I did not use the task management feature very much because it seemed difficult to set up. I did not care for the platform from a user-friendly perspective because I am more of a construction professional than a computer professional. Some of the features were hard to navigate through. I also found that true with some of the Whole Foods employees who were trying to use it. They were confused on how to approve things and get things completed in the task management. Additionally, some of the change order approval processes were unclear. They did not know how to approve them. When uploading a task, it was confusing to identify who was the approver of that document because the responsibility was doubled up. The task management section and the distribution list along with the project approval person designation were difficult and confusing to navigate through.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable features were the cost breakdown structure and work breakdown structure."

"Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management is a well-engineered product from an IT perspective."

"The solution's tech support is good."

"The most valuable feature of Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management is accuracy."

"Delay analysis and extension of time claims are some of the key features."

"The most valuable features were the cost breakdown structure and work breakdown structure."

"The ability to streamline the process of obtaining signatures from our contractors is valuable."

"The integration with Unifier, which is also an Oracle tool, ensures that the data is correct and timely."

More Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management pros

"What I appreciate about using Procore Project Management is the convenience of putting everything in one location, where pictures, schedules, blueprints, drawings, change orders, and all documents are accessible in one platform."

"The financial side of Procore Project Management is better."

"The coordination between the field and the office without the need to print or physically transport drawings is very valuable."

"Other companies have been using it for years, and it is a very stable platform."

Cons

"There is scope for development in integrating with some AI products."

"Primavera could be better integrated with other products, and it needs more cost management features."

"They should work on integrating the solution with ERP."

"The scalability has room for improvement."

"The reporting could improve project management. We need multiple source reports. If someone is new to the support it has a steep learning curve."

"There is a need for improvement in the interfacing and possibly better integration with other programs."

"For us in LATAM, the pricing is extremely high. That is why I only work with oil and gas and mining industries because they have substantial budgets."

"The solution's user interface is an area with shortcomings that need improvement."

More Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management cons

"It is not entirely intuitive, so there are areas for improvement."

"It would be nice if the tool can reduce its operational cost. It would make it more competitive."

"I did not care for the platform from a user-friendly perspective because I am more of a construction professional than a computer professional."

"It takes time to use it. It is not entirely intuitive, so there are areas for improvement."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is highly priced compared to one of its competitors."

"My company has made an annual payment towards the costs of the solution. Price-wise, the solution is okay."

"Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management is an expensive solution. There is an upfront cost to purchase the solution and then there are annual fees to use the solution."

"The solution itself is cost-effective."

"The tool is cheap and I would rate it a ten out of ten."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Project Management Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

11%

Energy/Utilities Company

10%

Government

Comms Service Provider

Energy/Utilities Company

13%

Real Estate/Law Firm

11%

Construction Company

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	4

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management?

Primavera appears to be more expensive than Microsoft Project but potentially less than Maximo. Pricing details from ten years ago are not committed to memory, and I would have to refer back to doc...

What needs improvement with Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management?

Because we use mostly P6 and we do not use OPC, which is the new cloud version that is visually easier to use, I would rate it as an eight.

What is your primary use case for Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management?

We try to use Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management combined with Unifier. Unifier is a cost control tool. It is mostly used in oil and gas, mining, and construction industries, but predominantly i...

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Procore Project Management?

Regarding the pricing difference between Procore Project Management and Microsoft Project, I think Microsoft Project is quite expensive. I think Procore and Smartsheets are more in line with what c...

What needs improvement with Procore Project Management?

What is your primary use case for Procore Project Management?

I have experience using Procore Project Management, which I have used with companies like Whole Foods and Hill Phoenix. At Whole Foods, they required me to use their platform for project management...

Adobe Workfront vs Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management

Comparisons

Compared 11% of the time

Jira vs Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management

Compared 8% of the time

EcoSys vs Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management

Compared 8% of the time

Broadcom Clarity vs Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management

Compared 7% of the time

Planisware vs Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management

Compared 7% of the time

More Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management Competitors

Microsoft Project vs Procore Project Management

Compared 19% of the time

Trimble Project Management vs Procore Project Management

Compared 15% of the time

EcoSys vs Procore Project Management

Compared 13% of the time

SAP Portfolio and Project Management vs Procore Project Management

Compared 13% of the time

Airtable vs Procore Project Management

Compared 10% of the time

More Procore Project Management Competitors

Product Reports

Project Portfolio Management

Download Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management product report

Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management report

Project Management Software

Download Procore Project Management product report

Also Known As

Primavera Portfolio Management, OPPM

No data available

Overview

Oracle's Primavera Portfolio Management is the leading portfolio management software solution, providing unmatched flexibility and infrastructure for enterprise portfolio management. With its unique functionality, real-world enterprise scalability, and unlimited configurability, Primavera Portfolio Management is ideal for managing just about any type of portfolio from ideation through execution.

Oracle

Procore Technologies, Inc. provides cloud-based construction software to clients across the globe. Using its award-winning suite of project management tools, hundreds of thousands of registered Procore users manage all types of construction projects including industrial plants, office buildings, apartment complexes, university facilities, retail centers, and more.

Procore Technologies

Sample Customers

Yarra Valley Water, John Wayne Airport, Hatch Mott Macdonald, Austrian Power Grid AG, EDF France, Chiyoda Corporation, Croatian Waters, Selex ES, Chicago Park District

Consigli,Doran,Harvey,HITT,Mortenson construction,Robins and Morton

Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management vs. Procore Project Management