Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Oracle MySQL Cloud Service vs SQL Server comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 4, 2025

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Oracle MySQL Cloud Service
Ranking in Relational Databases Tools
10th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.4
Number of Reviews
21
Ranking in other categories
Open Source Databases (7th)
SQL Server
Ranking in Relational Databases Tools
1st
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
269
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Relational Databases Tools category, the mindshare of Oracle MySQL Cloud Service is 0.3%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SQL Server is 17.6%, down from 23.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Relational Databases Tools
 

Featured Reviews

Raghuram K M - PeerSpot reviewer
Ideal, stable, good support and it helps with the developer console
I have used MongoDB, MySQL, and Oracle. MongoDB is entirely different. It's a NoSQL platform database, so it's totally different. It is a little bit hard to work with. The way it is organized and structured is different. But between Microsoft Azure MySQL and Oracle, they are pretty similar. * Cost: Microsoft is not a preferred platform. Their licensing is very complex and expensive. Oracle is much better. * AI: In terms of data analytics and AI, Microsoft is better. Certain complex transformations are easier to do in MSSQL. So, if you have to analyze data from a lot of different data sources, it becomes much easier. However, the usage of the particular product depends on the project. Personally, I would like to work on MySQL. But in certain cases where the application scale is very large, and custom models from certain regions of the globe prefer Microsoft, then we have to go with MSSQL. But technically, there is not much difference.
Kapil Dev Khatri - PeerSpot reviewer
Helps monitor queries and identify which indexes need to be created in the databases
SQL Server is very simple due to its GUI, which is available for users. It allows for modifications and has execution plans available, along with options such as activity monitoring. This helps monitor queries and identify which indexes need to be created in the databases, tables, or columns to improve performance.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The most valuable aspect of the product is data migration."
"It is an established open-source database with a vast array of resources available, ensuring you can learn everything needed."
"Overall, I rate Oracle MySQL Cloud Service as a nine out of ten."
"Oracle MySQL Cloud Service handles data easily."
"MySQL is very stable and works beautifully with large amounts of data."
"All the features are excellent."
"The stability of the solution is very good. I wouldn't have used it for the past seven years if I was not satisfied."
"MySQL is very stable and works beautifully with large amounts of data."
"We like business integration, database, and analysis."
"SQL Server scales well."
"The solution is very easy to use. It's intuitive and easy to navigate. Overall, it's a straightforward product."
"The setup process is straightforward."
"The solution is stable."
"The most valuable feature of the solution, compared to other RDBMS solutions, such as Oracle MySQL or IBM DB2, it is more user-friendly and has backward compatibility. For example, if you have an application that requires an old version of SQL Server and you have the latest version of the license, you are able to install and use it in backward compatibility mode. They keep supporting the existing legacy application."
"SQL Server is a good solution for me."
"Very stable relational database management system that offers ease of management, querying, and scaling. It has well-designed databases."
 

Cons

"The technical support is in need of improvement."
"Integrating business intelligence or NLP solutions would help us save time and would prevent us from having to take a deep dive. Data problems seem to multiply on the system when you interact with it. Automation would save a lot of man-hours."
"MySQL should have some kind of native query browser. If it could come with a built-in connector."
"There could be improvements, particularly in Firebird, where the indexing is limited to just a single B-tree index, leading to poor performance for large-scale queries."
"There might be minor improvements, however, I can’t identify any particular areas for improvement at the moment."
"It requires a significant amount of expertise and effort to manage, especially when dealing with substantial volumes of data."
"The solution should offer memory management."
"Improvement could be made in the workflow, particularly when it comes to making changes or implementing certain functions."
"The solution could offer more integration with other platforms."
"The solution could improve by having more integration with other operating systems and other platforms."
"We have no vision. We don't know when or how we have been hacked."
"CAL licenses should cost less. Microsoft usually prices high for client access licenses. Server plus user client access license (CAL) licensing requires a separate Server license for each server on which the software is installed, plus a user CAL for each user accessing the server."
"The treatment of database storage could be improved."
"In the next release, I would like to see a better user interface and a familiar syntax."
"The scalability could be better."
"Microsoft could improve SQL Server by integrating the tools better."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The license is expensive."
"Oracle has a better licensing model compared to its competitors."
"The solution’s paid plans are expensive."
"The product is expensive."
"While the core solution itself is not exorbitant, the support services are associated with a significant maintenance fee, often ranging from twenty to thirty percent."
"It is an open-source product."
"The product is free since it is an open-source tool."
"The product’s price depends on the specific server requirements."
"SQL Server is an expensive solution."
"Since we are a cloud-based company, there is AWS pricing on top of the SQL Server pricing. The Enterprise Edition can typically sell from around $1000 dollars a month, which is not cheap. Then, there is an additional one-time Windows cost, based on the code, which can go anywhere from $30,000 to $40,000 for the license."
"Some of our clients purchase the license and others do not, they use Express SQL Server."
"For medium-sized customers who don't need some enterprise features, the tool would be available for 200 USD per month. For the enterprise segment, the tool's cost can go up to 6,000 USD."
"There is a license required for this solution and we pay monthly. The price is reasonable compared to other solutions."
"SQL Server has the best licensing price."
"The product is expensive."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Relational Databases Tools solutions are best for your needs.
858,435 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Educational Organization
37%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Computer Software Company
8%
Manufacturing Company
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Oracle MySQL Cloud Service?
Oracle MySQL Cloud Service handles data easily.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Oracle MySQL Cloud Service?
I have never paid for the full version of Oracle MySQL Cloud Service. We use the free version or the version available in RDS ( /products/amazon-rds-reviews ) from AWS ( /products/amazon-aws-review...
What needs improvement with Oracle MySQL Cloud Service?
Oracle MySQL Cloud Service should be easier to replicate and integrate into further solutions. Although it targets Linux and UNIX environments, its performance is not as optimized on Windows platfo...
Would you say the price of SQL Server is high compared to that of similar products?
SQL Server is fairly priced because it has various editions, depending on the number of users, servers, or core packs you are using. If you compare the product to others in this category, the price...
Has using SQL Server helped your organization in any way?
SQL Server has helped my organization through partitioning to distribute the workload, as it splits them up into smaller pieces so the machines can easily deal with it. However, this comes with a h...
Which authentication mode is best for SQL Server?
My company connects through SQL Server authentication. We have company Windows accounts, but we do not want to connect the two, out of security concerns and to keep things separated for our own pur...
 

Also Known As

No data available
Microsoft SQL Server, MSSQL, MS SQL
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Omnis, Naveex, Rehash Technologies
Microsoft SQL Server is used by businesses in every industry, including Great Western Bank, Aviva, the Volvo Car Corporation, BMW, Samsung, Principality Building Society, Wellmark Blue Cross and Blue Shield, and the Catholic District School Board of Eastern Ontario.
Find out what your peers are saying about Oracle MySQL Cloud Service vs. SQL Server and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.
858,435 professionals have used our research since 2012.