Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Oracle Java Cloud Service vs Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud comparison

Oracle and IBM are both solutions in the PaaS Clouds category. Oracle is ranked #18 with an average rating of 7.7, while IBM is ranked #17 with an average rating of 8.3. Oracle holds a 0.2% mindshare in PSP, compared to IBM’s 0.3% mindshare. Additionally, 85% of Oracle users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 85% of IBM users who would recommend it.
Oracle Java Cloud Service
Read 16 Oracle Java Cloud Service reviews
  • 210 Views
  • 131 Comparison Views
85% willing to recommend
Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud
Read 8 Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud reviews
  • 450 Views
  • 278 Comparison Views
85% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 15, 2024

Oracle Java Cloud Service and Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud are competing products in cloud-based solutions for software development and deployment. Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud seems to have the upper hand due to its comprehensive features that outweigh the higher cost compared to Oracle Java Cloud Service.

Features: Oracle Java Cloud Service provides significant integration capabilities and an easy-to-use Java development environment. It offers seamless cloud integration, robust customization options, and effective security features. Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud stands out with its exceptional containerization, support for multiple programming languages, and highly scalable application management, enhancing flexibility and tool availability for complex deployments.

Room for Improvement: Oracle Java Cloud Service could improve in offering support for a wider range of languages, enhancing its containerization capabilities, and providing more robust scaling options. Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud could benefit from simplifying its deployment processes, optimizing cost-effectiveness for smaller projects, and further improving ease of use for customers new to container platforms.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Oracle Java Cloud Service is known for its straightforward deployment process, supported by extensive documentation and robust customer support, ideal for Java-centric application teams. Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud offers a comprehensive automated deployment environment with excellent customer service that accommodates diverse deployment configurations, though it may be slightly more complex to deploy initially.

Pricing and ROI: Oracle Java Cloud Service generally offers a more affordable setup cost, making it cost-effective for businesses focusing on Java-based projects. Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud, while presenting a higher setup cost, delivers superior ROI through its extensive features and capabilities suitable for broader application landscapes, appealing to enterprises seeking long-term value and flexibility.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Oracle Java Cloud Service vs. Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud Report (Updated: April 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Oracle Java Cloud Service vs. Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud
April 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 850,028 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Oracle Java Cloud Service
Ranking in PaaS Clouds
18th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.3
Number of Reviews
16
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud
Ranking in PaaS Clouds
17th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
8
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the PaaS Clouds category, the mindshare of Oracle Java Cloud Service is 0.2%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud is 0.3%, down from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
PaaS Clouds
 

Featured Reviews

Adam Elguennioui - PeerSpot reviewer
Offers flexibility and better accessibility to users
The security part of the tool is not so strong, making it an area I would like to see improved in the solution. When working with a cloud tool, it's never 100 percent secure and it is always something to take into account. I would like to be more comfortable working with it and feeling safer. In the future, the tool can be made faster. In the future, I would like to see maybe some AI features in the tool to help automate stuff. You need to be able to create your own models to help create some automated actions.
Read full review
Adrian Bilauca - PeerSpot reviewer
Handles security setups independently for a more secure environment
OpenShift does have more secure features. Azure also has equivalent services. For my client, it was good enough to switch to Azure. For development, there wasn't any significant change in effort, however, for the DevOps team, it was a relief since Azure has managed services. We used elasticity and scalability all over.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"It is pretty easy to use."
"Self-provisioning, easy to choose from WebLogic 11g to 12c."
"The ability to manage security and access the server from any location with complete security using SSH is perfect for performing crucial tasks, even while travelling."
"Cloud has provided less maintenance."
"The auto-backup, incremental backup and restoration features can be invaluable for management."
"The automated features of auto-purging in 12c helps clear disk space on a routine basis."
"The framework supports auto-configuration. A lot of features are already there. It is reliable and user-friendly to develop code, back-end engineering, or locate specific information such as addresses."
"Backing up and recovery for my domain is very easy and fast. In addition, applying patches and undoing applied patches is effective and easy to do."
More Oracle Java Cloud Service pros
"Our pipeline integrates various monitoring tools like Fortify for security checks. Once the pipeline processes the code, the finished product is deployed on Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud. We ensure application setup and recovery by utilizing two separate clusters on OpenShift."
"The solution offers the most robust Kubernetes orchestration available."
"The portability, moving from one platform to another, is easy."
"I've used the elasticity and scalability all over."
"In general, customers appreciate its ability to run different workloads, manage applications through CI/CD pipelines like Jenkins, and leverage tools like Helm charts and Kako."
"For the DevOps team, it was a relief since Azure has managed services."
"The deployment mechanism has become more dynamic with the use of the product."
"The initial setup is easy."
More Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud pros
 

Cons

"The product's high price is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"The product is satisfactory but we need more training on managing the machine itself. For example, how do we add more storage, how do we extend a specific portion? I would like to see videos illustrating some of the technical tasks that we often need to do."
"There are issues with the application's development, including small glitches and errors."
"The security part of the tool is not so strong, making it an area I would like to see improved in the solution."
"Needs better integration with other Oracle/non-Oracle products."
"The effectiveness is satisfactory, and there haven't been any additional fees due to meeting demands. However, there's room for improvement in pricing, performance, and stability. Regarding the UI, it could be more user-friendly and integrated with various platforms. Currently, the UI lacks user-friendliness, especially for developers unfamiliar with container technology. Expecting them to create YAML files for security purposes is unrealistic without proper guidance or experience. This aspect needs improvement."
"The general purpose solution tries to cater to too many customers so it is heavy."
"There is more work and effort needed for when many of the managed services are not accessible, especially in the security area. You have to do your own security setups as opposed to using a managed firewall."
"Many of the managed services are not accessible."
"Making it even more cost-effective could be explored."
"Technical support could be a bit better."
"There is room for improvement in cluster-based queue monitoring and autoscaling."
"The service mesh integrations could improve the solution."
More Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Oracle is a little more expensive right now, but not much compared to SAP. Oracle's prices are very much dependent on the scale of the project and how many users are there."
"Oracle Java Cloud Service is an expensive product."
"It is somewhat expensive."
"The pricing is a little high in China."
"This product is not costly when compared to other vendors."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which PaaS Clouds solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Oracle Java Cloud Service?
The solution's technical support is good.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Oracle Java Cloud Service?
I did a comparative study on the pricing between Oracle and SAP S/4HANA, but it was related to databases and in the areas associated with the clouds. I can tell that Oracle is a little more expensi...
See all answers
What needs improvement with Oracle Java Cloud Service?
The security part of the tool is not so strong, making it an area I would like to see improved in the solution. When working with a cloud tool, it's never 100 percent secure and it is always someth...
See all answers
What do you like most about Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud?
Our pipeline integrates various monitoring tools like Fortify for security checks. Once the pipeline processes the code, the finished product is deployed on Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud. We ensu...
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud?
From a cost perspective, some cost-effective situations were more difficult to achieve in Azure than in OpenShift. Comparing them can be difficult since the financial services cloud had stripped ma...
See all answers
What needs improvement with Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud?
There is more work and effort needed for when many of the managed services are not accessible, especially in the security area. You have to do your own security setups as opposed to using a managed...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Amazon AWS vs Oracle Java Cloud Service Logo
Amazon AWS vs Oracle Java Cloud Service
Compared 100% of the time
More Oracle Java Cloud Service Competitors
No data available
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Oracle Java Cloud Service
April 2025
Oracle Java Cloud Service reportDownload Oracle Java Cloud Service product report
Buyer's Guide
PaaS Clouds
April 2025
Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud reportDownload Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud product report
 

Overview

Oracle Java Cloud Service is a complete platform and infrastructure cloud solution for building, deploying, and managing Java EE applications. Use Oracle Java Cloud Service to rapidly provision an application environment with Oracle WebLogic Server as the application container, Oracle Coherence as a caching and data grid tier, and Oracle Traffic Director as the software load balancer—all on top of infrastructure provided by Oracle Compute Cloud Service.

For more information on Oracle Java Cloud Service, visit Oracle.com

Oracle

Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud™ is a fully managed OpenShift service that leverages the enterprise scale and security of IBM Cloud, so you can focus on developing and managing your applications.

Deploy highly available, OpenShift clusters as-a-service with the click of a button on IBM Cloud. Move and build OpenShift-based workloads on a managed public cloud service to gain increased responsiveness, scalability, and reliability.

IBM
 

Sample Customers

Avaya, ADNOC Distribution, DocuSign, Zamil Industrial Investment Company
edenor, Ford
Buyer's Guide
Oracle Java Cloud Service vs. Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud
April 2025
Free Report: Oracle Java Cloud Service vs. Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud
Find out what your peers are saying about Oracle Java Cloud Service vs. Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Oracle Java Cloud Service vs. Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud report.
See our list of best PaaS Clouds vendors.

We monitor all PaaS Clouds reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.