Microsoft Azure vs Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud comparison

Microsoft Azure vs. Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud

Download the complete report

Helped 893,915 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft Azure

Ranking in PaaS Clouds

1st

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

324

Ranking in other categories

Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) (1st)

Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud

Ranking in PaaS Clouds

19th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the PaaS Clouds category, the mindshare of Microsoft Azure is 12.9%, down from 19.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud is 1.3%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

PaaS Clouds Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Microsoft Azure	12.9%
Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud	1.3%
Other	85.8%

PaaS Clouds

Featured Reviews

Syed Abid

Snr. Infrastructure Architect (Data Centre) at LogicEra

Versatile integrations and reliable customer satisfaction elevate cloud service experience

For Microsoft Azure improvement, they need to enhance their support system. The first level of support should be improved in terms of quality and response time. They need more technical support at the first level, as there are currently only one or two technical people among five to ten staff members at this level. They should ensure that the first level support is more technical because we normally provide services to technical users ourselves. When an issue arises, it usually escalates to the second or third level. When facing first level support, they may have limited knowledge and only collect screenshots to forward to their seniors. They should ensure that the first level support is aligned with L2 and L3 to better assist us, especially since we mention in the ticket that our issues are related to specific problems and require that sort of support.

Read full review

Adrian Bilauca

Chief Software Engineer at Totalsoft

Handles security setups independently for a more secure environment

OpenShift does have more secure features. Azure also has equivalent services. For my client, it was good enough to switch to Azure. For development, there wasn't any significant change in effort, however, for the DevOps team, it was a relief since Azure has managed services. We used elasticity and scalability all over.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It provides us with access to technology that's not available in any other form and only exists in the cloud, so in order to keep our solutions modern, we have to do it through the public cloud."

"Microsoft Azure continue to expand its Platform as a Service value and has set itself apart from other cloud providers that are focused on the IaaS world."

"I would advise others to start moving everything to the cloud because it is cheaper, flexible, and scalable."

"To deploy it was essential, we got a great success on the project using MS Azure."

"It enhance the application's performance by managing increased demand efficiently"

"We've found the solution to be extremely flexible."

"One of the services that I found to be great is the connector."

"The most valuable features of this solution are the value for money and flexibility."

More Microsoft Azure pros

"For the DevOps team, it was a relief since Azure has managed services."

"Our pipeline integrates various monitoring tools like Fortify for security checks. Once the pipeline processes the code, the finished product is deployed on Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud. We ensure application setup and recovery by utilizing two separate clusters on OpenShift."

"The stability of the solution is good."

"The portability, moving from one platform to another, is easy."

"The most valuable feature of Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud is the UI console. We are able to receive the resources from the console directly."

"In general, customers appreciate its ability to run different workloads, manage applications through CI/CD pipelines like Jenkins, and leverage tools like Helm charts and Kako."

"The deployment mechanism has become more dynamic with the use of the product."

"The solution offers the most robust Kubernetes orchestration available."

More Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud pros

Cons

"Microsoft Azure could improve by having the availability be 100%. Which is difficult, but not impossible."

"Predictability and quality need improvement. Make sure things work predictably, as expected, and are documented."

"Early on, there were issues with the workload interruptions."

"Some of the capabilities available in an on-premise SQL Server aren't available in Azure. For instance, we found Azure Managed Instance to be lacking in certain aspects. One of our clients decided to stay on-premise rather than migrate to Azure because of this reason."

"There could be more documentation and video tutorials to incorporate each and every feature. This way one can easily get the knowledge and implement it."

"We would like it to be cheaper. As a customer, we always want to pay less."

"The solution could always work to reduce its costs."

"They need to make storage easy and offer more interconnectivity between solutions."

More Microsoft Azure cons

"At this point, I cannot recommend this to other users because of the experience that we have had."

"The effectiveness is satisfactory, and there haven't been any additional fees due to meeting demands. However, there's room for improvement in pricing, performance, and stability. Regarding the UI, it could be more user-friendly and integrated with various platforms. Currently, the UI lacks user-friendliness, especially for developers unfamiliar with container technology. Expecting them to create YAML files for security purposes is unrealistic without proper guidance or experience. This aspect needs improvement."

"The general purpose solution tries to cater to too many customers so it is heavy."

"The installation and configuration procedure should be simplified."

"Technical support could be a bit better."

"The service mesh integrations could improve the solution."

"There is room for improvement in cluster-based queue monitoring and autoscaling."

"Making it even more cost-effective could be explored."

More Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I am currently on a pay-as-you-go subscription and my customers are going to be on a three-year contract. For what is offered in the three-year package it is quite reasonably priced."

"Several thousand dollars and counting, we haven't needed to upgrade on premises hardware (In fact we eliminated all of the old on-premises hardware and run 100% on Azure) or pay for it's maintenance, power etc."

"Licensing costs for Enterprise are on an annual basis."

"The pricing for the end-user packages is a bit high. It is full of very interesting services, but I would still like it to be less expensive."

"It is similar to AWS, where it is on-demand and is billed monthly."

"The subscription models can be confusing and it would be beneficial for them to simplify them. We are on an annual subscription."

"The price of the solution could be cheaper."

"Microsoft Azure's pricing is reasonable. We pay around 5000 dollars per annum."

More Microsoft Azure pricing and cost advice

"This product is not costly when compared to other vendors."

"The pricing is a little high in China."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which PaaS Clouds solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

893,915 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

it_user8586

Engineer at a tech consulting company with 51-200 employees

Aug 14, 2013

Amazon vs Rackspace vs Microsoft vs Google: Cloud Hosting Services Comparison

Amazon Web Services, Rackspace OpenStack, Microsoft Windows Azure and Google are the major cloud hosting and storage service providers. Athough Amazon is top of them and is oldest in cloud market, Rackspace, Microsoft and Google are giving tough competition to each other and to Amazon also for…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

12%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Computer Software Company

University

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	141
Midsize Enterprise	54
Large Enterprise	153

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	6

Questions from the Community

Which is preferable - IBM Public Cloud or Microsoft Azure?

IBM Public Cloud is IBM’s Platform-as-a-Service. It aims to provide organizations with a secure cloud environment to manage data and applications. One of the features we like is the cloud activity ...

Which is better - SAP Cloud Platform or Microsoft Azure?

One of the best features of SAP Cloud Platform is that it is web-based and you can log in from anywhere in the world. SAP Cloud Platform is suitable for companies of any size; it works well with bo...

How does Microsoft Azure compare to Google Firebase?

I would recommend Google Firebase instead of Microsoft Azure, simply for the array of features that it has to offer. In particular, the Firebase library grants you access to a shared data structure...

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud?

From a cost perspective, some cost-effective situations were more difficult to achieve in Azure than in OpenShift. Comparing them can be difficult since the financial services cloud had stripped ma...

What needs improvement with Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud?

There is more work and effort needed for when many of the managed services are not accessible, especially in the security area. You have to do your own security setups as opposed to using a managed...

What is your primary use case for Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud?

If you want to control a more secure environment, like an on-premises environment, I use OpenShift on IBM Financial Services Cloud but not on the public cloud.

Amazon AWS vs Microsoft Azure

Comparisons

Compared 8% of the time

Google Firebase vs Microsoft Azure

Compared 8% of the time

Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) vs Microsoft Azure

Compared 7% of the time

Alibaba Cloud vs Microsoft Azure

Compared 6% of the time

Pivotal Cloud Foundry vs Microsoft Azure

Compared 6% of the time

More Microsoft Azure Competitors

Red Hat OpenShift vs Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud

Compared 16% of the time

Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) vs Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud

Compared 16% of the time

VMware Tanzu Platform vs Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud

Compared 15% of the time

Google Cloud vs Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud

Compared 13% of the time

Cloud Foundry vs Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud

Compared 10% of the time

More Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud Competitors

Product Reports

Microsoft Azure

Download Microsoft Azure product report

PaaS Clouds

Download Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud product report

Also Known As

Windows Azure, Azure, MS Azure

No data available

Overview

Microsoft Azure is a versatile cloud platform known for its scalability, flexibility, and ease of use, offering comprehensive solutions like virtual machines, identity management, and data storage with robust security measures and global data centers.

Azure provides a straightforward setup with dynamic scaling and seamless integration with existing tools. Its robust security, compliance with privacy laws, and global data center presence make it a trusted choice for enterprises. With features supporting DevOps, IoT, AI/ML, and hybrid cloud environments, Azure facilitates efficient cloud migration and modernization, enhancing operational efficiency.

What are some of the key features of Microsoft Azure?

Scalability: Adjust resources automatically to meet demand.
Flexibility: Support for hybrid cloud setup and smooth integration with existing tools.
Virtual Machines: Extensive support for VMs to run various workloads.
Active Directory: Robust identity and access management services.
Data Storage: Diverse storage options for different data management needs.
Security Measures: Comprehensive security protocols and compliance support.

What benefits and ROI should users consider when evaluating Microsoft Azure?

Cost Efficiency: Managed services that reduce operational costs.
Reliability: High availability with global data center coverage.
Ease of Migration: Facilitates transition from on-premises solutions to the cloud.
Operational Efficiency: User-friendly interface and extensive training resources.

Organizations primarily use Azure for infrastructure services, application hosting, and data management across industries such as finance, healthcare, and retail. Resellers deploy cloud services for clients in private, public, and hybrid clouds, supporting enterprise applications and digital transformation projects.

Microsoft

Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud is known for its efficient transaction processing, robust Kubernetes orchestration, and seamless portability. It enhances application management and provides a versatile GUI for accessing resources on any cloud, aiding developers with a stable setup across platforms.

This offering supports continuous integration and deployment pipelines, integrating security checks with Fortify. The intuitive console allows for direct resource access, streamlining application management. Suitable for deploying workloads on public or private clouds, it handles middleware telecom transactions, digital application APIs, and manages microservices effectively. While appreciated for easy setup and stable performance, areas like autoscaling, performance, and pricing require enhancements for improved user experience.

What are the key features of Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud?

Kubernetes Orchestration: Efficiently manages Kubernetes applications across clusters.
Autoscaling: Dynamically adjusts resources based on demand.
Security Integration: Supports Fortify for robust security checks.
CI/CD Pipelines: Facilitates automation in deployment processes.
GUI Access: Provides a user-friendly interface for resource management.

What benefits can users expect from Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud?

Seamless Portability: Easily migrate applications across cloud environments.
Enhanced Stability: Offers a stable environment for deploying workloads.
Improved Efficiency: Streamlines management with advanced orchestration.
Cost-Effectiveness: Optimizes resource usage for budget-friendly operations.

Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud is widely implemented in industries focusing on telecom and digital applications. Companies deploy microservices for secure, cloud-based environments, leveraging Kubernetes for managing services effectively. It enables advanced cluster management and supports deployment of customer services on both IBM and Microsoft platforms.

IBM

Sample Customers

BMW, Toyota, easyJet, NBC Sports, HarperCollins, Aviva, TalkTalk Business, Avanade, and Telenor.

edenor, Ford

Microsoft Azure vs. Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud