Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Oracle Enterprise Performance Management Cloud vs Oracle Planning and Budgeting Cloud comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Oracle Enterprise Performan...
Ranking in Financial Performance and Strategy Management
4th
Average Rating
9.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.4
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
Tax Management Software (17th), Financial Close Software (12th)
Oracle Planning and Budgeti...
Ranking in Financial Performance and Strategy Management
2nd
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
6.7
Number of Reviews
22
Ranking in other categories
Business Performance Management (4th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Financial Performance and Strategy Management category, the mindshare of Oracle Enterprise Performance Management Cloud is 7.8%, down from 9.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Oracle Planning and Budgeting Cloud is 10.0%, down from 12.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Financial Performance and Strategy Management
 

Featured Reviews

Sandeep-Banavali - PeerSpot reviewer
Provides all essential features needed in an integrated Enterprise Performance Management framework
The solution's initial setup/configuration is straightforward. As far as cloud setup is concerned, no installation is involved. In that case, the solution is maintained and hosted by Oracle. The time frame for deployment depends on the use cases. It is rapidly deployable for out-of-the-box features and customizable for any further changes/enhancements needed. It takes anywhere between six to ten weeks to deploy for standard requirements.
Arthur Perkins - PeerSpot reviewer
Enhancing future planning with predictive capabilities and flexible deployment
OCI can predict changes in your infrastructure in advance so that customers aren't caught off guard. It would be nice if OCI could predict these changes and notify Administrators without the Administrators asking OCI to do it. It would be nice if this function was automated. Right now, OCI can predict what changes should be made. But, at the Administrator's prompting.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The initial setup is pretty straightforward."
"The solution offers well-integrated and dynamic platforms for all disciplines of enterprise performance management."
"It gives you an end-to-end solution from integrating data from the source system to reporting. So it's a highly recommended tool."
"Beneficial analysis and easy to do management adjustments."
"The most valuable feature is the data integration in Oracle Planning and Budgeting Cloud."
"The product has a direct plugin to Microsoft Excel."
"The most valuable features of Oracle Planning and Budgeting Cloud are the many capabilities it provides."
"The tool improves the organizational budgeting process in several ways. One significant aspect is the extensionable functionality it offers. To illustrate, consider a scenario where a company has factories in Mexico producing Volkswagen and Kentucky producing Ford."
"We previously used Oracle EDS, and when comparing it to this solution, this solution has a much better interface. There are lots of advantages of the new solutions. Having it on the cloud, we are able to forget about keeping them updated or taking care of the database. We have minimal maintenance."
"Once you do the budget in Oracle ERP, you can upload it, but it's easier to create and manage budgets in the Oracle budgeting tool itself. For example, if you have a shortfall in the budget, it's easier to manage that and the forms, too, especially if you also have Oracle Forms Management. You can get the forms from somewhere and then transform those forms into budget heads."
 

Cons

"On the cloud, additional security is required."
"Integration of AI, IoT, and RPA-based automation and prediction features with the solution will be a great plus. Oracle is continuously investing efforts in this direction and new features are being released on a continuous basis."
"The FR recording studio that is used to build reports is clunky and awful to use. This could be improved a lot. The solution does have problems and limitations."
"Oracle Planning and Budgeting Cloud could improve by having better integration with some other modules that we would add to this solution."
"The tool's interface is outdated. However, OneStream is easier to navigate."
"Oracle made a mistake by forcing HFM users to transition to FCCS before the solution was mature enough."
"The business rules behind the forms need improvement, and the total processing time should be enhanced with the help of proper commands, specifically regarding the execution time of existing rules."
"Some of the things in this product are just too cumbersome and we don't need them and they make it harder to do certain things, or certain things have to have more specific names or descriptions."
"Oracle Planning and Budgeting Cloud could improve by creating a more visual and user-friendly interface similar to the old ABC analytics."
"One potential improvement would be a more visual workflow, as the current method using a tax list is not as effective."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Its licensing covers support and maintenance infrastructure as well."
"The price of Oracle Planning and Budgeting Cloud is expensive. However, it solves a lot of issues at the company. Having a better price could make us think about using more cloud products for Oracle and increase usage."
"The solution is free."
"There is an annual subscription for this solution and it is priced high."
"It is expensive."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Financial Performance and Strategy Management solutions are best for your needs.
857,688 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Educational Organization
28%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Computer Software Company
8%
Insurance Company
7%
Financial Services Firm
12%
Computer Software Company
11%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Energy/Utilities Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Oracle Planning and Budgeting Cloud?
While cloud pricing may initially appear more expensive due to the absence of infrastructure expenses, it is fair. There's no need for physical servers or infrastructure management. The licensing i...
What needs improvement with Oracle Planning and Budgeting Cloud?
Oracle Planning and Budgeting Cloud could improve by creating a more visual and user-friendly interface similar to the old ABC analytics. The ability to easily distribute costs visually, using clic...
What is your primary use case for Oracle Planning and Budgeting Cloud?
At Panama Canal, the entire budget was uploaded into the system, and every process, from a purchase requisition to the purchase order and invoice, had to go through the budgeting system before ente...
 

Also Known As

Oracle EPM Cloud
Oracle PBCS, Oracle Enterprise Business Planning
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Eindhoven University of Technology, HES-SO University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland, NetCologne, Kolos Cement Limited
Australian Finance Group Ltd., Daelim Industrial Co. Ltd., TBS Group, Delaware Life Insurance, Shelf Drilling Ltd., Abu Dhabi Department of Finance, Fugro Norway AS, Drake & Scull International PJSC (DSI), Racepoint Global, Edgewater Technology Inc., King Abdulaziz City for Science and Technology, Communications Test Design Inc.
Find out what your peers are saying about Oracle Enterprise Performance Management Cloud vs. Oracle Planning and Budgeting Cloud and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.
857,688 professionals have used our research since 2012.