OpenText Trading Grid vs SAP Process Orchestration comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
OpenText Logo
608 views|427 comparisons
50% willing to recommend
SAP Logo
3,771 views|1,590 comparisons
93% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between OpenText Trading Grid and SAP Process Orchestration based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about SAP, MuleSoft, IBM and others in Business-to-Business Middleware.
To learn more, read our detailed Business-to-Business Middleware Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The solution is easy to implement."

More OpenText Trading Grid Pros →

"The monitoring tools are the most valuable feature.""The most valuable feature is the seamless integration with backend systems.""The monitoring is one of the greatest features in Process Orchestration because it is user-friendly and easy for somebody who is not experienced.""In my opinion, SAP PO is the most mature suite of tools to integrate processes across SAP environments at this moment. It's really unbeatable because it allows you to integrate whatever scenarios you can imagine.""The solution is easy to use.""The solution is stable.""Process Orchestration fulfils the need for middleware to mediate types of connectivity.""It is a scalable solution."

More SAP Process Orchestration Pros →

Cons
"Technical support needs to be better."

More OpenText Trading Grid Cons →

"The solution is not very scalable because it is at the end of its life.""We encounter challenges while connecting to MQTT and MQDD adapters.""In terms of technical support, it would be helpful if they handled the tickets a bit faster when queries are sent to them.""Its administration management feature needs to be simpler to use.""This is an on-premise platform and one area they can improve on is having the ability to work with SaaS solutions.""The cloud capability features need improvement.""It does not have all of the industry-standard solutions available in PO and it is not plug and play, so we have to do a lot of development.""The product roadmap suggests it will approach the end of support in several years, and a lot of innovations are now implemented by SAP not in SAP PO, but in SAP Integration Suite, hence, the platform is stable, but doesn't receive a lot of new features in recent updates."

More SAP Process Orchestration Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "The cost of SAP products is quite high but the quality is really good."
  • "The pricing for this solution is fine."
  • "There are fees in addition to the licensing."
  • "It's not an expensive solution."
  • "Looking at market conditions, vendors nowadays are giving products at very low price levels. However, SAP Process Orchestration have not yet reduced their prices. The prices could be reduced a lot to stay competitive."
  • "The license is a one-time payment, and additional costs are only incurred on the infrastructure side since it's an on-premise solution."
  • "The price of SAP Process Orchestration was reasonable."
  • "The fee for maintenance is costly."
  • More SAP Process Orchestration Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business-to-Business Middleware solutions are best for your needs.
    768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The solution is easy to implement.
    Top Answer:The pricing is moderate. I'd rate the solution three out of five in terms of affordability.
    Top Answer:If you are on Trading Grid and you're trying to fetch the data, for example, the IDoc from SAP or the transfer data, sometimes there are system glitches wherein you will not be able to download the… more »
    Top Answer: It provides essential features such as continuous monitoring of all interfaces are crucial for our needs.
    Top Answer:We subscribe to annual licenses, and the competitive license cost is reasonable. We find that the cost is even more affordable compared to other options available in the market.
    Top Answer:Implementing changes and introducing new interfaces in Process Orchestration should have been more straightforward. The current system is burdened with a heavy load and has become overly complex… more »
    Ranking
    Views
    608
    Comparisons
    427
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    783
    Rating
    8.0
    Views
    3,771
    Comparisons
    1,590
    Reviews
    16
    Average Words per Review
    394
    Rating
    8.4
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Trading Grid, GXS Trading Grid
    SAP NetWeaver Process Integration, NetWeaver Process Integration
    Learn More
    Overview

    OpenText Trading Grid (formerly GXS) is a unique global integration platform that enables and streamlines cross enterprise business processes. With extreme flexibility and a service-oriented, business-to-business e-commerce platform, the Grid helps companies automate global trading communities by shielding complexity from rapidly changing standards, eliminating manual and duplicative efforts and enabling a new level of process integration and business intelligence.

    SAP NetWeaver Process Integration facilitates the integration of business processes that span different departments, organizations, or companies. SAP PI is based on general standards so as to enable 3rd-party systems to be integrated. At the center of SAP PI is an XML-based communication that uses HTTP (Hyper Text Transfer Protocol). Irrespective of the scenario used, the application-specific contents are transferred in messages in user-defined XML eXtensible Markup Language) from the sender to the receiver either via the Integration Server, or directly between the systems involved. SAP PI can be installed in different ways: Dual usage type installation: Based on both AS ABAP and AS Java. and Advanced Adapter Engine Extended (AEX): Based on AS Java only.
    Sample Customers
    Autoliv, Hella, Hutchinson, Michelin
    Lenovo, Dansk Supermarked A/S, Ego Pharmaceuticals Pty. Ltd, Kaeser Kompressoren
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company16%
    Manufacturing Company11%
    Retailer10%
    Financial Services Firm9%
    REVIEWERS
    Manufacturing Company30%
    Wholesaler/Distributor17%
    Computer Software Company13%
    Retailer9%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company15%
    Manufacturing Company14%
    Energy/Utilities Company7%
    Financial Services Firm7%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business25%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise62%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business27%
    Midsize Enterprise3%
    Large Enterprise70%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business18%
    Midsize Enterprise12%
    Large Enterprise69%
    Buyer's Guide
    Business-to-Business Middleware
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about SAP, MuleSoft, IBM and others in Business-to-Business Middleware. Updated: April 2024.
    768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    OpenText Trading Grid is ranked 8th in Business-to-Business Middleware with 1 review while SAP Process Orchestration is ranked 1st in Business-to-Business Middleware with 28 reviews. OpenText Trading Grid is rated 8.0, while SAP Process Orchestration is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of OpenText Trading Grid writes "Industry-leading, easy to implement, and has good mapping specification guidelines". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP Process Orchestration writes "A tool that can be useful for small integrations and large integrations". OpenText Trading Grid is most compared with IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services, TrueCommerce EDI, SPS Commerce Fulfillment (EDI), SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite and SAP Cloud Platform, whereas SAP Process Orchestration is most compared with Mule Anypoint Platform, SAP Data Services, webMethods Integration Server, IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services and IBM B2B Integrator.

    See our list of best Business-to-Business Middleware vendors and best Cloud Data Integration vendors.

    We monitor all Business-to-Business Middleware reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.