Boomi iPaaS vs OpenText Trading Grid comparison

Boomi and OpenText are both solutions in the Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) category. Boomi is ranked #6 with an average rating of 7.9, while OpenText is ranked #19. Boomi holds a 11.1% mindshare in PaaS, compared to OpenText’s 1.4% mindshare. Additionally, 85% of Boomi users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 50% of OpenText users who would recommend it.

Boomi iPaaS

Read 28 Boomi iPaaS reviews

1,879 Views
1,354 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

OpenText Trading Grid

Read 1 OpenText Trading Grid review

229 Views
166 Comparison Views

50% willing to recommend

Boomi iPaaS

OpenText Trading Grid

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Boomi iPaaS and OpenText Trading Grid based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Salesforce, SAP and others in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS).

To learn more, read our detailed Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 849,686 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Boomi iPaaS

Ranking in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)

6th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

OpenText Trading Grid

Ranking in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)

19th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business-to-Business Middleware (12th), Cloud Data Integration (31st)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) category, the mindshare of Boomi iPaaS is 11.1%, up from 7.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText Trading Grid is 1.4%, up from 1.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)

Featured Reviews

Eugene Paden

CTO at a computer software company with 201-500 employees

Integration solution proves maturity and drives productivity

There are many features we're using. We're starting to do AI now regarding integration with other platforms, focusing on creating integrations. A significant area for improvement is version control. Currently, you develop and cannot properly roll back to a previous version unless you create different versions. With proper version control, you could know which version to revert to and test other versions.

Read full review

VARUNKUMAR

Mgr Value Chain Integration/EDI at a non-tech company with 10,001+ employees

Industry-leading, easy to implement, and has good mapping specification guidelines

The good thing about OpenText is that we have the mapping specification guideline available, which is not there in a solution like SEEBURGER. Whenever you want to take a decision to move away from OpenText, you have already documented your mapping and what your mapping looks like. So you go to the next provider, provide them with that mapping specification, and it'll be very easy for them to develop a new map instead of just taking the data - input data, output data - and then looking for how the data is getting transformed. So you have the mapping spec level which is a very good feature of OpenText, which we do not have in SEEBURGER. It's very hard to move from SEEBURGER. The solution is easy to implement. It's stable and reliable. They are the industry leaders in the integration space.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Extremely flexible for any kind of integration between systems."

"This solution has a user-friendly interface and very good documentation with solutions that helped us in working with the tool efficiently."

"The iPaaS functionality is very mature. The browser based IDE is also very mature and stable."

"Low-code development is the most valuable feature."

"The maturity of the product is significant."

"It is easy to learn and implement."

"I really appreciate the on-the-go access through the browser and the B2B integration."

"The tool's most valuable features I've found are related to debugging and testing. It makes it easy to track execution, documents, and process history. This functionality is particularly useful for identifying issues with data and providing insights to the business."

More Boomi iPaaS pros

"The solution is easy to implement."

Cons

"The product's UI could be more convenient."

"It crashes if we run high-volume integration."

"There are stability issues."

"There should be more scripting possibilities."

"The most valuable features of Boomi are the integration capabilities, the Data Hub product, and the UDI integration."

"There are still some areas that need improvement. For example, when updates are going on, the product becomes very slow."

"They are lacking in some streaming features, and messaging features from a listener's point of view."

"The deployment was simple, but the implementation is missing a lot of capabilities."

More Boomi iPaaS cons

"Technical support needs to be better."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The licensing model of Dell Boomi is based on a ‘pay-per-use’ model."

"AtomSphere Integration's pricing is competitive, and I would rate it seven out of ten."

"The cost of the solution is in the neighborhood of $20,000 annually. There are no costs above the standard licensing fee."

"Approximately 20k annually."

"The pricing is a bit complex. While the entry fee may be lower than other solutions, it could be expensive depending on your usage."

"There could be an easy-to-understand licensing model."

"It is an expensive platform."

"They do not charge by the number of people using the software (client-server model), but rather they charge based on the number of connections used. This makes it very cost effective."

More Boomi iPaaS pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

849,686 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

16%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

Non Profit

Computer Software Company

14%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Retailer

11%

Real Estate/Law Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Boomi AtomSphere Integration?

The tool's most valuable features I've found are related to debugging and testing. It makes it easy to track execution, documents, and process history. This functionality is particularly useful for...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Boomi AtomSphere Integration?

The pricing for Boomi iPaaS is reasonable, costing around $6,000 per year. It is affordable even for small customers, like a salon with a couple of branches.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Boomi AtomSphere Integration?

Although Boomi iPaaS is top in the market, there might be room for improvement in the ETL aspect, which was recently integrated as another module. This aspect of Boomi iPaaS is not mature enough at...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Microsoft Azure Logic Apps vs Boomi iPaaS

Compared 25% of the time

webMethods.io vs Boomi iPaaS

Compared 9% of the time

SSIS vs Boomi iPaaS

Compared 6% of the time

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs Boomi iPaaS

Compared 6% of the time

SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite vs Boomi iPaaS

Compared 5% of the time

More Boomi iPaaS Competitors

IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services vs OpenText Trading Grid

Compared 26% of the time

SPS Commerce Fulfillment (EDI) vs OpenText Trading Grid

Compared 24% of the time

SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite vs OpenText Trading Grid

Compared 15% of the time

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs OpenText Trading Grid

Compared 12% of the time

More OpenText Trading Grid Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Boomi iPaaS

April 2025

Download Boomi iPaaS product report

Buyer's Guide

Business-to-Business Middleware

March 2025

Download OpenText Trading Grid product report

Also Known As

Boomi

Trading Grid, GXS Trading Grid

Overview

The Boomi AtomSphere integration platform as a service (iPaaS) supports all your application integration processes – between cloud platforms, software-as-a-service applications, and on-premises systems. Your entire team has online access to a powerful range of integration and data management capabilities, that can be realized in a fraction of the time of legacy middleware technologies.

Boomi

OpenText Trading Grid (formerly GXS) is a unique global integration platform that enables and streamlines cross enterprise business processes. With extreme flexibility and a service-oriented, business-to-business e-commerce platform, the Grid helps companies automate global trading communities by shielding complexity from rapidly changing standards, eliminating manual and duplicative efforts and enabling a new level of process integration and business intelligence.

OpenText

Sample Customers

DocuSign Inc., Innotas, Certent, Renesas Electronics America (REA), Kelly-Moore Paints, Mindjet, City of McKinney, Ritchie Bros. Auctioneers (RBA), Daylight Transport, A10 Networks

Autoliv, Hella, Hutchinson, Michelin

Buyer's Guide

Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)

April 2025

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Salesforce, SAP and others in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS). Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

849,686 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) vendors.

We monitor all Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.