Sr. Quality Assurance Project Manager at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees
Reseller
Top 5
Oct 30, 2025
I do have experience with OpenText products and OpenText ALM. I have been using ALM Quality Center, which has had a few names for it over time, but it is the old Quality Center that was then renamed to ALM. I think it is still referred to in different versions, such as ALM Enterprise and ALM Professional. The virtualization feature is a good one. With UFT itself, the advanced reporting features are exceptional in the fact that it gives you line-by-line indicators of what your results of your tests are. However, there is not anything specific to Digital Lab that provides reporting features. I would rate this review a nine out of ten overall.
Senior Director at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
Real User
Top 5
Jul 23, 2025
The product usage has shifted significantly in the last two to three years, particularly due to SAP's partnership with Tricentis. The solution rates 7 out of 10 overall. Many users have started moving to scriptless tools such as Tosca or low-code tools such as Katalon. This fundamental shift is occurring because productivity is improved, maintenance is easier, and more people in the market are educated on these tools. Regarding analytics, the earlier usage involved extracting reports and creating spreadsheet dashboards. Now, there are integrations available to pull data to Confluence pages or display dashboards within the tool itself. From a product standpoint, any bugs or challenges faced have been resolved through upgrades and patches. The pricing is comparatively lower than Tricentis products. The solution receives an 8 out of 10 for stability and a 7 out of 10 for overall rating.
Sales Leader at a computer software company with 1,001-5,000 employees
MSP
Top 10
Jul 16, 2024
I recommend OpenText UFT Digital Lab because it allows you to increase your test coverage across multiple devices and platforms using the same framework. It's a great solution for boosting productivity and fostering innovation. Overall, I rate the solution an eight out of ten.
I haven't tried browser testing with the tool, but I have tried using it on two to four different desktop applications. The improvements in testing capabilities from the use of the solution are reflected in the area of object detection methods. For automation testing, the tool provides the record and playback option, which helps with object detection easily. The tool provides data-driven testing, which helps continuously use test cases. I don't think the real device testing in OpenText UFT Digital Lab impacted testing accuracy. I rate the tool an eight out of ten.
I highly recommend OpenText's end-to-end solution for application lifecycle management. I can say it ranks among the top three options in this regard. My recommendation is not solely based on its affordability, but rather its effectiveness. When the right processes, people, methods, and frameworks are employed, OpenText's solution can yield substantial benefits and a rapid return on investment. It is crucial to implement and utilize the product correctly without altering it into something it wasn't designed to be. I would rate it nine out of ten.
Learn what your peers think about OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: January 2026.
Developer Automation Tests at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees
Real User
Aug 5, 2019
In rating the product on a scale of one to ten where ten is best, I would rate this product a seven. I think that Mobile Center can offer a good platform and practice to do your work. It is easy to implement and easy to configure once you get used to the product. The problems are the lack of better documentation and more friendly user interface.
OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web offers integration with HPE and non-HPE tools, real device testing, and device management. It supports real-time analytics and multi-platform testing, ensuring traceability and flexibility with decentralized devices.OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web is designed to enhance testing efficiency for mobile and desktop applications by allowing ease of integration with different testing environments. It features real-time analytics,...
I do have experience with OpenText products and OpenText ALM. I have been using ALM Quality Center, which has had a few names for it over time, but it is the old Quality Center that was then renamed to ALM. I think it is still referred to in different versions, such as ALM Enterprise and ALM Professional. The virtualization feature is a good one. With UFT itself, the advanced reporting features are exceptional in the fact that it gives you line-by-line indicators of what your results of your tests are. However, there is not anything specific to Digital Lab that provides reporting features. I would rate this review a nine out of ten overall.
The product usage has shifted significantly in the last two to three years, particularly due to SAP's partnership with Tricentis. The solution rates 7 out of 10 overall. Many users have started moving to scriptless tools such as Tosca or low-code tools such as Katalon. This fundamental shift is occurring because productivity is improved, maintenance is easier, and more people in the market are educated on these tools. Regarding analytics, the earlier usage involved extracting reports and creating spreadsheet dashboards. Now, there are integrations available to pull data to Confluence pages or display dashboards within the tool itself. From a product standpoint, any bugs or challenges faced have been resolved through upgrades and patches. The pricing is comparatively lower than Tricentis products. The solution receives an 8 out of 10 for stability and a 7 out of 10 for overall rating.
I recommend OpenText UFT Digital Lab because it allows you to increase your test coverage across multiple devices and platforms using the same framework. It's a great solution for boosting productivity and fostering innovation. Overall, I rate the solution an eight out of ten.
I haven't tried browser testing with the tool, but I have tried using it on two to four different desktop applications. The improvements in testing capabilities from the use of the solution are reflected in the area of object detection methods. For automation testing, the tool provides the record and playback option, which helps with object detection easily. The tool provides data-driven testing, which helps continuously use test cases. I don't think the real device testing in OpenText UFT Digital Lab impacted testing accuracy. I rate the tool an eight out of ten.
I highly recommend OpenText's end-to-end solution for application lifecycle management. I can say it ranks among the top three options in this regard. My recommendation is not solely based on its affordability, but rather its effectiveness. When the right processes, people, methods, and frameworks are employed, OpenText's solution can yield substantial benefits and a rapid return on investment. It is crucial to implement and utilize the product correctly without altering it into something it wasn't designed to be. I would rate it nine out of ten.
I rate the product an eight out of ten.
We are at an early stage in terms of using this solution. I would rate this solution an eight out of ten.
In rating the product on a scale of one to ten where ten is best, I would rate this product a seven. I think that Mobile Center can offer a good platform and practice to do your work. It is easy to implement and easy to configure once you get used to the product. The problems are the lack of better documentation and more friendly user interface.
Try to put it first of all in your own lab and then try to put it in the customer's.