Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

ON24 Platform vs TeamViewer comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 3, 2025

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

ON24 Platform
Ranking in Virtual Meetings
24th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
8.1
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
Virtual Events Platforms (4th)
TeamViewer
Ranking in Virtual Meetings
7th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
87
Ranking in other categories
Remote Access (3rd)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Virtual Meetings category, the mindshare of ON24 Platform is 1.5%, up from 1.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of TeamViewer is 6.9%, down from 7.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Virtual Meetings
 

Featured Reviews

reviewer1337886 - PeerSpot reviewer
Easy setup and an a la carte pricing model
The solution needs a more modern interface. One of our biggest complaints is that we don't have the ability to dynamically push our interface to participants. Adobe Connect is an older technology, but it allows us to push our own layout and design to participants. One of the solution's strengths is that it's web-only but that is also a weakness. It is not a software solution but is browser-based which has its advantages and disadvantages. Zoom has become such a force that its ease of use surpasses ON24.
Heiko Humpert - PeerSpot reviewer
Allows an ease of access to various systems and has a straightforward setup process
The product allows easy access to any system in case of any issues We cannot see the number of monitors working on the system simultaneously. It becomes complicated to switch from one monitor to another for different windows. The product's stability depends on the network's stability in our…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Friendly user interface and simple navigation."
"The solution works well with third-party integrations."
"This is a unique solution that is very easy to install."
"It saves trips to customer sites, which saves time. I am able to get in there remotely and fix things."
"The most valuable feature has been the ability to give control to others for support purposes."
"Our computers are spread amongst six physical locations. TeamViewer reduces the need to travel to those offices to help staff."
"The most valuable feature of TeamViewer is its ease of use and beneficial remote access."
"The most valuable feature is you do not need to know the Windows username and password to connect and see the staff screen."
"Getting started with TeamViewer was easy, with a very straightforward usage"
"The implementation is quite straightforward."
 

Cons

"Bandwidth optimization could be increased."
"The solution needs a more modern interface."
"TeamViewer has a legacy and may not be using the latest UI trends."
"Considering the earlier versions of the product, I think TeamViewer used to slow down the systems."
"The product can sometimes crash."
"Voice communication and screen communication or face-to-face communication could be improved."
"The solution could be improved by enhancing the use of the mobile version to be used on phones."
"TeamViewer could be more secure."
"TeamViewer could improve by having a cloud version. Having the solution on the system could cause some cyber security concerns with data."
"The solution could improve by increasing or removing the time limitation on the use of a session."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We paid $1,800 for five webinars, which is the standard fee. If you require support there is a $300 additional fee, extra attendees is an additional fee, integration is an additional fee, etc. All these extras could add on another $2,500 which was not in our budget."
"The version of the solution we are using is free."
"TeamViewer is $600 or $700 per port per year..."
"We have a corporate license. The maximum amount number of users changes based on the amount you pay. E.g., with our license, there is a maximum amount of users who can use the solution at the same time (10 users)."
"I used the free version of TeamViewer."
"We are not using the solution for commercial use therefore it is free to use."
"TeamViewer offers a free version to try. Download and give it a shot. See what it's like and if you like it, then buy the license for it."
"We have a permanent license and the price is reasonable."
"The price of the license could be less expensive."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Virtual Meetings solutions are best for your needs.
862,077 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Computer Software Company
13%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Financial Services Firm
6%
University
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
Should I choose Teamviewer Tensor over the regular Teamviewer?
The number one advantage of TeamViewer for me is its ease of use, specifically as it relates to the client side. By far, one of its best features is the remote access it provides. I can control som...
What do you like most about TeamViewer?
It is easy to use and has a pretty good UI.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for TeamViewer?
The tool's price is a problem because TeamViewer wants users to sign up, and I feel most of the products want their users to do the same. TeamViewer is very pricey. You have to sign up for a yearly...
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

IBM, Zendesk, Salesforce, Linkedin, Intel
Porsche Informatik, Philips, DHL, Intel, Motorola, Microsoft, IBM, Siemens, Fujitsu, American Red Cross
Find out what your peers are saying about ON24 Platform vs. TeamViewer and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.
862,077 professionals have used our research since 2012.