Obsidian CDR Platform vs Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform comparison

Obsidian Security and Zscaler are both solutions in the Cloud Access Security Brokers (CASB) category. Obsidian Security is ranked #21, while Zscaler is ranked #9 with an average rating of 8.4. Obsidian Security holds a 0.8% mindshare in CASB, compared to Zscaler’s 9.2% mindshare. Additionally, 98% of Zscaler users are willing to recommend the solution.

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 8, 2026

Obsidian CDR Platform and Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform compete in cybersecurity solutions. Zscaler is notable for its comprehensive security features, whereas Obsidian is favored for pricing flexibility and support.

Features: Obsidian CDR Platform includes robust data protection, compliance management, and seamless integration with existing systems, focusing on user experience. Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform is centered around its zero trust framework, advanced threat protection, and comprehensive analytics, emphasizing network security on a broad scale.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Obsidian CDR Platform offers a straightforward deployment process with responsive support, enabling quicker adaptation for businesses. Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform involves a complex setup due to its extensive features, leading to a steeper learning curve, though its robust customer service helps manage deployment intricacies.

Pricing and ROI: Obsidian CDR Platform is known for a competitive pricing structure offering rapid ROI, appealing to cost-conscious organizations. Zscaler, despite higher initial costs, provides security capabilities justifying long-term investment. Obsidian provides immediate economic benefits, while Zscaler offers value through extensive features.

To learn more, read our detailed Cloud Access Security Brokers (CASB) Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Cloud Access Security Brokers (CASB)

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 885,264 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

iboss

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Cloud Access Security Brokers (CASB) category, the mindshare of iboss is 2.7%, up from 1.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Obsidian CDR Platform is 0.8%, down from 0.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform is 9.2%, down from 9.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Cloud Access Security Brokers (CASB) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
iboss	2.7%
Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform	9.2%
Obsidian CDR Platform	0.8%
Other	87.3%

Cloud Access Security Brokers (CASB)

Featured Reviews

reviewer2701851

Managing Director

Enhances web security with a single pane of glass and flexible deployment

I don't see any need for improvement; one of the really good things about iboss as a company is that they listen to customer feedback. I have suggested enhancements, and they are responsive, making changes for the better, and they do a lot of testing. To improve iboss, although we haven't used it, we considered the VPN solution that comes with the highest tier licensing, which includes DLP and various other add-ons. We prefer using another product which automatically logs you back onto your network when turning on your PC. With iboss, the connection is manual, which doesn't meet our needs. Additionally, sizing can be tricky because, although the initial recommendations may seem adequate, actual usage may require more gateways than anticipated.

Read full review

Use Obsidian CDR Platform?

Leave a review

Vibin Thomas

Team Lead, Technical Content Security at Valuepoint Systems

Zero trust access has transformed remote connectivity and now simplifies secure app usage

Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform, especially Zscaler Private Access, is very strong, though there are a few areas where improvements can be made. One challenge observed is around initial troubleshooting and visibility. While Zscaler Private Access provides logs, it can sometimes take time to pinpoint the exact cause of access issues, especially in complex environments with multiple policies and identity integration. Another area is the dependency on identity and connector health. Since Zscaler Private Access is heavily reliant on app connectors and identity providers, any issues with these components can impact user access, making proper monitoring critical. During the initial setup, policy configuration and application onboarding require careful planning, especially for larger environments with many applications. These challenges are manageable with proper design and monitoring. Overall, the platform delivers strong security and user experience. I would recommend a few improvements, especially around user interface, reporting, and troubleshooting experience. From a user interface perspective, while the platform is powerful, the policy configuration and navigation can feel complex, especially for new users. A more simplified and intuitive layout for policy mapping and application access would help reduce the learning curve. In terms of reporting, Zscaler Private Access provides logs, but having more built-in customizable dashboards and analytics would be very helpful. Better visibility into user access patterns, application performance, and real-time troubleshooting insights would improve operational efficiency. From a support and troubleshooting standpoint, it would be beneficial to have more granular centralized visibility, allowing for quick end-to-end tracing of a user request from authentication to application access without switching between multiple views. These improvements would make the platform even more efficient, especially for large-scale enterprise environments.

Read full review

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Access Security Brokers (CASB) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

885,264 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

11%

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

21%

Computer Software Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

Insurance Company

Financial Services Firm

12%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Computer Software Company

10%

Insurance Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	6
Midsize Enterprise	6
Large Enterprise	6

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	16
Midsize Enterprise	12
Large Enterprise	43

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with iboss?

For zero trust implementation, we encountered complexity issues, especially with a large infrastructure company Exxon...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for iboss?

Previously when I used iboss, we did the POC for iboss for ExxonMobil. Four or five people wanted to move from our ol...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for iboss?

Regarding pricing, setup costs, and licensing, iboss is not cheap, and that's my only concern. There are cheaper alte...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is the better solution - Prisma Access or Zscaler Private Access?

We looked into Prisma Access before choosing Zscaler Private Access (ZPA). Palo Alto’s Prisma Access is a secure ac...

See all answers

What do you like most about Zscaler SASE?

The most valuable features of Zscaler Private Access are reliability, scalability, and availability.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Zscaler SASE?

The solution needs to improve a lot of aspects.

See all answers

Comparisons

Netskope vs iboss

Compared 10% of the time

Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks vs iboss

Compared 8% of the time

Fortinet FortiGate vs iboss

Compared 7% of the time

FortiSASE vs iboss

Compared 7% of the time

Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs iboss

Compared 4% of the time

More iboss Competitors

AppOmni vs Obsidian CDR Platform

Compared 20% of the time

Grip Security vs Obsidian CDR Platform

Compared 9% of the time

MetaDefender vs Obsidian CDR Platform

Compared 9% of the time

Orca Security vs Obsidian CDR Platform

Compared 8% of the time

DoControl SaaS Security Platform (SSP) vs Obsidian CDR Platform

Compared 4% of the time

More Obsidian CDR Platform Competitors

Cato SASE Cloud Platform vs Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform

Compared 8% of the time

FortiSASE vs Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform

Compared 4% of the time

Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks vs Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform

Compared 4% of the time

Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform

Compared 4% of the time

Cloudflare One vs Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform

Compared 4% of the time

More Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

iboss

March 2026

Download iboss product report

Buyer's Guide

Cloud Detection and Response (CDR)

March 2026

Download Obsidian CDR Platform product report

Buyer's Guide

Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform

March 2026

Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform report

Download Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform product report

Also Known As

iBoss Cloud Platform

No data available

Zscaler SASE, Zscaler DLP, Zscaler CASB, Zscaler CSPM, Zscaler Browser Isolation, Zscaler Posture Control

Overview

Iboss offers a comprehensive cloud-based security platform valued for its scalability and autonomous features, ensuring robust security with easy deployment and management capabilities.

Renowned for its robust security architecture, Iboss integrates seamlessly within diverse networks, delivering efficient granular filtering and advanced content categorization. Its single pane of glass console provides ease of management, allowing rapid scalability suitable for rapidly deploying environments. Operates in BYOD setups due to inline filtering without device installation. Integration with cloud-based applications enhances user control, and features like SASE, SSL inspection, and ChatGPT risk protection stand as highlights. Despite its strengths, users have pointed out areas for enhancement like direct navigation in reports, SSL decryption, and better cloud integration while having room to improve data loss prevention.

What are the most important features of Iboss?

Scalability: Supports rapid deployment across diverse networks.
SASE: A consolidated approach to secure access.
SSL Inspection: Ensures safe data transmission.
Granular Filtering: Detailed control over accessible content.
Single Pane Management: Unifies control through a centralized console.

What benefits should users consider in reviews?

Cost-effectiveness: Offers competitive pricing with robust features.
Autonomous Operation: Reduces management overhead.
Responsive Support: Provides assistance when needed.
Flexible Deployment: Available for both cloud and on-premises environments.

The usage of Iboss spans educational institutions, specifically K-12, to enforce internet policies, protect data, and support remote work environments. It provides web filtering and security frameworks to ensure safe browsing. Its platform-as-a-service model offers flexibility for both cloud-based and on-premises requirements, integrating seamlessly to deliver enhanced security features suitable for various deployment needs including zero trust, CASB, and network security for work-from-home setups.

iboss

Obsidian CDR enables security teams to focus on mitigating risks and threats and improving the security of their SaaS applications. The solution provides continuous visibility and powerful analytics to uncover, investigate, and respond to breaches and insider threats in SaaS applications quickly without causing business interruptions or slowing down business. The Obsidian CDR Platform data infrastructure is built with a deep understanding of how the APIs are structured, what data can be retrieved, and with what frequency. The Obsidian CDR Platform is capable of stopping even the most advanced attacks across SaaS and cloud services by using a unique identity-centric approach.

Obsidian CDR Features

Obsidian CDR has many valuable key features. Some of the most useful ones include:

Unified visibility and monitoring: Obsidian provides a clean, consolidated view of users, data, and applications in the cloud. With the solution’s unified visibility, you can control your inventory of users and access, you can take advantage of role mapping, and utilize the platform’s activity monitoring and third-party authorizations.

Cloud breach defense: Through the use of configuration and behavioral analysis and machine learning, Obsidian CDR can successfully generate alerts around breaches and insider threats. The Obsidian platform detects indicators of anomalous logins, SaaS persistence, data exfiltration, lateral movement, malicious insider activity, OAuth token abuse, and other threats.

Incident response: Obsidian provides quick searching, filtering, and export capabilities to give incident responders timelines and context. In addition, teams can remediate directly inside Obsidian to lock accounts, unshare files, remove mail forwarding rules, etc.

SaaS security posture management: Obsidian CDR populates recommendations to strengthen the security of cloud applications by removing stale accounts and fixing misconfigurations. The solution also enables security teams to detect configuration changes that weaken the security posture of applications, and observe when users are given additional privileges. Teams can also use the data to audit and report on compliance adherence.

Obsidian CDR Benefits

There are many benefits to implementing Obsidian CDR. Some of the biggest advantages the solution offers include:

Integration: Obsidian integrates with SaaS applications such as Salesforce, G Suite, Zoom, Microsoft Office 365, Dropbox, and Slack to automatically aggregate data about users, accounts, privileges, activity, and configurations.

Holistically monitor user activity: With Obsidian CDR, your organization can holistically monitor user activity across endpoints and SaaS apps. You can correlate users’ SaaS accounts with their endpoint devices in order to get richer context of user activity.

Defend against breaches and threats: By implementing Obsidian CDR, you can easily detect and proactively hunt for internal and external threats by discovering suspicious user behavior across SaaS accounts and devices.

Quickly respond to incidents: With Obsidian CDR, you can investigate and respond to breaches and incidents faster by pivoting to a pre-populated contextual view of user activity and alerts in both systems.

Strengthen security with risk monitoring: Obsidian CDR helps you Identify and mitigate risks and inappropriate activity to improve your organization’s security posture and prevent breaches.

Obsidian Security

Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange enhances security with seamless cloud-based connectivity and VPN-less operation, offering integration with multiple identity providers and advanced security features, suitable for remote work environments.

Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange provides secure, adaptive connectivity without traditional VPNs, allowing organizations to replace legacy systems and bolster remote work security. The platform offers cloud-based protection, single sign-on, dynamic URL categorization, and scalable solutions. While advanced security features like DLP and threat protection enhance data protection, users may face issues with speed, connectivity, and some customization options. Integration challenges, latency due to multi-tenant hosting, reporting delays, and licensing costs require consideration. It supports secure internet access and private application security, ensuring traffic control and data compliance.

What are the key features of Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange?

VPN-less Connectivity: Enables secure remote access without traditional VPNs.
Cloud-based Security: Offers scalable protection utilizing cloud infrastructure.
Single Sign-On: Integrates with multiple identity providers for streamlined access.
Dynamic URL Categorization: Provides real-time URL filtering to enhance security.
Advanced Threat Protection: Detects and mitigates sophisticated threats effectively.
Customizable Policies: Allows tailored security protocols to fit unique requirements.
Comprehensive DLP: Protects sensitive data through robust data loss prevention.
Integration Capabilities: Connects seamlessly with cloud services and applications.

What are the benefits of using Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange?

Enhanced Security: Delivers consistent protection regardless of user location.
Improved Compliance: Ensures adherence to data protection regulations.
Streamlined Access: Simplifies connectivity to private and cloud applications.
Scalability: Supports expanding organizational demands with cloud scalability.
Real-time Visibility: Provides instant insights into security incidents and network traffic.

Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange is deployed across industries to secure remote access and enforce zero trust principles. Organizations in finance, healthcare, and technology sectors utilize it for secure internet access and visibility into cloud applications, enhancing performance and compliance in dynamic environments.

Zscaler

Sample Customers

More than 4,000 global enterprises trust the iboss Cloud Platform to support their modern workforces, including a large number of Fortune 50 companies.

Information Not Available

Siemens, AutoNation, GE, NOV

Buyer's Guide

Cloud Access Security Brokers (CASB)

March 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Palo Alto Networks, Cisco, Netskope and others in Cloud Access Security Brokers (CASB). Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

885,264 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Cloud Access Security Brokers (CASB) vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Access Security Brokers (CASB) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.