OpenNebula vs nOps comparison

Read 15 OpenNebula reviews

3,373 Views
3,204 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

nOps

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 25, 2026

OpenNebula and nOps are in the cloud management and optimization category, focusing on infrastructure management and AWS optimization respectively. OpenNebula appears more cost-efficient and receives higher customer support satisfaction, while nOps offers advanced AWS-specific features.

Features: OpenNebula provides diverse cloud infrastructure management features, including multi-cloud and hybrid solutions, effective orchestration, and scalability. It also offers user management and integration with various hypervisors. nOps provides AWS resource optimization, continuous compliance monitoring, and workflow automation. It stands out for its automated cost savings, Kubernetes pod resizing, and customizable cost allocation mechanisms.

Room for Improvement: OpenNebula could improve in advanced AWS-specific integrations, offering more detailed resource insights, and developing more out-of-the-box compliance functionalities. nOps could benefit from enhancing its multi-cloud management capabilities, offering easier integration with non-AWS services, and providing a more extensive marketplace similar to OpenNebula.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenNebula is known for an easy deployment process and excellent support across multi-cloud environments, resulting in a simplified user experience. nOps excels at seamless AWS integration and offers specialized support for AWS-specific challenges. Their focus differs, with OpenNebula emphasizing cross-environment flexibility and nOps ensuring AWS ecosystem efficiency.

Pricing and ROI: OpenNebula is recognized for competitive pricing, delivering substantial ROI by reducing infrastructure costs and enhancing resource use efficiency. nOps may have higher initial costs but justifies this with precise AWS cost control solutions and significant cloud savings. OpenNebula focuses on general infrastructure cost efficiency, while nOps targets AWS cost reduction.

To learn more, read our detailed OpenNebula vs. nOps Report (Updated: June 2026).

OpenNebula vs. nOps

Download the complete report

Helped 902,988 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

nOps

Ranking in Cloud Management

17th

Average Rating

9.6

Reviews Sentiment

4.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

OpenNebula

Ranking in Cloud Management

19th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2026, in the Cloud Management category, the mindshare of nOps is 0.8%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenNebula is 1.7%, down from 6.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Cloud Management Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
nOps	0.8%
OpenNebula	1.7%
Other	97.5%

Cloud Management

Featured Reviews

Tom Weeks

Sr. Director of Engineering at a computer software company with 201-500 employees

Automates savings plan management and improves cost visibility while reducing cloud infrastructure needs

I find it to be a valuable cost-savings tool. Its best features include several things: first, it is hands-off, so I can set it and forget it. I get it set up, and it manages AWS savings plans on my behalf. This frees my team up to work on more valuable work without losing out on valuable discounts. It also provides a dashboard with more detailed insights into cost and AWS cloud costs than what comes out of the box with AWS Cost Explorer. Third, the nOps Kubernetes agent automatically resizes pods based on usage, which allows us to run significantly fewer EC2 instances than we would otherwise. nOps has positively impacted my organization by saving both time and money.

Read full review

FOURES Jean-Philippe

Products Manager at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees

Reliable, simple to manage, and offers great technical support

The support of VXLAN fits with our network management. Thanks to this we can propose mixed solutions using virtual resources on OpenNebula and bare metal servers hosted in our facilities linked to each other on the sale network. This use case is very useful when some applications need bare metal power (Kubernetes workers, huge databases, AI models computations, et cetera). The cluster management is very useful for splitting our different clusters (mutual vs dedicated). We can manage deployments and capacity planning without pain. The API is also really simple and it helped us to develop the Terraform provider to manage OpenNebula like any other cloud infrastructure.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Since making this shift, we have seen a twenty to thirty percent reduction in the total AWS compute expenditure, which represents a significant win for us."

"I find it to be a valuable cost-savings tool; its best features include several things: first, it is hands-off, so I can set it and forget it, and it manages AWS savings plans on my behalf, freeing my team up to work on more valuable work without losing out on valuable discounts."

"nOps smoothly integrated with our AWS infrastructure and achieved significant savings without much intervention from our internal team."

"The solution provides actionable reporting and cost-saving recommendations."

"One customer saved 35 percent on their cloud bill, which is pretty significant."

"For our use case, we found the solution to be the best fit when dealing with infrastructure services."

"The ability to use it almost like a public cloud for an organization is a big asset, as it will create a value proposition and can control costs in a great way."

"What's best about OpenNebula that people like is that it's easy to deploy. It's also easy to manage. It's interesting because people choose OpenNebula over other solutions because of the ease of management."

"It has enabled us to decrease the optics by around 55 to 60%."

"It makes maintenance very easy and stress-free for our teams."

"OpenNebula freed my customer from doing the maintenance operations of the servers because now that can be done by his clients."

"I'll definitely recommend OpenNebula because it's an open-source solution that's effortless to set up, and the total cost of ownership is low."

"The solution provides templates for configurations that can easily be exchanged to VMs."

More OpenNebula pros

Cons

"The customer support is lacking but still pretty good."

"However, it misses a perfect score because multi-cloud feature parity is still catching up to its gold-standard AWS toolset."

"I suggest improving the heat map capability with the option to use showback values as the x and y-axis."

"From the features, I would like to see RDS RIs and maybe better visibility on how the engine is deciding whether to use spot or on demand, to replace the instance or not"

"As with all enterprise software licensing, the pricing is not intuitive and must be negotiated; grandfathered contracts are better than anything offered today."

"There are no payment gateways in OpenNebula."

"The web interface could be better. It's not very difficult to use, but there's room for enhancement."

"An area for improvement in OpenNebula is the number of features it has. The solution doesn't have that many cloud features compared to other solutions. You'd say, "Okay, simplicity over a rich feature list?" Some say, "No, I need a big machine or a cloud interface for my customers to manage resources. I don't have to go and do it for them." Some people do it that way, and it works, but I'd like to improve the limited features in OpenNebula."

"I would like to see OpenNebula add more integration with REST API. XML-RPC API is good, but it becomes a pain to form a resting output."

"The storage feature that they have is a bit confusing."

"Template management also needs improvement in OpenNebula because it's inferior right now."

"They have been saying for the past two and a half years that they would develop a feature to hot-add RAM and CPU, but it does not work."

More OpenNebula cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"We use the Community Edition, rather than the Enterprise Edition."

"The solution is open source so is free."

"OpenNebuoa has recently come up with a new subscription model that is economical and a lot of new customers are choosing this as it is an easy subscription model."

"OpenNebula gives good value for money."

"The licensing for OpenNebula used to be free, but now it's no longer free. A customer contacted me asking to move to another provider because of the changes in the licensing terms for OpenNebula. I have no information on how much the OpenNebula license is because the customer pays for it, and I only do the integration."

"VRA is very expensive but OpenNebula is free."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

902,988 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Construction Company

24%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Comms Service Provider

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

12%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Computer Software Company

University

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Midsize Enterprise	6
Large Enterprise	3

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for nOps?

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is that it was very easy, and it was also brokered by us with the client. I did not purchase nOps through the AWS Marketplace.

See all answers

What needs improvement with nOps?

While the AWS integration is flawless and deeply mature, I believe the multi-cloud capabilities for platforms such as Microsoft Azure or Google Cloud Platform can sometimes feel a bit less comprehe...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for nOps?

My primary use case for nOps is automated AWS cost optimization, FinOps compliance, and infrastructure visibility. I use it to instantly surface underutilized resources and automate the management ...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Zesty vs nOps

Compared 16% of the time

Spot by Flexera vs nOps

Compared 13% of the time

Flexera Cloud Management Platform (CMP) vs nOps

Compared 10% of the time

AWS Trusted Advisor vs nOps

Compared 10% of the time

Red Hat CloudForms vs nOps

Compared 10% of the time

More nOps Competitors

CloudStack vs OpenNebula

Compared 15% of the time

VMware Aria Automation vs OpenNebula

Compared 7% of the time

Nutanix Cloud Manager (NCM) vs OpenNebula

Compared 6% of the time

VMware Aria Operations vs OpenNebula

Compared 5% of the time

Morpheus vs OpenNebula

Compared 5% of the time

More OpenNebula Competitors

Product Reports

nOps

Download nOps product report

Download OpenNebula product report

Also Known As

nOps - Cloud Optimization Platform

No data available

Overview

nOps is a robust tool that excels in managing AWS infrastructure by offering cost optimization, performance monitoring, compliance tracking, and change management. Users praise its real-time monitoring, user-friendly dashboard, and actionable insights that enhance operational efficiency, reduce expenses, and ensure compliance. nOps significantly improves productivity, collaboration, and strategic decision-making across organizations.

nOps.io

OpenNebula offers scalability, ease of deployment, and integration capabilities that enhance cloud management for enterprises. It supports both virtual and bare metal resources, providing a versatile cloud management experience.

OpenNebula provides a robust platform for building, managing, and automating private and public clouds. Its compatibility with platforms like VMware, KVM, and containers makes it ideal for businesses hosting virtual private clouds and deploying Kubernetes clusters. OpenNebula's API and SDK facilitate automation and integration, allowing organizations to connect with IT systems effectively. Despite its strengths, improvements in object storage, REST API integration, and UI enhancements are needed. The documentation can be disorganized, and users encounter challenges with upgrades and community support.

What are key OpenNebula features?

Scalability: Easily manage resources for growing cloud environments.
User-Friendly Interface: Simplifies cloud management tasks.
Integration: Connects seamlessly with IT systems using robust API and SDK.
Hypervisor Support: Works with multiple hypervisors and container platforms.

What benefits do users find in OpenNebula?

Efficiency: Streamlines cloud operations, reducing management complexities.
Versatility: Offers support for both virtual and bare metal resources.
Community and Documentation: Though needing improvement, provides valuable resources for users.
Cost-Effectiveness: Lightweight nature minimizes resource expenditure.

OpenNebula implementation spans industries where cloud automation and management are critical. Companies utilize OpenNebula for deploying private clouds and managing infrastructure. Its support for Kubernetes clusters is beneficial in tech-driven sectors, highlighting OpenNebula's adaptability to different operational needs.

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Akamai, BBC, Fermilab, Terradue, Surf Sara, Produban, Netways, ESA, China Mobile, BlackBerry, Deloitte, Fuze, Telefonica, Trivago, Nokia, Encore Tech, Beeks.

OpenNebula vs. nOps