We performed a comparison between Nintex Workflow and OpenText 360 for SharePoint based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
"This solution is very easy to use and customize, using almost zero coding. It's built on SharePoint which many companies in our country have experience with. This made it easy to adapt the application in our environment."
"I really like the visual representation. It actually looks like a flow chart, which is nicer than a SharePoint Designer workflow, which doesn't have that ability."
"It is very easy to create and deploy. I am very happy with how user-friendly Nintex Workflow is."
"The SharePoint feature is a really good connection, there are many features that are good."
"It has integration with BI and Analytics tools, and RPA toolsets as well."
"This solution has good connection and we do not need to migrate everything in order to protect the repository."
"The most valuable features are collaboration, traceability, retention of documents, and search."
"The fact that you can see and create something that fits your business is the most valuable thing in this platform. It is a customizable product, so it fits your needs."
"OpenText 360's best features are platform independence and its performance when searching large numbers of documents."
"It has a lot of flexibility, and Microsoft does come up with some new additions from time to time."
"The most valuable feature of OpenText 360 for SharePoint is its performance. The solution is one of the best in the market if you search the internet."
"The interface could be better and more language support is needed in the development environment or in the solutions platform in general."
"The license pricing is too high currently for Nintex Workflow."
"We would like to design parallel workflows and long-running workflows, along with new features for connecting to cloud-based systems."
"We would like to have access to an on-premises solution. In our country, we have a relationship with Central Bank of Egypt, which do noes not allow cloud solutions to be used. They should offer an on-prem solution with a flexible price license."
"Unfortunately, Nintex Workflow is not that stable. We are looking at shifting to another tool."
"The solution is a bit too expensive. It could be cheaper."
"I would like for there to be even more integrations in the next release and I believe that the price could go down a bit."
"Its licensing needs to be simplified. Currently, its licensing is very complex. It contains a number of pieces, and you have to be an expert in reading all the conditions in the license. They should simplify the licensing and make it easier to understand. It would make a customer's life easier."
"If I have to really create an internal knowledge management portal, if I have to compare SharePoint and WordPress, WordPress is far, far better in regard to the SharePoint option."
"An area for improvement would be how the platform handles large volumes of documents. It also doesn't provide a very good, robust backup and restore capacity. In the next release, I would like the search technology to be improved."
"OpenText 360 is generally stable, though there are sometimes issues with document size or format."
At Nintex, our goal is to make work more meaningful by improving business processes. With the Nintex Platform, your organization can manage, automate, and optimize your business processes - all with clicks, not code.
Nintex Workflow is ranked 13th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 6 reviews while OpenText 360 for SharePoint is ranked 14th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 6 reviews. Nintex Workflow is rated 8.6, while OpenText 360 for SharePoint is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Nintex Workflow writes "Good support, straightforward to set up, and improves our process performance". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText 360 for SharePoint writes "Great for knowledge management, constantly evolving, and helps build good workflows". Nintex Workflow is most compared with K2, Camunda Platform, ServiceNow Orchestration, Bizagi and AgilePoint, whereas OpenText 360 for SharePoint is most compared with Apache Airflow, Camunda Platform, webMethods Integration Server, Agiloft Workflow and BPM and IBM BPM. See our Nintex Workflow vs. OpenText 360 for SharePoint report.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.