Nintex RPA vs Robocorp comparison

Nintex and Sema4.ai are both solutions in the Robotic Process Automation (RPA) category. Nintex is ranked #21 with an average rating of 5.7, while Sema4.ai is ranked #31. Nintex holds a 2.2% mindshare in RPA, compared to Sema4.ai’s 1.0% mindshare. Additionally, 88% of Nintex users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 84% of Sema4.ai users who would recommend it.

Nintex RPA

Read 30 Nintex RPA reviews

2,328 Views
2,281 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

Robocorp

Read 13 Robocorp reviews

1,317 Views
1,304 Comparison Views

84% willing to recommend

Nintex RPA

Robocorp

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 4, 2024

Nintex RPA and Robocorp compete in the RPA market, each offering unique capabilities. Nintex RPA stands out for users seeking simplicity in automation with minimal coding, while Robocorp appeals to developers who need flexible, Python-based solutions.

Features: Nintex RPA provides a drag-and-drop interface, strong integration capabilities, and ease of automation across various platforms. It is highly favored for its simplicity and lack of need for extensive coding knowledge. Robocorp offers Python-based development, which facilitates flexible customization and integration with third-party applications. Its Python foundation allows developers more advanced control and the ability to harness AI and data science capabilities.

Room for Improvement: Nintex RPA could improve its AI integrations and expand its PDF automation capabilities. Users have noted the OCR features are somewhat limited, and there's a need for better collaboration tools and enhanced mobile accessibility. Robocorp can focus on providing better deployment ease, improving the functionality of UI selectors, and expanding its library offerings. Both products can enhance support for document automation and offer more robust collaboration features, although Nintex has been noted to need improvement in error handling with non-standard document formats.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Nintex RPA offers various deployment options, including on-premises and hybrid solutions, which may suit diverse infrastructure needs. Customers appreciate its immediate and satisfactory customer service. Robocorp provides flexible deployment through public and private cloud options, with favorable support, though there's room to enhance initial support levels and direct communication channels.

Pricing and ROI: Nintex RPA is cost-efficient, with scalable pricing based on the number of bots and users, providing good ROI potential over time. Its pricing is considered moderate compared to competitors. Robocorp's pay-as-you-go model offers affordable entry points for smaller businesses, appealing to a wide range of users, despite being perceived as expensive. Both products are known to deliver significant ROI, with Robocorp offering pricing flexibility that is attractive to both small and large-scale operations.

To learn more, read our detailed Nintex RPA vs. Robocorp Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Nintex RPA vs. Robocorp

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 884,933 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Nintex RPA

Ranking in Robotic Process Automation (RPA)

21st

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Robocorp

Ranking in Robotic Process Automation (RPA)

31st

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Robotic Process Automation (RPA) category, the mindshare of Nintex RPA is 2.2%, up from 1.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Robocorp is 1.0%, down from 2.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Robotic Process Automation (RPA) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Nintex RPA	2.2%
Robocorp	1.0%
Other	96.8%

Robotic Process Automation (RPA)

Featured Reviews

JonathanNg

Global Automation Lead - Customer Operations at a energy/utilities company with 10,001+ employees

Helped us identify areas where frontline staff aren't following standard procedures or using unexpected systems, giving us better insight into our end users' workflows

To analyze and make sense of the data generated by Kryon process discovery can be a lot of effort. It's not as automatic as some might think. It really depends on how many processes you have and how actively you use them. But the scalability aspect isn't necessarily about deployment or technical maintenance. It's really about how you analyze and gain insights from the data gathering. I'd rate the scalability a seven out of ten because the solution has been scaling well for a long time. It's very easy to deploy. But getting value out of it at scale can be a challenge, just like with any deployment. We use it mainly for process discovery. We actually proceed it from different teams. So, we have 15 licenses that we rotate with different people, actually through different teams. So, we do discovery for the online team; we gather the results after about two weeks to a month. We analyze those results, and then we deploy them again on the analytics team. We regularly deploy it to different teams. So, it's in constant use. It just runs on the systems through discovery mode most of the time.

Read full review

Mohammed Zaman

Senior Lead Developer at a tech services company with 201-500 employees

It's easy to create Python libraries and custom scripts for a particular client and general use cases

We've had conversations with the head of Robocorp over Slack about things we want to improve. We want to introduce some packages, but the authentication tokens and many other things are not there. We can do it in Python, but the custom packages are unavailable. We would also like an integrated PDF reader and better integration with custom solutions. The built-in Excel customization is limited, but we can still accomplish what we want using Python. We must rely on Python to customize processes in Robocorp. I don't know about the latest IDE from Robocorp, but the old one doesn't have a lot of activities. I don't know if they have updated the UI in the latest version, but they could improve that. The UI selector isn't that great. It would be nice to take elements from the console and customize parts. Everything is based on command lines, which I do not like. A flow chart with block items would be good for optimizing code. I would also like more support tools for developers so it's easier to understand when passing code to others.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We have been using Kryon Process Discovery for about a year now. With our initial tests and monitoring just a couple people, we were able to identify 79 possible use cases within a one-month period."

"Kryon will allow you to automate processes fast and easy and you do not need to be a developer to automate processes."

"The recording feature enables us to record what we're doing, like typing or clicking the mouse, and to identify objects on the screen. We basically teach the program how to type, instead of a person. That's the most powerful feature."

"By the end of this year we will have returned the investment, and we will start gaining more."

"Once I decide a process is suitable as a Kryon solution, the cycle of automation is quite quick. I learn about the manual process and I'm one of the two guys who program the Kryon environment. It's relatively simple. There are many details, but once you understand the concept it is quite easy."

"The bot is typically about twice as fast as a person and more accurate, as long as the data going in is good. That is the biggest advantage."

"The advanced Excel functionalities are really convenient because we work a lot with spreadsheets. It’s also easy to use the HTML selectors. It’s just a click and it picks it up. There’s not a lot of no hard-coding with it."

"As a business user, it's so easy to use. With the recording of the processes, we didn't need to hire a specific developer... we are able to build most of our processes without having to develop the actual development skillset... the simplicity is the biggest win."

More Nintex RPA pros

"I like the fact that it's very fast. The processing speed is good, and that's what matters to me. I also like that we don't have to bother with the infrastructure setup. We don't have to care about the status of the data set, as I believe the local group will provide it. We don't care about the licensing model. We only have to care about how long we are using it."

"It's easy to deploy bots via the API helper in Control Room. Robocorp's debugging features are also robust. It shows you a lot of data."

"Robocorp is based on Python, so you can use Python scripts and create libraries for your use cases. Building libraries and custom scripts for a particular client and general use cases is easy. We can reuse those scripts for other clients, so we start seeing benefits quickly."

"I have worked with UiPath and Automation Anywhere previously. Robocorp offers an improved development style and support as well as flexibility of its tools. You can easily develop custom libraries in Robocorp."

"It supports Python runtime because of that, runtime also improves."

"The solution is based on Python which makes it very valuable."

"The process execution and all features are very good."

"It offers high scalability and enables automation in ways that haven't been possible before."

More Robocorp pros

Cons

"It would be better to have [upgrades] done automatically, like an application on your smartphone. Or even if done manually, the upgrade should just be "next, next, next," and it's upgraded, rather than making it a project to upgrade."

"We have found some difficulties regarding the integration with legacy systems where the screen has elements in the Hebrew language. The connection to Hebrew, right-to-left systems, is more challenging."

"From our experience, the product is not suitable for end users."

"Nintex RPA is not suitable for PDF automation."

"Another major drawback is OCR. We are not able to read scanned documents correctly in a reliable way. There is always some margin of error. Some of the processes require us to read scanned documents, and you need to ensure that it is 100 percent accurate. Without that level of assurance, you can't automate such tasks."

"The product requires some more time in development. It still has some bugs and some things to work out. They're constantly releasing. They need to continue working out the general issues of using the product at scale, first and foremost."

"With the customer support, there have been some times where we have had to go through explaining the issue a couple times because it has gone through a couple of people's hands. There have been a couple of scenarios where we have had to re-explain the issue and bring somebody new up to speed on what is going on or what the problem is."

"Kryon RPA need to enhance the robustness of our multi-board architecture to ensure the availability of bots on multiple machines."

More Nintex RPA cons

"We use the latest version of the process studio and it takes up a lot of CPU storage. In our case, this has been up to 14 GB of storage."

"It would be better if it were more user-friendly for non-technical users. It would be better if they had some drag-and-drop features to create logic."

"They should fully develop Robocorp Studio because it would attract a lot of people to the Robocorp platform."

"There are certain libraries in Python, such as those dealing with PDF automation and word files, that require the presence of certain external dependencies in the environment to be successfully used."

"The standard libraries in Robocorp should be more advanced."

"An additional feature I'm looking for in Robocorp is SAP automation."

"The deployment process is complex and not straightforward, especially for legacy modernization."

"Robocorp is still in development, so most of the keywords are a bit confusing. I have to alter lots of automation steps between processing and development. However, Selenium is due for an update soon, and Robcorp is addressing some of the limitations caused by the previous Selenium version."

More Robocorp cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We have been able to alleviate two FTEs, which was a big savings for us. We were able to reuse those resources in other locations. It is over 5000 hours a year in total savings."

"We are probably saving $6000 to $8000 a month in labor costs. It's not a ton, but we're right around $60,000 to $80,000 a year with our current deployment."

"We've more than broken even over on the license. Year to date, we are at $120,000 in savings."

"The price is affordable."

"Can't beat the price... There are different pricing levels for every bot or unattended bot. You can buy however many you want. You'll need an additional virtual machine for it to work on."

"The product has reasonable pricing."

"It is very cheap. I would rate the pricing a three out of ten, with ten being expensive."

"We're paying in the neighborhood of about $66,000 a year. The cost is fairly similar to its competitors' costs. It might have been a little bit more reasonable than the others, and that cost was with Process Discovery in addition."

More Nintex RPA pricing and cost advice

"The product has good pricing."

"You don't have to pay for the license. You have to pay for the time you use it."

"Robocorp is much better in terms of pricing compared to UiPath."

"It's a cost-effective solution."

"In terms of licenses, there is a return on investment in that area."

"The price is cheaper than other competitors. I would rate the cost as one out of five."

"The solution is a very affordable price."

"The pricing is fine."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Robotic Process Automation (RPA) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

884,933 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

14%

Computer Software Company

Real Estate/Law Firm

Manufacturing Company

12%

Computer Software Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

Wholesaler/Distributor

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	7
Large Enterprise	18

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	6
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	4

Questions from the Community

Best RPA tools for IBM iSeries

We have found that Foxtrot (Now NintexRPA) is a very solid solution for IBM iSeries integration using the IBM ACS 5250 emulator, in addition Datamatics TruBot is an alternative solution.

See all answers

What do you like most about Nintex RPA?

Nintex RPA often includes security features, including encryption and user access controls, which ensure the protection of sensitive data and compliance with security standards.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Nintex RPA?

Although Nintex RPA is expensive, it is somewhat affordable considering its features. I would rate the cost aspect as an eight out of ten.

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

UiPath Platform vs Nintex RPA

Compared 14% of the time

Fortra's Automate vs Nintex RPA

Compared 11% of the time

Microsoft Power Automate vs Nintex RPA

Compared 6% of the time

Automation Anywhere vs Nintex RPA

Compared 6% of the time

SAP Intelligent RPA vs Nintex RPA

Compared 3% of the time

More Nintex RPA Competitors

UiPath Platform vs Robocorp

Compared 26% of the time

Microsoft Power Automate vs Robocorp

Compared 15% of the time

BotCity vs Robocorp

Compared 14% of the time

Blue Prism vs Robocorp

Compared 11% of the time

ElectroNeek vs Robocorp

Compared 7% of the time

More Robocorp Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Nintex RPA

March 2026

Download Nintex RPA product report

Buyer's Guide

Robocorp

March 2026

Download Robocorp product report

Also Known As

Kryon RPA

No data available

Overview

Using Nintex RPA, enterprises can leverage trained bots to quickly and cost-effectively automate routine tasks without the use of code in an easy-to-use drag and drop interface. Users are now equipped with a comprehensive, enterprise-grade process management and automation solution that streamlines processes fueled by both structured and unstructured data sources.

Nintex

Most robotic process automation initiatives fail to get off the ground because the current drag-and-drop offerings are expensive and frustrating for developers. Robocorp is a Python-based open source stack for automating applications and processes. Automate any task you can imagine with hundreds of keywords and libraries with performance, scalability, and security built-in. Our cloud robots can run on any platform from any machine, and scale horizontally to ensure mission-critical processes complete as efficiently as possible. Getting started is free, and our resource-based pricing ensures your costs are always straightforward - no matter how much your implementation grows.

Sema4.ai

Sample Customers

Amazon, Audi, Chevron, Toyota, Uber, Walmart

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Nintex RPA vs. Robocorp

March 2026

Free Report: Nintex RPA vs. Robocorp

Find out what your peers are saying about Nintex RPA vs. Robocorp and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

884,933 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Nintex RPA vs. Robocorp report.

See our list of best Robotic Process Automation (RPA) vendors.

We monitor all Robotic Process Automation (RPA) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.