NetVault Plus vs OpenText Data Protector comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Quest Software and OpenText are both solutions in the Backup and Recovery category. Quest Software is ranked #32 with an average rating of 8.0, while OpenText is ranked #47. Quest Software holds a 1.1% mindshare in BRS, compared to OpenText’s 1.1% mindshare. Additionally, 86% of Quest Software users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 80% of OpenText users who would recommend it.

NetVault Plus

Read 15 NetVault Plus reviews

6,067 Views
4,550 Comparison Views

86% willing to recommend

OpenText Data Protector

Read 102 OpenText Data Protector reviews

8,800 Views
8,096 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

NetVault Plus

OpenText Data Protector

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 1, 2026

OpenText Data Protector and NetVault Plus are both competitive in the backup and recovery market. NetVault Plus has the upper hand with its comprehensive database support and web-based management, contributing to user-friendly deployment and strong recovery features.

Features: OpenText Data Protector provides extensive integration capabilities with robust SAP and Oracle compatibility, a library-centric licensing approach for quick backup expansion, and flexible CLI options. NetVault Plus excels in supporting various databases, offers easy deployment, and includes powerful recovery features via a web-based interface.

Room for Improvement: OpenText Data Protector needs enhancements in its outdated GUI and reporting functions. Users also report that technical support speed and licensing complexity require improvement. NetVault Plus requires better scheduling options, deduplication capabilities, and enhanced command-line functionalities.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText Data Protector is deployed mainly on-premises with hybrid cloud integrations, receiving mixed customer service reviews. NetVault Plus is also primarily on-premises, noted for better customer service efficiency and effective technical support.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText Data Protector's pricing is reasonable, though additional features increase costs, with flexible licensing as an advantage. NetVault Plus is seen as more cost-effective with component-based licenses. Both solutions generally provide positive ROI when backup and restore features are utilized effectively.

To learn more, read our detailed NetVault Plus vs. OpenText Data Protector Report (Updated: November 2026).

Buyer's Guide

NetVault Plus vs. OpenText Data Protector

November 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 920,929 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

NetVault Plus

Ranking in Backup and Recovery

32nd

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

5.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Disaster Recovery (DR) Software (21st)

OpenText Data Protector

Ranking in Backup and Recovery

47th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

5.8

Number of Reviews

102

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the Backup and Recovery category, the mindshare of NetVault Plus is 1.1%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText Data Protector is 1.1%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Backup and Recovery Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
NetVault Plus	1.1%
OpenText Data Protector	1.1%
Other	97.8%

Backup and Recovery

Featured Reviews

Arno Wolthers

System Administrator at DIANA FEA BV

Reliable multi-platform backups have protected diverse servers and virtual libraries

Quest NetVault can improve in the area of Office 365 backups. Two years ago, I purchased the Office 365 plug-in or leased it for a year, and I have never been able to have a solid backup of Office 365 using Quest NetVault. I have resorted to a different solution specifically for Office 365 backups. It is not that it never works, but it fails so many times that it is not production-ready. On a weekly basis, I encounter problems and have to restart jobs or figure out what is wrong and then run it again. It simply needs to run as all the other Quest NetVault jobs do. If tomorrow there was a brand new Quest NetVault and I had the option to add something to make my life easier, besides improving the Office 365 backup, I would like to see that Quest Co Store products should be a part of Quest NetVault. They work and interact, but I have the impression it should be one solution.

Read full review

Ahmad-Hassan

Project Manager And Technical Consultant at EEMC

Provides effective backup for physical servers and needs improvements for cloud compatibility

We use OpenText Data Protector for Oracle database backup and some applications that run for database security OpenText Data Protector is good for physical backup, specifically for physical servers. It is effective for direct backups to EMC library or storage without using a repository. However,…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Its dashboard is quite well done. When you log into the GUI, you can basically see everything you need to know. There is also the possibility to edit the view as you like, which is great."

"If a job is pending, the solution communicates it to us through emails."

"Having the web-based interface is important to us because we can access it from any computer in the network, rather than having it installed and available for use only on a specific one."

"NetVault Plus's Unified Manager Console is useful, it is great actually, and helps with the day-to-day activity for my end, making it easier for an IT manager like me."

"NetVault is good for every kind of workload and the backup is very robust."

"Quest NetVault Plus has a high level of stability."

"The platform helps us with efficient QoreStor deduplication (DD) capabilities and configuration."

"It is working fine, and we are able to protect our customer's applications and data across their company with this single solution from Quest."

More NetVault Plus pros

"The most valuable features of this solution were the features we worked most with which were telemetry, and the scheduler."

"OpenText Data Protector is good for physical backup, specifically for physical servers."

"HP Data Protector integration with RMAN is very stable, robust and provides good diagnostics features to troubleshoot backup issues."

"It is a stable solution. Stability-wise, I rate the solution a nine out of ten...The initial setup process for the solution is easy."

"It is our enterprise backup solution centralizing all backup needs."

"The installation is pretty straightforward and simple; it's not too complex or overly difficult, deployment is fast so you can have it up and running in a day, and you don't need a big technical team to handle deployment and maintenance."

"A few of the most valuable features for us are backup and restore, the SQL databases, and the exchange and VM's on tape libraries and disks."

"The solution is easy to use."

More OpenText Data Protector pros

Cons

"I would like to see the option of cloud-based management."

"There's no positive impact that NetVault Plus has brought to my company; I mean, there's no particular benefit I have seen from using it."

"Veeam is the product that I can compare to NetVault Plus. I think Veeam Backup is better for VMware backup."

"The product’s SQL backup plugin needs improvement."

"The storage capacity is very low."

"The license expired without any warning and that caused us some problems."

"There are certain issues with the product that we report to Quest, and we get offered a workaround instead of a fix. There could be better interaction with the development teams, perhaps in terms of transparency."

"NetVault does not have the feature set that Commvault has."

More NetVault Plus cons

"The Data Protector software service shuts down randomly sometimes."

"The scheduler setup could be better. We are facing some issues scheduling the job based on our requirements."

"I have SUSE XEN virtualization set up in my environment. HP Data Protector does not provide integration with it, and I would like to see it integrate with XEN in a future release."

"We would like to have a direct plugin to VMware. It could also be simplified, made more usable and manageable."

"I would not recommend this product to my colleagues."

"We have so many specific technological cracks in Micro Focus, but we are not getting the features, facilities, or coordination between the global delivery centers and the R&D team that we need to express our ideas."

"We didn't know exactly where this solution would go a few years ago. It was in a storage department and then later in a software department."

"For me, the main weakness of Data Protector now is the Granular Recovery integrations, as they just don’t work as smoothly as they could."

More OpenText Data Protector cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price of our 12-month contract is approximately $1,500 AUD ($1,100 USD)."

"The tool is expensive."

"When we purchased four licenses, we were given a very good price. However, it is still on the high side when compared to some other vendors."

"The pricing is around $3,000 to $5,000. The charge additionally for support and to scale."

"The licensing cost is too high."

"Our licensing is on a capacity basis."

"The product is cheaper than Commvault."

"Data Protector's pricing is very competitive and we have no issues in this regard. I would give it an eight out of ten in terms of pricing."

"It is fast, reliable, and its licensing policy is great."

"It is more affordable compared to other vendors."

"Pricing/licensing is Data Protector's single best offering. In its most basic environment, the only license required is for whatever target device is required."

More OpenText Data Protector pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Backup and Recovery solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

920,929 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Construction Company

14%

Outsourcing Company

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

18%

Outsourcing Company

13%

Construction Company

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	6

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	28
Midsize Enterprise	22
Large Enterprise	61

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Quest NetVault?

NetVault is a great cloud-ready enterprise backup software for hybrid data centers. Here are some of the things I really like about the solution: It is easy to use right out of the box and scales ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Quest NetVault?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Quest NetVault?

My use cases for Quest NetVault involve one backup server, which has a Windows-based server with a lot of disks attached. On these disks, I have a virtual type library, and the system also has acce...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus Data Protector?

The solution is expensive as it requires purchasing all features without the option to negotiate based on client numbers, unlike Veeam which offers flexibility in pricing.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Micro Focus Data Protector?

OpenText Data Protector is not user-friendly, especially for cloud backup. It lacks functions and facilities compared to Veeam, which offers more user-friendliness for virtual machine backups. Ther...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Micro Focus Data Protector?

We use OpenText Data Protector ( /products/opentext-data-protector-reviews ) for Oracle database backup and some applications that run for database security.

See all answers

Comparisons

Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection vs NetVault Plus

Compared 10% of the time

Veeam Data Platform vs NetVault Plus

Compared 6% of the time

Commvault Cloud vs NetVault Plus

Compared 4% of the time

Veritas NetBackup vs NetVault Plus

Compared 3% of the time

Acronis Cyber Protect vs NetVault Plus

Compared 3% of the time

More NetVault Plus Competitors

Veritas NetBackup vs OpenText Data Protector

Compared 7% of the time

Microsoft DPM vs OpenText Data Protector

Compared 7% of the time

Veritas Backup Exec vs OpenText Data Protector

Compared 6% of the time

Veeam Data Platform vs OpenText Data Protector

Compared 6% of the time

Commvault Cloud vs OpenText Data Protector

Compared 4% of the time

More OpenText Data Protector Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

NetVault Plus

October 2026

Download NetVault Plus product report

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Data Protector

October 2026

Download OpenText Data Protector product report

Also Known As

NetVault Backup, Quest NetVault, Quest NetVault Backup, BakBone

Micro Focus Data Protector, Data Protector, OmniBack, HPE Data Protector

Overview

NetVault Plus is a dependable backup and recovery solution that efficiently manages and protects data across multiple environments, supporting scalable operations through user-friendly features and extensive compatibility with databases and virtual systems.

NetVault Plus offers a comprehensive approach to data backup and recovery, suitable for large-scale implementations across various industries. With capabilities in snapshot-based backup, swift recovery, and malware scanning, it ensures stable operations. The platform supports numerous databases and virtual machines, providing network access control and timely email updates on job statuses. Users benefit from its straightforward recovery processes and the ability to create backup jobs and tape server restoration. Though improvements are needed in web interface speed, pricing transparency, restore accuracy, and compatibility with newer technologies like MongoDB and Microsoft updates, it remains a significant tool for robust data protection.

What are the core features of NetVault Plus?

Efficient Search: Quickly locates tables and databases for easier management.
Built-in Reports: Offers built-in reporting capabilities for insightful data analysis.
User-Friendly Interface: Ensures ease of use for managing backup and recovery tasks.
Snapshot-Based Backup: Provides reliable snapshots for faster data restoration.
Malware Scanning: Protects data with integrated scanning for threats.

What should users expect in terms of benefits and ROI?

Scalability: Supports large-scale deployments efficiently.
Wide Support: Compatible with many database types and virtual machine setups.
Fast Recovery: Enables quick restore requests across regions.
Stable Operations: Ensures consistent performance over time.

In specialized industries like pharmacy and retail, NetVault Plus enhances client data management and security log processes, leveraging application snapshotting to protect virtual environments such as Nutanix Xi. It provides robust protection and backup solutions tailored to diverse server versions, including Oracle, SQL, and bare metal recovery scenarios.

Quest Software

OpenText Data Protector offers robust integration with systems like SQL, Oracle, VMware, and Exchange, boasting strong backup and recovery solutions across multiple environments, despite some areas needing improvement such as user-friendliness and GUI design.

OpenText Data Protector provides comprehensive data protection for servers, Linux systems, and applications including Oracle and Microsoft, alongside centralized storage management. It supports virtual, cloud, and on-premises environments, focusing on Oracle database security, HANA, and NAS appliances via NDMP. Despite its benefits, users encounter frequent errors with virtual environment backups, especially with VMware, and find the GUI outdated. Documentation needs improvement for troubleshooting, and support services face criticism for delayed responses. The licensing structure lacks flexibility, and while it supports efficient deduplication and scheduling, reporting capabilities often lead users to rely on external tools.

What are the key features of OpenText Data Protector?

Seamless Integration: Supports SQL, Oracle, VMware, and Exchange for smooth data management.
Centralized Management: Single interface for managing complex environments with ease.
Disaster Recovery: Offers robust recovery capabilities with automated scheduling.
Diverse OS Support: Accommodates numerous operating systems, enhancing flexibility.
Detailed Reporting: Generates reports for informed decision-making and strategy improvements.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Reliable Backup: Ensures data integrity and availability across platforms.
Flexibility: Adapts to changing environments and diverse IT landscapes.
Cost Efficiency: Streamlines processes to maximize ROI despite licensing costs.
Integration Quality: Works well with existing systems, reducing transition challenges.

OpenText Data Protector finds application in sectors requiring robust data protection, such as finance and healthcare, securing data in compliance-sensitive environments. Industries rely on it for protecting Oracle databases and ensuring data retention and recovery in both short- and long-term scenarios.

OpenText

Sample Customers

intel, Mars, MERK, Microsoft, Uber, Visa

GSK Vaccines, Repsol, Vodafone Group, Siemens AG, Medium Enterprise Transportation Services Company

Buyer's Guide

NetVault Plus vs. OpenText Data Protector

November 2026

Free Report: NetVault Plus vs. OpenText Data Protector

Find out what your peers are saying about NetVault Plus vs. OpenText Data Protector and other solutions. Updated: November 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

920,929 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our NetVault Plus vs. OpenText Data Protector report.

See our list of best Backup and Recovery vendors.

We monitor all Backup and Recovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.