NetVault Plus vs OpenText Data Protector comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Quest Software and OpenText are both solutions in the Backup and Recovery category. Quest Software is ranked #34 with an average rating of 8.0, while OpenText is ranked #52. Quest Software holds a 1.0% mindshare in BRS, compared to OpenText’s 1.0% mindshare. Additionally, 86% of Quest Software users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 80% of OpenText users who would recommend it.

NetVault Plus

Read 15 NetVault Plus reviews

5,112 Views
3,885 Comparison Views

86% willing to recommend

OpenText Data Protector

Read 102 OpenText Data Protector reviews

7,451 Views
6,855 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

NetVault Plus

OpenText Data Protector

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 1, 2026

OpenText Data Protector and NetVault Plus are both competitive in the backup and recovery market. NetVault Plus has the upper hand with its comprehensive database support and web-based management, contributing to user-friendly deployment and strong recovery features.

Features: OpenText Data Protector provides extensive integration capabilities with robust SAP and Oracle compatibility, a library-centric licensing approach for quick backup expansion, and flexible CLI options. NetVault Plus excels in supporting various databases, offers easy deployment, and includes powerful recovery features via a web-based interface.

Room for Improvement: OpenText Data Protector needs enhancements in its outdated GUI and reporting functions. Users also report that technical support speed and licensing complexity require improvement. NetVault Plus requires better scheduling options, deduplication capabilities, and enhanced command-line functionalities.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText Data Protector is deployed mainly on-premises with hybrid cloud integrations, receiving mixed customer service reviews. NetVault Plus is also primarily on-premises, noted for better customer service efficiency and effective technical support.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText Data Protector's pricing is reasonable, though additional features increase costs, with flexible licensing as an advantage. NetVault Plus is seen as more cost-effective with component-based licenses. Both solutions generally provide positive ROI when backup and restore features are utilized effectively.

To learn more, read our detailed NetVault Plus vs. OpenText Data Protector Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

NetVault Plus vs. OpenText Data Protector

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 913,924 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

NetVault Plus

Ranking in Backup and Recovery

34th

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

5.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Disaster Recovery (DR) Software (21st)

OpenText Data Protector

Ranking in Backup and Recovery

52nd

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

5.8

Number of Reviews

102

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2026, in the Backup and Recovery category, the mindshare of NetVault Plus is 1.0%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText Data Protector is 1.0%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Backup and Recovery Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
NetVault Plus	1.0%
OpenText Data Protector	1.0%
Other	98.0%

Backup and Recovery

Featured Reviews

Arno Wolthers

System Administrator at DIANA FEA BV

Reliable multi-platform backups have protected diverse servers and virtual libraries

Quest NetVault can improve in the area of Office 365 backups. Two years ago, I purchased the Office 365 plug-in or leased it for a year, and I have never been able to have a solid backup of Office 365 using Quest NetVault. I have resorted to a different solution specifically for Office 365 backups. It is not that it never works, but it fails so many times that it is not production-ready. On a weekly basis, I encounter problems and have to restart jobs or figure out what is wrong and then run it again. It simply needs to run as all the other Quest NetVault jobs do. If tomorrow there was a brand new Quest NetVault and I had the option to add something to make my life easier, besides improving the Office 365 backup, I would like to see that Quest Co Store products should be a part of Quest NetVault. They work and interact, but I have the impression it should be one solution.

Read full review

Ahmad-Hassan

Project Manager And Technical Consultant at EEMC

Provides effective backup for physical servers and needs improvements for cloud compatibility

We use OpenText Data Protector for Oracle database backup and some applications that run for database security OpenText Data Protector is good for physical backup, specifically for physical servers. It is effective for direct backups to EMC library or storage without using a repository. However,…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It has File and SQL backup, which is the main benefit for us."

"It is working fine, and we are able to protect our customer's applications and data across their company with this single solution from Quest."

"The solution allows us to block off our network and only give access to whatever we want."

"The user interface is good."

"The platform helps us with efficient QoreStor deduplication (DD) capabilities and configuration."

"Ultimately, our customers have been happy with the solution."

"The main reason I decided to use Quest NetVault was the support for many different platforms."

"If a job is pending, the solution communicates it to us through emails."

More NetVault Plus pros

"The most valuable feature is the protection of our data with the backup capability and performance."

"In terms of actually, reliably, backing things up, Data Protector is superior to the other products that we've used in-house."

"The feature that was most valuable was that we could restore one mailbox and we could do different backups for different databases."

"The most valuable feature for us is the central, single pane of glass that allows us to manage our clients without having to log into their systems."

"Micro Focus Data Protector is stable."

"The normal file system backup is easy to manage, and our success rate is quite high."

"This solution is awesome; it is leaps ahead of Backup Exec, leaps ahead."

"I haven't experienced any crashes while using the solution...Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."

More OpenText Data Protector pros

Cons

"Improvements could be made in the deduplication and data management capabilities. There is also a need for better security measures, as security is critical to ensure backups are safe and free from malware."

"The stability of the solution is poor."

"There are command-line limitations. There is not a very strong possibility to work with the command line. The commands that are there are not that powerful, and you need to be very good at scripting, for example, in PowerShell or in Bash in case it is running on Linux systems. You need to combine a lot of commands together, and still, you will not get a great output that is presentable to others. You cannot work with it as easily."

"In the next version, I would like to see support for the MongoDB database. As it is now, there is no component that works with it and we cannot back the data up using NetVault."

"The storage capacity is very low."

"There's no positive impact that NetVault Plus has brought to my company; I mean, there's no particular benefit I have seen from using it."

"Veeam is the product that I can compare to NetVault Plus. I think Veeam Backup is better for VMware backup."

"There are certain issues with the product that we report to Quest, and we get offered a workaround instead of a fix. There could be better interaction with the development teams, perhaps in terms of transparency."

More NetVault Plus cons

"The UX dates back to a very historic past."

"I don't like this solution so much because it's very technical and compared to Commvault and Veeam, it's not so user-friendly. The interface needs improvement."

"I don't use it today on a regular basis, but there are always feature improvements that our customers are looking for, such as more integration from an API perspective with different applications and cloud platforms."

"I have SUSE XEN virtualization set up in my environment. HP Data Protector does not provide integration with it, and I would like to see it integrate with XEN in a future release."

"VMware backup integration and cloud recovery is lacking."

"Customer Service: It's not good and needs to be improved. Technical Support: It's not good and needs to be improved."

"OpenText Data Protector is not user-friendly, especially for cloud backup."

"It took a long time to resolve some of the implementation issues."

More OpenText Data Protector cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The tool is expensive."

"The price of our 12-month contract is approximately $1,500 AUD ($1,100 USD)."

"When we purchased four licenses, we were given a very good price. However, it is still on the high side when compared to some other vendors."

"Pricing for Micro Focus Data Protector is reasonable."

"The licensing cost is too high."

"The solution requires paying for a license."

"Avoid using many LTO drives; when using fewer drives, the price will be extremely good."

"Data Protector's pricing is very competitive and we have no issues in this regard. I would give it an eight out of ten in terms of pricing."

"The pricing is neither too expensive nor very cheap."

"The license for the solution is very expensive compared to the other products in the market."

"In Data Protector, if you need extra features, you need to buy the agents for these features. Some of the features are Terabytes, some of them are agents. There's some complexity in the pricing and licensing."

More OpenText Data Protector pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Backup and Recovery solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

913,924 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Construction Company

15%

Outsourcing Company

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

18%

Outsourcing Company

14%

Construction Company

10%

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	6

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	28
Midsize Enterprise	22
Large Enterprise	61

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Quest NetVault?

NetVault is a great cloud-ready enterprise backup software for hybrid data centers. Here are some of the things I really like about the solution: It is easy to use right out of the box and scales ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Quest NetVault?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Quest NetVault?

My use cases for Quest NetVault involve one backup server, which has a Windows-based server with a lot of disks attached. On these disks, I have a virtual type library, and the system also has acce...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus Data Protector?

The solution is expensive as it requires purchasing all features without the option to negotiate based on client numbers, unlike Veeam which offers flexibility in pricing.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Micro Focus Data Protector?

OpenText Data Protector is not user-friendly, especially for cloud backup. It lacks functions and facilities compared to Veeam, which offers more user-friendliness for virtual machine backups. Ther...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Micro Focus Data Protector?

We use OpenText Data Protector ( /products/opentext-data-protector-reviews ) for Oracle database backup and some applications that run for database security.

See all answers

Comparisons

Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection vs NetVault Plus

Compared 9% of the time

Veeam Data Platform vs NetVault Plus

Compared 6% of the time

Commvault Cloud vs NetVault Plus

Compared 5% of the time

Acronis Cyber Protect vs NetVault Plus

Compared 3% of the time

Veritas NetBackup vs NetVault Plus

Compared 3% of the time

More NetVault Plus Competitors

Veritas NetBackup vs OpenText Data Protector

Compared 6% of the time

Microsoft DPM vs OpenText Data Protector

Compared 6% of the time

Veeam Data Platform vs OpenText Data Protector

Compared 6% of the time

Veritas Backup Exec vs OpenText Data Protector

Compared 5% of the time

Commvault Cloud vs OpenText Data Protector

Compared 5% of the time

More OpenText Data Protector Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

NetVault Plus

September 2026

Download NetVault Plus product report

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Data Protector

September 2026

Download OpenText Data Protector product report

Also Known As

NetVault Backup, Quest NetVault, Quest NetVault Backup, BakBone

Micro Focus Data Protector, Data Protector, OmniBack, HPE Data Protector

Overview

NetVault Plus is a dependable backup and recovery solution that efficiently manages and protects data across multiple environments, supporting scalable operations through user-friendly features and extensive compatibility with databases and virtual systems.

NetVault Plus offers a comprehensive approach to data backup and recovery, suitable for large-scale implementations across various industries. With capabilities in snapshot-based backup, swift recovery, and malware scanning, it ensures stable operations. The platform supports numerous databases and virtual machines, providing network access control and timely email updates on job statuses. Users benefit from its straightforward recovery processes and the ability to create backup jobs and tape server restoration. Though improvements are needed in web interface speed, pricing transparency, restore accuracy, and compatibility with newer technologies like MongoDB and Microsoft updates, it remains a significant tool for robust data protection.

What are the core features of NetVault Plus?

Efficient Search: Quickly locates tables and databases for easier management.
Built-in Reports: Offers built-in reporting capabilities for insightful data analysis.
User-Friendly Interface: Ensures ease of use for managing backup and recovery tasks.
Snapshot-Based Backup: Provides reliable snapshots for faster data restoration.
Malware Scanning: Protects data with integrated scanning for threats.

What should users expect in terms of benefits and ROI?

Scalability: Supports large-scale deployments efficiently.
Wide Support: Compatible with many database types and virtual machine setups.
Fast Recovery: Enables quick restore requests across regions.
Stable Operations: Ensures consistent performance over time.

In specialized industries like pharmacy and retail, NetVault Plus enhances client data management and security log processes, leveraging application snapshotting to protect virtual environments such as Nutanix Xi. It provides robust protection and backup solutions tailored to diverse server versions, including Oracle, SQL, and bare metal recovery scenarios.

Quest Software

OpenText Data Protector offers robust integration with systems like SQL, Oracle, VMware, and Exchange, boasting strong backup and recovery solutions across multiple environments, despite some areas needing improvement such as user-friendliness and GUI design.

OpenText Data Protector provides comprehensive data protection for servers, Linux systems, and applications including Oracle and Microsoft, alongside centralized storage management. It supports virtual, cloud, and on-premises environments, focusing on Oracle database security, HANA, and NAS appliances via NDMP. Despite its benefits, users encounter frequent errors with virtual environment backups, especially with VMware, and find the GUI outdated. Documentation needs improvement for troubleshooting, and support services face criticism for delayed responses. The licensing structure lacks flexibility, and while it supports efficient deduplication and scheduling, reporting capabilities often lead users to rely on external tools.

What are the key features of OpenText Data Protector?

Seamless Integration: Supports SQL, Oracle, VMware, and Exchange for smooth data management.
Centralized Management: Single interface for managing complex environments with ease.
Disaster Recovery: Offers robust recovery capabilities with automated scheduling.
Diverse OS Support: Accommodates numerous operating systems, enhancing flexibility.
Detailed Reporting: Generates reports for informed decision-making and strategy improvements.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Reliable Backup: Ensures data integrity and availability across platforms.
Flexibility: Adapts to changing environments and diverse IT landscapes.
Cost Efficiency: Streamlines processes to maximize ROI despite licensing costs.
Integration Quality: Works well with existing systems, reducing transition challenges.

OpenText Data Protector finds application in sectors requiring robust data protection, such as finance and healthcare, securing data in compliance-sensitive environments. Industries rely on it for protecting Oracle databases and ensuring data retention and recovery in both short- and long-term scenarios.

OpenText

Sample Customers

intel, Mars, MERK, Microsoft, Uber, Visa

GSK Vaccines, Repsol, Vodafone Group, Siemens AG, Medium Enterprise Transportation Services Company

Buyer's Guide

NetVault Plus vs. OpenText Data Protector

September 2026

Free Report: NetVault Plus vs. OpenText Data Protector

Find out what your peers are saying about NetVault Plus vs. OpenText Data Protector and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

913,924 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our NetVault Plus vs. OpenText Data Protector report.

See our list of best Backup and Recovery vendors.

We monitor all Backup and Recovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.