NetVault Plus vs OpenText Data Protector comparison

Quest Software and OpenText are both solutions in the Backup and Recovery category. Quest Software is ranked #40 with an average rating of 7.7, while OpenText is ranked #26 with an average rating of 9.0. Quest Software holds a 1.0% mindshare in BRS, compared to OpenText’s 0.9% mindshare. Additionally, 84% of Quest Software users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 80% of OpenText users who would recommend it.

NetVault Plus

Read 13 NetVault Plus reviews

1,999 Views
1,739 Comparison Views

84% willing to recommend

OpenText Data Protector

Read 102 OpenText Data Protector reviews

2,452 Views
2,207 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

NetVault Plus

OpenText Data Protector

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 23, 2025

OpenText Data Protector and NetVault Plus compete in the data protection category. Data Protector appears to hold an advantage in large-scale environments due to its extensive ecosystem integration, whereas NetVault Plus offers more cost-effective and scalable solutions favored by users for affordability.

Features: OpenText Data Protector offers seamless integration with HPE infrastructure, manages backups for both physical and virtual environments, and provides efficient disaster recovery processes. NetVault Plus is known for its ease of deployment and robust reporting capabilities, supporting multiple database environments and delivering effective disaster recovery solutions.

Room for Improvement: Data Protector could improve VMware integration, enhance reporting, and simplify its complex licensing model. Its development pace lags behind competitors. NetVault Plus could enhance deduplication and security features, improve support for cloud platforms, and expand database support such as for MongoDB.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Both solutions provide comprehensive technical support. Data Protector users have mixed feedback on response times, while NetVault Plus is praised for its simplicity in deployment across on-premises and cloud environments, as well as its robust customer service.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText Data Protector is perceived as expensive, especially for smaller businesses, due to its complex licensing structures. Measuring ROI is challenging but noted for success in enterprise environments. NetVault Plus offers flexible licensing and is considered more affordable and aligned with the needs of small to medium enterprises, leading to higher customer satisfaction and perceptions of better ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed NetVault Plus vs. OpenText Data Protector Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

NetVault Plus vs. OpenText Data Protector

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 879,899 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

NetVault Plus

Ranking in Backup and Recovery

40th

Average Rating

7.2

Reviews Sentiment

5.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Disaster Recovery (DR) Software (27th)

OpenText Data Protector

Ranking in Backup and Recovery

26th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

5.8

Number of Reviews

102

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Backup and Recovery category, the mindshare of NetVault Plus is 1.0%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText Data Protector is 0.9%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Backup and Recovery Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
OpenText Data Protector	0.9%
NetVault Plus	1.0%
Other	98.1%

Backup and Recovery

Featured Reviews

MohanKumar4

Manager at Fractalio Data Pvt Ltd

Consistent high ratings reflect user satisfaction and reliability

The effective features are file system backup and bare metal recovery. I find it effective because the recovery time when the system goes down is approximately 10 hours, so you can recover the system, and the recovery procedure is quite straightforward. The solution is on-premises. Deduplication is handled by their own product called Corestore, which is a software-based deduplication engine. The deduplication ratio is quite good, and the backup window reduces because of it. To use Quest NetVault Plus backup, my advice is that the product is quite simple; there's no need to access or log in to the backup server, just log in from any system in the same network, and the configuration part is also quite simple. I rate Quest NetVault Plus a nine out of ten.

Read full review

reviewer1751496

Project Manager and Technical Consultant at a computer software company with 201-500 employees

Provides effective backup for physical servers and needs improvements for cloud compatibility

We use OpenText Data Protector for Oracle database backup and some applications that run for database security OpenText Data Protector is good for physical backup, specifically for physical servers. It is effective for direct backups to EMC library or storage without using a repository. However,…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The initial setup is straightforward. It's not that complicated. Deployment took maybe about 15 minutes."

"The backup and recovery capabilities of NetVault Plus are very important for maintaining my business."

"The interface is very user-friendly."

"Quest NetVault Plus has a high level of stability."

"The user interface is good."

"The solution allows us to block off our network and only give access to whatever we want."

"Quest NetVault Plus is quite effective for managing backups across multiple systems because we don't need to log in to the backup server to manage it; it's web-based, so from any system in the network, you can log in and manage everything."

"It has File and SQL backup, which is the main benefit for us."

More NetVault Plus pros

"Ability to automatically detect and secure new data sources without requiring manual configuration intervention."

"It's supports Unix, Linux, all of the OS's. It's very stable software."

"The initial setup is very easy."

"OpenText Data Protector is good for physical backup, specifically for physical servers."

"Deduplication implementation with CAPA is very good."

"The file system backup (by far, the most used) is the most valuable feature."

"The solution is easy to use."

"Micro Focus Data Protector's most valuable feature is its interaction with the fiber share. It is easy to use, we use it to back up without any problem to VTLs, and can use the Fiber Channel that is still the TCP."

More OpenText Data Protector pros

Cons

"The interface can be improved. It should be more clear what features are available and make them easy to find."

"The storage capacity is very low."

"Improvements should come, particularly in compatibility, backup performance, or better troubleshooting."

"The stability of the solution is poor."

"I would like to see the option of cloud-based management."

"There are certain issues with the product that we report to Quest, and we get offered a workaround instead of a fix. There could be better interaction with the development teams, perhaps in terms of transparency."

"Improvements could be made in the deduplication and data management capabilities. There is also a need for better security measures, as security is critical to ensure backups are safe and free from malware."

"There are command-line limitations. There is not a very strong possibility to work with the command line. The commands that are there are not that powerful, and you need to be very good at scripting, for example, in PowerShell or in Bash in case it is running on Linux systems. You need to combine a lot of commands together, and still, you will not get a great output that is presentable to others. You cannot work with it as easily."

More NetVault Plus cons

"They should design the solution so that it is much easier for deployment and make the UI easy to use."

"The scheduler setup could be better. We are facing some issues scheduling the job based on our requirements."

"VM backups needs to be improved. They need to make it similar to the way Veeam and Commvault are doing the virtual backups."

"It has a lot of undeveloped functions like window searching and patent searching, and within the main backup processes like VMware and Microsoft Exchange. It's completely not user-friendly, and it has no built-in antivirus software. In my opinion, Micro Focus Data Protector is not an enterprise level solution."

"Recently, clients have raised concerns about the lack of comprehensive documentation for Data Protector."

"The challenge is that we can't restore a single file from the VM in the data process when we do VM backups. But with Commvault, you can restore a single file even if you have a VM snapshot package. That's one drawback of this tool. When we do VM backups, it should help us browse the VMs to restore a single file instead of doing the complete VM restore."

"We have so many specific technological cracks in Micro Focus, but we are not getting the features, facilities, or coordination between the global delivery centers and the R&D team that we need to express our ideas."

"I don't like this solution so much because it's very technical and compared to Commvault and Veeam, it's not so user-friendly. The interface needs improvement."

More OpenText Data Protector cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The tool is expensive."

"When we purchased four licenses, we were given a very good price. However, it is still on the high side when compared to some other vendors."

"The price of our 12-month contract is approximately $1,500 AUD ($1,100 USD)."

"It is more affordable compared to other vendors."

"We have many competitors who are pricing better, and we believe that our pricing is higher."

"The pricing is neither too expensive nor very cheap."

"Avoid using many LTO drives; when using fewer drives, the price will be extremely good."

"The pricing is acceptable for enterprise level companies, but it's not acceptable for small- and medium-sized businesses. Micro Focus Data Protector is not an enterprise level solution, and it should cover small- and medium-sized businesses with acceptable prices."

"Pricing for Micro Focus Data Protector is reasonable."

"The licensing cost was not annual. We didn't pay any license. We paid when we deployed and we didn't pay for anything after that. There were no additional fees after the initial payment."

"It is fast, reliable, and its licensing policy is great."

More OpenText Data Protector pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Backup and Recovery solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

879,899 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Performing Arts

Manufacturing Company

Government

Computer Software Company

Performing Arts

10%

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	6

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	28
Midsize Enterprise	22
Large Enterprise	61

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Quest NetVault?

NetVault is a great cloud-ready enterprise backup software for hybrid data centers. Here are some of the things I really like about the solution: It is easy to use right out of the box and scales ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Quest NetVault?

I don't know of any improvements needed because everything is okay; I have no problems. NetVault Plus doesn't have a support team in my country; having a local contact in Turkey would be very usefu...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Quest NetVault?

My primary purpose for using NetVault Plus is file backup, only file backup. We don't need granular backup right now because the betting system operates only in Turkey, and government policy is ver...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus Data Protector?

The solution is expensive as it requires purchasing all features without the option to negotiate based on client numbers, unlike Veeam which offers flexibility in pricing.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Micro Focus Data Protector?

OpenText Data Protector is not user-friendly, especially for cloud backup. It lacks functions and facilities compared to Veeam, which offers more user-friendliness for virtual machine backups. Ther...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Micro Focus Data Protector?

We use OpenText Data Protector ( /products/opentext-data-protector-reviews ) for Oracle database backup and some applications that run for database security.

See all answers

Comparisons

Veeam Data Platform vs NetVault Plus

Compared 14% of the time

Rubrik vs NetVault Plus

Compared 10% of the time

Acronis Cyber Protect vs NetVault Plus

Compared 7% of the time

Commvault Cloud vs NetVault Plus

Compared 7% of the time

Veritas NetBackup vs NetVault Plus

Compared 7% of the time

More NetVault Plus Competitors

Veeam Data Platform vs OpenText Data Protector

Compared 24% of the time

Commvault Cloud vs OpenText Data Protector

Compared 9% of the time

Dell Avamar vs OpenText Data Protector

Compared 6% of the time

Veritas NetBackup vs OpenText Data Protector

Compared 6% of the time

Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention vs OpenText Data Protector

Compared 5% of the time

More OpenText Data Protector Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

NetVault Plus

December 2025

Download NetVault Plus product report

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Data Protector

December 2025

Download OpenText Data Protector product report

Also Known As

NetVault Backup, Quest NetVault, Quest NetVault Backup, BakBone

Micro Focus Data Protector, Data Protector, OmniBack, HPE Data Protector

Overview

NetVault Plus is a dependable backup and recovery solution that efficiently manages and protects data across multiple environments, supporting scalable operations through user-friendly features and extensive compatibility with databases and virtual systems.

NetVault Plus offers a comprehensive approach to data backup and recovery, suitable for large-scale implementations across various industries. With capabilities in snapshot-based backup, swift recovery, and malware scanning, it ensures stable operations. The platform supports numerous databases and virtual machines, providing network access control and timely email updates on job statuses. Users benefit from its straightforward recovery processes and the ability to create backup jobs and tape server restoration. Though improvements are needed in web interface speed, pricing transparency, restore accuracy, and compatibility with newer technologies like MongoDB and Microsoft updates, it remains a significant tool for robust data protection.

What are the core features of NetVault Plus?

Efficient Search: Quickly locates tables and databases for easier management.
Built-in Reports: Offers built-in reporting capabilities for insightful data analysis.
User-Friendly Interface: Ensures ease of use for managing backup and recovery tasks.
Snapshot-Based Backup: Provides reliable snapshots for faster data restoration.
Malware Scanning: Protects data with integrated scanning for threats.

What should users expect in terms of benefits and ROI?

Scalability: Supports large-scale deployments efficiently.
Wide Support: Compatible with many database types and virtual machine setups.
Fast Recovery: Enables quick restore requests across regions.
Stable Operations: Ensures consistent performance over time.

In specialized industries like pharmacy and retail, NetVault Plus enhances client data management and security log processes, leveraging application snapshotting to protect virtual environments such as Nutanix Xi. It provides robust protection and backup solutions tailored to diverse server versions, including Oracle, SQL, and bare metal recovery scenarios.

Quest Software

OpenText Data Protector standardizes and consolidates backups across multiple platforms. It provides secure, comprehensive backup protection for business-critical data and applications whether virtual, physical, or online in the cloud.

OpenText

Sample Customers

intel, Mars, MERK, Microsoft, Uber, Visa

GSK Vaccines, Repsol, Vodafone Group, Siemens AG, Medium Enterprise Transportation Services Company

Buyer's Guide

NetVault Plus vs. OpenText Data Protector

December 2025

Free Report: NetVault Plus vs. OpenText Data Protector

Find out what your peers are saying about NetVault Plus vs. OpenText Data Protector and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

879,899 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our NetVault Plus vs. OpenText Data Protector report.

See our list of best Backup and Recovery vendors.

We monitor all Backup and Recovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.