NAKIVO Backup &amp; Replication vs OpenText Data Protector comparison

NAKIVO Backup & Replication vs. OpenText Data Protector

Download the complete report

Helped 913,806 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

NAKIVO Backup & Replication

Ranking in Backup and Recovery

12th

Average Rating

9.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Disaster Recovery (DR) Software (11th)

OpenText Data Protector

Ranking in Backup and Recovery

52nd

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

5.8

Number of Reviews

102

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2026, in the Backup and Recovery category, the mindshare of NAKIVO Backup & Replication is 1.1%, down from 1.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText Data Protector is 1.0%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Backup and Recovery Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
NAKIVO Backup & Replication	1.1%
OpenText Data Protector	1.0%
Other	97.9%

Backup and Recovery

Featured Reviews

EDERLEY TERRERO

Business Consulting at Gestion IT

Robust data protection has safeguarded mailboxes and disaster recovery for our clients

NAKIVO Backup & Replication has released many updates lately and at this point it works excellently. Needs will always appear, particularly around the AI topic and other things that come out over time. I understand that solutions always have to keep moving forward, but so far I see it as excellent.I give it a nine because nothing is perfect. There are always solutions, and NAKIVO Backup & Replication is a tool that adapts perfectly to certain needs. However, we cannot dismiss that there are powerful solutions on the market that have been around for much longer. I rate it a nine because we can always improve.

Read full review

Ahmad-Hassan

Project Manager And Technical Consultant at EEMC

Provides effective backup for physical servers and needs improvements for cloud compatibility

We use OpenText Data Protector for Oracle database backup and some applications that run for database security OpenText Data Protector is good for physical backup, specifically for physical servers. It is effective for direct backups to EMC library or storage without using a repository. However,…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Nakivo has enabled me to concentrate on other tasks without worrying about the daily backups."

"The VM, restore, and file recovery capabilities are considered gold standards."

"Perfect for someone who doesn't want to waste time."

"The simplicity of Nakivo is its best feature; it does exactly what it should, which is to create restorable backups!"

"The initial setup is very straightforward, and I love the Linux version as well; also, NAKIVO is scalable and stable."

"The product license and support delivery have been great!"

"Nakivo gives users confidence in knowing that if something happens with their application server, exchange server, or other applications, they can recover it easily and quickly."

"Backups are very easy to implement and schedule, the product is very useful, and the recovery procedure is very extensive and feature-rich."

More NAKIVO Backup & Replication pros

"Data Protector is quite simple and easy to deploy. The deployment is always the same. It's on a server, and the agents are deployed to the machines in a straightforward way. We have two engineers who deploy and manage all our backup solutions."

"The most valuable feature for us is the central, single pane of glass that allows us to manage our clients without having to log into their systems."

"The most valuable feature is the capability to back up our SQL server."

"It is a traditional backup model. If you talk about file server and the official Windows database, it's a stable product."

"Huge, simply eliminating the need for tape changers returned the cost of the hardware within less than half a year."

"If others have a similar environment like we do, then I would suggest this solution for them."

"Data Protector's granular recovery features make it easy for us to create and restore backups in an understandable and user-friendly manner. With granular recovery, any database or even just a database table can be restored at will."

"The main purpose of this software suite (safely backup and restore main systems) is fully achieved."

More OpenText Data Protector pros

Cons

"In the future, I would like to see support for backing up data to more cloud platforms, besides Amazon."

"I would like to see some additional models in the next release to make backups more functional."

"In the next release, it would be good to have ability/feature to backup only Oracle database from the Linux OS beside backing up whole VM."

"It would be good if I could have a remote upgrade of our Synology Transporters, but the manual upgrade is easy and no problem at all."

"I would like to see support for backing up from other platforms, such as physical machines."

"In the press releases, it would be useful to make sure that the manual space reclaim procedure does not have to be performed but that it happens automatically, thus optimizing the use of space."

"The upgrade process is a bit dated and could use some changes."

"We would like the ability to do raw metal restores from bootable media."

More NAKIVO Backup & Replication cons

"The problem with HPE Data Protector is when it goes wrong, it's very hard to fathom why it went wrong."

"Until last year it was very good, but in 2015 we felt a drop in service because some technical resources disappeared."

"The GUI could be updated. The GUI hasn't changed since version 6. It's on version 10 now. The reporting could also be better. Also, while Data Protector is excellent for backing up physical hardware, it needs more features for backing up VM images because many environments use hypervisor."

"Micro Focus Data Protector must improve its overall evolution record. They need to focus on hardware based instant recovery, client recovery, and cloud ability. Now there is no cloud ability."

"I think the GUI needs a vast overhaul."

"We would like to have a direct plugin to VMware. It could also be simplified, made more usable and manageable."

"Hyper-V backups need improvement so they can do GRE."

"VM backups needs to be improved. They need to make it similar to the way Veeam and Commvault are doing the virtual backups."

More OpenText Data Protector cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The product is quite cheap compared to other products on the market, but despite this, it is rich in features both at the level of backup and recovery as well as at the level of additional options."

"This product is cheaper than other big rivals."

"It's really cheap, and our company saves a significant amount of money on IT backup solutions per year."

"You have a lot of different options when it comes to pricing and the pricing models are pretty flexible and affordable."

"The price could be lower."

"The prices are high."

"Nakivo Backup & Replication also have another great value, which is that it is one of the lowest prices on the market."

"As a free solution for a small environment, this is a great solution!"

More NAKIVO Backup & Replication pricing and cost advice

"The product is cheaper than Commvault."

"It is more affordable compared to other vendors."

"The solution requires paying for a license."

"Pricing/licensing is Data Protector's single best offering. In its most basic environment, the only license required is for whatever target device is required."

"Pricing for Micro Focus Data Protector is reasonable."

"We have many competitors who are pricing better, and we believe that our pricing is higher."

"The licensing structure provides cost savings to business."

"In Data Protector, if you need extra features, you need to buy the agents for these features. Some of the features are Terabytes, some of them are agents. There's some complexity in the pricing and licensing."

More OpenText Data Protector pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Backup and Recovery solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

913,806 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

16%

Manufacturing Company

Construction Company

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

18%

Outsourcing Company

14%

Construction Company

10%

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	81
Midsize Enterprise	16
Large Enterprise	9

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	28
Midsize Enterprise	22
Large Enterprise	61

Questions from the Community

How does Nakivo compare with Veeam Backup & Replication?

Nakivo is my favorite backup software. Below are the main benefits of Nakivo compared to Veeam 1. Low cost. 2. Backup storage with global deduplication (this is the main requirement of a backup sol...

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Nakivo?

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing shows that NAKIVO Backup & Replication is more price-efficient than other solutions, and we are satisfied with the pricing.

What needs improvement with Nakivo?

Improving NAKIVO Backup & Replication involves addressing the hassle of choosing the right license level when starting out, especially with specific requirements, and the lack of macOS support ...

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus Data Protector?

The solution is expensive as it requires purchasing all features without the option to negotiate based on client numbers, unlike Veeam which offers flexibility in pricing.

What needs improvement with Micro Focus Data Protector?

OpenText Data Protector is not user-friendly, especially for cloud backup. It lacks functions and facilities compared to Veeam, which offers more user-friendliness for virtual machine backups. Ther...

What is your primary use case for Micro Focus Data Protector?

We use OpenText Data Protector ( /products/opentext-data-protector-reviews ) for Oracle database backup and some applications that run for database security.

Veeam Data Platform vs NAKIVO Backup & Replication

Comparisons

Compared 10% of the time

Hornetsecurity Altaro VM Backup vs NAKIVO Backup & Replication

Compared 5% of the time

Rubrik vs NAKIVO Backup & Replication

Compared 3% of the time

BDRShield vs NAKIVO Backup & Replication

Compared 3% of the time

HPE Zerto Software vs NAKIVO Backup & Replication

Compared 3% of the time

More NAKIVO Backup & Replication Competitors

Veritas NetBackup vs OpenText Data Protector

Compared 6% of the time

Microsoft DPM vs OpenText Data Protector

Compared 6% of the time

Veeam Data Platform vs OpenText Data Protector

Compared 6% of the time

Veritas Backup Exec vs OpenText Data Protector

Compared 5% of the time

Commvault Cloud vs OpenText Data Protector

Compared 5% of the time

More OpenText Data Protector Competitors

Product Reports

NAKIVO Backup & Replication

Download NAKIVO Backup & Replication product report

OpenText Data Protector

Download OpenText Data Protector product report

Also Known As

No data available

Micro Focus Data Protector, Data Protector, OmniBack, HPE Data Protector

Overview

NAKIVO Backup & Replication delivers rapid deployment and intuitive management across environments like Windows, Linux, and NAS. It is known for fast VM recovery, robust data protection, and cloud integration with competitive pricing.

NAKIVO Backup & Replication supports diverse IT landscapes, offering efficient deduplication, offsite backups, and policy-based replication. Its granular file restores, effective compression, and seamless cloud integration make it a preferred choice for minimizing downtime and enhancing business resilience. Users highlight its security measures, flexible deployment options, and automatic backups as core strengths. However, further enhancements in interface refinement, storage array integrations, and broadened support for virtual technologies and physical machine backups could enhance user satisfaction. Users seek improved control over alerts, better reporting capabilities, and optimized deduplication and compression.

What are the key features of NAKIVO Backup & Replication?

Fast VM Recovery: Minimal downtime with quick restore options for virtual machines.
Deduplication & Compression: Efficient data storage through advanced deduplication techniques and compression.
Cloud Integration: Seamless operations with cloud platforms like AWS for flexible backup solutions.
Policy-Based Replication: Automated replication policies ensuring consistent and reliable data backup.
Granular File Restores: Restore specific files without needing full system recovery, saving time and resources.

What benefits should users look for when evaluating NAKIVO Backup & Replication?

Competitive Pricing: Cost-effective solution with robust features.
Ease of Use: Intuitive management for a hassle-free experience.
Reliable Performance: Consistent results in protecting and recovering data.
Strong Support: Responsive customer service catering to user needs.

In industries like technology and finance, NAKIVO Backup & Replication is essential for securing virtual environments such as VMware and Hyper-V. Its deployment on NAS devices and capability for offsite backups to cloud platforms like AWS are appreciated. Organizations utilize it for backup, replication, and recovery of virtual machines using daily and incremental methods, ensuring efficient data protection and disaster recovery processes.

Nakivo

OpenText Data Protector offers robust integration with systems like SQL, Oracle, VMware, and Exchange, boasting strong backup and recovery solutions across multiple environments, despite some areas needing improvement such as user-friendliness and GUI design.

OpenText Data Protector provides comprehensive data protection for servers, Linux systems, and applications including Oracle and Microsoft, alongside centralized storage management. It supports virtual, cloud, and on-premises environments, focusing on Oracle database security, HANA, and NAS appliances via NDMP. Despite its benefits, users encounter frequent errors with virtual environment backups, especially with VMware, and find the GUI outdated. Documentation needs improvement for troubleshooting, and support services face criticism for delayed responses. The licensing structure lacks flexibility, and while it supports efficient deduplication and scheduling, reporting capabilities often lead users to rely on external tools.

What are the key features of OpenText Data Protector?

Seamless Integration: Supports SQL, Oracle, VMware, and Exchange for smooth data management.
Centralized Management: Single interface for managing complex environments with ease.
Disaster Recovery: Offers robust recovery capabilities with automated scheduling.
Diverse OS Support: Accommodates numerous operating systems, enhancing flexibility.
Detailed Reporting: Generates reports for informed decision-making and strategy improvements.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Reliable Backup: Ensures data integrity and availability across platforms.
Flexibility: Adapts to changing environments and diverse IT landscapes.
Cost Efficiency: Streamlines processes to maximize ROI despite licensing costs.
Integration Quality: Works well with existing systems, reducing transition challenges.

OpenText Data Protector finds application in sectors requiring robust data protection, such as finance and healthcare, securing data in compliance-sensitive environments. Industries rely on it for protecting Oracle databases and ensuring data retention and recovery in both short- and long-term scenarios.

OpenText

Sample Customers

Coca Cola, Honda, 3M, University of Arizona, University of Maryland, University of Arkansas, Johns Hopkins University, Marriott, Radisson Hotels and Resorts, Fujifilm, Eiffage

GSK Vaccines, Repsol, Vodafone Group, Siemens AG, Medium Enterprise Transportation Services Company

NAKIVO Backup & Replication vs. OpenText Data Protector