NAKIVO Backup & Replication vs OpenText Data Protector comparison

Nakivo and OpenText are both solutions in the Backup and Recovery category. Nakivo is ranked #13 with an average rating of 8.8, while OpenText is ranked #23 with an average rating of 10.0. Nakivo holds a 1.2% mindshare in BRS, compared to OpenText’s 1.0% mindshare. Additionally, 99% of Nakivo users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 80% of OpenText users who would recommend it.

NAKIVO Backup & Replication

Read 94 NAKIVO Backup & Replication reviews

7,602 Views
6,234 Comparison Views

99% willing to recommend

OpenText Data Protector

Read 102 OpenText Data Protector reviews

6,661 Views
6,195 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

NAKIVO Backup & Replication

OpenText Data Protector

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 8, 2026

OpenText Data Protector and NAKIVO Backup & Replication compete in the backup and replication solutions category. NAKIVO seems to have the upper hand due to its user-friendliness and affordability, which cater well to small and medium-sized environments.

Features: OpenText Data Protector is recognized for its comprehensive integration capabilities with SAP, Oracle, and various operating systems, allowing swift adaptation in complex environments. Its library-centric licensing enables rapid procedure adjustments. NAKIVO Backup & Replication is praised for its ease of use, effective ransomware protection, and robust encryption, providing strong data security and recovery options.

Room for Improvement: OpenText Data Protector could improve its interface and strengthen integration with newer virtual and cloud technologies. Enhancing configuration simplicity and reporting capabilities is needed. NAKIVO could further enhance its advanced reporting and refine its user interface for more intuitive interaction.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText Data Protector enables integration in both on-premises and private cloud environments but has encountered mixed reviews on customer service, with reports of slower support responses. NAKIVO supports hybrid deployments and is commended for its responsive and consistent customer support.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText Data Protector is known for being a pricier option with a library-centric licensing model, yet offering ROI in intricate setups. In contrast, NAKIVO provides clear, economical pricing and licensing, facilitating significant cost savings particularly for SMEs, thus delivering positive ROI through efficient backup solutions.

To learn more, read our detailed NAKIVO Backup & Replication vs. OpenText Data Protector Report (Updated: August 2026).

Buyer's Guide

NAKIVO Backup & Replication vs. OpenText Data Protector

August 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 908,834 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

NAKIVO Backup & Replication

Ranking in Backup and Recovery

13th

Average Rating

9.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Disaster Recovery (DR) Software (11th)

OpenText Data Protector

Ranking in Backup and Recovery

23rd

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

5.8

Number of Reviews

102

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Backup and Recovery category, the mindshare of NAKIVO Backup & Replication is 1.2%, down from 1.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText Data Protector is 1.0%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Backup and Recovery Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
NAKIVO Backup & Replication	1.2%
OpenText Data Protector	1.0%
Other	97.8%

Backup and Recovery

Featured Reviews

EDERLEY TERRERO

Business Consulting at Gestion IT

Robust data protection has safeguarded mailboxes and disaster recovery for our clients

NAKIVO Backup & Replication has released many updates lately and at this point it works excellently. Needs will always appear, particularly around the AI topic and other things that come out over time. I understand that solutions always have to keep moving forward, but so far I see it as excellent.I give it a nine because nothing is perfect. There are always solutions, and NAKIVO Backup & Replication is a tool that adapts perfectly to certain needs. However, we cannot dismiss that there are powerful solutions on the market that have been around for much longer. I rate it a nine because we can always improve.

Read full review

Ahmad-Hassan

Project Manager And Technical Consultant at EEMC

Provides effective backup for physical servers and needs improvements for cloud compatibility

We use OpenText Data Protector for Oracle database backup and some applications that run for database security OpenText Data Protector is good for physical backup, specifically for physical servers. It is effective for direct backups to EMC library or storage without using a repository. However,…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We really appreciate the simplicity of the solution."

"Since we started using Nakivo Backup and Replication, we can perform operations that would be very expensive using a VMware license, for a very very affordable price."

"Nakivo's backup and replication product has provided us with a solution that meets our requirements and we are definitely better off using this solution."

"The ability to use a variety of cloud providers rather than being tied into one is a huge bonus."

"It is a cost-effective solution with an easy-to-configure user-friendly interface."

"It saves us a lot of time, starting with the fast deployment and configuration, through to the daily backup jobs, controlling the processes, and watching the data storage space."

"Backups are working smoothly with Nakivo Backup."

"It is fast, simple, powerful, and has a price without competition."

More NAKIVO Backup & Replication pros

"It is the best solution for general operations like backup and restore."

"I have used Micro Focus Data Protector for the file backup facilities. My primary use of the software is to backup file data."

"For our data there is no price."

"This solution is awesome; it is leaps ahead of Backup Exec, leaps ahead."

"The organizations I work with that use the product are actually managing to get a higher availability figure."

"Overall, this is a good product and it hasn't given us any problems."

"It has the ability to backup both DB2 (IBM's RDBMS) and HP-UX (HP's Unix OS)."

"What we find most valuable in Micro Focus Data Protector is that it provides Japanese data protection, for example, it protects information such as the full Japanese name, address, etc."

More OpenText Data Protector pros

Cons

"Implementing more comprehensive data deduplication and compression techniques could optimize storage utilization and reduce backup times, improving overall efficiency."

"The feature that has a backup repository, like QNAP + ext. HDD's could be improved."

"For our usage, we've found the connections to remote shares (like CIFS or NFS) while quite easy to set up are a little bit prone to interruption."

"What must be improved is the response time to technical support requests."

"Log and report creation can be improved."

"In the future, I would like to see support for backing up data to more cloud platforms, besides Amazon."

"Nakivo's implementation documentation could use a little beefing up."

"In terms of what could be improved for the next release, I would probably answer better documentation and licensing models."

More NAKIVO Backup & Replication cons

"The new backup systems are using new mechanisms for the recovery phases; for example, VM, recovery and testing the backup before recovering it. These features are not available in Data Protector."

"The level of support is lacking. They need to step up the level of service they offer."

"VM backups needs to be improved. They need to make it similar to the way Veeam and Commvault are doing the virtual backups."

"Be ready for an exercise in frustration, but once all the problems are resolved, then you’re OK."

"It is scalable. It's not as scalable as HPE would like to think it is."

"This product is lagging behind most of its competitors. It is still expensive to add features and the ESXi integration is terrible -- you have to restore a whole VMDK to then get the ability to restore a file."

"Based on a recent conversation, technical support has been working to fix a problem for six months, but still haven’t actually fixed it."

"Customer Service: It's not good and needs to be improved. Technical Support: It's not good and needs to be improved."

More OpenText Data Protector cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We use a perpetual license that is priced well."

"From the perspective of Indian users, the cost is a little bit high."

"I think the price is competitive. However, for some projects, it can be a bit much for price-sensitive small businesses."

"The prices are high."

"The pricing, setup costs, and licensing are easy to understand, no matter how you want to implement it."

"Nakivo is cheaper per machine and per backup."

"It's really cheap, and our company saves a significant amount of money on IT backup solutions per year."

"You have a lot of different options when it comes to pricing and the pricing models are pretty flexible and affordable."

More NAKIVO Backup & Replication pricing and cost advice

"They have two types of licensing, one is for storage capacity and the other is client licensing. The capacity licensing here is a bit expensive."

"Pricing for Micro Focus Data Protector is reasonable."

"The licensing cost was not annual. We didn't pay any license. We paid when we deployed and we didn't pay for anything after that. There were no additional fees after the initial payment."

"In Data Protector, if you need extra features, you need to buy the agents for these features. Some of the features are Terabytes, some of them are agents. There's some complexity in the pricing and licensing."

"The solution requires paying for a license."

"Pricing/licensing is Data Protector's single best offering. In its most basic environment, the only license required is for whatever target device is required."

"The licensing cost is too high."

"The pricing is acceptable for enterprise level companies, but it's not acceptable for small- and medium-sized businesses. Micro Focus Data Protector is not an enterprise level solution, and it should cover small- and medium-sized businesses with acceptable prices."

More OpenText Data Protector pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Backup and Recovery solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

908,834 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

16%

Manufacturing Company

Construction Company

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

20%

Construction Company

11%

Outsourcing Company

11%

Marketing Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	81
Midsize Enterprise	16
Large Enterprise	9

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	28
Midsize Enterprise	22
Large Enterprise	61

Questions from the Community

How does Nakivo compare with Veeam Backup & Replication?

Nakivo is my favorite backup software. Below are the main benefits of Nakivo compared to Veeam 1. Low cost. 2. Backup storage with global deduplication (this is the main requirement of a backup sol...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Nakivo?

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing shows that NAKIVO Backup & Replication is more price-efficient than other solutions, and we are satisfied with the pricing.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Nakivo?

Improving NAKIVO Backup & Replication involves addressing the hassle of choosing the right license level when starting out, especially with specific requirements, and the lack of macOS support ...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus Data Protector?

The solution is expensive as it requires purchasing all features without the option to negotiate based on client numbers, unlike Veeam which offers flexibility in pricing.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Micro Focus Data Protector?

OpenText Data Protector is not user-friendly, especially for cloud backup. It lacks functions and facilities compared to Veeam, which offers more user-friendliness for virtual machine backups. Ther...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Micro Focus Data Protector?

We use OpenText Data Protector ( /products/opentext-data-protector-reviews ) for Oracle database backup and some applications that run for database security.

See all answers

Comparisons

Veeam Data Platform vs NAKIVO Backup & Replication

Compared 9% of the time

Hornetsecurity Altaro VM Backup vs NAKIVO Backup & Replication

Compared 6% of the time

Rubrik vs NAKIVO Backup & Replication

Compared 3% of the time

Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines vs NAKIVO Backup & Replication

Compared 3% of the time

BDRShield vs NAKIVO Backup & Replication

Compared 3% of the time

More NAKIVO Backup & Replication Competitors

Veeam Data Platform vs OpenText Data Protector

Compared 6% of the time

Veritas NetBackup vs OpenText Data Protector

Compared 6% of the time

Veritas Backup Exec vs OpenText Data Protector

Compared 5% of the time

Microsoft DPM vs OpenText Data Protector

Compared 5% of the time

Commvault Cloud vs OpenText Data Protector

Compared 4% of the time

More OpenText Data Protector Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

NAKIVO Backup & Replication

July 2026

Download NAKIVO Backup & Replication product report

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Data Protector

July 2026

Download OpenText Data Protector product report

Also Known As

No data available

Micro Focus Data Protector, Data Protector, OmniBack, HPE Data Protector

Overview

NAKIVO Backup & Replication delivers rapid deployment and intuitive management across environments like Windows, Linux, and NAS. It is known for fast VM recovery, robust data protection, and cloud integration with competitive pricing.

NAKIVO Backup & Replication supports diverse IT landscapes, offering efficient deduplication, offsite backups, and policy-based replication. Its granular file restores, effective compression, and seamless cloud integration make it a preferred choice for minimizing downtime and enhancing business resilience. Users highlight its security measures, flexible deployment options, and automatic backups as core strengths. However, further enhancements in interface refinement, storage array integrations, and broadened support for virtual technologies and physical machine backups could enhance user satisfaction. Users seek improved control over alerts, better reporting capabilities, and optimized deduplication and compression.

What are the key features of NAKIVO Backup & Replication?

Fast VM Recovery: Minimal downtime with quick restore options for virtual machines.
Deduplication & Compression: Efficient data storage through advanced deduplication techniques and compression.
Cloud Integration: Seamless operations with cloud platforms like AWS for flexible backup solutions.
Policy-Based Replication: Automated replication policies ensuring consistent and reliable data backup.
Granular File Restores: Restore specific files without needing full system recovery, saving time and resources.

What benefits should users look for when evaluating NAKIVO Backup & Replication?

Competitive Pricing: Cost-effective solution with robust features.
Ease of Use: Intuitive management for a hassle-free experience.
Reliable Performance: Consistent results in protecting and recovering data.
Strong Support: Responsive customer service catering to user needs.

In industries like technology and finance, NAKIVO Backup & Replication is essential for securing virtual environments such as VMware and Hyper-V. Its deployment on NAS devices and capability for offsite backups to cloud platforms like AWS are appreciated. Organizations utilize it for backup, replication, and recovery of virtual machines using daily and incremental methods, ensuring efficient data protection and disaster recovery processes.

Nakivo

OpenText Data Protector offers robust integration with systems like SQL, Oracle, VMware, and Exchange, boasting strong backup and recovery solutions across multiple environments, despite some areas needing improvement such as user-friendliness and GUI design.

OpenText Data Protector provides comprehensive data protection for servers, Linux systems, and applications including Oracle and Microsoft, alongside centralized storage management. It supports virtual, cloud, and on-premises environments, focusing on Oracle database security, HANA, and NAS appliances via NDMP. Despite its benefits, users encounter frequent errors with virtual environment backups, especially with VMware, and find the GUI outdated. Documentation needs improvement for troubleshooting, and support services face criticism for delayed responses. The licensing structure lacks flexibility, and while it supports efficient deduplication and scheduling, reporting capabilities often lead users to rely on external tools.

What are the key features of OpenText Data Protector?

Seamless Integration: Supports SQL, Oracle, VMware, and Exchange for smooth data management.
Centralized Management: Single interface for managing complex environments with ease.
Disaster Recovery: Offers robust recovery capabilities with automated scheduling.
Diverse OS Support: Accommodates numerous operating systems, enhancing flexibility.
Detailed Reporting: Generates reports for informed decision-making and strategy improvements.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Reliable Backup: Ensures data integrity and availability across platforms.
Flexibility: Adapts to changing environments and diverse IT landscapes.
Cost Efficiency: Streamlines processes to maximize ROI despite licensing costs.
Integration Quality: Works well with existing systems, reducing transition challenges.

OpenText Data Protector finds application in sectors requiring robust data protection, such as finance and healthcare, securing data in compliance-sensitive environments. Industries rely on it for protecting Oracle databases and ensuring data retention and recovery in both short- and long-term scenarios.

OpenText

Sample Customers

Coca Cola, Honda, 3M, University of Arizona, University of Maryland, University of Arkansas, Johns Hopkins University, Marriott, Radisson Hotels and Resorts, Fujifilm, Eiffage

GSK Vaccines, Repsol, Vodafone Group, Siemens AG, Medium Enterprise Transportation Services Company

Buyer's Guide

NAKIVO Backup & Replication vs. OpenText Data Protector

August 2026

Free Report: NAKIVO Backup & Replication vs. OpenText Data Protector

Find out what your peers are saying about NAKIVO Backup & Replication vs. OpenText Data Protector and other solutions. Updated: August 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

908,834 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our NAKIVO Backup & Replication vs. OpenText Data Protector report.

See our list of best Backup and Recovery vendors.

We monitor all Backup and Recovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.