N-able EDR vs Trellix Active Response comparison

N-able and Trellix are both solutions in the Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) category. N-able is ranked #46 with an average rating of 7.5, while Trellix is ranked #45 with an average rating of 8.0. N-able holds a 0.6% mindshare in EDR, compared to Trellix’s 0.4% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of N-able users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 50% of Trellix users who would recommend it.

N-able EDR

Read 4 N-able EDR reviews

793 Views
777 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Trellix Active Response

Read 5 Trellix Active Response reviews

561 Views
550 Comparison Views

50% willing to recommend

N-able EDR

Trellix Active Response

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 9, 2024

Trellix Active Response and N-able EDR are two leading products in endpoint detection and response. N-able EDR stands out with superior features that justify its higher cost according to user reviews.

Features: Trellix Active Response offers real-time threat detection, automated incident response, and strong support. N-able EDR provides comprehensive threat intelligence, advanced machine learning capabilities, and deeper analytical insights.

Room for Improvement: Trellix Active Response could improve integration capabilities, reduce false positives, and enhance its user interface. N-able EDR could enhance reporting features, reduce complexity in configuration, and offer more intuitive navigation.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Trellix Active Response receives favorable feedback for its straightforward deployment process and responsive customer service. N-able EDR is noted for its more complex setup but offers excellent support and detailed guidance, requiring a steeper learning curve yet providing robust assistance.

Pricing and ROI: Trellix Active Response is known for its cost-effectiveness and tangible ROI through reduced incident response time. N-able EDR, though more expensive, is seen as a worthwhile investment by users who report significant improvements in threat management and operational efficiency.

To learn more, read our detailed N-able EDR vs. Trellix Active Response Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

N-able EDR vs. Trellix Active Response

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,114 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

N-able EDR

Ranking in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

46th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Trellix Active Response

Ranking in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

45th

Average Rating

7.0

Reviews Sentiment

5.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) category, the mindshare of N-able EDR is 0.6%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Trellix Active Response is 0.4%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Trellix Active Response	0.4%
N-able EDR	0.6%
Other	99.0%

Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

Featured Reviews

Nyiko Malapane

Senior Operations Specialist at Tagit cc

Reporting effectiveness and advanced AI capabilities improve threat awareness while needing pricing simplification and licensing self-service

With pricing, they can improve by bundling their pricing because sometimes billing comes in a very long process. If they could bundle it as one solution and show the capabilities or features, they would be able to sell it more effectively, and as resellers, we could sell it to customers more easily. The technical support is responsive, but sometimes we experience limitations regarding the ability to add licensing. They could implement a self-service platform for assigning new licenses or ordering more. Currently, we depend on contacting someone who sends a new contract to sign through the process. They could change their licensing model, though I am not the right person to comment on functionality. On the reporting side, everything is covered.

Read full review

Ezzard De Lange

Senior Manager Operational Technology and Cyber Security at Eskom Ltd

Operational efficiencies increase with immediate threat alerts for endpoints

We use Trellix Active Response primarily for our endpoints, including desktop computers. It monitors all the tools that our users use for their day-to-day work The alerts provided by Trellix Active Response are its most valuable feature. They notify us immediately of any vulnerabilities on the…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature, which I can describe as the '360 vision' of the inventory device, provides a complete view of all the devices."

"We have been using this solution for quite some time, and the AI functionality is quite advanced; we are able to provide insights on different aspects and read the reports easily."

"The most valuable feature, which I can describe as the '360 vision' of the inventory device, provides a complete view of all the devices."

"It provides visibility and a storyline to track the virus or malware's activities, showing infected processes and changes made."

"The most valuable features are the rollback feature, it's important for us. The AI models and are good."

"The alerts provided by Trellix Active Response are its most valuable feature."

"It's a little lighter compared to the older version, which was mostly signature-based."

"The continuous monitoring component of this solution allows Trellix to launch the MDR solution, which correlates all incidents and provides investigation reports within a short period of time, hence offering an advantage to the customers using Trellix Active Response and its integrated products."

"The solution is scalable."

"We are hoping to automate detection and response and take advantage of user behavior analytics, given that we are working from home. About half of our workers are still remote, so Active Response gives us that visibility and lets us automate a number of those events."

Cons

"I would like to see them add support for both Android and iOS smartphones."

"Concerning the license, if I add one more device without a license, it will automatically subscribe to a license. I do not appreciate that."

"With pricing, they can improve by bundling their pricing because sometimes billing comes in a very long process."

"I would rate the scalability as seven out of ten. The capability is useful. Concerning the license, if I add one more device without a license, it will automatically subscribe to a license. I do not appreciate that."

"We have a lot of false positives we see in the dashboard. I think this is the only problem we are facing."

"I also expected Active Response 's user interface to be much more analytical."

"The only area for improvement is regarding operational technology devices, specifically the engineering automation systems."

"While the product is good, we are currently facing support issues."

"There are some components on the cloud that should also reside in the on-prem deployment models but don't."

"I would rate technical support from Trellix Active Response as a seven because sometimes we face difficulties finding engineers quickly, leading to customer frustration."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing is average."

"Our costs were somewhere around $600K in Trinidad dollars, which might be about $100K US. We have the ETP plus the EDR. Our recent renewal was 1800 licenses as opposed to the full amount. Our transaction cost was about $600K Trinidad dollars, which is somewhere around $90-100K US."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,114 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

18%

Comms Service Provider

14%

Healthcare Company

10%

Non Profit

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with N-able EDR?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for N-able EDR?

We are using N-able EDR, but I think Sophos makes sense because of the environment we operate in. The localization and different elements were important factors we were looking at. They have their ...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering N-able EDR?

I am more focused on operations and procurement. The decision to use this solution was made before I joined the company. It started with patch management systems and progressed into EDR, backup mon...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for McAfee Active Response?

Based on our evaluations, Trellix Active Response's pricing was the most feasible from a cost perspective. I rate the pricing between a six and an eight. It is justified.

See all answers

What needs improvement with McAfee Active Response?

For Trellix Active Response, there is room for improvement in the platform area and security area to make the dashboard visibility clearer and easier for customers to monitor malicious activities o...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for McAfee Active Response?

The typical use case for Trellix Active Response is to provide quick incident response, as the product collects and correlates logs with the ePO dashboard, allowing customers to get visibility of t...

See all answers

Comparisons

SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs N-able EDR

Compared 12% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs N-able EDR

Compared 11% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs N-able EDR

Compared 8% of the time

Elastic Security vs N-able EDR

Compared 8% of the time

Check Point Harmony Endpoint vs N-able EDR

Compared 7% of the time

More N-able EDR Competitors

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform vs Trellix Active Response

Compared 29% of the time

Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vs Trellix Active Response

Compared 23% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Trellix Active Response

Compared 17% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Trellix Active Response

Compared 13% of the time

Tanium vs Trellix Active Response

Compared 9% of the time

More Trellix Active Response Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

December 2025

Download N-able EDR product report

Buyer's Guide

Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

December 2025

Download Trellix Active Response product report

Also Known As

No data available

McAfee Active Response

Overview

N-able EDR effectively safeguards against cybersecurity threats like malware and ransomware. With AI-driven capabilities and seamless integration with remote monitoring tools, it offers advanced protection and management for servers and workstations.

N-able EDR, known for its advanced defense mechanisms, utilizes AI and machine learning to enhance threat detection beyond traditional antivirus capabilities. It provides comprehensive visibility with its '360 vision,' integrating smoothly with remote management for unified performance monitoring. While it excels in protecting Windows environments, users seek improvements in mobile support and billing practices. A focus on enhancing licensing efficiency and reducing false positives could further enhance its usability. Ranked highly by Gartner and MITRE ATT&CK, N-able EDR remains a favored choice among users for its effective threat management and detailed reporting functionalities.

What are the key features of N-able EDR?

Rollback feature: Helps revert devices to previous states after an attack.
AI models: Improve threat detection using sophisticated algorithms.
Exceptional detection and protection: Offers robust defense against multiple threat vectors.
Auto-response capability: Uses machine learning for efficient incident management.
'360 vision': Provides complete visibility of device inventories.

What benefits and ROI should users consider?

Comprehensive security: Enhanced detection surpassing traditional antivirus.
Efficient monitoring: Unified device management through RMM integration.
Insightful reporting: Advanced reports provide critical security insights.
Inventory management: Full device oversight with '360 vision'.

In sectors reliant on Windows-based systems, N-able EDR is deployed as a primary antivirus solution. Its advanced AI and reporting features allow businesses to efficiently manage threat landscapes. However, while it secures servers and workstations, industries requiring mobile device support may find its current capabilities insufficient, prompting requests for broader platform integration.

N-able

Continuous Visibility into Your Endpoints:
Capture and monitor events, files, host flows, process objects, context, and system state changes that may be indicators of attack or dormant attack components.

Identify and Remediate Breaches Faster:
Access tools you need to quickly correct security issues. Send intelligence to analytics, operations, and forensic teams.

Target Critical Threats:
Get preconfigured and customizable actions when triggered, so you can target and eliminate threats.

Trellix

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Liquor Control Board of Ontario

Buyer's Guide

N-able EDR vs. Trellix Active Response

December 2025

Free Report: N-able EDR vs. Trellix Active Response

Find out what your peers are saying about N-able EDR vs. Trellix Active Response and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,114 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our N-able EDR vs. Trellix Active Response report.

See our list of best Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.