MySQL vs Tibero comparison

Oracle and TmaxSoft are both solutions in the Relational Databases Tools category. Oracle is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.2, while TmaxSoft is ranked #28. Oracle holds a 6.9% mindshare in SQL, compared to TmaxSoft’s 2.1% mindshare. Additionally, 91% of Oracle users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of TmaxSoft users who would recommend it.

MySQL

Read 152 MySQL reviews

8,289 Views
3,896 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

Tibero

Read 4 Tibero reviews

736 Views
729 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

MySQL

Tibero

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 4, 2025

MySQL and Tibero are competitive players in the database management system category. Data comparisons show Tibero has the upper hand in feature richness, but MySQL is notable for its pricing and support value.

Features: MySQL offers an open-source database management solution with cross-platform compatibility and extensive community support. It integrates easily with web applications, making it popular among developers. Tibero boasts strong security features, high Oracle database compatibility, and scalable options, appealing to enterprises needing robust systems.

Room for Improvement: MySQL could benefit from advancements in security measures, enhanced scalability, and better Oracle compatibility. Tibero might improve by offering more competitive pricing, increasing community-driven support, and simplifying its deployment process to appeal to smaller businesses.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: MySQL's deployment is straightforward, assisted by a wealth of online resources and community support, ensuring rapid problem solving. Tibero offers superior customer service with dedicated teams, and although its deployment is more complex, it benefits from comprehensive support throughout implementation.

Pricing and ROI: MySQL is attractive for businesses focused on cost-effectiveness, given its low setup cost as an open-source solution, thereby shortening the ROI timeline. Tibero, though requiring a higher initial investment due to licensing fees, justifies its cost over time with advanced features and stability, offering a desirable ROI for stability-focused companies.

To learn more, read our detailed MySQL vs. Tibero Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

MySQL vs. Tibero

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 879,310 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

MySQL

Ranking in Relational Databases Tools

4th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

152

Ranking in other categories

Open Source Databases (1st)

Tibero

Ranking in Relational Databases Tools

28th

Average Rating

9.4

Reviews Sentiment

8.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2025, in the Relational Databases Tools category, the mindshare of MySQL is 6.9%, down from 8.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Tibero is 2.1%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Relational Databases Tools Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
MySQL	6.9%
Tibero	2.1%
Other	91.0%

Relational Databases Tools

Featured Reviews

Prabir Kumar Kundu

SR AVP–Presales Cloud & Platform Management Services at Path Infotech ltd

Offers robust security and availability with impressive replication capabilities

Regarding their documentation and interface, there is room for improvement. Documentation is definitely required when running multiple databases on a cluster system. The load balancer, MySQL LB, which is used to connect to the application, lacks clear documentation. When there are multiple application servers connecting to the MySQL cluster and going through the MySQL load balancer, the documentation is not user-friendly. It's there, but only technical persons with deep knowledge of the MySQL database can implement it. Most of the community users or ISVs who use MySQL don't have many technical persons or DBA experts, so they face some challenges for the high availability of connecting high available databases from high available applications. That documentation should be simplified.

Read full review

Cheul Jin-Lee

Consultant at TechData BIMA JSC

A stable and cost-effective tool that is fully compatible with Oracle

We are a solution provider and Tibero is one of the database products that we implement for our customers. All applications for Oracle work with Tibero and don't need to be customized The most valuable feature is compatibility with the Oracle database. If you have knowledge of Oracle then you…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The feature that I have found most valuable is its ubiquity. MySQL is everywhere, so if I need to find a developer to do things to it that I don't know, it's very easy to find someone who has expertise in it."

"The product is flexible and easy to use."

"The most valuable features are that it's free and the documentation is good."

"MySQL is easy to integrate. It works with just about every language."

"Support for enterprise-grade features like clustering, master-slave replication, even Sharding (to some extent) which is an advanced feature."

"The most valuable feature is the on-premises data encryption facilities."

"MySQL gives us a very user-friendly workspace in which to query the database."

"The relations in the database, the dynamic workflow, and the ability to connect with all columns. It's useful for e-commerce."

More MySQL pros

"Tibero is very easy to setup and maintain."

"Tibero uses Hyper-Threading architecture, which is incredibly fast."

"The most valuable feature is compatibility with the Oracle database."

"Tibero is a relational database management system, which supports disaster recovery, active cluster, active storage, etc."

Cons

"If the customer is already using or has already used Oracle for a long time they will know the look and feel and the character of this database that can fit into their business."

"In the next release, I would like to see the scalability features improved to allow you to configure it and reduce the complexity with the configuration, making it easier for the end-user to scale. Make it as simple as it can be."

"The technical support should be more knowledgeable and available worldwide."

"I would like to have features that allow us to jump between the cloud and our on-premises system."

"I feel that some tools which make it easier to create queries or make it easier for other functions would be really interesting to see."

"This solution needs to be improved when it comes to working with desktop applications on the developer side."

"The solution is expensive."

"From a user perspective, the initial setup could be simplified a bit."

More MySQL cons

"In PL/SQL code, there is a scope of improvement. We expect more PL/SQL packages should be included in the next release."

"The knowledge base is quite small and should be expanded."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"There is a licensing cost because we are going for a proprietary product. There are some other versions for which there is no licensing cost."

"MySQL is a cheap solution."

"MySQL is very cheap. It could be free. It also has a yearly licensing option."

"Can range from free to quite expensive, depending on the environments and requirements, so better to really set goals ahead of setting it up."

"MySQL Enterprise Support is not cheap, though might still be cheaper than Oracle or SQL Server. They may not have local support depending on where you’re based, but there are many smaller agencies out there that will readily provide support. You’ll need to spend some time looking around."

"When you know the setup will continue to grow, make sure you have the paid support."

"It is an open source platform."

"We're using the open-source version right now, which is free. I do see some value in some of the more enterprise functions. We're using the open-source version right now, and I was interested in the MySQL Enterprise version really for the tools that they provide, but we decided not to make the purchase."

More MySQL pricing and cost advice

"The price of Tibero is cheaper than that of Oracle."

"The overall costs are very low compared to Oracle."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Relational Databases Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

879,310 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

Government

16%

Computer Software Company

University

Logistics Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	74
Midsize Enterprise	32
Large Enterprise	62

No data available

Questions from the Community

Why are MySQL connections encrypted and what is the biggest benefit of this?

MySQL encrypts connections to protect your data and the biggest benefit from this is that nobody can corrupt it. If you move information over a network without encryption, you are endangering it, m...

See all answers

Considering that there is a free version of MySQL, would you invest in one of the paid editions?

I may be considered a MySQL veteran since I have been using it since before Oracle bought it and created paid versions. So back in my day, it was all free, it was open-source and the best among sim...

See all answers

What is one thing you would improve with MySQL?

One thing I would improve related to MySQL is not within the product itself, but with the guides to it. Before, when it was free, everyone was on their own, seeking tutorials and how-to videos onli...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Firebird SQL vs MySQL

Compared 22% of the time

PostgreSQL vs MySQL

Compared 12% of the time

MariaDB vs MySQL

Compared 6% of the time

SQL Server vs MySQL

Compared 6% of the time

SAP HANA vs MySQL

Compared 5% of the time

More MySQL Competitors

Oracle Database vs Tibero

Compared 77% of the time

Oracle Database In-Memory vs Tibero

Compared 7% of the time

SQL Server vs Tibero

Compared 6% of the time

Altibase vs Tibero

Compared 6% of the time

SAP HANA vs Tibero

Compared 5% of the time

More Tibero Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

MySQL

December 2025

Download MySQL product report

Buyer's Guide

Relational Databases Tools

November 2025

Download Tibero product report

Overview

MySQL is an open-source database known for its ease of use and high performance. It offers features like replication and clustering, making it ideal for diverse applications. Its cost-effectiveness and LAMP integration are key advantages for businesses.

MySQL supports a variety of languages and platforms, providing reliable, scalable data management. Its graphical interface and LAMP architecture integration enhance its usability, while community support further strengthens its appeal. Challenges include scalability issues with large databases, lack of advanced clustering, and limited high-availability features. Complex queries may affect performance, and integration can pose difficulties. The outdated interface and insufficient documentation are also concerns, along with replication and backup reliability issues.

What are MySQL's key features?

Open-source nature: Freely available and customizable.
Cross-platform compatibility: Supports multiple operating systems.
Scalability: Capable of handling large volumes of data.
Replication and clustering: Ensure data redundancy and load balancing.
Full-text search: Provides powerful search capabilities.
LAMP integration: Seamlessly integrates with Linux, Apache, and PHP.

What benefits should users consider?

Cost-effectiveness: Reduces expenses due to its open-source nature.
High performance: Efficiently processes large volumes of data.
Active community support: Access to a wide range of resources and expertise.
Versatile use cases: Suitable for varied applications including web development and IoT.

MySQL is widely implemented in industries such as web development, e-commerce, and finance. It's used for managing dynamic websites, powering e-commerce platforms, and supporting financial applications. Its compatibility with PHP and cost-effectiveness make it suitable for CMS platforms like WordPress. With cloud services integration, MySQL is a backend choice for scalable applications in various sectors.

Oracle

Tibero by TmaxSoft bridges the gap between legacy relational databases and the new paradigm of running workloads in virtualized data centers and the Cloud, allowing enterprises to fully leverage their investment by embracing a simple, true utilization licensing model.

TmaxSoft

Sample Customers

Facebook, Tumblr, Scholastic, MTV Networks, Wikipedia, Verizon Wireless, Sage Group, Glassfish Open Message Queue, and RightNow Technologies.

NSPK, Indian Financial Technology & Allied Services (IFTAS), fonePaisa Payment Solutions

Buyer's Guide

MySQL vs. Tibero

December 2025

Free Report: MySQL vs. Tibero

Find out what your peers are saying about MySQL vs. Tibero and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

879,310 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our MySQL vs. Tibero report.

See our list of best Relational Databases Tools vendors.

We monitor all Relational Databases Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.