MySQL vs SQLite comparison

Read 8 SQLite reviews

1,951 Views
1,541 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

MySQL

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 23, 2025

SQLite and MySQL are both database solutions that compete in the category of relational database management systems. MySQL seems to have the upper hand due to its scalability and advanced features suited for complex applications, whereas SQLite is ideal for smaller, more lightweight needs.

Features: SQLite offers simplicity, a zero-configuration setup, and minimal resource usage, which makes it extremely useful for mobile apps, and small to medium-sized applications. MySQL is equipped with advanced features like high performance for handling complex queries, a variety of storage engines, and high concurrency support, making it perfect for large-scale applications.

Room for Improvement: SQLite could enhance its support for more complex multi-user environments and offer better scalability options. Strengthening data security features and increasing concurrency capacity would make it more attractive for larger applications. MySQL could improve its initial setup process to be more user-friendly for beginners, reduce its resource consumption in smaller environments, and simplify its licensing options to appeal to a broader user base.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: SQLite offers an easy deployment process with no external dependencies, making it extremely quick to implement. MySQL, requiring a dedicated server and extra configuration, involves a more complex setup but offers comprehensive customer support options.

Pricing and ROI: SQLite, being open-source, involves no initial cost, providing excellent ROI for projects with limited budgets. MySQL, also open-source but with optional enterprise-level features, may entail additional costs, yet its advanced capabilities can deliver significant ROI for enterprises needing robust data solutions.

To learn more, read our detailed MySQL vs. SQLite Report (Updated: November 2025).

Download the complete report

MySQL vs. SQLite

November 2025

Helped 872,922 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

MySQL

Ranking in Open Source Databases

1st

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

150

Ranking in other categories

Relational Databases Tools (4th)

SQLite

Ranking in Open Source Databases

14th

Average Rating

7.2

Reviews Sentiment

5.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Embedded Database (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2025, in the Open Source Databases category, the mindshare of MySQL is 8.8%, down from 13.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SQLite is 5.6%, up from 3.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Open Source Databases Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
MySQL	8.8%
SQLite	5.6%
Other	85.6%

Open Source Databases

Featured Reviews

Prabir Kumar Kundu

SR AVP–Presales Cloud & Platform Management Services at Path Infotech ltd

Offers robust security and availability with impressive replication capabilities

Regarding their documentation and interface, there is room for improvement. Documentation is definitely required when running multiple databases on a cluster system. The load balancer, MySQL LB, which is used to connect to the application, lacks clear documentation. When there are multiple application servers connecting to the MySQL cluster and going through the MySQL load balancer, the documentation is not user-friendly. It's there, but only technical persons with deep knowledge of the MySQL database can implement it. Most of the community users or ISVs who use MySQL don't have many technical persons or DBA experts, so they face some challenges for the high availability of connecting high available databases from high available applications. That documentation should be simplified.

Read full review

Neeraj Tiwari

Student at Queens University Belfast

Pretty easy to execute my SQL queries but issues while uploading and importing my dataset

It was a bit easy to use compared to other tools. It's simple. I found it pretty easy to execute my SQL queries. Since I was a beginner, it was comfortable for me to learn SQL using SQLite. However, when I used it for my professional work and for my assignments, I found some complications. Maybe I'm not proficient with it, that's why. The main benefit for me was learning. Since I was new to SQL, SQLite helped me understand how to work with structured data.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"This is a lightweight product that is not demanding on the resources, which is what I think gives it the edge."

"The ML modules in MySQL are advantageous since they make data handling easy and quick at MNQM."

"The solution is very stable."

"While MySQL offers strong basic functionality."

"The initial setup is easy."

"Apart from the features that are in the enterprise part, we find the database to be valuable. The connectors and the backup features are valuable as well. We use the basic database. We don't really use the extra features. Our clients like the security features in the database."

"It is a very stable solution. I deployed the product six years ago, and it still works fine."

"The solution helps us perform with our databases and extract data."

More MySQL pros

"SQLite’s most valuable feature is the ability to store granular-level backups of databases."

"It was a bit easy to use compared to other tools. It's simple. I found it pretty easy to execute my SQL queries."

"The product is lightweight and highly scalable."

"Sometimes, you want data to persist within the app even when there's no internet connectivity. To avoid showing blank screens, we can use SQLite to store data locally and then sync it with the cloud database when connectivity is restored."

"I use Flutter Technology with the JSF plugin."

"I haven't encountered any problems in my use cases. So, it has been a stable product for me."

Cons

"Some problems with big table operations, and a struggle to keep the servers responding in peak situations."

"Oracle should start putting in some of the enterprise features in the standard feature. There are some key features that should be part of the standard."

"The licensing of the solution is on the expensive side."

"When it comes to supporting big data, there is space to improve upon the database engines that are supported by MySQL."

"MySQL tutorials and guides could be improved. Often they are too complex for someone with no database experience to understand."

"When working with a cluster wide, I have to use the MySQL cluster version."

"If it had something similar to Microsoft’s DTS engine then it would be the best database system out there."

"Rather than going in-depth about the technical features, which a technical person can directly tell, I would say that MySQL should be able to adapt to the next framework. The 5G framework means an unstructured framework. So if MySQL becomes smoother and more adaptable, it'll be easier."

More MySQL cons

"Compared to other tools, the performance was less effective than that of Microsoft Access."

"A potential drawback is that the database file stored within the application's local storage could be accessible to users."

"There are some difficulties on the server side. When syncing data with databases like SQL Server or Oracle, SQLite requires a kind of double effort."

"It could have a user-friendly GUI and better intelligence features."

"I primarily use SQLite for small-scale applications due to its limitations in storing large amounts of data. For larger-scale projects, I typically opt for MySQL or other alternatives. Storing a large number of dates in SQLite can significantly impact its performance."

"The performance could be better."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"MySQL is a cheap solution."

"I am using the Community Edition, which is available free of charge."

"The pricing is not much expensive, it's cheap."

"There is a licensing cost because we are going for a proprietary product. There are some other versions for which there is no licensing cost."

"The solution does not come with a licensing fee."

"MySQL is released under an open-source license, so you have nothing to pay to use it."

"I don't pay for a license."

"For the on-premise version, no license is required."

More MySQL pricing and cost advice

"It's a good value."

"I rate the product’s pricing a six out of ten."

"The tool is open-source."

"It's not expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Open Source Databases solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

872,922 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Computer Software Company

15%

Comms Service Provider

12%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	73
Midsize Enterprise	31
Large Enterprise	61

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	5
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	3

Questions from the Community

Why are MySQL connections encrypted and what is the biggest benefit of this?

MySQL encrypts connections to protect your data and the biggest benefit from this is that nobody can corrupt it. If you move information over a network without encryption, you are endangering it, m...

Considering that there is a free version of MySQL, would you invest in one of the paid editions?

I may be considered a MySQL veteran since I have been using it since before Oracle bought it and created paid versions. So back in my day, it was all free, it was open-source and the best among sim...

What is one thing you would improve with MySQL?

One thing I would improve related to MySQL is not within the product itself, but with the guides to it. Before, when it was free, everyone was on their own, seeking tutorials and how-to videos onli...

What do you like most about SQLite?

It was a bit easy to use compared to other tools. It's simple. I found it pretty easy to execute my SQL queries.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SQLite?

It is not expensive.

What needs improvement with SQLite?

There were some complications. For example, you have to upload the dataset into SQLite, and once it's uploaded, you might find difficulties working with it.

Oracle Berkeley DB vs SQLite

Comparisons

Firebird SQL vs MySQL

Compared 21% of the time

PostgreSQL vs MySQL

Compared 13% of the time

SQL Server vs MySQL

Compared 6% of the time

MariaDB vs MySQL

Compared 6% of the time

Percona Server vs MySQL

Compared 3% of the time

More MySQL Competitors

Firebird SQL vs SQLite

Compared 34% of the time

LanceDB vs SQLite

Compared 8% of the time

InfluxDB vs SQLite

Compared 8% of the time

Compared 8% of the time

SAP HANA vs SQLite

Compared 5% of the time

More SQLite Competitors

Product Reports

Download MySQL product report

MySQL

October 2025

Download SQLite product report

October 2025

Overview

MySQL is an open-source database known for its ease of use and high performance. It offers features like replication and clustering, making it ideal for diverse applications. Its cost-effectiveness and LAMP integration are key advantages for businesses.

MySQL supports a variety of languages and platforms, providing reliable, scalable data management. Its graphical interface and LAMP architecture integration enhance its usability, while community support further strengthens its appeal. Challenges include scalability issues with large databases, lack of advanced clustering, and limited high-availability features. Complex queries may affect performance, and integration can pose difficulties. The outdated interface and insufficient documentation are also concerns, along with replication and backup reliability issues.

What are MySQL's key features?

Open-source nature: Freely available and customizable.
Cross-platform compatibility: Supports multiple operating systems.
Scalability: Capable of handling large volumes of data.
Replication and clustering: Ensure data redundancy and load balancing.
Full-text search: Provides powerful search capabilities.
LAMP integration: Seamlessly integrates with Linux, Apache, and PHP.

What benefits should users consider?

Cost-effectiveness: Reduces expenses due to its open-source nature.
High performance: Efficiently processes large volumes of data.
Active community support: Access to a wide range of resources and expertise.
Versatile use cases: Suitable for varied applications including web development and IoT.

MySQL is widely implemented in industries such as web development, e-commerce, and finance. It's used for managing dynamic websites, powering e-commerce platforms, and supporting financial applications. Its compatibility with PHP and cost-effectiveness make it suitable for CMS platforms like WordPress. With cloud services integration, MySQL is a backend choice for scalable applications in various sectors.

Oracle

SQLite is an open-source, serverless, reliable, and flexible, SQL database engine. It is particularly favored in the realm of embedded database solutions and small to medium-sized projects. Unlike traditional database systems that operate on a client-server model, SQLite is a serverless database engine, meaning it runs directly within the application it powers. This unique architecture makes SQLite an ideal choice for applications where simplicity, efficiency, and minimal configuration are paramount.

SQLite is an embedded database engine, which means it operates directly within the application that uses it, without requiring a separate server process. It is designed to be cross-platform, supporting multiple operating systems, and is is compatible with a wide range of programming languages, such as C, C++, Python, Java, and more. This makes it highly portable and suitable for a wide range of applications, from mobile devices to desktop software and web applications.

The key advantages of SQLite is its reliability, the lightweight nature and efficient performance. It has a small footprint, typically requiring only a few megabytes of disk space, and can operate entirely in memory if needed. It is designed to be reliable and robust, with built-in features such as atomic commit and rollback, which ensure data integrity even in the event of system crashes or power failures. Finally, the SQLite solution requires no configuration or setup, making it easy to use and deploy. It can be embedded directly into applications without the need for complex installation or configuration procedures.

SQLite Functionality

SQL Compliance: SQLite supports a substantial portion of the SQL standard, including features like transactions, triggers, views, and indexes.
File-based Storage: SQLite stores its entire database as a single cross-platform file on the host machine's file system.
ACID Compliance: SQLite fully supports ACID (Atomicity, Consistency, Isolation, Durability) transactions, ensuring data consistency and integrity in concurrent access scenarios.

SQLite is an open-source project distributed under a public domain license, which means it can be used, modified, and distributed freely, without any licensing costs or restrictions.

To summarize, SQLite is widely used in various applications, including web browsers (e.g., Mozilla Firefox, Google Chrome), mobile applications (e.g., Android, iOS), embedded systems, and desktop software. Its simplicity, portability, and efficiency make it a popular choice for developers who require a lightweight and reliable database solution, especially in resource-constrained environments or applications with modest data storage needs.

Sample Customers

Facebook, Tumblr, Scholastic, MTV Networks, Wikipedia, Verizon Wireless, Sage Group, Glassfish Open Message Queue, and RightNow Technologies.

Oracle, Bloomberg, Bentley, Mozilla