MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs SAP Process Orchestration comparison

Salesforce and SAP are both solutions in the Business-to-Business Middleware category. Salesforce is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.0, while SAP is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.0. Salesforce holds a 12.0% mindshare in BBM, compared to SAP’s 8.0% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of Salesforce users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 91% of SAP users who would recommend it.

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Read 58 MuleSoft Anypoint Platform reviews

1,706 Views
1,150 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

SAP Process Orchestration

Read 33 SAP Process Orchestration reviews

2,005 Views
872 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

SAP Process Orchestration

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 9, 2025

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform and SAP Process Orchestration compete in the integration platform category. MuleSoft has the upper hand due to its versatility, ease of use, and integration flexibility.

Features: MuleSoft Anypoint Platform stands out with robust API and integration capabilities, featuring over 200 connectors, high adaptability in cloud and on-premises environments, and user-friendly API management. SAP Process Orchestration excels in integrating with SAP systems, effective monitoring tools, and providing comprehensive SAP environment solutions despite limited non-SAP connections.

Room for Improvement: MuleSoft needs to improve technical support responsiveness, simplify processes for non-technical users, and offer more pricing flexibility. SAP Process Orchestration requires enhancements in legacy process management, cloud migration capabilities, and intuitive monitoring tools for non-technical business users.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: MuleSoft offers extensive deployment flexibility across public, private, and hybrid clouds, although customer service receives both praise and criticism. SAP Process Orchestration is mainly on-premises, which can be cumbersome for cloud-first strategies, though its support team is dedicated yet occasionally slow in response.

Pricing and ROI: Both platforms are expensive; MuleSoft's pricing, based on usage and vCores, can be high for large transaction volumes, while SAP PO's pricing is justified in bundled agreements. MuleSoft offers considerable ROI through its integration capabilities, although its cost can be prohibitive for SMEs. SAP's ROI is valued within SAP environments, though extra adapter costs may arise.

To learn more, read our detailed MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs. SAP Process Orchestration Report (Updated: May 2025).

Buyer's Guide

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs. SAP Process Orchestration

May 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 850,760 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Ranking in Business-to-Business Middleware

1st

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Message Queue (MQ) Software (4th), Workload Automation (4th), Cloud Data Integration (4th), Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) (2nd)

SAP Process Orchestration

Ranking in Business-to-Business Middleware

2nd

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Business-to-Business Middleware category, the mindshare of MuleSoft Anypoint Platform is 12.0%, down from 15.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SAP Process Orchestration is 8.0%, down from 12.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Business-to-Business Middleware

Featured Reviews

Vijay Subramanyam

Delivery Head at cblsolutions

Robust, reliable, and stable, ensuring high availability for critical integrations

I would rate the scalability an eight out of ten; it is a highly scalable solution. We have around 200 end users using this solution in our company. We use it to its maximum capacity. However, it's not for P1 applications, but definitely for severity two cases (P2 level). It integrates critical applications, but it's not a platform that, if it stops, the entire system would come down. So, it's more like a severity two level. However, it has the potential to eventually become a P1 platform. Not exactly P1 applications, but a P1 platform. Because now we are still in the transition to migrate everything, all the integrations to Mule Anypoint Platform. But once it's done, then this platform becomes critical. Because even now, we have point-to-point connections.

Read full review

Laxman Molugu

Chief Executive Officer at Saanvi systems inc

Enhances operational efficiency with valuable prepackaged content and cost-effective pricing

For organizations that operate within an SAP ecosystem, SAP Process Orchestration is recommended due to its cost-effectiveness and the availability of valuable prepackaged content. It is important to consider the needs of your industry, as SAP Process Orchestration may not meet all requirements in consumer-oriented sectors. I'd rate the solution eight out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"When we talk about the APIs, there are multiple policies one can apply on APIs, like rate limiting policies, OWASP policies, and OWASP security policies, that can be easily configured in Mule Anypoint Platform."

"MuleSoft offers with the Anypoint Platform a unified platform for API management and an integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) as well as an on-premise Enterprise Service Bus pattern."

"The initial setup is quite easy because the solution has a good interface through which the configuration, mapping, and so on can be done."

"The monitoring capabilities of this product are very good because of the feedback it supplies in statistics."

"The solution is very scalable with solid performance and the capability of extending it using any custom Java in case you don't have anything out of the box. MDP is strong. It is good compared to other products regarding its capabilities in managing or orchestrating the issue load."

"It's easy to use and comes as a bundle package with the Anypoint Platform, removing the need for any complex setup."

"Mule works very well with Salesforce and CRMs."

"The most valuable feature is the variety of characters Anypoint Platform has. It is very scalable and customizable."

More MuleSoft Anypoint Platform pros

"The initial setup is easy...The solution gets automatically connected. The deployment takes six months. I rate its setup phase a ten out of ten."

"The most valuable feature of SAP Process Orchestration is its flexibility in being able to build integrations with SAP systems and non-SAP systems."

"The solution provides very good and central logging systems. It offers high flexibility with vertical and horizontal extend capacity."

"Process Orchestration fulfils the need for middleware to mediate types of connectivity."

"The standard adapter with EBA abilities is the most valuable feature. It has good process integration."

"I think it is a very stable tool. My company did not have any problem with the tool."

"It is simple to transfer files."

"The most valuable feature is the seamless integration with backend systems."

More SAP Process Orchestration pros

Cons

"One area we'd like to see improvement in is the error logging and troubleshooting process."

"Price-wise, it is a good product since it is reasonably priced...Mule Anypoint Platform can get too complex for non-technical people."

"MuleSoft's release calendar is rather conventional with two major, two minor releases and hotfixes in between. The competition sometimes offer more rapid release cycles and provides improved and new functionality with a faster time-to-market."

"It's extremely expensive to change things in Anypoint MQ. There's also this issue of slow output of messages, and that needs to be improved."

"Over the years, Mule Anypoint Platform has undergone significant improvements. When I first started using it, the API gateway capabilities were fairly basic."

"One area for improvement is the Community Hub or developer portal, which should be part of the base offering."

"The compatibility with vendors can be improved. Microsoft Azure heavily uses single software."

"Better documentation, in particular with respect to the initial setup, would be helpful."

More MuleSoft Anypoint Platform cons

"The usability is an area where it can be improved upon."

"Process Orchestration doesn't provide authentication for data sent to us, meaning we have to rely on client certificate-based or basic authentication."

"It is not a scalable solution for the cloud. I would not recommend this for the cloud."

"I think the big improvement required in the tool stems from the fact that the whole issue around it is that we have some downtime failures during upgrades and patching."

"The solution could improve by making it more user-friendly by limiting the code required. We have to add some code in some cases where we need complex logic or some other functions. If this was able to be done in a more simplified manner then it would save a lot of effort and time."

"Process Orchestration needs to provide secure connectivity as no one has any data information."

"Its administration management feature needs to be simpler to use."

"It's very difficult to find errors in a simple way."

More SAP Process Orchestration cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing of our solution is highly competitive. While it may not be categorized as exceptionally low, it is certainly more affordable compared to IBM."

"I can't give you a straightforward answer because sometimes it depends on the usage. If you're going to have fewer than 5 million messages, it is free of cost. If you're going to have more than 5 million messages, they're going to charge $100 per month"

"I rate the product price a nine on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive."

"On a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive, I rate the solution's pricing as four or five out of ten."

"The product is still very expensive."

"The tool is heavily bundle-priced. I rate the solution’s pricing five on a scale of ten, where one is expensive, and ten is cheap."

"Licensing can be complex as is the case with most iPaaS/cloud offerings."

"Mule Anypoint Platform pricing is slightly higher compared to Dell Boomi."

More MuleSoft Anypoint Platform pricing and cost advice

"Looking at market conditions, vendors nowadays are giving products at very low price levels. However, SAP Process Orchestration have not yet reduced their prices. The prices could be reduced a lot to stay competitive."

"The price of SAP Process Orchestration was reasonable."

"The license is a one-time payment, and additional costs are only incurred on the infrastructure side since it's an on-premise solution."

"It is a very expensive solution. We only pay for the license."

"My company deals with different pricing models of the product, according to which we don't pay for the solution directly, but we do pay for the maintenance part."

"The product is not a low-priced solution, but I can say that it is competitively priced in the market."

"Normally, you will have to choose CPU-based licensing...I rate the tool price a five out of ten."

"It's not an expensive solution."

More SAP Process Orchestration pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business-to-Business Middleware solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

850,760 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Educational Organization

19%

Computer Software Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

17%

Computer Software Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

Energy/Utilities Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What advice do you have for others considering Mule Anypoint Platform?

I architected solutions using Oracle SOA/OSB, Spring Boot, MuleSoft Anypoint Platform on cloud / on-premises and hybrid modes; What I see is though if you are an enterprise and have enough money th...

See all answers

How does TIBCO BusinessWorks compare with Mule Anypoint Platform?

Our organization ran comparison tests to determine whether TIBCO BusinessWorks or Mule Anypoint platform integration and connectivity software was the better fit for us. We decided to go with Mule...

See all answers

What can Mule Anypoint Platform be used for and what do you use it for most often?

This is a very flexible solution that comes with multiple uses. My organization mostly uses Mule Anypoint Platform for API management, as it lets us build new APIs easily and design new interfaces...

See all answers

What do you like most about SAP Process Orchestration?

It provides essential features such as continuous monitoring of all interfaces are crucial for our needs.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SAP Process Orchestration?

SAP solutions are generally expensive. SAP Process Orchestration was integrated with SAP ECC in a package, but my customers have consistently described it as an expensive product.

See all answers

What needs improvement with SAP Process Orchestration?

The user interface of SAP Process Orchestration should be more modern to enhance its appeal. It can seem complicated and outdated to new users. Additionally, the tool relies on Java, which feels le...

See all answers

Comparisons

Redwood RunMyJobs vs MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Compared 18% of the time

Tidal by Redwood vs MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Compared 7% of the time

Apache Kafka vs MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Compared 6% of the time

ActiveMQ vs MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Compared 5% of the time

More MuleSoft Anypoint Platform Competitors

SAP Data Services vs SAP Process Orchestration

Compared 13% of the time

IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services vs SAP Process Orchestration

Compared 13% of the time

webMethods.io vs SAP Process Orchestration

Compared 12% of the time

Workato vs SAP Process Orchestration

Compared 7% of the time

Axway AMPLIFY Application Integration vs SAP Process Orchestration

Compared 5% of the time

More SAP Process Orchestration Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

April 2025

Download MuleSoft Anypoint Platform product report

Buyer's Guide

SAP Process Orchestration

April 2025

Download SAP Process Orchestration product report

Also Known As

Data Integrator, Anypoint MQ

SAP NetWeaver Process Integration, NetWeaver Process Integration

Overview

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform is used for integration and API management, connecting enterprise applications across retail, e-commerce, and supply chain. It supports cloud-to-cloud and cloud-to-on-premises scenarios with real-time and asynchronous messaging.

Users leverage MuleSoft Anypoint Platform for diverse integrations including cloud-based and on-premises, enabling data transformations, middleware functions, and hybrid integrations. It seamlessly connects systems like SAP, Salesforce, and Oracle, facilitating data transfers and integrating legacy systems. The platform offers a graphic interface, quick implementation, and a variety of connectors, contributing to its popularity for robust and scalable solutions. Despite its strengths, users seek better technical support, more connectors, simplified runtime management, and improved documentation.

What are the key features of MuleSoft Anypoint Platform?

Marketplace for integration platforms: Provides pre-built connectors and templates.
API management: Efficient management and monitoring of APIs.
Graphic interface: User-friendly design for ease of use.
Monitoring capabilities: Comprehensive monitoring and observability features.
Quick implementation: Rapid deployment of integrations and APIs.
Pre-built templates: Ready-to-use templates for common integrations.
Stability and performance: Reliable and high-performing platform.
Data transformation with DataWeave: Powerful tool for data mapping and transformation.
Support for hybrid deployments: Flexibility to integrate cloud and on-premises systems.

What benefits and ROI can users expect?

Increased connectivity: Seamless integration of multiple systems.
Operational efficiency: Streamlined processes and data flows.
Scalability: Ability to grow with business needs.
Cost savings: Reduced development time with pre-built components.
Enhanced visibility: Improved monitoring and management of integrations.

Enterprises in retail, e-commerce, and supply chain implement MuleSoft Anypoint Platform to connect various applications and systems. It supports real-time messaging for inventory management, synchronizes customer data across platforms, and integrates with legacy systems for smooth data migration. Users benefit from quick deployments and a marketplace that accelerates integration projects.

Salesforce

SAP NetWeaver Process Integration facilitates the integration of business processes that span different departments, organizations, or companies. SAP PI is based on general standards so as to enable 3rd-party systems to be integrated. At the center of SAP PI is an XML-based communication that uses HTTP (Hyper Text Transfer Protocol). Irrespective of the scenario used, the application-specific contents are transferred in messages in user-defined XML eXtensible Markup Language) from the sender to the receiver either via the Integration Server, or directly between the systems involved. SAP PI can be installed in different ways: Dual usage type installation: Based on both AS ABAP and AS Java. and Advanced Adapter Engine Extended (AEX): Based on AS Java only.

SAP

Sample Customers

VMware, Gucci, MasterCard, Target, Time Inc, Hershey's, Tesla, Spotify, Office Depot, Intuit, CBS, Amtrak, Salesforce, Gap, Ralph Lauren

Lenovo, Dansk Supermarked A/S, Ego Pharmaceuticals Pty. Ltd, Kaeser Kompressoren

Buyer's Guide

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs. SAP Process Orchestration

May 2025

Free Report: MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs. SAP Process Orchestration

Find out what your peers are saying about MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs. SAP Process Orchestration and other solutions. Updated: May 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

850,760 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs. SAP Process Orchestration report.

See our list of best Business-to-Business Middleware vendors and best Cloud Data Integration vendors.

We monitor all Business-to-Business Middleware reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.