Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection vs Proofpoint Enterprise DLP comparison

Mimecast and Proofpoint are both solutions in the Data Loss Prevention (DLP) category. Mimecast is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.3, while Proofpoint is ranked #7 with an average rating of 8.3. Mimecast holds a 2.8% mindshare in DLP, compared to Proofpoint’s 1.3% mindshare. Additionally, 99% of Mimecast users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Proofpoint users who would recommend it.

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 11, 2026

Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection competes with Proofpoint Enterprise DLP in data protection and insider risk management. Mimecast stands out in integration capabilities and streamlined processes, while Proofpoint's extensive feature set appeals to those seeking comprehensive protection.

Features: Mimecast offers strong insider threat detection, seamless integration with existing systems, and email security enhancements. Proofpoint features broad data loss prevention capabilities, advanced threat protection, and comprehensive reporting.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Mimecast provides straightforward deployment supported by efficient customer service. Proofpoint offers a flexible but more complex deployment model, with robust support for thorough problem resolution.

Pricing and ROI: Mimecast's competitive pricing makes it accessible with a satisfying return on investment. Proofpoint, though costlier, delivers significant ROI due to advanced features and deep data loss prevention.

To learn more, read our detailed Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection vs. Proofpoint Enterprise DLP Report (Updated: August 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection vs. Proofpoint Enterprise DLP

August 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 909,099 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cloudflare One

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Data Loss Prevention (DLP) category, the mindshare of Cloudflare One is 2.0%, up from 1.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection is 2.8%, up from 2.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Proofpoint Enterprise DLP is 1.3%, down from 1.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Data Loss Prevention (DLP) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection	2.8%
Proofpoint Enterprise DLP	1.3%
Cloudflare One	2.0%
Other	93.9%

Data Loss Prevention (DLP)

Featured Reviews

Cobe Van Coller

Network Architect at IP Dimension

Cloud security has improved remote access and has reduced costs for smaller client sites

I have used Cloudflare One's Identity-Aware Proxy, and it is quite straightforward from what I have seen so far. The app registration on the Azure side integrates fully into Cloudflare, and I am very satisfied with that part because it is easy to set up. The integration of Cloudflare One's Secure Web Gateway and Zero Trust Network Access works without any issues. That part is pretty automatic, and if you complete the rest of the setup, it comes together by itself with no issues from my side. What makes it nice is that we can actually start replacing on-site firewalls at this stage for the smaller clients because it does not matter if they go to a coffee shop or work from home; they are still secured by the same connection. The hops get shorter and you get better latency. We have done testing to see if it is better. One thing that we did notice with our proof of concept with our current client is that they have people connecting from the UK. When they used their previous VPN solution, uploading CAD drawings and other files to the server took a long time. They mentioned that it is much quicker on Cloudflare One's solution. I definitely believe that is part of the improved performance, and I am satisfied with that as well. What is nice about Cloudflare One is that it makes the setup easier and also easier to train technicians to maintain it. Compared to legacy systems, we do not need to get fancy firewalls in place that are costly. That is definitely also a cost-saver with Cloudflare One.

Read full review

External Ganesh

Security Engineer at Comcast

Insider threats have been detected faster and internal data exposure is now controlled

Regarding how Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection can be improved, sometimes the tool is slightly laggy, wherein it would take some time for us to fetch the related logs from the Mimecast portal, and that of course can be improved. There could also be a graph or a kind of a graph where, if the organization has a smaller number of employees, it is fine, but if it has a large number of employees and different departments, then in that case, Mimecast could give us an AI suggestion upon how to improvise the current security posture, how we stand and where we can go up to in terms of implementing or tweaking the policies. As the organization's size gets bigger, it would also be better if Mimecast could provide some solutions upon how to segregate the users into groups and what groups can have which policies. Those kinds of features can be added. Regarding Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection's AI capabilities, I think its governance and security could improve as I am not entirely sure how it works. It would be helpful if Mimecast could, as the AI capabilities are in place, maintain a strict governance policy upon the data that is being processed, especially for user personally identifiable information. As insider risk management sometimes also gets into the personal details of the user, organizations might be hesitant; even we are also hesitant to use the AI capabilities. If Mimecast could provide more information about how they store the data and whether the agents are local agents or cloud-hosted agents, that would be of great help for the organizations to consider its AI capabilities while adhering to the compliance needs of a particular organization.

Read full review

Sudarsan Rajamani

Director Cybersecurity at a media company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Email data controls have reduced accidental leaks and support ongoing compliance monitoring

Overall, Proofpoint Enterprise DLP is a strong platform, but there are areas for improvement to enhance usability and effectiveness. One challenge is policy complexity and lifecycle management. As DLP programs mature, policies become layered and interdependent, leading to frustrations such as rule overlap that causes multiple triggers on a single message. Limited visibility into policy hierarchy impacts, difficulty modeling how new rules interact with existing ones, and change management requiring careful validation can all be challenging. An improvement opportunity would be advanced policy simulation tools for conflict detection between rules and clear rule precedence visualization, which would help understand the source of issues. The administrator user experience can feel dense from an admin perspective, especially when managing multiple layered policies, handling rule precedence, troubleshooting overlapping triggers, and onboarding new administration. As DLP programs mature, policy environments become complex quickly. Improvement opportunities would include visual policy mapping, impact previews, easier bulk policy editing, simpler policy cloning with conflict detection, and smarter recommendations during policy creation that would be very beneficial. Regarding data discovery and risk posture visibility, improvements are needed. While email layer protection is robust, organizations need better visibility across their repositories. There is an opportunity for built-in sensitive data discovery scanning and risk exposure mapping to identify which business units handle more sensitive data. A data movement visualization dashboard could also be beneficial, transitioning from reactive DLP blocking to proactive data exposure intelligence, which would significantly increase maturity.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The tool also offers good scalability, and the dashboard, along with real-time analytics, is very good."

"Cloudflare Access is a stable solution."

"Cloudflare Zero Trust Platform removes the risk of exposing the applications to the public."

"Cloudflare Access is part of the Zero Trust philosophy."

"The simplicity of the solution is its valuable features as almost no effort was needed to learn the configurations. It is also one of the cheapest firewalls available in this category."

"The solution has different options that can be used to differentiate DDoS attacks."

"Enables me to work from two locations."

"It is a stable solution."

More Cloudflare One pros

"Without Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection, your mail communication is not safe, and there is no one monitoring your communication."

"Works in the background and users are able to perform restores."

"Once setup, it rarely requires user intervention."

"For the investment made, we have saved the company tens of thousands of dollars from ransomware and human error."

"Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection stands out the most, with URL protection, link scanning, blocking of users, and creation of multiple profile groups, gateways, and policies as valuable features, and there have been many positive changes with Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection since implementation, and we feel it is working out positively."

"Since I started working with CrashPlan we have less tickets open, since we offer monitor issues we received daily alerts and most of the issues are fixed even before the customer realizes they have an issue."

"The reason for us moving over to CrashPlan was cost and retention, as we saved the company $6000 a year using CrashPlan and no more "surprise, you are out of space" messages."

"Customer Service: Awesome. They listened to me and helped reached my goal."

More Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection pros

"Proofpoint Enterprise DLP has positively impacted my organization by improving the security posture of our data and containment within incidents, providing reassurance that PII has not leaked during times of incidents."

"Proofpoint Enterprise DLP's prevention and detection of user policies is very effective."

"Detection and prevention of data loss is very crucial and important in every organization, and I believe that Proofpoint Enterprise DLP has strong capability for this task."

"If you are really considering using Proofpoint Enterprise DLP, based on my analysis, Proofpoint Enterprise DLP is used by organizations that want to do very critical things and do not want to compromise on security at any cost."

"Adaptive information protection has influenced my organization's approach to data security in a very good and positive manner."

"Proofpoint Enterprise DLP is a mature, reliable email-layer data protection solution that delivers strong value when implemented with proper governance."

"Proofpoint Enterprise DLP sounds to be great software, and it feels to me that it is a strong shift in how DLP is evolving."

"Proofpoint Enterprise DLP is very reliable, and I have not seen very big downtime from their side in the last four years, which shows how serious they are about the customer business, their operations, and their services."

More Proofpoint Enterprise DLP pros

Cons

"There are premium tier live service and lower tier live service, so we opted for the lower tier. But there is no medium tier where we pay a little extra and get a bit more service. So if that can be improved."

"Feedback could be enhanced."

"The response time for support must be reduced."

"Feedback could be enhanced. While I work efficiently with Clover as a partner in Mexico City, sometimes the information and requests are easier to manage with more concrete solutions."

"The software has automated alerts, but the automated alerts are not available in the mobile app."

"From a logging perspective, it is still a bit difficult to see exactly what users are being blocked with the current views."

"When there are any dynamic changes in complex applications, the tool takes a lot of time, making its analytics-related area a major matter of concern where improvements are needed."

"Cloudflare DDoS has poor technical support."

More Cloudflare One cons

"I would love to have an app on my phone to give me status updates on the backup system and push me notifications if something goes offline or has an issue so I wouldn't have to go look at the dashboard as much."

"Would like to see the ability to bulk clear alerts in the admin console in a future release."

"If anything, make integrating cloud storage a little bit easier - I'd love to be able to choose the cloud I'm going to push to, but it's hard to find instructions for doing that."

"It is not cheap."

"Sometimes we do encounter vague answers for some of the queries we have, but apart from that, the customer support response has always been very good."

"Sometimes the tool is slightly laggy, wherein it would take some time for us to fetch the related logs from the Mimecast portal, and that of course can be improved."

"Not available for iPads yet."

"From time to time, you will see issues with the software not connecting to the on-premise server, or the client crashes on a users machine."

More Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection cons

"Proofpoint Enterprise DLP is generally a high-pricing solution, so it generally requires additional licenses for the DLP."

"Proofpoint Enterprise DLP is currently very good. It could become more user-friendly for someone who is not from the DLP field and could also help someone from a finance domain by integrating it with other domains as well."

"My impression of Proofpoint Enterprise DLP's ability to monitor problematic Copilot use is that some improvements are still required on that part because I believe it is not so matured yet and the new features are being implemented."

"Usability has improved over the years; initially, it was difficult to navigate around the tooling, and my only other concern is around the number of products and how it's packaged up, as it gets a bit confusing at times."

"I think Proofpoint Enterprise DLP could be improved by including templates."

"I rate Proofpoint Enterprise DLP a nine on a scale of one to ten because Microsoft Purview is truly a game changer."

"In terms of improvements, I find there are some blind spots in Proofpoint Enterprise DLP; you can obviously add more channels for detection, and logging can be much improved, specifying exactly what action took place or what alert was generated."

"It is not one hundred percent reliable, but I believe it is easy for saving time for the user regarding the accuracy and reliability of the AI output in Proofpoint Enterprise DLP."

More Proofpoint Enterprise DLP cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution's pricing lacks transparency."

"The prices are slightly expensive."

"My company has to make yearly payments towards the licensing costs attached to the solution. There are no hidden charges apart from the licensing costs of the solution."

"The pricing is somewhere in the middle. I would rate the pricing a seven out of ten."

"The pricing of the solution is cheap. The licensing cost is also very low. I rate the cost and pricing a three out of ten."

"The price tag is no longer $200,000, but rather $300,000 to $400,000. It's twice."

"Cloudflare Zero Trust Platform's pricing is good."

"The solution is not that expensive."

"The pricing is reasonable. It's my understanding that the cost is about $7 for unlimited storage in the cloud per server."

"It used to be a good solution for SOHO in particular as it had unlimited storage for a reasonable price. However, their pricing model has changed and they are now primarily targeting enterprise users."

"They were the best solution and surprisingly enough, the cheapest."

"It was expensive. It was more expensive than Eureka, and it was more expensive than Barracuda Backup, but what we got was a full team. They didn't come in and nickel and dime us. They provided the assistance we needed. They didn't say that they need to charge us for something or it is going to take another statement of work. It was all bundled into it... We pay for the software maintenance. It is probably 18% or 20% of the license fee for rev releases."

"It is 100% worth the cost to get and keep the support, especially when setting it up."

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Loss Prevention (DLP) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

909,099 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Construction Company

19%

Comms Service Provider

11%

Outsourcing Company

Financial Services Firm

16%

Construction Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Outsourcing Company

Financial Services Firm

17%

Outsourcing Company

Insurance Company

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	10
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	12

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	33
Midsize Enterprise	29
Large Enterprise	44

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	26

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cloudflare Zero Trust Platform?

Pricing is competitive. Akamai is more expensive, in my view.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Cloudflare Zero Trust Platform?

In my opinion, Cloudflare One can be improved mainly through compatibility, as the integration should be much simpler...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Cloudflare Zero Trust Platform?

Cloudflare One's primary use case for my organization is to protect servers and to provide remote access with the VPN...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Code42 Next-Gen DLP?

I am unsure about Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection's pricing, setup costs, and licensing details....

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Code42 Next-Gen DLP?

My advice for those looking at Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection is to compare your use case compr...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Code42 Incydr?

A con to mention is that Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection, at times, may not capture everything. ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Proofpoint Enterprise DLP?

Proofpoint Enterprise DLP is really good overall, but I feel it can improve by making the policy management more intu...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Proofpoint Enterprise DLP?

Based on what I learned in the seminar, Proofpoint Enterprise DLP can be most useful in preventing sensitive data fro...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Proofpoint Enterprise DLP?

Having used Proofpoint Enterprise DLP, my advice would be to spend time planning and tuning your policies before enfo...

See all answers

Comparisons

Cato SASE Cloud Platform vs Cloudflare One

Compared 3% of the time

Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform vs Cloudflare One

Compared 3% of the time

Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks vs Cloudflare One

Compared 3% of the time

Twingate vs Cloudflare One

Compared 3% of the time

Fortinet FortiGate vs Cloudflare One

Compared 3% of the time

More Cloudflare One Competitors

Digital Guardian vs Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection

Compared 10% of the time

Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention vs Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection

Compared 6% of the time

NetVault Plus vs Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection

Compared 6% of the time

Teramind vs Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection

Compared 6% of the time

Check Point CloudGuard Code Security vs Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection

Compared 5% of the time

More Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection Competitors

Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention vs Proofpoint Enterprise DLP

Compared 18% of the time

Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform vs Proofpoint Enterprise DLP

Compared 17% of the time

Material Data Protection vs Proofpoint Enterprise DLP

Compared 13% of the time

GTB Technologies Inspector vs Proofpoint Enterprise DLP

Compared 9% of the time

Next DLP vs Proofpoint Enterprise DLP

Compared 4% of the time

More Proofpoint Enterprise DLP Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cloudflare One

August 2026

Download Cloudflare One product report

Buyer's Guide

Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection

July 2026

Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection report

Download Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection product report

Buyer's Guide

Proofpoint Enterprise DLP

July 2026

Download Proofpoint Enterprise DLP product report

Also Known As

Cloudflare Area 1 Email Security, Cloudflare Bot Management, Cloudflare Gateway, Cloudflare Zero Trust Platform, Cloudflare DDoS, Cloudflare SASE & SSE Platform

Mimecast Incydr, Code42 Next-Gen DLP, Code42 Next-Gen Data Loss Protection, Code42 Forensic File Search, Code42 Backup + Restore

No data available

Overview

Cloudflare One is a comprehensive platform for security, performance, and connectivity. It provides features like rate limiting, DDoS protection, and application access, tailored to enhance user experience while securing internet access and accelerating communications.

Designed to integrate security measures with ease of use and scalability, Cloudflare One offers a secure web gateway and zero trust network access. These features ensure seamless setup and operation, making connectivity reliable and protected. Users appreciate its integrated console, intuitive interface, and the ability to manage risk effectively. It offers straightforward deployment, improves latency, and boasts cost-effectiveness. While its onboarding process and documentation need enhancement, its value in content delivery and application shielding is notable. Despite challenges in integrating Cloudflare Access with existing VPNs and the need for better automation and support, it remains vital for DNS and infrastructure protection.

What features make Cloudflare One stand out?

Rate Limiting: Controls the traffic rate to prevent abuse.
DDoS Protection: Shields applications from distributed denial-of-service attacks.
Secure Web Gateway: Provides secure internet access with seamless operation.
Zero Trust Network Access: Ensures secure, application-based connectivity without relying on traditional VPNs.
Access for Connectivity: Facilitates access to internal applications securely.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Security: Robust measures for DNS and browsing protection.
Performance: Enhanced site accessibility and communication speed.
Cost-Effectiveness: Offers competitive pricing for its features.
Ease of Deployment: Straightforward and efficient setup process.

In industries like finance, retail, and technology, Cloudflare One is crucial for enabling secure remote access and protecting web applications against dynamic threats. It supports compliance access policies and enhances content delivery, playing a key role in safeguarding digital infrastructure.

Cloudflare

Mimecast Incydr protects organizations against insider risk and data exfiltration, whether accidental, negligent, or malicious. It monitors endpoint, cloud, browser, and email activity to see when files move to places you don't trust, without requiring policies, proxies, or content classification to work. Administrators get a single dashboard for data flow visibility, adaptive controls ranging from education to blocking, and integrations with HR, endpoint detection, and identity systems to automate response as risk changes.

What key features should users explore?

Shadow AI Visibility: Sees uploads, pastes, and prompts into GenAI tools like ChatGPT and Claude across endpoint and browser, with no policies required.
Adaptive Controls: Applies the right level of protection per user and scenario, from in-the-moment education (Instructor) to real-time blocking of paste, uploads, or removable media.
Departing Employee Monitoring: Automatically watchlists offboarding employees through HCM integrations (Workday, BambooHR, and others) the moment HR confirms departure.
Risk Prioritization (PRISM): Prioritizes incidents using hundreds of risk indicators based on data sensitivity, user behavior, and destination.
Block by Source/Destination: Blocks sensitive data (source code, financial systems, HR data) from reaching unsanctioned destinations, without writing regex-based policies.

What benefits can impact ROI?

Faster Investigation: Reduces time to investigate high-risk incidents by 50%, verified by Forrester Total Economic Impact (TEI) research.
Low Administrative Overhead: Half of customers spend less than 4 hours a week on administration, without dedicated headcount.
Proven Return: 172% ROI and under 6-month payback, independently verified by Forrester TEI.
Automated Offboarding Security: HCM integrations remove manual handoffs between HR and security during the highest-risk period of employment.
Reduced Tool Sprawl: Combines DLP, CASB, and UEBA-style visibility in a single lightweight endpoint agent.

Industries and use cases

Mimecast Incydr is used across industries to address insider risk, departing employee data theft, and shadow AI exposure. Enterprises use it to monitor data movement across endpoint, cloud, and browser channels, automate watchlisting during employee offboarding, and gain visibility into how employees and AI tools interact with sensitive data, supporting both security operations and compliance requirements in regulated industries.

Mimecast

Proofpoint Enterprise DLP safeguards data with advanced protection capabilities tailored for comprehensive data loss prevention. It is designed to effectively manage and secure sensitive information across various environments.

Proofpoint Enterprise DLP delivers robust security to enterprises seeking to protect critical data. It supports diverse use cases, ensuring seamless adaptation to an organization's unique data protection needs. With valuable features focused on compliance and user activity monitoring, it decreases the risk of unauthorized data access. The system also offers opportunities for improvement in integration ease and reporting functions, which could enhance its adaptability and analytics capabilities.

What are its most important features?

Advanced Threat Management: Monitors and mitigates threats in real-time to ensure data security.
Compliance Enforcement: Automates policy enforcement to meet data protection regulations.
User Activity Monitoring: Tracks and analyzes user interactions with sensitive data for improved security insights.

What benefits or ROI can users expect?

Data Security Improvement: Enhances protection against unauthorized data breaches, reducing potential financial loss.
Regulatory Compliance: Simplifies adherence to compliance standards, minimizing legal risks.
Operational Efficiency: Streamlines data management processes, saving time and resources.

In industries such as healthcare and finance, where data security and compliance are critical, Proofpoint Enterprise DLP's targeted solutions provide essential tools for industry-specific challenges. Tailoring capabilities to fit sector-specific needs ensures that organizations can effectively protect sensitive data.

Proofpoint

Sample Customers

23andMe

Adobe, Okta, Samsung, Taylormade, Boston University, Lending Club, North Highland, Stanford University, Ping Identity, Qualcomm, Pandora.

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection vs. Proofpoint Enterprise DLP

August 2026

Free Report: Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection vs. Proofpoint Enterprise DLP

Find out what your peers are saying about Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection vs. Proofpoint Enterprise DLP and other solutions. Updated: August 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

909,099 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection vs. Proofpoint Enterprise DLP report.

See our list of best Data Loss Prevention (DLP) vendors.

We monitor all Data Loss Prevention (DLP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.