No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Microsoft Virtual Server vs VMware ThinApp [EOL] comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft Virtual Server
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.1
Number of Reviews
39
Ranking in other categories
Application Virtualization (3rd)
VMware ThinApp [EOL]
Average Rating
9.0
Number of Reviews
3
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Featured Reviews

UdaySiddu - PeerSpot reviewer
Software Consultant at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
Virtual machines have improved cost savings and now provide safe, fast, snapshot-based recovery
Virtual Servers are valuable to us. We have been using Microsoft Virtual Server for the last five years. We use it for common applications and server applications. Microsoft Virtual Server machines are good compared to on-premises infrastructure. You can take a snapshot whenever we require it, and we can rebuild it. The data is safe, easily accessible, fast, and scalable. For snapshots, whenever we do any maintenance activity, the admin team takes snapshots. If there are any issues or upgrade problems, they revert back to the old one.
it_user769638 - PeerSpot reviewer
Associate Operations at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees
Streamlines checking our app after pushing an update, which helps cut costs
In the past we used multiple servers to load-balance the application and when we pushed updates to the application we would need to check it on all servers. But when it comes to VMware ThinApp we can do it on a file server or Isilon share and this helps cut costs and create a healthy environment. If we publish an application in Citrix through a server we should have more capacity. On multiple occasions, some applications need updates so at that point we need to disable the servers. But in this case there is no need for disabling user sessions, they can use it and we can do just gpupdate to update all servers in a row.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The solution's performance is good."
"The solution provides easy monitoring and easy troubleshooting."
"Microsoft Virtual Server is a highly scalable solution."
"Microsoft Virtual Server is stable."
"Everything is fine as far as our implementation goes."
"It is easy to use. It offers good compatibility with other operating systems. That's one of the reasons I used it."
"The most valuable feature is the stability of the solution."
"The product provides flexibility."
"A great solution to get started with app virtualization, app mobility and deployment"
"In the past we used multiple servers to load-balance the application and when we pushed updates to the application we would need to check it on all servers, but when it comes to VMware ThinApp we can do it on a file server or Isilon share and this helps cut costs and create a healthy environment."
 

Cons

"Identifying the server owner or the virtual machine owner is a difficult task for admins."
"The tool must provide updates less frequently."
"There could be more security features included in the product."
"Microsoft Virtual Server needs to improve its patching. It should offer us a review before updates. The solution should also improve its pricing."
"Support could always be a bit better."
"The product must provide better data analytics."
"I would give technical support from Microsoft a seven because some advanced technical support is not free."
"Server security can always be improved."
"There are some functional areas Thinapp could be improved. Perhaps including application specific or hardware specific virtual drivers"
"There are some improvements needed regarding different types of options and still they are in research and build stage so once everything is set it will look good."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is very expensive."
"Microsoft Virtual Server’s licensing is expensive."
"Compared to the other products in the market, I believe that the prices of Microsoft Virtual Server are on the higher side."
"The pricing must be improved."
"Some of the licensing costs are monthly, and others are yearly."
"It is an expensive product."
"The solution has a yearly license. If we switch to a yearly subscription plan for Microsoft Virtual Server, it would be cheaper in the long run. The price per month would be higher, but the overall cost for the year would be lower."
"Microsoft Virtual Server is an expensive solution."
Information not available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Virtualization solutions are best for your needs.
920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Construction Company
21%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Comms Service Provider
11%
Outsourcing Company
10%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business20
Midsize Enterprise8
Large Enterprise15
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft Virtual Server?
I am not involved much in cost-related matters but heard from management that it is a better choice.
What needs improvement with Microsoft Virtual Server?
For improvements, sometimes users use service accounts to log into the server. Identifying the server owner or the virtual machine owner is a difficult task for admins. Manually, someone needs to u...
What is your primary use case for Microsoft Virtual Server?
I am using Microsoft Virtual Server as an end-user. I am using Microsoft Virtual Server Discovery and Microsoft Virtual Server ITSM, which is a basic tool, not a development or discovery tool. I am...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Also Known As

Virtual Server, MS Virtual Server
ThinApp
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Paylocity, ASELSAN, Sochi Organizing Committee, Supervisor of Elections, Orange County, Florida, Netgem, Nav Canada, The British & Irish Lions
Delhi International Airport, Telus Communications Company, Mansfield District Council, St Edmunds College, Sydney Adventist Hospital, ITSAM, Hertz International, Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd. , ASVZ, Appenzell Ausserrhoden Informatik, MTF, Stadt Hattingen, €sterreichisches Verkehrsbªro AG, DER Reisebªro GmbH & Co OHG, Thomas-Krenn.AG, BFI Wien, Metal One Pipe & Tubular Products Inc., NTT Neomeit
Find out what your peers are saying about Citrix, Microsoft, Parallels and others in Application Virtualization. Updated: October 2026.
920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.