Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Microsoft Power Apps vs Microsoft Power Automate comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
7.7
Microsoft Power Apps boosts time-to-market, automates processes, and reduces costs, despite complex licensing and varied returns.
Sentiment score
7.8
Microsoft Power Automate is a cost-effective, efficient RPA solution with seamless integration, offering significant ROI and streamlining operations.
The connection between Power Apps and Power BI simplifies generating and presenting reports, alleviating the workload and enhancing productivity.
The aim is to create a cleaner interface to replace spreadsheets, thus standardizing processes and improving efficiency.
It has helped us save time, and we've saved thousands of hours through automation.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
6.4
Microsoft Power Apps support varies in responsiveness; technical users report fewer issues, while rapid updates cause confusion.
Sentiment score
6.4
Microsoft Power Automate support varies, with premium plans offering better service; users often rely on community resources.
Their assistance was crucial as we developed the solutions.
A few months ago, I contacted support for an issue, but the response time was longer than expected.
Microsoft's technical support is around a seven to eight.
Having experience with coding is essential to fully utilize Power Automate.
I have contacted the technical support of Microsoft regarding some issues, and their support is good.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
6.7
Microsoft Power Apps' scalability is generally positive, though some encounter licensing challenges and issues with complex, large data sets.
Sentiment score
6.8
Microsoft Power Automate scales well for small to medium businesses, excelling within Microsoft environments but limited in complex integrations.
If it is flexible and includes premium connectors, scalability is easy.
It is quite scalable, though there are some limitations regarding the number of records.
Microsoft Power Automate is scalable enough for me and my customers.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
7.6
Microsoft Power Apps is stable and reliable, but may slow with large datasets; generally rated 7-9 out of 10.
Sentiment score
7.6
Microsoft Power Automate is stable and reliable, particularly for non-complex projects, with user ratings between seven and nine.
I would rate the stability of Microsoft Power Apps as a nine out of ten.
 

Room For Improvement

Users want better integration, performance, and customization in Power Apps, with concerns about costs, data handling, and support.
Microsoft Power Automate needs improvements in image recognition, integration, documentation, licensing, and user training to enhance user experience.
In many use cases, applications might require importing data exceeding two thousand records, potentially reaching one hundred thousand.
These tools should be intuitive for business users who will need at least a week of training to use them effectively.
This would assist business process users who lack coding knowledge.
It would be better to make it a wizard more than requiring coding.
 

Setup Cost

Microsoft Power Apps pricing is generally reasonable, especially with Office 365, but can increase with premium features and external users.
Microsoft Power Automate offers cost-effective pricing, but additional premium features can increase expenses compared to other solutions.
For small to medium enterprises, it is affordable, especially with Microsoft Enterprise licensing.
For more elaborate work, an upgrade to an enterprise license, costing around $35 per license, is needed.
It is in the middle range and considered reasonable given the current price.
Microsoft Power Automate is reasonably priced compared to others in the market.
 

Valuable Features

Microsoft Power Apps offers seamless data integration, low-code development, and scalability, enhancing business processes within the Microsoft ecosystem.
Microsoft Power Automate offers a low-code interface, seamless integration, and cost-effective automation for enhanced productivity across multiple systems.
Canvas Apps provide complete user design flexibility with many connectors to integrate into Microsoft Power Apps, making it efficient to fetch and update information from various data sources such as Dataverse, Excel, SharePoint, and Azure.
It integrates seamlessly with Power Automate for process automation and connects with email, SharePoint, Power BI, and MS Teams, facilitating everyday processes.
If we are using Outlook or Power BI for our reports, the integration is easier because it is within the Microsoft ecosystem.
We have saved thousands of hours by automating tasks that would have been labor-intensive and error-prone if done manually.
It helps show the optimal way to utilize a process by discovering, validating, and improving the process automation.
 

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft Power Apps
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
94
Ranking in other categories
Rapid Application Development Software (1st), Low-Code Development Platforms (1st)
Microsoft Power Automate
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
127
Ranking in other categories
Robotic Process Automation (RPA) (2nd), Process Mining (2nd)
 

Mindshare comparison

While both are Process, Business Automation, and Digital Transformation solutions, they serve different purposes. Microsoft Power Apps is designed for Rapid Application Development Software and holds a mindshare of 14.1%, down 22.0% compared to last year.
Microsoft Power Automate, on the other hand, focuses on Robotic Process Automation (RPA), holds 20.9% mindshare, down 21.3% since last year.
Rapid Application Development Software
Robotic Process Automation (RPA)
 

Featured Reviews

Guhan Eshwar - PeerSpot reviewer
Building tools with user-friendly interfaces abut needs integration improvements
An integration of Copilot options within Microsoft Power Apps would be useful. In UiPath apps, there is an autopilot function that uses a generative AI model, which creates layouts and connects data services automatically with a prompt. Such integration would be beneficial to build basic frameworks that can be enhanced. This would assist business process users who lack coding knowledge.
Nilesh Pundkar - PeerSpot reviewer
Good for email routing and management features but additional costs for plug-ins
Power Automate has fewer features and more limitations in general. It's not as mature a product as some of the others, like UiPath or Automate Anywhere. One of the main issues I've found is that Power Automate struggles with accessing Excel or other Office documents on servers. Even though it's a Microsoft product, we often have to log in through remote systems, and syncing can be problematic due to the way we use servers. At the very least, they should provide access to Office 365 directly, without requiring additional logins on servers. Most people utilizing Power Automate are already working within the Office 365 environment. Any proof of concepts (POCs) using Power Automate would naturally be built on top of Office 365.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Rapid Application Development Software solutions are best for your needs.
850,671 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
12%
Computer Software Company
11%
Government
10%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Financial Services Firm
15%
Computer Software Company
13%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Insurance Company
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

How would you choose between Microsoft PowerApps and Salesforce Platform?
I think it depends on your use case. If your organization uses Microsoft Enterprise products, PowerApps will work better in your environment. Similarly, if you have a Salesforce integration in pla...
Would you choose ServiceNow over Microsoft PowerApps?
Hi Netanya, I will choose ServiceNow because ServiceNow is a very good tool compared to Microsoft PowerApp. Because ServiceNow has a very strong module (Performance Analysis) reporting which will ...
Would you choose Microsoft Azure App Service or PowerApps?
Microsoft Azure App Service is helpful if you need to set up temporary servers for customers to run their programs in locations that other cloud providers do not cater to. When servers are closer t...
RPA that Bots can run without centralized control?
Yes, Attended Bots which can run without centralized control Module. RPA Tools like Automation Anywhere, uiPath ,Power Automation they do support this.
How do I choose between UiPath and Microsoft Power Automate?
Microsoft‌ ‌Power‌ ‌Automate‌ ‌is‌ ‌intuitive‌ ‌and‌ ‌easy‌ ‌to‌ ‌integrate‌ ‌and‌ ‌use.‌ ‌I‌ ‌like‌ ‌that‌ ‌there‌ ‌is‌ ‌no‌ ‌coding‌ ‌experience‌ ‌necessary,‌ ‌and‌ ‌appreciate‌ ‌the‌ ‌automated‌...
How is Automation Anywhere compared to Microsoft Power Automate?
‌Neither‌ ‌solution‌ ‌requires‌ ‌any‌ ‌coding‌ ‌experience,‌ ‌and‌ ‌both‌ ‌are‌ ‌easy‌ ‌to‌ ‌use‌ ‌and‌ ‌have‌ ‌great‌ ‌drag-and‌ ‌drop‌ ‌functionality.‌ ‌The‌ ‌training‌ ‌and‌ ‌resources‌ ‌for‌ ‌A...
 

Also Known As

PowerApps, MS PowerApps
Power Automate, Microsoft Flow, MS Power Automate, WinAutomation by Softomotive, ProcessRobot by Softomotive, Minit
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

TransAlta, Rackspace, Telstra
1. Coca-Cola 2. General Electric 3. Siemens 4. Accenture 5. Deloitte 6. Johnson & Johnson 7. Ford 8. Nestle 9. Procter & Gamble 10. IBM 11. Amazon 12. Google 13. Microsoft 14. Adobe 15. Cisco 16. Oracle 17. SAP 18. Intel 19. HP 20. Dell 21. Verizon 22. AT&T 23. T-Mobile 24. Walmart 25. Target 26. Home Depot 27. McDonald's 28. Starbucks 29. Nike 30. Apple 31. Facebook 32. Twitter
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, ServiceNow, OutSystems and others in Rapid Application Development Software. Updated: May 2025.
850,671 professionals have used our research since 2012.