Microsoft Parallel Data Warehouse vs TIBCO Live Datamart comparison

Microsoft and TIBCO are both solutions in the Data Warehouse category. Microsoft is ranked #12 with an average rating of 8.3, while TIBCO is ranked #22. Microsoft holds a 2.4% mindshare in Data Warehouse, compared to TIBCO’s 2.1% mindshare. Additionally, 87% of Microsoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of TIBCO users who would recommend it.

Microsoft Parallel Data War...

Read 40 Microsoft Parallel Data Warehouse reviews

1,177 Views
824 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

TIBCO Live Datamart

Read 2 TIBCO Live Datamart reviews

527 Views
390 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Microsoft Parallel Data War...

TIBCO Live Datamart

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2024

Microsoft Parallel Data Warehouse and TIBCO Live Datamart are competing products in the data management domain. Microsoft generally offers better pricing and support, but TIBCO is recognized for its advanced features.

Features: Microsoft Parallel Data Warehouse is known for its scalability and performance, handling large-scale queries efficiently. It integrates seamlessly with other Microsoft services, which enhances its value for enterprise needs. TIBCO Live Datamart specializes in real-time data streaming and analytics, offering real-time insights and low-latency capabilities for instant decision-making.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Microsoft Parallel Data Warehouse typically offers a traditional deployment model that aligns with existing Microsoft ecosystems, benefiting from established customer support. TIBCO Live Datamart offers a modern and flexible deployment approach, praised for quick setup and specialized support for real-time data applications.

Pricing and ROI: Microsoft Parallel Data Warehouse's setup costs align with its infrastructure, offering solid ROI for businesses invested in Microsoft technologies. TIBCO Live Datamart may have higher initial costs due to specialized features but promises quicker ROI in real-time data management scenarios.

To learn more, read our detailed Microsoft Parallel Data Warehouse vs. TIBCO Live Datamart Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Parallel Data Warehouse vs. TIBCO Live Datamart

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 884,873 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft Parallel Data War...

Ranking in Data Warehouse

12th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

TIBCO Live Datamart

Ranking in Data Warehouse

22nd

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Data Warehouse category, the mindshare of Microsoft Parallel Data Warehouse is 2.4%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of TIBCO Live Datamart is 2.1%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Data Warehouse Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Microsoft Parallel Data Warehouse	2.4%
TIBCO Live Datamart	2.1%
Other	95.5%

Data Warehouse

Featured Reviews

HassanFatemi

CEO at Smart Data-Driven Solutions

Has handled large volumes of data effectively but still needs cost flexibility

There could be improvements on the cost side of Microsoft Parallel Data Warehouse because it is still considered to be quite expensive by a lot of users, and many companies are not interested in solutions with parallel data warehousing due to this expense. Addressing the cost would be the number one area for improvement. Additionally, I have not worked recently with it, so I don't know if this feature already exists, but if it doesn't, having an elastic feature that adjusts the service's power dynamically based on the workload would be beneficial instead of fixing the power at a specific level.

Read full review

Mohsin Pathan

Associate Vice President - Solutions, presales & services at Bahwan CyberTek

Standout features are real-time dashboards and powerful aggregation

This product has a powerful aggregating feature which is great. It also has its own APIs. Whenever the data comes in, it can be streamed out anywhere. It's the only solution that provides real-time dashboards. Tableau doesn't have this feature. The three variants of historical data, real-time data and predicted data from Spitfire, give more strength to LiveDatamart without any dependency on other products. The product is easy to set up with very low maintenance required.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The interface is very user-friendly."

"The initial setup was straightforward."

"It is very strong, scalable, and has tons of features."

"Tools like the BI and SAS are excellent."

"The most valuable feature of this solution is performance."

"The solution's integration is good."

"The most valuable feature is the business intelligence (BI) part of it."

"We have complete control over our data."

More Microsoft Parallel Data Warehouse pros

"The solution has a powerful aggregating feature"

"You can create your own rules that include mathematic calculations."

Cons

"The solution is expensive and has room for improvement."

"The product must provide more frequent updates."

"It is expensive. SQL Data Warehouse is not supported by all versions of SQL Server such as the Express version and therefore becomes unavailable to many limiting its acquisition and use."

"The ETL designing process could be optimized for better efficiency."

"We'd like to see it be a bit more compatible with other solutions."

"When there are many users or many expensive queries, it can be very slow."

"I think that the error messages need to be made more specific."

"Concurrent queries are limited to 32, making it more of a data storage mechanism instead of an active DWH solution."

More Microsoft Parallel Data Warehouse cons

"Improvements need to be made on the load balancing side."

"The solution's setup could be quicker and easier."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Microsoft has an agreement with the government in our country, so our customers get their licensing costs from the Ministry. Whenever we work with any government, company, or government institute, which is mainly what we are doing, that license comes directly from the Ministry of Technology and Information."

"The tool could be expensive if we need to manage a lot of data."

"The solution is cost-effective."

"I think the program is well-priced compared to the other offerings that are out in the market."

"They offer an annual subscription. The pricing depends on the size of the environments."

"The solution's pricing is fairly decent for organizations with huge data sizes."

"Technical support is an additional fee and is expensive."

"All the features that we use do not require any additional subscription or yearly fees."

"The solution might be considered a bit expensive because it competes with open-source products."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Warehouse solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

884,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Marketing Services Firm

14%

Manufacturing Company

Insurance Company

Performing Arts

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	16
Midsize Enterprise	6
Large Enterprise	22

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft Parallel Data Warehouse?

Microsoft Parallel Data Warehouse is very expensive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Microsoft Parallel Data Warehouse?

The pricing could be better; I think it actually just went up.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Microsoft Parallel Data Warehouse?

The basic use case for us is virtual machines. In real estate, we use it for our operations. They handle large data sets well, and the performance is good during those times.

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Oracle Exadata vs Microsoft Parallel Data Warehouse

Compared 11% of the time

Teradata vs Microsoft Parallel Data Warehouse

Compared 9% of the time

biGENIUS vs Microsoft Parallel Data Warehouse

Compared 7% of the time

VMware Tanzu Data Solutions vs Microsoft Parallel Data Warehouse

Compared 6% of the time

IBM Netezza Performance Server vs Microsoft Parallel Data Warehouse

Compared 6% of the time

More Microsoft Parallel Data Warehouse Competitors

Kovair Data Lake vs TIBCO Live Datamart

Compared 10% of the time

IBM Netezza Performance Server vs TIBCO Live Datamart

Compared 8% of the time

Snowflake vs TIBCO Live Datamart

Compared 8% of the time

Teradata vs TIBCO Live Datamart

Compared 7% of the time

Infobright DB vs TIBCO Live Datamart

Compared 7% of the time

More TIBCO Live Datamart Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Parallel Data Warehouse

March 2026

Microsoft Parallel Data Warehouse report

Download Microsoft Parallel Data Warehouse product report

Buyer's Guide

Data Warehouse

February 2026

Download TIBCO Live Datamart product report

Also Known As

Microsoft PDW, SQL Server Data Warehouse, Microsoft SQL Server Parallel Data Warehouse, MS Parallel Data Warehouse

Streambase, TIBCO LiveView Data Mart

Overview

The traditional structured relational data warehouse was never designed to handle the volume of exponential data growth, the variety of semi-structured and unstructured data types, or the velocity of real time data processing. Microsoft's SQL Server data warehouse solution integrates your traditional data warehouse with non-relational data and it can handle data of all sizes and types, with real-time performance.

Microsoft

TIBCO Live Datamart is the industry’s first ultra fast continuous query processing engine made for live operational intelligence. It supports real-time data from anywhere, consumes live streaming data, and can connect to historical data in monolithic and edge systems by using either included data adapters or by leveraging the TIBCO integration platform. With its real-time computations against high-speed streaming data and continuous pushing of results to live queries, TIBCO Live Datamart offers users faster time to actionable insight and automated action.

TIBCO

Sample Customers

Auckland Transport, Erste Bank Group, Urban Software Institute, NJVC, Sheraton Hotels and Resorts, Tata Steel Europe

Aerospace Corporation, Balfour Beatty Infrastructure Services, Banco Sabadell, Bolton Borough Council

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Parallel Data Warehouse vs. TIBCO Live Datamart

March 2026

Free Report: Microsoft Parallel Data Warehouse vs. TIBCO Live Datamart

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft Parallel Data Warehouse vs. TIBCO Live Datamart and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

884,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Microsoft Parallel Data Warehouse vs. TIBCO Live Datamart report.

See our list of best Data Warehouse vendors.

We monitor all Data Warehouse reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.