We performed a comparison between Microsoft Data Quality Services and Talend Data Quality based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Informatica, SAP, Talend and others in Data Quality."This solution is particularly useful for data enrichment."
"It’s easy to monitor the processes. Every morning I’ll open the Talend Administration Center to check the status of the process. Within seconds I’m able to see which process ran successfully and which have failed and why they failed."
"The most valuable feature lies in the capability to assign data quality issues to different stakeholders, facilitating the tracking and resolution of defective work."
"We are able to get emails from URLs very easily using this function when others fail."
"I really like the fact that there are no out-of-the-box solutions regarding the development of jobs. Other vendors may have modules which cleanse your addresses. In Talend, you have the freedom to completely develop the process yourself. This can be tricky, but it also makes it fun."
"The solution enables robust data matching, merging, survivorship, and Data Stewardship that can be a part of data quality workflows or true master data management."
"It reduces the QA effort immensely by handling most of the test scenarios in a reusable way."
"Provides a flexible development environment to the coder."
"It lowers the amount of time in development from weeks to a day."
"I would rate my experience with the initial setup a six out of ten, with one being very easy and ten being extremely challenging. So, there is room for improvement in the setup process."
"There are too many functions which could be streamlined."
"Finding assistance with issues can be spotty. With Python, there are literally millions of open source answers which are recent and apply to the version that we are using."
"NullPointerExceptions are going to be the death of me and are a big reason for our transition away from Talend. One day, it is fine with a 1000 blank rows, then the next day, it will find one blank cell and it breaks down."
"The ability to change the code when debugging the JavaScript could be improved."
"The performance is one area that Talend Data Quality could improve in because large volumes take a lot of time."
"If we encounter issues, it’s most likely when using the Talend Open Studio. The studio can be slow, get stuck, or crash. But again, it can be caused by the resources of your machine or your connection with the repository. If we encounter issues with the Studio we restart the Studio. In emergencies, we create and use a new workspace."
"When we upgraded to Version 6.4.1, we tried using a GIT repository instead of a SVN repository. After a few incidents where things disappeared and changes were not saved, we decided to go back to a SVN repository."
"In terms of the solution's technical support, the interactions were satisfactory, but there is room for improvement, especially in managing expectations."
More Microsoft Data Quality Services Pricing and Cost Advice →
Microsoft Data Quality Services is ranked 14th in Data Quality with 1 review while Talend Data Quality is ranked 4th in Data Quality with 20 reviews. Microsoft Data Quality Services is rated 8.0, while Talend Data Quality is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Microsoft Data Quality Services writes " Usefulness of data enrichment features, which can help improve data quality and accuracy". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Talend Data Quality writes "Saves a lot of time, good ROI, seamless integration with different databases, and stable". Microsoft Data Quality Services is most compared with Informatica Data Quality, whereas Talend Data Quality is most compared with Ataccama DQ Analyzer, Informatica Data Quality, Alteryx, Precisely Trillium and Informatica Cloud Data Quality.
See our list of best Data Quality vendors.
We monitor all Data Quality reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.