Microsoft Azure Application Gateway vs Tenable.io Web Application Scanning comparison

"The tool is easy to use and quite flexible. It has policy management features as well. The solution screens all traffic to our web applications before passing it to the application. We recently tested it on one of our poorly developed applications, and the upgrade gave us a 100% result based on our tests. It's very effective as a security measure, and people can detect threats even through the web application."

"Azure Application Gateway's most valuable feature is ease of use. The configuration is straightforward. It isn't difficult to adjust the size of your instances in the settings. You can do that with a few clicks, and the configuration file is the same way. You can also set rules and policies with minimal time and effort."

"The solution has built-in rules that reduce alerts and are easy to configure."

"The solution's integration is very good."

"We find it valuable because it is compatible with our existing Azure solution."

"The production is a valuable feature."

"It has a filter available, although we are not currently using it because it is not part of our requirements. But it is a good option and when it becomes part of our requirements we will definitely use it."

"I like the tool's stability and performance."

"Tenable.io Web Application Scanning provides a detailed report, identifying functions that are complex and need to be more maintainable and readable."

"The most valuable feature is the reporting, which provides a good level of detail with respect to vulnerabilities."

"It is fully automated."

"The initial setup is straightforward."

"Tenable provides the end analysis results covering all the published vulnerabilities and information on the market."

"I would recommend Tenable.io Web Application Scanning to others."

"The most effective feature of the product is the ability to scan the entire environment."

"All the features are valuable to us as they offer cutting-edge scanning methods and address the latest issues with a contemporary approach. Tenable.io Web Application Scanning is highly stable. I rate it a nine out ten. Since the solution works on the Cloud, it's highly scalable. I rate the scalability a nine out of ten. The setup of the solution is straightforward. The Return on Investment is substantial. I recommend the solution to all."

"Microsoft Azure Application Gateway's first deployment is complex. It needs to improve its pricing."

"There is room for improvement in the pricing model."

"The tool's pricing could be improved."

"The solution has many limitations. You cannot upgrade the VPN to the application gateway. So I started with version one, which has limited capabilities, and they provided version two. And unfortunately, I cannot upgrade from v one to v two like other services. So I have to decommission the version one and create a new one with version two. Also the version one was complex with the certificates uploading the SQL certificates."

"Microsoft Azure Application Gateway could improve by allowing features to use more third-party tools."

"The solution needs improvements in integrating different services and creating a better application balance."

"We faced some downtime while validating CNAME."

"The monitoring on the solution could be better."

"Tenable.io Web Application Scanning is not very user-friendly and you need a lot of information to get proper reports. The tool's support is not very responsive."

"Sometimes it lags with different cloud environments."

"The cloud and the on-premises versions have their own controllers, and there is no way to centrally manage controllers."

"The dashboard could be more user-friendly."

"The report customization needs to be better."

"Tenable.io Web Application Scanning conducts a general scan, which wastes time. The scan needs to be specific."

"The reporting has a very limited customization capability."

"Tenable.io Web Application Scanning could improve by offering faster fuzzing."

"Microsoft Azure Application Gateway is a pretty affordable product. My company needs to make yearly payments towards the licensing costs of the solution. The additional costs apart from the licensing costs of the solution vary."

"The solution is reasonably priced."

"The solution is cheaper than Imperva. I rate it four to five out of ten."

"I would rate the pricing a three out of ten, with ten being cheap and one being expensive."

"Microsoft Azure Application Gateway is expensive."

"It is not expensive."

"Between v1 and v2, there is a lot of change in the pricing. It is very costly compared to AWS."

"The solution's pricing is not complex. It is not expensive from our point of view."

"The pricing is okay."

"The application is extremely affordable. There are no additional costs involved with licensing. We switched to Tenable.io Web Application Scanning from other solutions due to pricing."

"Tenable.io Web Application Scanning is expensive for small businesses."

"I rate the product's pricing a four out of ten."

"For Tenable.io Web Application Scanning, it comes to around 6,50,000 Indian rupees, plus taxes."

"It follows the same licensing scheme as Tenable.io and Tenable. sc."

"The price of the solution is reasonable compared to the competitors. The license cost is based on the number of users and the annual usage."