We performed a comparison between Micro Focus UFT Mobile and Silk Test based on real PeerSpot user reviews.Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, SeleniumHQ, Micro Focus and others in Functional Testing Tools.
Micro Focus UFT Mobile amplifies team productivity by providing a centralized, enterprise-level, end-to-end lab and management gateway of distributed real mobile devices and emulators that helps teams develop, debug, test, monitor, and optimize their omnichannel mobile applications to promote an enhanced user experience across all digital touchpoints. Testers and Developers alike can validate all aspects of the mobile user experience including functionality, performance, and security using services simulations and network virtualization. UFT Mobile supports continuous testing and drives continuous improvement and optimization by analyzing availability and performance of mobile application via production monitoring.
Micro Focus UFT Mobile is ranked 29th in Functional Testing Tools while Silk Test is ranked 19th in Functional Testing Tools with 2 reviews. Micro Focus UFT Mobile is rated 0.0, while Silk Test is rated 7.6. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Silk Test writes "A stable solution with good scripting feature, but needs better scalability and a bigger pool of third-party contractors". Micro Focus UFT Mobile is most compared with Micro Focus UFT One, Appium, AWS Device Farm, Perfecto and Micro Focus UFT Developer, whereas Silk Test is most compared with Micro Focus UFT One, Selenium HQ, Apache JMeter, Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional and Tricentis Tosca.
See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors.
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.