No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Micro Focus Service Test [EOL] vs Visual Studio Test Professional comparison

OpenText and Microsoft are both solutions in the Functional Testing Tools category. Additionally, 100% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 96% of Microsoft users who would recommend it.
Visual Studio Test Professi...
Read 53 Visual Studio Test Professional reviews
  • 3,291 Views
  • 1,909 Comparison Views
96% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive Summary
We performed a comparison between Micro Focus Service Test [EOL] and Visual Studio Test Professional based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, Worksoft, OpenText and others in Functional Testing Tools.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Functional Testing Tools Report (Updated: May 2026).
Buyer's Guide
Functional Testing Tools
May 2026
Download the complete report
Helped 899,645 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Micro Focus Service Test [EOL]
Average Rating
7.6
Reviews Sentiment
1.0
Number of Reviews
6
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Visual Studio Test Professi...
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
53
Ranking in other categories
Functional Testing Tools (11th), Test Management Tools (6th)
 

Featured Reviews

it_user375834 - PeerSpot reviewer
it_user375834
VRM - Venue Results Manager at a sports company with 1,001-5,000 employees
It made it easy for the test team to monitor and measure test execution​.
The most valuable features for us are Performance on execution Usage, once most of tasks are drag and drop, so you just need to drag the features during script preparation Integration with other ALM tools My team integrated test scripts from HP Service Test into HP QC ALM test management tool.…
Read full review
Payel Saha - PeerSpot reviewer
Payel Saha
Test Automation Architect at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
Integrated collaboration with automated test management has improved our agile workflows and continuously supports quality reporting
Visual Studio Test Professional could be improved as earlier we had flexibility in automation testing with TFS, which became a bit difficult moving to Azure DevOps. Additionally, in Visual Studio Code, we have an agent mode for GitHub Copilot, which is very helpful in testing or development phases, while Visual Studio's GitHub Copilot is a bit tricky and sometimes does not provide my desired output.For future improvements, I would like to see prompt fixing, as currently, if something goes wrong in Visual Studio, the fixing options are not always correct. If that intelligence is embedded, it would be very helpful.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Service Test provides different opportunities in SOA testing, which helps us to provide better SOA solutions to clients."
"It has helped a lot in reducing the time that would be put in for a particular module."
"The data validation used to take a lot of time, and now through Service Test it is done within minutes."
"Service Test is user friendly and requires QTP developers a relatively minimal learning curve to catch up with any changes in features that may get introduced by newer versions."
"My team integrated test scripts from HP Service Test into HP QC ALM test management tool, which made it easy for the test team to monitor and measure test execution."
"The most valuable feature is the graphical workflow."
"Visual Studio is an exemplary integrated development environment that stands out due to its exceptional features. It allows for the seamless selection of the appropriate programming language for the specific development tasks at hand. This facilitates a swift and effortless transition between languages, providing a highly efficient development experience."
"The solution is very useful for compiling existing projects and developing new projects."
"The tool is free, resulting in no costs associated with its use. The absence of price makes it cost-effective."
"Microsoft programs are usually very easy and straightforward to install."
"The most valuable features are tools like IntelliSense and ReSharper."
"Visual Studio Test Professional is a user-friendly solution."
"It is very easy to use, and you can handle a lot of things together at once in one package, which is a good point for us."
"Visual Studio Test Professional is a scalable solution."
More Visual Studio Test Professional pros
 

Cons

"Service Test technology is primarily meant to test applications without user interface therefore falling short of helping in the test of UI applications unlike QTP."
"They should come up with something like Fiddler to see the service status."
"When an entire script is ready in the tool and there is a modification of WSDL at the final point, you need to form the code from scratch and there will be a lot of objects in the tool that wouldn't work after the inclusion of the new WSDL, which requires significant manual effort to fix."
"If the license server went down, all the HPST nodes would fail their automation tests, which would bring down the entire automated test infrastructure and people would think the current build was bad."
"Its pricing is a bit high when compared to other SOA testing tools."
"The integration with Git needs improving because it is a bit disjointed and unpredictable."
"The service right now is far too expensive. You need to pay per user."
"The pricing of this solution should be lowered."
"Visual Studio Test Professional should include more automation."
"The solution is quite expensive."
"It could be available for multiple platforms and other operating systems like Mac with a native port."
"The tool crashes and has high memory consumption."
"The solution should be cheaper."
More Visual Studio Test Professional cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"For the cloud services option, you buy a subscription per account or per user. This costs around $52 a month per person."
"There are two versions of Visual Studio Test Professional: Community and Professional. We are currently using the Community version, but if we start working on a commercial product, we will consider upgrading to the Professional version. We need to identify how we will proceed with our projects, and based on that, we will decide on our licensing."
"It is a price-effective solution"
"There is a paid version of the solution as well as a community version that is free."
"Visual Studio Test Professional is a very expensive solution."
"We pay for the solution annually and the price could be reduced."
"We use the solution’s community version, and the solution’s pricing could be cheaper."
"We have licensing for Visual Studio Community edition."
More Visual Studio Test Professional pricing and cost advice
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
899,645 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Construction Company
16%
Financial Services Firm
16%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Marketing Services Firm
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business2
Midsize Enterprise1
Large Enterprise4
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business15
Midsize Enterprise14
Large Enterprise24
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Visual Studio Test Professional?
The tool is free, resulting in no costs associated with its use. The absence of price makes it cost-effective.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Visual Studio Test Professional?
Visual Studio Test Professional could be improved as earlier we had flexibility in automation testing with TFS, which became a bit difficult moving to Azure DevOps. Additionally, in Visual Studio C...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for Visual Studio Test Professional?
We are using Microsoft Visual Studio for automation testing, specifically using C# Selenium.Visual Studio Test Case Management, which is embedded in Azure DevOps itself, is part of our process. We ...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

OpenText Functional Testing vs Micro Focus Service Test [EOL] Logo
OpenText Functional Testing vs Micro Focus Service Test [EOL]
Compared 24% of the time
Tricentis Tosca vs Micro Focus Service Test [EOL] Logo
Tricentis Tosca vs Micro Focus Service Test [EOL]
Compared 20% of the time
TestingWhiz vs Micro Focus Service Test [EOL] Logo
TestingWhiz vs Micro Focus Service Test [EOL]
Compared 18% of the time
Sauce Labs vs Micro Focus Service Test [EOL] Logo
Sauce Labs vs Micro Focus Service Test [EOL]
Compared 17% of the time
SmartBear TestComplete vs Micro Focus Service Test [EOL] Logo
SmartBear TestComplete vs Micro Focus Service Test [EOL]
Compared 10% of the time
More Micro Focus Service Test [EOL] Competitors
Tricentis Tosca vs Visual Studio Test Professional Logo
Tricentis Tosca vs Visual Studio Test Professional
Compared 8% of the time
OpenText Functional Testing vs Visual Studio Test Professional Logo
OpenText Functional Testing vs Visual Studio Test Professional
Compared 7% of the time
OpenText Functional Testing for Developers vs Visual Studio Test Professional Logo
OpenText Functional Testing for Developers vs Visual Studio Test Professional
Compared 4% of the time
OpenText Application Quality Management vs Visual Studio Test Professional Logo
OpenText Application Quality Management vs Visual Studio Test Professional
Compared 4% of the time
IBM Rational Performance Tester vs Visual Studio Test Professional Logo
IBM Rational Performance Tester vs Visual Studio Test Professional
Compared 4% of the time
More Visual Studio Test Professional Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Functional Testing Tools
May 2026
Micro Focus Service Test [EOL] reportDownload Micro Focus Service Test [EOL] product report
Buyer's Guide
Visual Studio Test Professional
May 2026
Visual Studio Test Professional reportDownload Visual Studio Test Professional product report
 

Also Known As

Service Test, HPE Service Test
No data available
 

Overview

Micro Focus Service Test is based on Virtual User Generator (VuGen) like Micro Focus LoadRunner software, which is code-centric and uses a technical interface that can be challenging for functional testing teams to utilize. It has also had instances of difficulty parsing some Web Services Description Languages (WSDLs) for complex services.

OpenText

Visual Studio Test Professional offers sophisticated testing capabilities with a focus on integration with Azure DevOps. Supporting software development, it aids in application creation, lifecycle management, and testing, accommodating a wide array of programming languages.

Visual Studio Test Professional delivers robust features essential for software developers, including seamless integration with C# and .NET projects and extensive customization options. The platform's robust debugging, unit testing, and memory analysis help streamline the development process. Its intuitive interface and integration with tools like IntelliSense and NuGet package manager enhance productivity, alongside its collaboration capabilities with Azure DevOps. While beneficial, it faces challenges such as integration issues with CI tools, high technical skill requirements, and concerns about pricing and stability. Refinements in user interface design, platform compatibility, and support for AI and machine learning technologies remain necessary.

What are the most important features of Visual Studio Test Professional?
  • Seamless Integration: Works efficiently with C# and .NET, reducing setup complexities.
  • Intelligent Tools: Includes IntelliSense for coding, simplifying complex tasks.
  • Robust Debugging: Offers advanced debugging features for troubleshooting.
  • Extensive Customization: Adaptable to meet development needs effectively.
  • Azure DevOps Collaboration: Enhances project collaboration and tracking.
What benefits or ROI should users look for?
  • Improved Efficiency: Streamlines development workflow, saving time.
  • Enhanced Collaboration: Team integrations facilitate smoother project execution.
  • Expanded Capabilities: Supports automation, leading to increased productivity.
  • Comprehensive Documentation: Extensive resources aid in navigating platform complexities.

Visual Studio Test Professional finds its application in software development and automation testing industries, where technical teams use it to create and manage applications across multiple environments. It supports test-driven development, ensuring secure and functional project outputs, and aids in the integration of DevOps practices, enhancing collaborative efforts in software solutions creation.

Microsoft
 

Sample Customers

John Lewis, SEED Infotech, Bajaj Allianz, TMNAS, Hexaware, Brewin Dolphin, A U.S. bank
Transport for Greater Manchester, Ordina, Bluegarden A/S, CLEAResult, Jet.com, OSIsoft, Australian Taxation Office, BookedOut, Tracasa
Buyer's Guide
Functional Testing Tools
May 2026
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, Worksoft, OpenText and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: May 2026.
DOWNLOAD NOW
899,645 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.