TFS and OpenText Application Quality Management are solutions in the application lifecycle management category, with each excelling in different areas. TFS offers better integration with Visual Studio and agile project management features, making it more suitable for developers working in a Microsoft ecosystem, whereas OpenText is prominent for test management and traceability, especially in large enterprises.
Features: TFS provides robust capabilities throughout the application lifecycle, including version control, agile project management, and seamless integration with Visual Studio. Its integration with native development environments and configurable processes make it valuable for managing R&D teams. OpenText Application Quality Management excels in test management and comprehensive lifecycle management, offering features like document generation and dashboard reporting. Its strength lies in managing complex testing environments and maintaining detailed traceability from requirements to defects.
Room for Improvement: TFS has limitations with non-Microsoft testing tools, limited support for other platforms, and users often request a more intuitive user interface. OpenText Application Quality Management users indicate high licensing costs, a complex user interface, and browser support limitations, especially with browsers other than Internet Explorer, as areas needing enhancement.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: TFS offers flexible deployment options with both on-premises and hybrid cloud solutions, aligning with diverse business needs. Microsoft’s customer service tends to receive positive feedback for reliability. OpenText Application Quality Management is mostly deployed on-premises, with its initial setup often described as complicated. Feedback on customer support quality varies, particularly regarding responsiveness.
Pricing and ROI: TFS, while considered expensive, offers long-term cost benefits within a Microsoft-centric ecosystem. OpenText Application Quality Management is perceived as costly, primarily due to its licensing structure, making it less accessible for smaller businesses. Both solutions can enhance productivity significantly, although OpenText’s initial investment may pose a challenge due to its pricing model.
It acts as an enabler for effective test and program management.
Integrating TFS with Visual Studio and Azure Cloud has improved our development processes by providing better integration and reducing errors.
Technical support has been excellent.
Quality is always high yet not perfect.
I am mostly happy with the technical support from OpenText ALM _ Quality Center.
as a Microsoft product, it might have limited global documentation or support options compared to GitLab.
OpenText ALM Quality Center is definitely scalable.
From a stability standpoint, OpenText ALM Quality Center has been pretty good.
Its stability is lacking as we have encountered security leaks and glitches.
Improvements are needed so that the system can continue running without creating a new run.
As for the scalability of OpenText ALM _ Quality Center, there are limitations, particularly in agile methodologies, which is currently my main concern.
HPLM has one of the best UIs compared to other test management tools, allowing for efficient navigation between test pieces, test folders, test suites, and test execution.
TFS is not as fast, easy to use, or configurable as GitLab, despite moving into the cloud.
I am content with how TFS is structured now, particularly the Azure version.
It would be cheaper to use a cloud model with a pay-per-use licensing model.
It creates constant visibility into the test process, showing the status, bugs, and automated test results.
The integration with internal applications and CollabNet is made possible through exposed APIs, allowing necessary integrations.
We can create a requirement for stability metrics with the test cases to ensure all requirements are covered.
The integration with Azure DevOps also offers seamless functionality for CI/CD processes.
Makes it easier for me to create builds and release pipelines without needing to program YAML files.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| OpenText Application Quality Management | 12.7% |
| TFS | 6.3% |
| Other | 81.0% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 39 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 32 |
| Large Enterprise | 161 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 17 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 25 |
| Large Enterprise | 64 |
OpenText Application Quality Management offers centralized data management, traceability, and integration capabilities. It aids in handling requirements, test planning, and defect tracking while supporting both manual and automated testing. Challenges exist in deployment and browser compatibility.
Known for its robust reporting and flexibility, OpenText Application Quality Management is tailored for large organizations requiring a comprehensive solution supporting lifecycle coverage and seamless tool integration. Users can consolidate testing processes, manage requirements, and centralize reporting across manual and automated testing. While some face issues with project tracking, outdated interfaces, and limited browser compatibility beyond Internet Explorer, it remains widely used for regression and performance testing. Integration with tools like JIRA and support for tools such as UFT and ALM PC underscore its utility.
What are the key features of OpenText Application Quality Management?In industries such as finance and healthcare, OpenText Application Quality Management is implemented to ensure rigorous testing standards. It supports test case creation and execution, defect tracking, and requirements management. Integration with JIRA and performance testing tools make it suitable for organizations needing synchronized testing environments.
Visual Studio’s Team Foundation Server (TFS) is a powerful application development lifecycle management solution. It aids developers in managing every aspect of their DevOps and application creation. TFS combines many different types of solutions into a single powerful platform.
Visual Studio TFS Benefits
Some of the ways that organizations can benefit by choosing to deploy TFS include:
Visual Studio TFS Features
Source code management. TFS comes with all of the tools that developers need to completely manage their source code. They can share their code so that multiple developers can work on the same project. Additionally, TFS enables them to do things like review the history of a particular piece of source code.
Reviews from Real Users
TFS is a highly effective solution that stands out when compared to many of its competitors. Two major advantages it offers are its source code management capabilities and its powerful integration suite.
Carl B., the vice president of engineering at Vertex Downhole Ltd, writes, “The most valuable features are related to source code management. Using TFS for source code management and being able to branch and have multiple developers work on the same projects is valuable. We can also branch and merge code back together.”
Ashish K., the principal consultant at Wipro, says, “I have found almost all of the features valuable because it integrates well with your Microsoft products. If a client is using the entire Microsoft platform, then TFS would be definitely preferable. It integrates with the digital studio development environment as well.”
We monitor all Test Management Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
