TFS and OpenText ALM are key competitors in the application lifecycle management arena. TFS appears to have an advantage due to its seamless integration with Visual Studio and robust application lifecycle management, while OpenText ALM focuses more on test management and traceability.
Features: TFS is highly valued for its ease of use, scalability, and seamless Visual Studio integration. It provides comprehensive application lifecycle management, robust version control, and extensive build capabilities. OpenText ALM emphasizes comprehensive test management, with strong tools for traceability and a focus on integration with various automation tools.
Room for Improvement: TFS could benefit from improved cross-platform integration, a more intuitive user interface, and expanded Agile functionalities. Licensing costs are also a concern for many users. OpenText ALM is critiqued for needing better reporting features, improved tool integration, and enhanced scalability while sharing usability issues with TFS.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: TFS offers flexibility with deployment options including on-premises, private cloud, and hybrid solutions. Support is primarily via Microsoft's extensive online resources. OpenText ALM provides similar deployment flexibility, but users find its support less accessible with more complicated migration processes. TFS benefits from stronger community support, whereas OpenText's documentation is more limited.
Pricing and ROI: TFS is often seen as expensive, yet its integration with Visual Studio is considered value-adding, justifying the costs for larger organizations due to productivity improvements. OpenText ALM is also perceived as costly, with flexible licensing but significant associated fees. Both products are deemed expensive but typically offer productivity gains that can justify the investment for larger enterprises.
It acts as an enabler for effective test and program management.
Integrating TFS with Visual Studio and Azure Cloud has improved our development processes by providing better integration and reducing errors.
Technical support has been excellent.
Quality is always high yet not perfect.
I am mostly happy with the technical support from OpenText ALM _ Quality Center.
as a Microsoft product, it might have limited global documentation or support options compared to GitLab.
OpenText ALM Quality Center is definitely scalable.
From a stability standpoint, OpenText ALM Quality Center has been pretty good.
Its stability is lacking as we have encountered security leaks and glitches.
Improvements are needed so that the system can continue running without creating a new run.
As for the scalability of OpenText ALM _ Quality Center, there are limitations, particularly in agile methodologies, which is currently my main concern.
HPLM has one of the best UIs compared to other test management tools, allowing for efficient navigation between test pieces, test folders, test suites, and test execution.
TFS is not as fast, easy to use, or configurable as GitLab, despite moving into the cloud.
I am content with how TFS is structured now, particularly the Azure version.
It would be cheaper to use a cloud model with a pay-per-use licensing model.
It creates constant visibility into the test process, showing the status, bugs, and automated test results.
The integration with internal applications and CollabNet is made possible through exposed APIs, allowing necessary integrations.
We can create a requirement for stability metrics with the test cases to ensure all requirements are covered.
The integration with Azure DevOps also offers seamless functionality for CI/CD processes.
Makes it easier for me to create builds and release pipelines without needing to program YAML files.
OpenText Application Quality Management offers extensive capabilities in test management, automation tool integration, and defect traceability, providing an efficient and user-friendly experience for tracking and managing testing workflows.
The platform supports test management by integrating with automation tools and managing the traceability of defects and requirements. It facilitates users with linking test cases to defects, uploading from Excel, and generating customizable reports, which enhances efficiency. Business Process Testing and requirement capturing for test cases further extend its capabilities. Users report concerns about its integration with other tools, particularly in DevOps and agile frameworks, as well as challenges with its complex interface and high cost. Improved integration, better browser compatibility, upgraded dashboards, and enhanced support for agile methodologies are recommended by many users.
What are the most important features of OpenText Application Quality Management?In industries such as finance, healthcare, and technology, organizations apply OpenText Application Quality Management for test management, planning, and automation. It is an essential tool for managing test scenarios, recording results, and supporting both manual and automated testing processes. This tool aids in regression testing, ensuring requirement traceability and acting as a repository for executing test cycles, thereby supporting robust quality assurance practices.
Visual Studio’s Team Foundation Server (TFS) is a powerful application development lifecycle management solution. It aids developers in managing every aspect of their DevOps and application creation. TFS combines many different types of solutions into a single powerful platform.
Visual Studio TFS Benefits
Some of the ways that organizations can benefit by choosing to deploy TFS include:
Visual Studio TFS Features
Source code management. TFS comes with all of the tools that developers need to completely manage their source code. They can share their code so that multiple developers can work on the same project. Additionally, TFS enables them to do things like review the history of a particular piece of source code.
Reviews from Real Users
TFS is a highly effective solution that stands out when compared to many of its competitors. Two major advantages it offers are its source code management capabilities and its powerful integration suite.
Carl B., the vice president of engineering at Vertex Downhole Ltd, writes, “The most valuable features are related to source code management. Using TFS for source code management and being able to branch and have multiple developers work on the same projects is valuable. We can also branch and merge code back together.”
Ashish K., the principal consultant at Wipro, says, “I have found almost all of the features valuable because it integrates well with your Microsoft products. If a client is using the entire Microsoft platform, then TFS would be definitely preferable. It integrates with the digital studio development environment as well.”
We monitor all Test Management Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
