MarkLogic vs SingleStore comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
MarkLogic Logo
234 views|176 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
SingleStore Logo
308 views|238 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between MarkLogic and SingleStore based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about MongoDB, Couchbase, InfluxData and others in NoSQL Databases.
To learn more, read our detailed NoSQL Databases Report (Updated: April 2024).
767,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"MarkLogic's greatest asset is its strong engineering foundation. It was specifically designed with search capabilities in mind, and the developers placed a great emphasis on ensuring the quality of the indexing and all subsequent layers that were added.""The rules can show us if there are missing items, like titles, and we can add them in to ensure everything is filled and makes sense and there are no missing details."

More MarkLogic Pros →

"The product's initial setup phase was pretty straightforward, with no complex processes.""The product can automatically reinstall and reconfigure in case of a shutdown.""The paramount advantage is the exceptional speed.""The ability to store data in memory is a standout feature, enhanced by robust failover mechanisms.""It's a distributed relational database, so it does not have a single server, it has multiple servers. Its architecture itself is fast because it has multiple nodes to distribute the workload and process large amounts of data.""MemSQL supports the MySQL protocol, and many functions are similar, so the learning curve is very short.""The most valuable feature is the ability to create pipelines, streamline and extract data from the pipelines."

More SingleStore Pros →

Cons
"The spreadsheet capabilities could be improved.""One of the most common requests is to improve the user interface of the database. While it is primarily a database, there are other databases available that offer more user-friendly interfaces. The UI is good for developers but not for regular users. More visuals would be beneficial."

More MarkLogic Cons →

"Having the ability to migrate servers using a single command would be extremely beneficial.""It is not the optimal choice for direct data collection through queries, and it's more suited for aggregation tasks.""The product can be developed further to provide more appropriate output to users as it is one of the areas where there are shortcomings.""There should be more pipelines available because I think that if MemSQL can connect to other services, that would be great.""For new customers, it's very tough to start. Their documentation isn't organized, and there's no online training available. SingleStore is working on it, but that's a major drawback.""We don't get good discounts in Pakistan.""Poor key distribution can significantly impact performance, requiring a backward approach in design rather than adding tables incrementally."

More SingleStore Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "MarkLogic is a pricey option, but there are some advantages to its pricing structure. For medium-sized clients or departments within larger companies, it is possible to obtain a license for one or two nodes for less than a hundred thousand dollars. Additionally, if you only need to deploy a single node, you can do so for under fifty thousand dollars. This is in contrast to other high-quality software options that are only accessible to larger businesses, where the starting price can be upwards of two hundred thousand dollars."
  • More MarkLogic Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "I would advise users to try the free 128GB version."
  • "SingleStore is a bit expensive."
  • "The product's licensing is not expensive. It is comparable."
  • "Using it for analytical purposes can be cost-effective in the long run, especially in terms of infrastructure."
  • "The price of the product is okay compared to the other available solutions in the market. SingleStore is a reasonably priced product, considering the functions it offers."
  • "They have two main options: cloud installation and bare-metal installation, each with different pricing models."
  • More SingleStore Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which NoSQL Databases solutions are best for your needs.
    767,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The rules can show us if there are missing items, like titles, and we can add them in to ensure everything is filled and makes sense and there are no missing details.
    Top Answer:It's a costly product. However, their reputation justifies the cost. It's a trusted product.
    Top Answer:The spreadsheet capabilities could be improved. We need to convert spreadsheets into an open XML format. We have to do a few levels of conversions before we convert the data into the information we… more »
    Top Answer:The paramount advantage is the exceptional speed.
    Top Answer:Using it for analytical purposes can be cost-effective in the long run, especially in terms of infrastructure. While building an on-premise cluster incurs an initial cost for servers with ample RAM… more »
    Top Answer:There's a noteworthy consideration when it comes to collecting massive amounts of data. It is not the optimal choice for direct data collection through queries, and it's more suited for aggregation… more »
    Ranking
    9th
    out of 18 in NoSQL Databases
    Views
    234
    Comparisons
    176
    Reviews
    2
    Average Words per Review
    587
    Rating
    9.5
    6th
    Views
    308
    Comparisons
    238
    Reviews
    6
    Average Words per Review
    607
    Rating
    8.7
    Comparisons
    SQL Server logo
    Compared 10% of the time.
    MySQL logo
    Compared 9% of the time.
    Teradata logo
    Compared 8% of the time.
    Oracle Database logo
    Compared 7% of the time.
    CockroachDB logo
    Compared 7% of the time.
    Learn More
    SingleStore
    Video Not Available
    Overview
    MarkLogic is an operational and transactional Enterprise NoSQL database that is designed to integrate, store, manage and search SON and XML documents and semantic data (RDF Triples).

    SingleStore is headquartered in San Francisco, California, and offers SingleStoreDB, which combines transactional, analytical, & vector data workloads in a real-time, unified, distributed SQL database that is MySQL and MongoDB wire protocol-compatible. SingleStoreDB Cloud is offered as a managed service on AWS, Google, and Azure and in private clouds including IBM Cloud Pak for Data and Red Hat OpenShift. Other partners (50+ in all) include HPE, Twingo, Data-Sleek, Datadog, and Arcion. SingleStoreDB Self-Managed runs on premise/containers/Kubernetes. SingleStore has offices in Sunnyvale, Seattle, Portland, Raleigh, Boston, London, Dublin, Lisbon, Kyiv, Hyderabad, and Singapore, with remote workers worldwide. It has hundreds of customers including 100+ Fortune 500, Forbes Global 2000, and Inc. 5000 brands across 37 verticals, with the top four being financial services and fintech; media, streaming, and telecommunications; adtech/martech/salestech; and retail/eCommerce. SingleStore platform features include Code Engine with WASM, Data API, dbt Connector, Limitless Point-in-Time Recovery, MongoDB API, Pipelines, Unlimited (Bottomless) Storage, and Workspaces.

    Sample Customers
    ALM, American Psychological Association, American Society of Agronomy, Cond_ Nast, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, Institute of Engineering and Technology, JWG Group, Lagardre Active, RSuite CMS, Wiley
    SingleStore has hundreds of customers including 100+ Fortune 500, Forbes Global 2000, and Inc. 5000 brands across 37 verticals, with the top four being financial services and fintech; media, streaming, and telecommunications; adtech/martech/salestech; and retail/eCommerce. Sample customers include: 6Sense Akamai Technologies Arcules Armis Security Canadian Tire CARFAX Cigna Cisco Systems Comcast dailyVest Dell Technologies Digital Asset Research (DAR) Directed Technologies DirectlyApply Factors.AI Fathom Analytics FirstEnergy GAMEFAM/Silicon Digital GE Goldman Sachs Heap Hulu IMAX impact.com Kakao Kellogg Kroger LiveRamp Lumana Millennium bcp MonitorBase NBC Universal Nyris Octane Outreach Palo Alto Networks PAN HOME Questrade Saudi Telecom Company Siemens AG SiriusXM Siteimprove SK Telecom SKAI Sony Interactive Entertainment Tata Communications Limited Western Digital Corporation ZoomInfo
    Top Industries
    No Data Available
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm25%
    Computer Software Company15%
    Comms Service Provider6%
    Manufacturing Company6%
    Company Size
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business57%
    Large Enterprise43%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business22%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise64%
    Buyer's Guide
    NoSQL Databases
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about MongoDB, Couchbase, InfluxData and others in NoSQL Databases. Updated: April 2024.
    767,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    MarkLogic is ranked 9th in NoSQL Databases with 2 reviews while SingleStore is ranked 6th in Database as a Service with 7 reviews. MarkLogic is rated 9.6, while SingleStore is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of MarkLogic writes "Frequent updates, helpful search capabilities, and high quality support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SingleStore writes "A reasonably priced product that offers good speed and seamless support". MarkLogic is most compared with MongoDB and Cassandra, whereas SingleStore is most compared with SQL Server, MySQL, Teradata, Oracle Database and CockroachDB.

    We monitor all NoSQL Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.