We performed a comparison between Cassandra and MarkLogic based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two NoSQL Databases solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable feature of Cassandra is its fast retrieval. Additionally, the solution can handle large amounts of data. It is the quickest application we use."
"The solution's database capabilities are very good."
"Some of the valued features of this solution are it has good performance and failover."
"I am satisfied with the performance."
"Can achieve continuous data without a single downtime because of node to node ring architecture."
"Cassandra has some features that are more useful for specific use cases where you have time series where you have huge amounts of writes. That should be quick, but not specifically the reads. We needed to have quicker reads and writes and this is why we are using Cassandra right now."
"The most valuable features of Cassandra are the NoSQL database, high performance, and zero-copy streaming."
"Our primary use case for the solution is testing."
"The rules can show us if there are missing items, like titles, and we can add them in to ensure everything is filled and makes sense and there are no missing details."
"MarkLogic's greatest asset is its strong engineering foundation. It was specifically designed with search capabilities in mind, and the developers placed a great emphasis on ensuring the quality of the indexing and all subsequent layers that were added."
"There could be more integration, and it could be more user-friendly."
"The solution doesn't have joins between tables so you need other tools for that."
"Doesn't support a solution that can give aggregation."
"The initial setup of Cassandra can be difficult in the configuration. There might be a need to have assistance. The implementation process can six months for connecting to certain databases."
"Cassandra can improve by adding more built-in tools. For example, if you want to do some maintenance activities in the cluster, we have to depend on third-party tools. Having these tools build-in would be e benefit."
"There were challenges with the query language and the development interface. The query language, in particular, could be improved for better optimization. These challenges were encountered while using the Java SDK."
"The disc space is lacking. You need to free it up as you are working."
"The solution is limited to a linear performance."
"The spreadsheet capabilities could be improved."
"One of the most common requests is to improve the user interface of the database. While it is primarily a database, there are other databases available that offer more user-friendly interfaces. The UI is good for developers but not for regular users. More visuals would be beneficial."
Cassandra is ranked 4th in NoSQL Databases with 19 reviews while MarkLogic is ranked 9th in NoSQL Databases with 2 reviews. Cassandra is rated 8.0, while MarkLogic is rated 9.6. The top reviewer of Cassandra writes "Well-equipped to handle a massive influx of data and billions of requests". On the other hand, the top reviewer of MarkLogic writes "Frequent updates, helpful search capabilities, and high quality support". Cassandra is most compared with Couchbase, InfluxDB, MongoDB, ScyllaDB and Oracle NoSQL, whereas MarkLogic is most compared with MongoDB. See our Cassandra vs. MarkLogic report.
See our list of best NoSQL Databases vendors.
We monitor all NoSQL Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
