Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Manhattan Active Omni vs Microsoft Dynamics comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Manhattan Active Omni
Ranking in Order Management Hubs
3rd
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Microsoft Dynamics
Ranking in Order Management Hubs
1st
Average Rating
8.6
Number of Reviews
11
Ranking in other categories
Point of Sale (POS) Systems (1st)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2025, in the Order Management Hubs category, the mindshare of Manhattan Active Omni is 11.5%, down from 21.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Microsoft Dynamics is 8.9%, up from 4.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Order Management Hubs Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Microsoft Dynamics8.9%
Manhattan Active Omni11.5%
Other79.6%
Order Management Hubs
 

Featured Reviews

Use Manhattan Active Omni?
Leave a review
AhmedHalim - PeerSpot reviewer
ERP Administrator at CACC Cargolinx
Has supported financial operations effectively but reporting and dimension features need improvement
Microsoft Dynamics is my comfort zone in the application in the finance module. I am familiar with analytics features such as Microsoft Power BI. Regarding sales forecasting, we mainly use Power BI in our analysis for sales, not the application reports. It's a limitation only in the reporting because Microsoft Power BI is excellent for creating reports or customizing dashboards; Microsoft Dynamics focuses on functions, not reporting. In Egypt, we haven't used the AI features yet, so it's too soon to judge this feature. The pricing structure is clearly defined, but it's just too expensive. So far, there are no specific issues regarding the cloud. Even with businesses in sectors that can afford it, retail solutions in Microsoft Dynamics are not as strong compared to LS Business Central. On a scale of 1-10, I rate Microsoft Dynamics a 7 out of 10.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Order Management Hubs solutions are best for your needs.
879,310 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Comms Service Provider
18%
Computer Software Company
16%
Government
8%
Construction Company
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business13
Midsize Enterprise3
Large Enterprise1
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft Dynamics?
When rating the cost of Microsoft Dynamics from 1 to 10, where one is very cheap and ten is very expensive, I would give it a nine.
What needs improvement with Microsoft Dynamics?
Microsoft Dynamics could be improved in anything I can take as an ERP system, be it for insurance contracts, be it for my bookkeeping, whatever. Whenever I have legal entities sending around money ...
What is your primary use case for Microsoft Dynamics?
I'm working mostly with all of them within the cloud and the Defender for Endpoint. Essentially, I need one defender per technology because if I want to have a Defender for World of Warcraft, then ...
 

Also Known As

Distributed Order Management, Manhattan Associates Distributed Order Management
MS Dynamics
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

David's Bridal
Harris Farm Markets, Ariston Thermo Group, Delhi Integrated Multi-Modal Transit System Ltd., Zimbabwe Revenue Authority, Kodak Alaris, APi Group Inc, Thorlux Lighting, Aruba Networks, Ceskoslovenska obchodni banka, a. s. (CSOB)
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Blue Yonder, Manhattan Associates and others in Order Management Hubs. Updated: November 2025.
879,310 professionals have used our research since 2012.