Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Logz.io vs OpenText Enterprise Security Manager comparison

Logz.io and OpenText are both solutions in the Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) category. Logz.io is ranked #40 with an average rating of 8.3, while OpenText is ranked #21 with an average rating of 7.0. Logz.io holds a 0.4% mindshare in SIEM, compared to OpenText’s 1.6% mindshare. Additionally, 90% of Logz.io users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 88% of OpenText users who would recommend it.
Logz.io
Read 8 Logz.io reviews
  • 1,026 Views
  • 462 Comparison Views
90% willing to recommend
OpenText Enterprise Securit...
Read 98 OpenText Enterprise Security Manager reviews
  • 2,595 Views
  • 2,491 Comparison Views
88% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 21, 2025

OpenText Enterprise Security Manager and Logz.io are competing products in the security management domain. Logz.io has the upper hand due to its innovative features, which make it worth its pricing over OpenText, despite the latter's competitive pricing and support.

Features: OpenText Enterprise Security Manager is known for robust compliance support, integration capabilities, and strong monitoring functions. In contrast, Logz.io excels with advanced log analytics, cloud-native architecture, and superior customization options, which enhance its value proposition.

Room for Improvement: OpenText could improve its flexibility and agility in cloud environments, enhance user interface speed, and expand integration capabilities for more seamless multi-platform support. Logz.io might benefit from improving the ease of use for newcomers, optimizing its cost for smaller businesses, and expanding its default alert options for more comprehensive needs.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText offers a traditional deployment model with comprehensive support suitable for enterprises. Logz.io provides a flexible, cloud-focused deployment, which is attractive for modern businesses seeking agility in cloud environments, complemented by responsive customer service.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText has higher setup costs due to its on-premise capabilities but provides consistent ROI for traditional setups. Meanwhile, Logz.io, leveraging a cloud-based infrastructure, offers a cost-effective solution with high ROI potential, particularly appealing to businesses looking for scalable and efficient log management.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Logz.io vs. OpenText Enterprise Security Manager Report (Updated: September 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Logz.io vs. OpenText Enterprise Security Manager
September 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 868,787 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Logz.io
Ranking in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)
40th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.5
Number of Reviews
8
Ranking in other categories
Log Management (32nd)
OpenText Enterprise Securit...
Ranking in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)
21st
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.7
Number of Reviews
98
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) category, the mindshare of Logz.io is 0.4%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText Enterprise Security Manager is 1.6%, up from 1.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
OpenText Enterprise Security Manager1.6%
Logz.io0.4%
Other98.0%
Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)
 

Featured Reviews

Derrick Brockel - PeerSpot reviewer
The solution is a consistent logging platform that provides excellent query mechanisms
We can query a lot of data points and build dashboards. The vendor is good at adjusting their models. Most companies want us to forecast our yearly use and pay it upfront on day one. With Logz.io, we commit to use 14 TB in a year. However, they measure us every month and give us a monthly bill. Depending on our monthly usage, we pay for 14 TB divided by 12 months or a little extra. It's a little bit more like AWS. Other solutions do not do it. They want their money upfront. We really like the dashboards. We have 36 sub-accounts. Each sub-account is an app, and we could put restrictions on that app. Previously, there were capacity restrictions on the sub-accounts. If we have a sub-account of 1 TB and use only 100 GB, we waste 900 GB that day. We could not share it between sub-accounts. Now, they provide an overhead volume. We do a reserve, and any sub-account could use anything over the reserve. It utilizes our footprint better.
Read full review
Ramnesh Dubey - PeerSpot reviewer
Allows for monitoring logs according to industry standards within ESM but has a total capacity capped at 12 TB, limiting real-time data retention periods
The first limitation is with the ArcSight Data Storage Manager (ADSM). ArcSight's total capacity is currently capped at 12 TB. This becomes an issue if a customer needs a longer real-time data retention period, such as exceeding 90 days or reaching a year or even ten months. Increasing the disk space beyond 12 TB is not currently possible. So, increasing the storage capacity is one area for improvement. Additionally, the real-time data retention is limited due to the 12 TB restriction. Depending on the Events Per Second (EPS) you receive, you might only be able to retain data for seven to ten days. Overall, the 12 TB limit is the main issue we face in terms of maximizing real-time data storage. Moreover, there are a few improvements I would like to see in future releases. My main suggestion for ArcSight is to simplify the deployment process. Currently, the installation process is quite complex. There are various components involved, including transformations, multiple installations, and containerization for various components. Ideally, I'd recommend that ArcSight allow the entire installation, including the ESM and database, to be completed within a single unified setup process for a streamlined experience. Additionally, having readily available and well-organized documentation for the step-by-step installation process would be incredibly helpful. I would also like to see better support.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The visualizations in Kibana are the most valuable feature. It's much more convenient to have a visualization of logs. We can see status really clearly and very fast, with just a couple of clicks."
"We use the product for log collection and monitoring."
"The query mechanism for response codes and application health is valuable."
"It is massively useful and great for testing. We can just go, find logs, and attach them easily. It has a very quick lookup. Whereas, before we would have to go, dig around, and find the server that the logs were connected to, then go to the server, download the log, and attach it. Now, we can just go straight to this solution, type in the log ID and server ID, and obtain the information that we want."
"We use the tool to track the dev and production environment."
"The tool is simple to setup where it is just plug and play. The tool is reliable and we never had any performance issues."
"InsightOne is the main reason why we use LogMeIn. This is mostly because of log data that we are pushing tools and logs in general."
"The other nice thing about Logz.io is their team. When it comes to onboarding, their support is incredibly proactive. They bring the brand experience from a customer services perspective because their team is always there to help you refine filters and tweak dashboards. That is really a useful thing to have. Their engagement is really supportive."
"Feature-rich solution which provides better network visibility for improved security"
"ArcSight Enterprise Security Manager (ESM) is very cheap compared to other tools."
"On the positive side, ArcSight ESM's performance was excellent. It was very fast when writing queries. It provided good performance monitoring and had built-in rules to show which rules triggered most often and impacted performance. This performance monitoring was well-implemented."
"ArcSight ESM provides us the flexibility to write our own passwords and customize the solution. It lets us search and log a variety of SmartConnectors. It has 480-plus SmartConnectors."
"It is a robust product and has multiple valuable features."
"It makes maintenance very easy."
"Usability is the most valuable feature. The accessibility is quite good."
"Support is very good."
More OpenText Enterprise Security Manager pros
 

Cons

"The solution needs to expand its access control and make it accessible through API."
"I would like them to improve how they manage releases. Some of our integrations integrate specifically with set versions. Logz.io occasionally releases an update that might break that integration. On one occasion, we found out a little bit too late, then we had to roll it back."
"The price can be cheaper and they should have better monitoring."
"Capacity planning could be a little bit of a struggle."
"I would like granularity on alerting so we can get tentative alerts and major alerts, then break it down between the two."
"When it comes to reducing our troubleshooting time, it depends. When there are no bugs in Logz.io, it reduces troubleshooting by 5 to 10 percent. When there are bugs, it increases our troubleshooting time by 200 percent or more."
"The solution needs to improve its data retention. It should be greater than seven days. The product needs to improve its documentation as well."
"The product needs improvement from a filtering perspective."
"The first limitation is with the ArcSight Data Storage Manager (ADSM). ArcSight's total capacity is currently capped at 12 TB. This becomes an issue if a customer needs a longer real-time data retention period, such as exceeding 90 days or reaching a year or even ten months. Increasing the disk space beyond 12 TB is not currently possible."
"We would like the ability to easily identify either unused resources or those that are being used sub-optimally."
"Sometimes, it takes ages to get an issue resolved. I have ArcSight experience, so I normally try to fix things on my own or find a workaround, but it's tough to get support when I need it."
"ArcSight ESM needs to improve performance, user interface, and automation."
"The onboarding process for this solution could be better. It also needs a better GUI."
"The correlation engine effectively connects different events, significantly improving our detection reach. However, limitations exist with non-default alerts, where additional costs arise for integration."
"The tool should improve its UI. It also should make data more searchable."
"Its search part can be improved. When I go to the console and search for a few logs or something else, it takes a lot of time. When I try to search for three days or one week, it takes too much time. This is a major area of improvement. I wanted them to include features like SOAR, threat intelligence, and automation, and they seem to have included all these features in version 7.3 or 7.4."
More OpenText Enterprise Security Manager cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The product's pricing is cheaper than other solutions."
"At the time it was set up, we thought Logz.io was very reasonable for what we were getting in terms of how much time and hosting costs it was saving us, because you don't have to run the servers for it anymore."
"The product is a little expensive."
"You pay for what you need, and that is a good model. They are also quite happy to talk to you about your uses and your use case. They will even go as far as suggesting things that you don't need to do in order to save you money. At one point, I was quite surprised at how cheap it could be if we wanted it to be or how much they would help us manage our costs."
"The tool is an open source product."
"HPE ArcSight pricing might be more expensive than other SIEM solutions, but in my opinion it has powerful features and great flexibility in developing complex use cases."
"ArcSight can be a little bit expensive because of the area that we work in and the cost. Licensing is mostly on a yearly basis, not monthly."
"The product licenses are inexpensive."
"Pricing is good, I'd rate the pricing a seven out of ten, with ten being low price. It's better than Splunk and IBM QRadar because their pricing is based on EPS."
"There is a license required for this solution."
"ArcSight is pretty expensive compared with its competitors. I believe that is fine as it provides value."
"Aggregation can help a lot in pushing down licensing costs."
"The pricing is great compared to others."
More OpenText Enterprise Security Manager pricing and cost advice
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
868,787 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Comparison Review

VS
Jun 28, 2015
Qradar vs. ArcSight
Continuing with the SIEM posts we have done at Infosecnirvana, this post is a Head to head comparison of the two Industry leading SIEM products in the market – HP ArcSight and IBM QRadar Both the products have consistently been in the Gartner Leaders Quadrant. Both HP and IBM took over niche SIEM…
Read full review
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
14%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Comms Service Provider
11%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Financial Services Firm
14%
Computer Software Company
12%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Performing Arts
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business3
Midsize Enterprise1
Large Enterprise6
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business37
Midsize Enterprise14
Large Enterprise57
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Logz.io?
The query mechanism for response codes and application health is valuable.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Logz.io?
The product is a little expensive. We're pushing 17 TB. It costs us one and a half million dollars a year.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Logz.io?
Capacity planning could be a little bit of a struggle. The product must add some AI capabilities to learn from previous behaviors. Instead of us setting thresholds, the tool should learn the thresh...
See all answers
Which is the best SIEM tool for a mid-sized financial services firm: Arcsight or Securonix?
In my market, a lot of financial companies had or have an ArcSight installation. Just because in former times it was pretty good. Now a lot of them are looking for a more effective solution due to ...
See all answers
What do you like most about ArcSight Enterprise Security Manager (ESM)?
We utilize ArcSight ESM for real-time threat detection in our organization. We have custom rules that we've developed on top of the WAN services, along with scheduled licensing activities.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ArcSight Enterprise Security Manager (ESM)?
ArcSight Enterprise Security Manager (ESM) is very cheap compared to other tools. It is worth the investment if you are considering the cost.
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Coralogix vs Logz.io Logo
Coralogix vs Logz.io
Compared 28% of the time
Datadog vs Logz.io Logo
Datadog vs Logz.io
Compared 15% of the time
Grafana Loki vs Logz.io Logo
Grafana Loki vs Logz.io
Compared 11% of the time
Amazon OpenSearch Service vs Logz.io Logo
Amazon OpenSearch Service vs Logz.io
Compared 11% of the time
ManageEngine File Audit Plus vs Logz.io Logo
ManageEngine File Audit Plus vs Logz.io
Compared 9% of the time
More Logz.io Competitors
Trellix ESM vs OpenText Enterprise Security Manager Logo
Trellix ESM vs OpenText Enterprise Security Manager
Compared 18% of the time
IBM Security QRadar vs OpenText Enterprise Security Manager Logo
IBM Security QRadar vs OpenText Enterprise Security Manager
Compared 11% of the time
Splunk Enterprise Security vs OpenText Enterprise Security Manager Logo
Splunk Enterprise Security vs OpenText Enterprise Security Manager
Compared 9% of the time
SurfWatch Labs SurfWatch vs OpenText Enterprise Security Manager Logo
SurfWatch Labs SurfWatch vs OpenText Enterprise Security Manager
Compared 7% of the time
Elastic Security vs OpenText Enterprise Security Manager Logo
Elastic Security vs OpenText Enterprise Security Manager
Compared 7% of the time
More OpenText Enterprise Security Manager Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Logz.io
September 2025
Logz.io reportDownload Logz.io product report
Buyer's Guide
OpenText Enterprise Security Manager
September 2025
OpenText Enterprise Security Manager reportDownload OpenText Enterprise Security Manager product report
 

Also Known As

Logz
Micro Focus ArcSight, HPE ArcSight, ArcSight
 

Overview

Logz.io is a leading cloud-native observability platform that enables engineers to use the best open source tools in the market without the complexity of operating, managing, and scaling them. Logz.io offers four products: Log Management built on ELK, Infrastructure Monitoring based on Prometheus, Distributed Tracing based on Jaeger, and an ELK-based Cloud SIEM. These are offered as fully managed, integrated cloud services designed to help engineers monitor, troubleshoot and secure their distributed cloud workloads more effectively. Engineering driven companies like Siemens, Unity and ZipRecruiter use Logz.io to simplify monitoring and security workflows, increasing developer productivity, reducing time to resolve issues, and increasing the performance and security of their mission-critical applications.

Logz.io

OpenText Enterprise Security Manager enables real-time threat detection through scalable and adaptable solutions, integrating seamlessly with multiple platforms for complex security scenarios across different environments.

OpenText Enterprise Security Manager offers extensive security monitoring capabilities, combining log analysis and incident management to enhance cybersecurity and compliance. Its powerful event correlation engine provides real-time alerts for rapid incident response. Users benefit from customizable dashboards and comprehensive log collection, making it a significant tool in the SIEM market. Flexible deployment options cater to both on-premises and cloud environments, supporting enterprises in managing IT infrastructure and threat detection efficiently.

What are the key features of OpenText Enterprise Security Manager?
  • Event Correlation Engine: Real-time threat detection with advanced correlation capabilities.
  • Scalability: Adapts to enterprise-level demands and complex security needs.
  • Integration: Seamlessly integrates with multiple platforms and third-party tools.
  • Customizable Dashboards: Tailored views and active lists enhance user experience.
  • Advanced Alerting: Provides timely incident response and security alerts.
Why should users look for reviews when evaluating OpenText Enterprise Security Manager?
  • Timely Incident Responses: Fast alerting and action against threats.
  • User-Friendly Experience: Customizable dashboards simplify monitoring tasks.
  • Comprehensive Security Management: Integrated log management and threat detection across domains.
  • Adaptability and Scalability: Supports both on-premises and cloud deployments.

In industries such as finance, healthcare, and energy, OpenText Enterprise Security Manager is implemented for monitoring critical systems and ensuring compliance with regulatory needs. Enterprises leverage its capabilities for forensic investigations and active threat management, serving as a central hub for cybersecurity operations across diverse IT infrastructures.

OpenText
 

Sample Customers

Dish Network, The Economist, Forbes, Holler, Kenshoo, OneSpan, Siemens, Sisense, Unity, ZipRecruiter
Lake Health, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Bank AlJazira, Banca Intesa, and Obrela.
Buyer's Guide
Logz.io vs. OpenText Enterprise Security Manager
September 2025
Free Report: Logz.io vs. OpenText Enterprise Security Manager
Find out what your peers are saying about Logz.io vs. OpenText Enterprise Security Manager and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
868,787 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Logz.io vs. OpenText Enterprise Security Manager report.

We monitor all Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.