No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Limeade ONE [EOL] vs Microsoft Teams comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Limeade ONE [EOL]
Average Rating
8.6
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Microsoft Teams
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
179
Ranking in other categories
Virtual Meetings (3rd), Enterprise Social Software (2nd)
 

Featured Reviews

it_user671481 - PeerSpot reviewer
Lead Architect, Digital Workplace Consultant at a tech vendor with 201-500 employees
Allows us to engage employees and to shorten communication cycles using social network techniques.
Social communications that allows us to engage employees and to shorten communication cycles using social network techniques. Expert browser that allows you to quickly find colleagues with proper experience. Ideation that enables internal crowdsourcing and innovation scenarios The…
Anna Virtsan - PeerSpot reviewer
IT Project Manager at UkrSibbank
Have streamlined daily workflow and task management but still face inconvenience from recent interface changes and limited integration options
There are challenges and issues in Microsoft Teams, such as after recent updates where group chats were combined with Teams, chats, and groups into one. Users have to work with settings to make it normal again so Teams are separated from chats, and that was a really inconvenient update. Many users ask me to help make it back again to separate Teams and groups from one-to-one chats. That's probably the worst update they've made recently. Additionally, there are some minor features, such as when I work with messages, I don't have an actual forward or quote option when replying to someone's message. I need to be careful not to miss the quote sign. For a lot of people, they are confused about where the quotes option is. I've received a couple of hundred support tickets just regarding this issue. The function to share email to Teams chat doesn't work sometimes due to our compliance policies, and sometimes it would be nice to be able to forward an email to the group chat and have further discussions. Microsoft Teams could improve by being less glitchy because it glitches a lot, leading to undelivered emails and undelivered messages. It would be beneficial if the MS application Shifts, which adds functionality to groups, could be integrated into the groups calendar. Currently, many teams don't use the app because it is not integrated with the general calendar or the Outlook calendar, making it basically a useless application. The platform needs less Copilot and more people. The general Copilot integration into the platform is less glitchy, but Microsoft Teams is quite heavy and glitchy sometimes. Stability depends a lot on compliance restrictions, policies, and quality of internet. Sometimes, when updates are enrolling, the platform glitches, breaks, or shuts down.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Social communications that allows us to engage employees and to shorten communication cycles using social network techniques."
"We have had success with deploying Newsgator's social functionality on top of our SharePoint environment."
"You can ping, chat, and call someone, and at the same time, on the next tab, you can see all the documents related to what someone is referring to."
"There is a new Skype feature in Teams that is excellent."
"Message and chat retention is a valuable feature."
"You can add Teams to a conversation; you can create reports, project plans, or many other things based on Microsoft solutions, and it has improved communication between teams and within each team."
"The solution has features like good voice clarity, good video quality, and recording."
"Microsoft Teams positively impacts my organization as it is feature-rich, helping us with better collaboration on a quick note with a good turnaround time, facilitating decision-making when we require a quick connect and providing the same kind of feeling over Microsoft Teams to connect people with better quality video and audio, regardless of physical availability."
"For me, Microsoft Teams' most valuable features are online meetings, calls, and chat. While I also use it to access OneDrive and my calendar, the core functions I rely on are meetings and calls."
"I think it has helped me organize my day-to-day activities. It has also helped me to align with the schedule of my colleagues and other partners because there's a feature where we can see the schedule of other Team members."
 

Cons

"The OOB user interface should be enhanced to be more user-friendly and responsive."
"Need to improve their mobile / smartphone apps by adding more functionality."
"As an instant messenger, Teams is not as good as Lync."
"I would like to get more frequent updates, and the solution’s stability could be improved."
"Since Microsoft Teams is a typical Microsoft product, inviting guest users to the conversation can be problematic if they're not in the active directory."
"For improvements to Microsoft Teams, I would say sometimes the tool gets stuck."
"I think it would be helpful if the whiteboard tool was embedded in the solution rather than having to deploy or download a tool for this."
"If I could completely eliminate Outlook and only use Teams, that would help me immensely. Productivity would increase drastically and many of our team members would be more efficient in our day-to-day, as we would be living primarily in a single tool."
"Microsoft Teams has a limitation on the number of people, which could be increased."
"The product needs to improve its stability."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"The product's pro accounts are cheap."
"I would rate the product's pricing an eight out of ten."
"The solution's cost is high."
"Microsoft Teams is expensive compared to other solutions."
"It is a bit more than moderately expensive."
"I rate Microsoft Teams an eight out of ten for its pricing."
"We get the solution on a corporate plan, where everything is included."
"Its pricing is reasonable."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Social Software solutions are best for your needs.
908,800 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Financial Services Firm
16%
Construction Company
14%
Educational Organization
8%
Manufacturing Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business66
Midsize Enterprise46
Large Enterprise74
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft Teams?
When we pay for Microsoft Teams, it is always expensive. I do not know exactly how much the license is, but when we pay, it is always expensive.
What needs improvement with Microsoft Teams?
There are too many features in Microsoft Teams, and I think it is not good. I believe they should have fewer features in Microsoft Teams and limit it to calls, presentations, and sharing, similar t...
What is your primary use case for Microsoft Teams?
My main use cases for Microsoft Teams are for meetings and calls. I have not yet used it for collaboration.
 

Also Known As

Social Sites, Sitrion Social Sites
MS Teams
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

BitBurger, Daiichi-Sankyo, ING, Mercer, Merck, NSN, Renault, Stockland, Unisys
Honeywll, AIRFRANCE, AccuWeather, Lilly
Find out what your peers are saying about Slack, Microsoft, Atlassian and others in Enterprise Social Software. Updated: August 2026.
908,800 professionals have used our research since 2012.