Postman Enterprise and Kong Gateway Enterprise are prominent competitors in the API management market. Kong Gateway Enterprise often holds the advantage due to its robust security and ability to handle high API traffic volumes, while Postman Enterprise is known for its cost-effectiveness in testing and support.
Features: Postman Enterprise is celebrated for its intuitive workspace, allowing automated testing, collaboration tools, and comprehensive API documentation capabilities. Conversely, Kong Gateway Enterprise is distinguished by its scalability, powerful security, and advanced analytics, catering to high-performance API traffic needs.
Room for Improvement: Postman Enterprise could enhance features like security measures for larger organizations, integration with more enterprise tools, and tackling more complex API management scenarios. Kong Gateway Enterprise can improve by simplifying its deployment complexity, offering more comprehensive built-in documentation, and providing better customer support options for smaller-scale users.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Postman Enterprise excels in rapid deployment through its cloud-based model and offers extensive online support resources. Kong Gateway Enterprise provides adaptable solutions with options for both cloud and on-premises deployment, emphasizing customizable scalability and security.
Pricing and ROI: Postman Enterprise offers competitive pricing, making it accessible for small teams with high ROI potential through its collaborative and useful API development features. In contrast, Kong Gateway Enterprise's higher price point is justified by its advanced features for managing large-scale API operations, appealing to businesses seeking comprehensive solutions.
A minimum of 50% time is saved when comparing manual to automation.
The technical support from Kong Gateway Enterprise would be rated about eight, as we missed local technical support.
I appreciate the ease of using Postman, especially its desktop version, due to the features it offers such as cookie management and environment synchronization.
There is a lot of support available through forums and user groups, which has been sufficient for me.
The scalability of this solution would be rated about eight or nine.
Postman does not have database validation available, which affects its scalability.
This solution is scalable.
I rate it ten out of ten for stability.
I have not experienced any issues or downtimes.
During the development phase, you will face issues, but once it goes to production, you won't face such issues.
More plugins for additional integrations would be helpful and openness for traditional development languages, such as .NET, because many enterprises are looking for .NET solutions or incorporating with .NET solutions.
These limitations are less restrictive compared to Swagger, which has more severe limitations when used with web navigation.
Maybe Postman can be a good contender and replicate some features such as more scripting and control over API calls.
One of the primary challenges with Postman is handling authentication issues, especially relating to tokens and passwords.
Postman is open-source, so the cost is minimal compared to commercial platforms.
Postman is much cheaper than the other tools.
Postman's pricing model includes a basic free version, which is favorable given the Professional enterprise options offered.
The most valuable features of Kong Gateway Enterprise are its seamless integration with Kubernetes and cloud, many plugins that can be incorporated in a solution, and its incorporation with low-code function systems.
Postman's collaboration tools, such as version control and team workspaces, are particularly useful when working with teams of three to four people.
It has helped significantly since it is easy; the development team and QA team all use it, enabling us to automate almost 70% of our APIs using Postman.
The desktop version's features like cookie management, environment compatibility, security settings, proxy integration, and data synchronization add significant value.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Kong Gateway Enterprise | 7.1% |
| Postman Enterprise | 1.2% |
| Other | 91.7% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 8 |
| Large Enterprise | 19 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 17 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 9 |
| Large Enterprise | 41 |
Kong delivers a next generation API platform built for modern architectures. With a lightnight-fast, lightweight, and flexible core, Kong delivers sub-millisecond latency across all your services. Kong's is deployment-, vendor-, and pattern-agnostic, allowing you to run your services how you want, where you want, and with who you want - from baremetal to cloud, monolith to microservices, service mesh, and beyond.
Postman Enterprise provides API testing capabilities with features like automation, integration, and shared environments, enhancing efficiency for REST and SOAP APIs. Teams benefit from its intuitive interface and support for automation and scripting.
Postman Enterprise is designed for API testing, supporting REST and SOAP APIs to enhance manual and automated testing. It offers endpoint validation, unit and integration testing, and data-driven testing. This platform is valued for its easy setup, flexibility in automation, and scripting, enabling collaborations through shared collections and generating reports. However, users find room for improvement in automation, integration with platforms, SOAP API testing, and collection management.
What are the key features of Postman Enterprise?In industries relying on API development, Postman Enterprise aids in creating robust testing environments. Whether technology, finance, or healthcare, teams leverage its data-driven testing capability and collaboration features for comprehensive and accurate testing outcomes.
We monitor all API Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
